Archived threads in /k/ - Weapons - 1965. page

>>33016163
Like?

File: Engines.png (195KB, 681x488px) Image search: [Google]

195KB, 681x488px

>>33016163
Two reasons:
>muh contrarianism
>Russia isn't as open about issues with equipment as the West, so stupid people get the impression that those problems don't exist in slavshit equipment.

>>33016163
Russians are basically the real world version of the Drow.

Slugger > Hellcat

>>33014711
Su-100.

>>33014711
M36 and su 100

I think* (lol) I remember reading somwhere that m36's had like and 8:1 kill/death vs German tanks.

File: 1370404567945.jpg (62KB, 450x557px) Image search: [Google]

62KB, 450x557px

People get a kick out of pretending to be retarded in front of strangers on the internet. Nothing you can do about it but trhow facts at them 'till they leave.

>>33012973
>till they leave
But they dont...they just ignore you and keep posting

>>33013540
Then they are shills and we spend the thread pointing and laughing at them.

First for: Don't do it kid. Trust me.

What's the best length for an infantry contract?
Five years seems too much in case I hate it.

>>33006064
well im not infantry so i wouldnt be able to give you an accurate answer, but i like my 4+4 contract. anything else seemed too long or too short, although i reenlisted so im in for it now

The fuck did they even need it for in the first place? It's not like they need to project aerial power anywhere. Any country they could conceivably get in a conflict with is either close enough that land bases will suffice or so overwhelmingly powerful in naval terms that they're fucked anyways

>>32995386
Shittier Portugal doesn't even need a military wtf

In recent years, Thailand and UK have turned their carriers into helicopter only

Syria has proven Russia's carrier is a joke

China doesn't even take their own seriously

France only has one

I don't think even India and Italy take their own carrier capability seriously

Muricca is only one who can do carriers

>>33032778
Dick waving

>>33032778
>Was the Tsar Bomba actually impressive as a weapon or was it just dick waving?

The latter.

>>33032778
dick waving. pretty much any nuke test that wasn't immediately hidden or never existed was dick waving.
still fucking sweet though.
also;

>take saturn V
>take tsar bomba at full 100mt yield
>give it MIRV shit and minimize the size as much as possible
>given my weight calculations, Saturn V at full payload could send 4 Tsar Bombas into LEO
>more than enough for what we need since we're not orbiting
>stick with 4 MIRVs, could probably swing five
>now have a missile with 5 100mt MIRVs or could drop them all on the same target for 500MT of fuck you
it is a glorious plan.

Cant the rifle towards your support hand, it'll be easier to line it all up like that

>>33032527
I am, but it feels like the forward hook on the mag keeps missing the groove in the magwell. Maybe its the mag? Im using surplus croatian metal mags. 10, 20, and a polymer 30, which seems to seat easier. Im scratching the shit out on the mags. Is this normal? Its my first AK.

>>33032511
Angle them more. Make it really dramatic.

>>33031126
Do you have blankets or sheets?

>advertising to burglars that you own firearms

>>33031142

I dont agree with this, what if you go hunting? That says you own firearms?

What if you wear camo to the range? that says you have guns


A normal single or double rifle case is pretty obvious as well


a lot of people use ammo cans for the range too.

>taking land
Land is useless and occupations are bitch work.
Destroy and move on.

File: mysoul.jpg (28KB, 463x612px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 463x612px

>>33030178

We all fantasize about it were on /k/ then we realize we don't want to actually die in a ditch so we just post pictures here

File: deus vult.jpg (286KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

286KB, 1920x1080px

>>33030178
I dream of holy conquest against the muslims, a massive deportation of them into reservations, and then a proper nation being on the land that adheres to the morals of God, liberty, and grit.

>>33030054
SoCal is to /k/ in the same way that 1940s germany is to the jews.

>>33030054
There's been talk on the slack for norcal meets but o one ever commits. Which sucks because I'd really like a socal meet.

>>33030054
Bring your scuba gear.

>>33030006
Hey that's cool man

File: 426185.jpg (72KB, 880x660px) Image search: [Google]

72KB, 880x660px

How much jew gold do you horde? There really isn't a reason to not wet tumble...

>>33030006
I think Jerry Miculek uses a cement mixer to tumble his brass.

File: Royal_Oak_Armouries-DargenGreathelm-patina.jpg (97KB, 1018x1024px) Image search: [Google]

97KB, 1018x1024px

>>33029746
well, aside from the fact that its pretty damn iffy as an outfit...

lets see.
going by the helm, its early 14th C, the end of the templars, right at the tail end of the crusades.

lets assume 1298, so minimal hard plate.

A properly made sword: Albion, lets say, and a scabbard - scabbard by DBK or the likes. that's about $1,500.
Shield, wouldn't be metal-edged. properly made from limewood boards, gessoed, painted, from one of the eastern european guys, probably about $500-600.

Helm. lets got for a Dargen greathelm from Jeff Hildebrandt "Royal Oak Armoury". that's about $1000CDN, so, $800ish. (see pic)
Mail, you're in luck, the indians are making surprisingly good quality 6mm riveted mail nowadays - enough that its pretty affordable.
So, a coif will be $125.
Chausses, those will be about $350-400,
And the big one there, the hauberk: that's just short of $600. You might want mitten gauntlets too, so add $200 there.

Underneath that, you've got the textiles and other clothing.
a good pair of turnshoes is essential, because there's nothing worse than bad turnshoes, trust me. LEarnt that mistake when I started reenacting. Foxblade or the likes would do, so, lets say £100, $125.
Braes in linen, they're about $30 from suppliers, and then the undershirt in linen, that's about $50, you want two because trust me, you'll sweat like a pig. so, $130 in underwear layers.
Then woolen hose, those will be about $100-120 for a reasonable pair.
And then you have your aketon or gambeson over the shirt, under the mail. That's going to set you back at least $300 for a passable one, but for comfort, I'd be looking at custom, probably the Ukrainians because they're mental but cheap, so, say $500 for that.


Now the surcoat, that's in good linen with embroidered cross, probably $200-250.
And a good belt for the mail, $100 with tooling and proper historical buckles.

Add in little details, $5,500 is a reasonable pricetag to get a decent quality basic kit of that date.

File: 15048315473_2456f1c498_o.jpg (1MB, 1301x1952px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1301x1952px

here's that sort of kit put together, Same equipment, but a knight in europe at roughtly that era... helm maybe slightly later, you get some extras like aliettes and early poleyns, there too, but not a huge set of additions.

File: joe-side.jpg (3MB, 2880x4320px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 2880x4320px

>>33029993
>early poleyns

I say, forgetting that that surcoat measn you cant even see the poelyns... and instead forgetting the greaves which you can see. duh.

Oh, and that surcoat is wool, not linen, of course. white wool's a real nightmare.

>>33029556
Always bolt actions
have consistantly hit targets at 600 yards from prone, no bipod/rests
I like .223 for practice, cheap to shoot and thanks to AR fags I can get it everywhere.
next gun is a savage 11 308 to go with my savage 11 223
30-06 is also good, but AR fags made 308 common, so I'll give up the 120fps for cheaper shooting

>mfw I'm going to have to buy new barrels
>mfw I'm going to have to buy a lathe to do it properly because the local smiths suck.
>mfw I have no face

File: P9040913.jpg (1MB, 2937x1176px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2937x1176px

>>33029556
>long range shooting enthusiasts
half assed... our local range only goes to 200 yards but one of my coworkers has some land with an 800yard shooting lane...

>Savage 12FV 26" varmint barrel
>308
>20MOA rail, cheek riser pad, threaded for brake, sweet paint job
>buy a savage 10T-SR in 6.5
>800 with 175gr SMK hand loads under 44.0gr varget (2800 shit dangin' FPS yo)
>bolt
>primary arms 4-16x mil/moa scope I got for $80

>>33031054
Oh, and using a nikon prostaff that came with my rifle. good scope, nice and bright. 3-9x40 is good for shooting gophers. BDC reticle is off though, wish it came in a plain cross hair or that i'd stop being cheap and get a mil-dot, but as is. 223 shoots so flat I don't know why they bothered with a BDC

>>33029445
Fuck off and read the sticky. Come back when you have the most basic understanding of firearms

File: 16809408_1246282435406876_65702965_n.jpg (87KB, 600x800px) Image search: [Google]

87KB, 600x800px

>>33029445
Just buy a glock for 109$ with ammo.

A glock 17 is too large to carry concealed in most clothing and for most people who aren't the size of Shaq

You also need a CC permit in Georgia to conceal carry

You should do both. Take classes and train on your own

>scope
>sub-sonic

>>33029389
Accurate ranging is more important for precise shots because of how bad the bullet drop is. Some reticles help with ranging.

I would get something with a large objective lens and lower power, probably not over 6x. That way you'll have a big FOV to handle that drop and you'll grab more light for low-light shots, which I understand often coincide with a need for quiet shots.

>>33029382
What caliber and gun you goofy nigger?