Archived threads in /k/ - Weapons - 1967. page

so get one?

you know you can own more than one gun, right?

>>33029275
I don't like redundancy. If I were to get a PX4 Compact, it would replace my Glock 19.

>>33029285
>I don't like redundancy

Then get off this board, faggot. I have probably 12 rifles that all do the same exact thing in a slightly different way. Why do you own more than like two outfits of clothes? I mean they all just do the same thing, don't they? Isn't that kind of redundant?

I was unaware scientists had invented a generation of superbabies that are nigh invulnerable to full sized cartridges.

>>33029096
The mortality rate from a typical gunshot wound is only 18% I read. Those 1911 guns just aren't as effective these days, I guess. I imagine guns have made similar progress as planes, cars, and other technology over the last century.

>>33029138
You guessed wrong.

Because if they have some chink company make some shitty stuff and they slap their glock name on it, they will make mad bank.

>>33028884
>Plastic toy company makes sand castle shovel
What is there to explain?

>Op is a faggot
Explain

>>33028641
They, and several other companies, got bought out by a capital interests group (Cerberus) and consolidated into a large super factory facility that severely disrupted production flow and allowed a cut in quality to ensue. Some are recovering, like Marlin, but the main Remington brand doesn't seem to give a shit about its low-market rifles that compete with Savage and Tikka.

This is the Brand group they keep everything under:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_Group

>>33028769
are the 700 models trash too? 870s?

>>33028769
>>33028944
Samefag

>>33028629
Just put down no and N/A

>>33028629
what does "mentally defective" even mean

like are we talking actual retardation here or are we talking "le depression sads"

I have not filled out the new one but looking at it my first thought to to put N/A.


the old form told you to skip those questions if a U.S citizen.

Well, the guy's hat says France. The horse says cavalry. The size of the rifle then says some sort of carbine. Could be a Berther M1916 or a Lebel 1892, although that fore barrel is mighty delicate for a military rifle so could in theory be something with a custom stock - or be entirely a civilian weapon, of course.

>>33028470
I know it's a frontier policeman from Argentina.

Spencer carbine?

>>33028196
Just go with semiauto. It really isnt that big of a deal to pull the slide right after taking it out. Id rather 10 in the mag and have to rack the slide than 5 in the cylinders

>>33028196
In the event of a rampage shooter your first step should be to get to the ground as quickly as fucking possible and human shield the moslem girl in your class while you THEN draw your pistol.

>>33028196
Jesus what state is this

>>33028016
>I feel they are just as ideal on a DA/SA gun. The hammer spur is an unnecessary holdover from the revolver days
ok how do you manually cock a bobbed hammer on a da/sa gun without the spur?
on a dao bobbed is fine cause you will never ever manually cock the hammer but you will with a da/sa.

>>33028135
My point being that manually cocking the hammer on a DA/SA gun is unnecessary

>not having a hammer spur

You need a spur to use a string or rubber band to do the full auto mod.

>>33027945
You already sent the money then they sent you that picture?

>>33027945
Nah you shouldn't be mad, thats what you get when you buy pieces of shit.

>>33027959
Kill yourself sandnigger

>not a firearm
The only restriction I could see is city building codes or the neighborhood comity deciding you can't have it in your yard.

Daily reminder that smoothbore cannons are legally on the same tier as muskets.

Nope. I was looking into this before because I thought it'd be cool project to build. Most people build catapults for chucking pumpkins. Most of those seem like counter balanced trebuchet though

>>33027889
that's because trebuchets can throw things a lot farther. the downside to a trebuchet though is that they are huge and much less transportable than a catapult.

>>33027838
go with the gun that doesn't have the "safety" lock.

>>33027838
Just go for the one you like best. Though I imagine that the gp100 would last longer. Don't forget that if you abuse any gun it will break.

>>33027838
Get a ruger red hawk in 45 colt/ 45 acp
45 colt can exceed 44 magnum all day long, with lower pressures. And you can shoot 45 acp in moon >clips without changing a whole cylinder. And 45 acp is cheaper to plink, 45 colt for everything else also,
>dat big bore class

115th CONGRESS
1st Session
H. R. 367

To provide that silencers be treated the same as long guns.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
January 9, 2017
Mr. Duncan of South Carolina (for himself, Mr. Carter of Texas, Mr. Gene Green of Texas, Mr. Austin Scott of Georgia, Mr. Biggs, Mr. Gosar, Mr. Hudson, Mr. LaMalfa, Mr. Harris, Mr. Westerman, Mr. Olson, Mr. Chaffetz, Mr. Hensarling, Mr. Carter of Georgia, Mr. Labrador, Mr. Brooks of Alabama, Mr. Smith of Texas, Mr. Bishop of Utah, Mr. Brat, Mr. Abraham, Mr. Palmer, Mrs. Love, Mr. Bridenstine, Mr. Stewart, Mr. Marshall, Mr. Emmer, Mr. Ratcliffe, Mr. Jody B. Hice of Georgia, Mr. Buck, Mr. Weber of Texas, Mr. Messer, Mr. Mooney of West Virginia, Mr. DeSantis, Mr. Newhouse, Mr. Smith of Missouri, Mr. Graves of Georgia, Mr. Lamborn, Mr. Wenstrup, Mr. Rogers of Alabama, Mr. DesJarlais, Mr. Massie, Mr. King of Iowa, Mr. Gohmert, and Mr. Yoder) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

A BILL
To provide that silencers be treated the same as long guns.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the “Hearing Protection Act of 2017”.

SEC. 2. EQUAL TREATMENT OF SILENCERS AND FIREARMS.

(a) In General.—Section 5845(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking “(7) any silencer” and all that follows through “; and (8)” and inserting “; and (7)”.

(b) Effective Date.—

It's going to be over a year before anything changes, if it even passes.
Focus on your first kiss (not counting your uncle) instead of this distant bullshit.

>>33027471

(1) IN GENERAL.—Except as otherwise provided in this subsection, the amendment made by this section shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act.

(2) TRANSFERS.—In the case of the tax imposed by section 5811 of such Code, the amendment made by this section shall apply with respect to transfers after October 22, 2015.

SEC. 3. TREATMENT OF CERTAIN SILENCERS.

Section 5841 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the end the following:


“(f) Firearm Silencers.—A person acquiring or possessing a firearm silencer in accordance with Chapter 44 of title 18, United States Code, shall be treated as meeting any registration and licensing requirements of the National Firearms Act (as in effect on the day before the date of the enactment of this subsection) with respect to such silencer.”.

SEC. 4. PREEMPTION OF CERTAIN STATE LAWS IN RELATION TO FIREARM SILENCERS.

Section 927 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following: “Notwithstanding the preceding sentence, a law of a State or a political subdivision of a State that, as a condition of lawfully making, transferring, using, possessing, or transporting a firearm silencer in or affecting interstate or foreign commerce, imposes a tax on any such conduct, or a marking, recordkeeping or registration requirement with respect to the firearm silencer, shall have no force or effect.”.

File: The Other Side.jpg (34KB, 1800x302px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 1800x302px

>>33027415
Here's the other side.

>>33027415
Trapdoor loads only and go remove buffalo and drunk reservation dwellers. But seriously trapdoor loads only and have fun playing artillery past 200m you will be surprised how doable 500 can get

>>33027492
did you just have a stroke

>>33027277
didn't we just have this thread?

>>33027287
like 5 times
lame since the first time

>>33027277
*walks behind you*
Nothing anti-personnel, kid.

File: 1446306717214.jpg (21KB, 300x300px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 300x300px

Woah... really makes you think...

It was a rush-job to field a 75mm gun while they worked out the kinks on a proper medium tank that could mount a 75 in a turret.

>>33027266
enemies worth fighting only come from the right