[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Search | Free Show | Home]

Archived threads in /p/ - Photography - 197. page

This is a blue board which means that it's for everybody (Safe For Work content only). If you see any adult content, please report it.

File: IMG-20170215-WA0011.jpg (415KB, 1600x1066px) Image search: [Google]
IMG-20170215-WA0011.jpg
415KB, 1600x1066px
Criticism is welcome.
12 posts and 2 images submitted.
>>
>>3023070
I feel a direct view would have been better. Having the edge out to a wide expanse kind looks off.
>>
>>3023070
sky is ded. y? r u retart?
>>
>>3023070
>criticism welcome
>won't tell me why you took the picture
>won't tell me what you were trying to convey
>won't tell me why you chose that depth of field
>won't tell me how you arrive to the shooting and post-processing decisions that you did

Criticism of what? What are you trying to improve? As far as a I can tell, without knowing any background here, it's a boring picture of a bench that's hardly in focus.

File: Gran Canaria014.jpg (312KB, 1660x1012px) Image search: [Google]
Gran Canaria014.jpg
312KB, 1660x1012px
just scanned these self-developed colour pictures i've taken. post yours!
8 posts and 6 images submitted.
>>
File: Gran Canaria015.jpg (240KB, 1655x1012px) Image search: [Google]
Gran Canaria015.jpg
240KB, 1655x1012px
>>
File: Gran Canaria013.jpg (370KB, 1664x1012px) Image search: [Google]
Gran Canaria013.jpg
370KB, 1664x1012px
i love the contrast of the caves to the new and horrible appartment complexes
>>
File: Gran Canaria020.jpg (380KB, 1655x988px) Image search: [Google]
Gran Canaria020.jpg
380KB, 1655x988px

File: adams.jpg (431KB, 787x1024px) Image search: [Google]
adams.jpg
431KB, 787x1024px
What are the arguments for and against always lining up your verticals?
15 posts and 2 images submitted.
>>
>What are the argument for lining up your verticals?
muh verticals
>What are the arguments for lining up your verticals?
It's autistic and only autistic people care.
>>
>>3022415
The human brain lines up verticals naturally, even when you're upside down you still know which way is up. I'm not saying you should ALWAYS line up your verticals, but unless there's a point or purpose it looks bad if you dont.
>>
>>3022415
Jared told me to line up my horizonticals as well.

File: IMG-20130212-WA0009.jpg (54KB, 612x816px) Image search: [Google]
IMG-20130212-WA0009.jpg
54KB, 612x816px
Are rangefinder cameras better for creepshots due to their quieter shutter sounds?
You guys ever taken a picture of somebody without them knowing?

How do I build up the courage for that?
45 posts and 8 images submitted.
>>
>>3021621
Just responding from a technical point of view. Many mirror less cameras have silent shutters which make absolutely zero noise
>>
>>3021621
there are a wide range of film cameras that make very faint to almost no sound at all. size and shape adds to inconspicuousness too

i used to creep on people. now i go up front, ask for directions or something like that and when they are answering, then i shoot. works better.

>>3021624
lol.
>>
the best creep camera is obviously a mobile app where you can press the shutter with a scroll movement

File: _P2M0021B.jpg (2MB, 2352x1568px) Image search: [Google]
_P2M0021B.jpg
2MB, 2352x1568px
Previous thread: >>3015032

Post pictures of places that make you happy to be.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeSIGMA
Camera ModelSIGMA DP2 Merrill
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)45 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width4704
Image Height3136
Number of Bits Per Component16, 16, 16
Compression SchemeUncompressed
Pixel CompositionRGB
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution180 dpi
Vertical Resolution180 dpi
Image Data ArrangementChunky Format
Image Created2017:02:09 20:39:53
Exposure Time1/80 sec
F-Numberf/4.0
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating125
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
FlashNo Flash
Focal Length30.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width2352
Image Height1568
RenderingCustom
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceManual
Scene Capture TypeStandard
Unique Image ID30303431363930354296625841313236
242 posts and 151 images submitted.
>>
>>3019015
Don't tell me what to do.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATION
Camera ModelNIKON D750
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom 4.4 (Macintosh)
Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.7
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern740
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)50 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Created2017:02:09 15:08:39
Exposure Time1/4000 sec
F-Numberf/1.8
Exposure ProgramAperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating125
Lens Aperturef/1.8
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModeCenter Weighted Average
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length50.00 mm
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceManual
Scene Capture TypePortrait
Gain ControlNone
ContrastNormal
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal
Subject Distance RangeUnknown
>>
I can't decide if I should take out the fire hydrant.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATION
Camera ModelNIKON D750
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom 4.4 (Macintosh)
Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.7
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern740
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)50 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Created2017:02:09 15:14:43
Exposure Time1/4000 sec
F-Numberf/1.8
Exposure ProgramAperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating400
Lens Aperturef/1.8
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModeCenter Weighted Average
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length50.00 mm
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceManual
Scene Capture TypePortrait
Gain ControlLow Gain Up
ContrastNormal
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal
Subject Distance RangeUnknown
>>
File: IMGP1843-2.jpg (947KB, 1400x1158px) Image search: [Google]
IMGP1843-2.jpg
947KB, 1400x1158px
toasting in a fresh bread

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakePENTAX
Camera ModelPENTAX K-50
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.7 (Windows)
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)75 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution240 dpi
Vertical Resolution240 dpi
Image Created2017:02:08 06:09:05
Exposure Time1/30 sec
F-Numberf/1.7
Exposure ProgramAperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating800
Lens Aperturef/1.7
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length50.00 mm
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
ContrastHard
SaturationNormal
SharpnessHard
Subject Distance RangeDistant View

File: IMG_20170214_155547_770.jpg (67KB, 632x357px) Image search: [Google]
IMG_20170214_155547_770.jpg
67KB, 632x357px
This may not be /p/hoto, but ya may wanna check out!

https://youtu.be/wLxrBmY3Ol4
12 posts and 1 images submitted.
>>
Trust me its cool
>>
>>3021873
what lens does chromab this much?
>>
>>3021883
I did it in post using photoshop for thumb and premiere pro for the video. Original footage was shot on 1080p/25fps or 720p/50fps with a Canon EOS M + 18-55. Pretty basic as camera, still gives me nice results!

File: Media pass.jpg (176KB, 862x1024px) Image search: [Google]
Media pass.jpg
176KB, 862x1024px
What would it take to create a fake publication for the purpose of attaining media passes? At what point does this fake publication become a real one?

Is it as simple as a website or even a facebook page? What kind of readership do you think you'd need for something like a small event (club level car racing, local events), or a big one (big concerts, big motorsports events)?

I'm thinking if you could fake a readership, you could use this publication to acquire passes for one and one's friends. For example: people on 4chan. Then those people would maybe write an article and submit event photos. Of course, at that point, it becomes legitimate, doesn't it?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS4 Macintosh
PhotographeriQoncept
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width4096
Image Height4096
Compression SchemeUnknown
Pixel CompositionRGB
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution0 dpi
Vertical Resolution0 dpi
Image Data ArrangementChunky Format
Image Created2013:01:30 19:48:49
Color Space InformationUncalibrated
Image Width3448
Image Height4096
9 posts and 1 images submitted.
>>
Just make up some pass for a blog and have a barcode or qr code that scans to your website, just make it look official.

I read an article on fstoppers about how photographers can check bags for free or reduced price if they are with a media organization. The guy who said he worked for fstoppers made a bullshit press pass and they took it as valid. Will try to find article.
>>
>>3022592
https://fstoppers.com/business/how-print-media-pass-save-money-checked-bags-airport-149776

Found it
>>
>>3022592
Nice, although there's no way that would work for actually getting into an event that passes are issued for.

is Nikon Kill?

Canon can't be far behind, why would anyone buy a compact camera now with phones producing good enough shots. DSLRs are btfu by Sony mirrorless, even in pro imaging. The crushing disappointment of Nikon 1 and Canon M, were some of the first nails in Canikons casket. Can they ever recover?
82 posts and 11 images submitted.
>>
imagine if digital died and we saw a resurrection in film
>>
>>3021947
Cameras will die and we'll see an upbringing in phones. You'll get CANON printed around your phone lens. That's it.
>>
>>3021945
>is Nikon Kill?
No.

File: kisebb.png (5MB, 2016x1134px) Image search: [Google]
kisebb.png
5MB, 2016x1134px
My first shot on iphone7. Opinions?
8 posts and 1 images submitted.
>>
4chan has a board to discuss technology (including phones).

>>>/g/
>>
>>3020259
OP in case you're retarded it's /g/. Now delete this thread and post there.
>>
read the sticky

File: 3SK1p.jpg (368KB, 2000x1997px) Image search: [Google]
3SK1p.jpg
368KB, 2000x1997px
>STREET PHOTOGRAPHY

What are the best resources for learning street photography?

Who are some great street photographers that are worth following?

Tell me everything

>POST YOUR BEST STREET PHOTOGRAPHY SHOT

bonus points for street photography in atypical locations
18 posts and 6 images submitted.
>>
Bump I'm attempting street photography, for the first time, tomorrow and would like pointers
>>
street photography is a meme, lads. don't bother with it.
>>
>>3022909
Is that Regan?

File: image.png (172KB, 600x400px) Image search: [Google]
image.png
172KB, 600x400px
Can we have an inspirational/motivational photography thread? Post inspirational quotes. Share inspirational anecdotes. Find an early photography you took and post it alongside a recent photograph to show your own progress. Let's get some positivity up in here.
35 posts and 10 images submitted.
>>
cool thread OP.

lets start this motherfucker with this magnificent straya cunt, the excellent, high energy, Trent Parke:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZHVXEzfo6DQ
>>
This Alex Soth AMA has tons of gems.
https://www.reddit.com/r/photography/comments/391u7u/im_alec_soth_magnum_photographer_and_founder_of/?utm_source=amp&utm_medium=comment_header

Couple snippets:

>A lot of people bite off more than they can chew. Rather than doing a story of poverty in the south, one might do a story on woman who loses her job in Alabama. That sort of thing. Otherwise the project gets bigger and bigger in one's head and becomes impossible to tackle. (though in the end it might end up being about poverty in the South).

>Amazing pictures are happening all of the time. They are so omnipresent that it feels crazy to chase after them all. I guess that is why I limit myself to projects. I can focus my energy and attention to those pictures that serve the purpose of the project.
I personally disagree with this one, but definitely understand what he means. Right now always having a camera on me is working really well.vi can see that changing eventually though.
>>
>>3020409
He speaks such a clear English. As a non-native I can understand every single word he says. Marvelous.

File: kODACHROME.jpg (285KB, 2048x1450px) Image search: [Google]
kODACHROME.jpg
285KB, 2048x1450px
Why is Kodachrome so perfect, bros?

How does it have that "realistic" look while boasting, at the same time, funky and plain wrong colors? How the fuck did they achieve that?

Why is it so 3D?

You all knew that film was something else when the jews at VSCO didnt even attempt to call any of their garbage presets "Kodachrome".
31 posts and 11 images submitted.
>>
>>3020274
Alchemy.
>>
>>3020274
It has that 'realistic look' despite being so wrong because you weren't alive and actually think shit looks like that back then. The world, as documented in color, from the 40s-70s was largely documented using Kodachrome. It's the only way you've seen the workd from that time in history. It contradicts what you know the world to look like, but at the same time it's the only way you've seen that time since you weren't alive then.

Kodachrome is known for lots of things, accurate colors was never one of them. It was also a pretty mediocre film when compared to some of Kodak's later Ektachrome offerings. I shot a few roll of Kodachrome 25 as well as Kodachrome 64 and was unimpressed. At a time it was the best color film available, but by the 90s there were much better alternatives.

Another thing to keep in mind is tons of images you see from that time period were shot with medium and large format cameras. Part of the reason for that '3d look'.
>>
>>3020336
This makes sense

File: unnamed.jpg (43KB, 430x342px) Image search: [Google]
unnamed.jpg
43KB, 430x342px
>STF
>AF

Canikon BTFO
81 posts and 15 images submitted.
>>
File: 0013104.jpg (163KB, 1058x700px) Image search: [Google]
0013104.jpg
163KB, 1058x700px
>>3018171
>STF
>af
>hahaha btfo HOW CAN THEY EVEN COMPE...
>>
>>3018186

I mean, that's /thread, right?
>>
What's STF?

File: LA.jpg (257KB, 1200x800px) Image search: [Google]
LA.jpg
257KB, 1200x800px
hey guys, I am going down to Los Angeles for a couple days later this month and im bringing my dslr, Im trying to find cool places to shoot in LA. I like to shoot architecture, city scapes and nature and im looking for places off the beaten path other than the touristy spots. Would any of yall have any suggestions on places to check out? Thank you for your time.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Width1200
Image Height800
31 posts and 8 images submitted.
>>
>>3017570
I grew up and currently live in LA, it's basically designed for tourism so there's not a lot of non touristy spots

i mean UCLA or USC have really nice architecture, Griffith park gets the dankest sunsets.

Idk man, la isn't great for the types of photography you described, but if you're gonna go you should just try Santa Monica or Griffith park
>>
>>3017579
Not OP, but flying to Cali and stopping in LA mid march. Probably around the financial district/Chinatown

How diverse is the architecture around there?

Also, any great places to eat?
>>
File: chinatown.jpg (147KB, 650x277px) Image search: [Google]
chinatown.jpg
147KB, 650x277px
>>3017570
Never been in LA, but if were to go there, I would for sure rewatch one of the thousand movies set there.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS3 Macintosh
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2011:01:22 11:13:37
Color Space InformationUncalibrated
Image Width650
Image Height277

File: 7CVodDc.jpg (1B, 486x500px)
7CVodDc.jpg
1B, 486x500px
Hey /p/
Any of you guys got stories of people getting belligerent to you while you took pictures?
94 posts and 19 images submitted.
>>
>>3013318
Fuck you OP.
>>
Yeah, I had a guy grab and detain me until the cops showed up because I took a snap of him on the street. Pretty sure he was drunk.
It wasn't very interesting. He was holding on to my left arm and I had the camera in the other hand, so I couldn't take a swing at him. His other hand was holding his dog's leash, so he couldn't take a swing at me. Hah.
I tried to get the cops to charge him with illegally detaining me but they told me to fuck off.

Pic related. It wasn't even good.
>>
>>3014704

Pages: [First page] [Previous page] [187] [188] [189] [190] [191] [192] [193] [194] [195] [196] [197] [198] [199] [200] [201] [202] [203] [204] [205] [206] [207] [Next page] [Last page]

[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Search | Top | Home]

I'm aware that Imgur.com will stop allowing adult images since 15th of May. I'm taking actions to backup as much data as possible.
Read more on this topic here - https://archived.moe/talk/thread/1694/


If you need a post removed click on it's [Report] button and follow the instruction.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com.
If you like this website please support us by donating with Bitcoins at 16mKtbZiwW52BLkibtCr8jUg2KVUMTxVQ5
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties.
Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from that site.
This means that RandomArchive shows their content, archived.
If you need information for a Poster - contact them.