File: dead flower.jpg (236KB, 2048x1360px) Image search:
[Google]
236KB, 2048x1360px
This is a pic I took with my Canon Rebel T3i about 4 years ago. I no longer have that camera, unfortunately. I have a gofundme going to help me finally afford a camera after 3 years of trying, but idk how fruitful that will be.
15 Posts / 1 Images
View this topic
>>
>>2682559
Wow, you have amazing talent. Please tell us how to find your crowdfunding site, as I would definitely contribute. I'd feel honoured to be part of helping the early development of a true artist.
>>
Thank you so much, you don't know how much that means to me! However, the system keeps thinking this is spam haha, I'm not sure how to get my link in here.
>>
www dot gofundme dot com slash (k262nnmc)
There we go, haha.
some guy
Suggest an everyday but good DSLR 2015-10-09 21:25:36 Post No.2682395
[Report] Image search: [Google]
Suggest an everyday but good DSLR 2015-10-09 21:25:36 Post No.2682395
[Report] Image search: [Google]
File: 21526403045_fb984bdcbf_h.jpg (968KB, 1600x1200px) Image search:
[Google]
968KB, 1600x1200px
Suggest an everyday but good DSLR
some guy
2015-10-09 21:25:36
Post No. 2682395
[Report]
[View this topic]
Hi, I currently have a Lumix but want to buy a good DSLR that:
– isn't too expensive (~$250)
– isn't too big/bulky
– takes sharp shots
– takes videos
I appreciate any good suggestions, will research on the best ones.
13 Posts / 2 Images
View this topic
>>
>>2682395
in b4 gear thread
also
in b4 lol
>>
>>2682395
sony a6000
>>
>>2682398
an a6000 isn't $250 anon.
Anonymous
Printing company recommendations 2015-10-09 04:51:02 Post No.2682004
[Report] Image search: [Google]
Printing company recommendations 2015-10-09 04:51:02 Post No.2682004
[Report] Image search: [Google]
File: tpps-printing.jpg (631KB, 2048x1536px) Image search:
[Google]
631KB, 2048x1536px
Printing company recommendations
Anonymous
2015-10-09 04:51:02
Post No. 2682004
[Report]
[View this topic]
For those of us who don't have local printers, let's put together a list of printers who do good work.
14 Posts / 1 Images
View this topic
>>
>>2682004
Typical Canon and Epson printers are all you need if you only have some hundred rather than thousands of photo prints a week.
You still want to consider 3rd party ink or a 3rd party ink supply system.
>>
>>2682009
That gets stupidly expensive if you print larger than 8x10 (even expensive there) and precludes a large number of printing options as well.
>>
>>2682015
No, not with 3rd party inks (that you maybe reset and refill), not if you install a CISS and just feed the ink from tanks.
It's certainly not how Canon / Epson thought they'd make their monies, but it gives you a high quality printer on the cheap.
> and precludes a large number of printing options as well
Like what? They're inkjets, and you can get those Canon / Epson printers up to a pretty decent size.
I guess you won't conveniently print billboard-sized prints, but I see no large issue overall?
File: tadpole hd.jpg (223KB, 1366x768px) Image search:
[Google]
223KB, 1366x768px
New /p/fag here
Last night I came here for the very first time. I've never been interested in photgraphy, mainly due to the fact that I cannot grasp the intrinsicies that make it a fine art.
Whole here, I looked into various threads, trying to understand, more or less, what makes a good photograph. Obviously this is a broad and general question, but I was hoping, at least, for a satisfactory answer.
All I could see was other anons destroying other people's work. Fair enough; this art is subjective.
Since nobody can agree to like pretty much anything an anon posts here, could somebody post pictures which are generally (kek) accepted to be 'good' pictures?
Pic related?
12 Posts / 2 Images
View this topic
>>
>>2681507
My best advice is to read books instead of asking this board for advice.
I'd post some widely liked pictures, but one doesn't have to be a genius to know that someone will disagree.
>>
>>2681516
Everything is going to be interpreted as subjective, either possitively or negatively.
Based on my experience with other boards, certain people, music, authors are generally, meses aside, considered as /an/ aproved; /pol/ aproved, etc.
I guess I should have formulated my question as such: what are some /p/ approved pics?
>>
>>2681517
anything uncle terry shot
Anonymous
Hasselblad experts - Can you Identify this items? 2015-10-07 20:31:39 Post No.2681265
[Report] Image search: [Google]
Hasselblad experts - Can you Identify this items? 2015-10-07 20:31:39 Post No.2681265
[Report] Image search: [Google]
File: IDENTI.png (433KB, 569x379px) Image search:
[Google]
433KB, 569x379px
Hasselblad experts - Can you Identify this items?
Anonymous
2015-10-07 20:31:39
Post No. 2681265
[Report]
[View this topic]
What am I looking here at ? Bodies ? Lenses? Can you identify any extras in there? ...box is old as fuck...
19 Posts / 5 Images
View this topic
>>
File: IDENTY.png (500KB, 590x397px) Image search:
[Google]
500KB, 590x397px
last one, sorry for the quality, old lady style
what can you see? anything worth something?
>>
From left to right
lens on a body
Hasselblad body with no lens (jelly)
lens
lens
>>
you need to send all this worthless stuff to me for free so I can "recycle" it properly....
File: crop380w_student_photographer_black_and_white.jpg (47KB, 380x250px) Image search:
[Google]
47KB, 380x250px
I want to get into photography but i dont exactly live in the safest of areas and im not trying to be a major professional but i still want good quality
what are some good cameras i can consider that dont scream "please rob me and steal everything i own"?
im looking at about a $300-$400 price range
16 Posts / 3 Images
View this topic
>>
>>2681035
gear thread
>>
$3-400 that doesn't scream "Rob me and everything I own"?
Ruger LCR.
>>
>>2681045
do this
but to save the hassle get a compact like the ricoh gr
it looks like a dumpy compact from the 90's
black and discrete and pocketable
sage
File: DSC00413.jpg (357KB, 1000x666px) Image search:
[Google]
357KB, 1000x666px
So got my first "good" camera outside of point and shoots. I'm trying to be a big boy and not shoot in auto mode. So the internet says to use Aperture mode for shooting. So on my first outing with the camera I put the camera in A mode and messed around. I do have some questions though, When you open up the aperture you getting a shallower DoF, I understand this, on my kinda crappy kit leans I shot some a F3.5 (the most open I can get with this lens) and do like the effect for some shots but a lot of the stuff i'm gonna want to take pics of is landscapes stuff like pic related. At what point does the DoF open up so you get "everything in focus"? I used F5 a lot since it looked good on the camera screen.
I also have some shutter speed questions, I saw some humming birds and wanted to "freeze them" in time so to speak, what kind of shutter speed am I gonna need to do that? In general what speed of shutter should I be using for hand held shots? How slow can it get before it gets blurry?
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make SONY Camera Model ILCE-6000 Camera Software ILCE-6000 v2.00 Maximum Lens Aperture f/3.5 Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 24 mm Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 350 dpi Vertical Resolution 350 dpi Image Created 2015:10:05 13:56:39 Exposure Time 1/1250 sec F-Number f/5.0 Exposure Program Aperture Priority ISO Speed Rating 100 Brightness 10.5 EV Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 16.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 6000 Image Height 4000 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal
12 Posts / 4 Images
View this topic
>>
google hyperfocal distance, shoot at no slower than 1/focal length.of a second
>>
>>2681020
/thread
>>
File: 20141230-20141230-IMG_6387_stitch-2.jpg (729KB, 2000x1125px) Image search:
[Google]
729KB, 2000x1125px
>>2681020 +1
Basically, focus to the infinite and go for an aperture of ƒ9 ~ƒ11, even if you have to bump the ISO.
Are you french? I swear your picture is in France.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.7.1 (Windows) Photographer David MORNET Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2015:10:05 20:54:49
File: 1443409188426.jpg (4KB, 100x174px) Image search:
[Google]
4KB, 100x174px
Wanting to buy an A7S but the ebay retailer specified that is ntsc only and I'm Australian..I don't know much about this concern but will it effect the video footage I take or fuck up the edit. I hope not because the price is great and would love some advice
15 Posts / 4 Images
View this topic
>>
File: 1426486468045.jpg (2MB, 7680x4320px) Image search:
[Google]
2MB, 7680x4320px
>australia cucked yet again
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand
>>
>>2680982
I take it I'm in hot water here
>>
File: tumblr_ntvcibGzIs1uoz7nao1_400.png (126KB, 400x571px) Image search:
[Google]
126KB, 400x571px
I'm pretty sure Final Cut or Premiere or Windows Movie Maker out whatever the fuck you just will process it the same way, then up to you how you save it
File: 51HgYVS2ZXL._SY300_.jpg (19KB, 300x300px) Image search:
[Google]
19KB, 300x300px
Hey /p/ I know you probably get this question a lot and are sick as hell of it but I'm coming here because I trust you guys know what you're doing, so please ignore me if I'm annoying.
I've got a DSLR camera (Rebel T3) that I got on a whim with my tax return money because it was dirt cheap and I've only really been taking random shots of nature around the house, never really exerted any effort, and I've not had it long enough to know all the settings and tricks.
But now my cousin is getting married and he's adamant about me taking photos at his wedding, I already explained to him I'm not good, and that for every good photo I have I deleted like 200+ blurry/out of focus photos, but he's still insisting.
tl;dr Could you please spare any tips on how not to fuck up these photos entirely? I am googling as well, but I figured I might as well ask people that have been doing this for a while.
13 Posts / 1 Images
View this topic
>>
Taking photos as in for fun or taking photos as in doing the job of an actual wedding photographer? Because if it's the latter there's no way you won't fuck it up.
>>
>>2680969
For fun.
>>
>>2680970
If it's for fun, I wouldn't worry too much about it.
What a qt.
http://www.zaikeinews.com/articles/752/20151003/japans-first-female-photojournalist-going-strong.htm
Will you still be shooting 80 years from now, /p/?
15 Posts / 2 Images
View this topic
>>
>>2680540
If I don't die from eating fried butter every day, sure.
>>
>>2680601
>fried butter
What? Shouldn't it melt right away?
>>
Hopefully some kind of Lightro Camera. They look fascinating but are not up to resolution, price, quality of most cameras today
Is it at all possible to get into photography with just a phone camera? I know I won't be able to adjust settings, but I can work on things like angle and getting the shot in the correct frame. I like photography, but not enough to spend the money on a decent camera.
14 Posts / 6 Images
View this topic
>>
>>2680328
Holy shit this board is slow, I'll checkup tomorrow morning.
>>
Things you might be able to learn
>composition from only one focal length
>
I cant think of anything else. I do see some great iphone only instagram accounts now and then but consider those the extreme minority.
Buy a fucking camera when you get your first highschool job. Ask the gear thread.
Things you wont learn with a smart phone:
>what good dynamic range should look like
>focusing
>use of bokeh
>what focal length to use for different shots
>what is "good lighting" for a photo
>pan photography
>how aperature effects sharpness, DOF, Bokeh, ect
>what a "stop" is
>how to select a good shutter speed
Thats just the beginning
>>
Quick question /p/, can you help me identify this camera?
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 640 Image Height 623
19 Posts / 4 Images
View this topic
>>
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 640 Image Height 732
>>
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 640 Image Height 721
>>
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 640 Image Height 740
File: IMG_9947.jpg (642KB, 1200x800px) Image search:
[Google]
642KB, 1200x800px
Anyone have or used a Sony a5000? If so, how was it and what lens were you using? Also, feel free to suggest any alternatives.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS 600D Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS5 Macintosh Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.8 Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 5184 Image Height 3456 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2014:04:09 15:06:10 Exposure Time 1/80 sec F-Number f/5.0 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 800 Lens Aperture f/5.0 Exposure Bias 0 EV Subject Distance 0.94 m Metering Mode Partial Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 17.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1200 Image Height 800 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Manual Scene Capture Type Standard
17 Posts / 1 Images
View this topic
>>
I can suggest using the fucking gear thread.
>>
>>2680061
get the a5100. you'll get phase detect auto focus and xavc-s.
>>
>>2680062
gear thread is trash, anon.
File: San Luis Potosí Hora Azul..jpg (584KB, 2598x1732px) Image search:
[Google]
584KB, 2598x1732px
Upload your pics of México
13 Posts / 5 Images
View this topic
>>
>>2679928
Too much straightening out. You need to keep a little bit of convergence to prevent the tower looking like it is about to topple over to the right.
Learn to trust your eyes and instinct don't just religiously follow the grid lines on the screen.
>>
File: 9726370961_76341d03b4_o.jpg (1MB, 4912x3264px) Image search:
[Google]
1MB, 4912x3264px
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make SONY Camera Model SLT-A37 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 4.4 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/4.5 Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 39 mm Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2013:09:11 21:52:52 Exposure Time 15 sec F-Number f/22.0 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 100 Lens Aperture f/22.0 Brightness 0.6 EV Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 26.00 mm Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Contrast Hard Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal
>>
>>2680558
I really want to like this, I really do.
but lights on the left side really take all the focus away from the picture overall.
Anonymous
Tell me how crap these are please 2015-10-04 21:39:00 Post No.2679459
[Report] Image search: [Google]
Tell me how crap these are please 2015-10-04 21:39:00 Post No.2679459
[Report] Image search: [Google]
File: Swan (2) (1).jpg (2MB, 2917x1289px) Image search:
[Google]
2MB, 2917x1289px
Tell me how crap these are please
Anonymous
2015-10-04 21:39:00
Post No. 2679459
[Report]
[View this topic]
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Macintosh) Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 2917 Image Height 1289 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2015:10:04 17:38:35 Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 2917 Image Height 1289
13 Posts / 6 Images
View this topic
>>
File: Swan (1) (1).jpg (2MB, 1894x2232px) Image search:
[Google]
2MB, 1894x2232px
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Macintosh) Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 1894 Image Height 2232 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2015:10:04 17:35:48 Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 1894 Image Height 2232
>>
File: Autumn forest 2.jpg (5MB, 2109x1655px) Image search:
[Google]
5MB, 2109x1655px
>>
File: 21611198586_5fea2fe75a_o.jpg (3MB, 3088x1689px) Image search:
[Google]
3MB, 3088x1689px