Muhmegapickels (ID: !!0Z+XAssRGPW)
snapps from LAX 2017-02-07 04:47:43 Post No.3017538
[Report] Image search: [Google]
snapps from LAX 2017-02-07 04:47:43 Post No.3017538
[Report] Image search: [Google]
File: L1017099 (Custom).jpg (141KB, 1000x673px) Image search:
[Google]
141KB, 1000x673px
snapps from LAX
Muhmegapickels (ID: !!0Z+XAssRGPW)
2017-02-07 04:47:43
Post No. 3017538
[Report]
[View this topic]
some people protesting the immigration ban
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.7.1 (Windows) Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2017:01:29 19:53:28 Unique Image ID 00000000000000000000000000005137
105 Posts / 35 Images
View this topic
>>
Muhmegapickels (ID: !!0Z+XAssRGPW)
2017-02-07 04:48:00
Post No.3017539
[Report] Image search: [Google]
[Report] Image search: [Google]
File: L1017113 (Custom).jpg (208KB, 1000x673px) Image search:
[Google]
208KB, 1000x673px
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.7.1 (Windows) Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2017:01:29 19:53:34 Unique Image ID 00000000000000000000000000005145
>>
Muhmegapickels (ID: !!0Z+XAssRGPW)
2017-02-07 04:48:30
Post No.3017541
[Report] Image search: [Google]
[Report] Image search: [Google]
File: L1017119 (Custom).jpg (277KB, 1000x673px) Image search:
[Google]
277KB, 1000x673px
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.7.1 (Windows) Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2017:01:29 19:53:40 Unique Image ID 0000000000000000000000000000514B
>>
Muhmegapickels (ID: !!0Z+XAssRGPW)
2017-02-07 04:49:01
Post No.3017542
[Report] Image search: [Google]
[Report] Image search: [Google]
File: L1017151 (Custom).jpg (257KB, 1000x673px) Image search:
[Google]
257KB, 1000x673px
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.7.1 (Windows) Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2017:01:29 19:53:46 Unique Image ID 0000000000000000000000000000516B
File: Nikon_D70_with_Nikkor_18-70mm_ED.jpg (3MB, 4363x2909px) Image search:
[Google]
3MB, 4363x2909px
Hello everyone, I just got this for my birthday. Could someone give me an introduction to what I'm in for? I don't really know where to start.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make PENTAX Camera Model PENTAX K-5 Camera Software Bibble 5 Pro 5.2.2 Equipment Make PENTAX Camera Model PENTAX K-5 Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 64 mm Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 150 dpi Vertical Resolution 150 dpi Image Created 2011:07:24 13:51:03 Exposure Time 1/80 sec F-Number f/8.0 Exposure Program Not Defined ISO Speed Rating 320 Lens Aperture f/8.0 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Flash No Flash Focal Length 42.50 mm Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Manual Scene Capture Type Standard Contrast Hard Saturation Normal Sharpness Hard Subject Distance Range Macro
18 Posts / 1 Images
View this topic
>>
>>3015968
so you need a quick memedown on nikon?
>>
>>3015969
Sure?
>>
Imagine using a 10 year old cell phone. Now imagine using a 10 year old digital camera. Sure it works but why even?
File: 1473437776832.jpg (503KB, 1000x775px) Image search:
[Google]
503KB, 1000x775px
is photography good for living ? what kind of photography should i embrace if i want to make a lot of money ? i like product photography
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make NIKON CORPORATION Camera Model NIKON D7000 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/5.5 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Color Filter Array Pattern 806 Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 72 mm Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2016:09:05 16:14:40 Exposure Time 1/250 sec F-Number f/7.1 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 100 Lens Aperture f/7.1 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Fine Weather Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 48.00 mm Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 1000 Image Height 775 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Manual Scene Capture Type Standard Gain Control None Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal Subject Distance Range Unknown
12 Posts / 2 Images
View this topic
>>
hey
>>
>>3013952
Honestly if you want to be a photographer your safest bet is real estate photography. It's really hard to make it in photography these days, many magazines like The Sun and Sports Illustrated laid off all their sports photographers, photojournalism is dead, people would rather hand out disposable cameras to their guests than hire a wedding photographer. Either way you're probably not going to be making "a lot" of money off of it. Honestly it would probably be easier to become a doctor or investment banker than it is to get rich off of photography.
>>
>>3013971
hello
File: Optimized-IMG_0413.jpg (641KB, 1200x800px) Image search:
[Google]
641KB, 1200x800px
what's your best long exposure shot?
i took this using a white shirt, uv light, built-in flash, f/22, and about 2 minutes of exposure. any criticism is much appreciated as i am new to this.
73 Posts / 44 Images
View this topic
>>
>took this using a white shirt, uv light, built-in flash, f/22, and about 2 minutes of exposure
>any criticism is much appreciated
>i am new to this.
Fair enough.
Any specific reason why the exposure had to me 2 minutes or use F22? On APS-C you're going to start hitting diffraction around f11-f16, which is why the image appears soft while the depth of focus is wide. It's a very easy mistake to make when you first start taking long exposures.
>>
>>3011016
the exposure time was kind of arbitrary, i just played till i felt like it was enough. the reason for the f22 was that i didnt want an overexposed photo.
about the apsc and diffraction, i had no idea- especially despite the amount of research ive tried putting into the subject. thank you!
>>
File: P1240294_cropped.jpg (3MB, 4608x2354px) Image search:
[Google]
3MB, 4608x2354px
This is literally one of the first pictures I took with my new camera
tripod is getting delivered tomorrow so I'll try to figure out how to take pretty pictures of stars, I like those
If anyone has pointers and advice or such, please feel free. I like the idea of long exposure
>tfw wasn't enough traffic for pretty lights
I'll have to go again I think
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make OLYMPUS IMAGING CORP. Camera Model E-M10 Camera Software paint.net 4.0.13 Maximum Lens Aperture f/3.5 Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 350 dpi Vertical Resolution 350 dpi Image Created 2017:01:24 21:27:44 Exposure Time 40 sec F-Number f/20.0 Exposure Program Shutter Priority ISO Speed Rating 200 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 14.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 4608 Image Height 3456 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Gain Control Low Gain Up Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal
File: Untitled_000000.jpg (639KB, 1920x1080px) Image search:
[Google]
639KB, 1920x1080px
What do you think of my time lapse technique? That's my first time lapse and i want to make better ones next times. May someone give me some advises?
I shot in raw, no corrections at all from the camera, my shutter speed was 25 seconds, then 5 seconds to let the camera save the image. ISO was 1600. Obviously i had manual focus on and exposure lock.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PGfXLxAzwEo
7 Posts / 2 Images
View this topic
>>
>>3018189
Not bad, but short and boring. Try to make a simple title, an intro, and some soft sci-fi music, probably something from Vangelis
See reference:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M-_vAnJb_ck
Also astrophotography thread I guess...
>>
>>3018249
yeah, it was all about the shooting technique, i know it needs music and some other things. I should record more time lapses (each one wich lasts about 6 to 8 seconds) and then merge them into 1 video (obviously using music and intro).
>>
>>3018280
Now that I could watch it in a larger format it is a bit choppy. See if you can set a smoother transition between the frames in the video conversion software.
For additional footage I'd recommend going over the parts of the constellation with a longer lens, 100mm and 200mm primes or with a 70-200mm showing the Great Nebula M42 and the Running Man, the Horsehead Nebula in the belt, Betelgeuse and the other notable stars and also some info about the objects. That would make an awesome video especially if you can manage good resolution in 4K.
File: 1475609778919.png (30KB, 1280x475px) Image search:
[Google]
30KB, 1280x475px
ARRI is having its 100th birthday this year.
22 Posts / 3 Images
View this topic
>>
>>3016560
literally who?
>>
>>3016560
>ARRI
Awesome company but too expensive
IF i had 20k in spare cash id buy a 35mm arri and a shitload of film for no reason. I don't have 20k in spare cash.
>>
>>3016570
What a fucking waste of money
File: Auto-Focusing-Tips-for-Your-DSLRs.jpg (51KB, 500x423px) Image search:
[Google]
51KB, 500x423px
I'm trying to use the EVF on my OMD EM-5, and I just can't focus it at all with either eye, it all looks blurry. The image is fine on the display screen when I toggle to that.
Are my eyes fucked?
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make NIKON CORPORATION Camera Model NIKON D3X Camera Software Microsoft Windows Photo Gallery 6.0.6001.18000 Maximum Lens Aperture f/1.4 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 6048 Image Height 4032 Compression Scheme Unknown Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 96 dpi Vertical Resolution 96 dpi Image Data Arrangement Chunky Format Image Created 2009:02:14 17:17:51 Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Manual Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal Subject Distance Range Unknown Unique Image ID E3D3B705FBD34594AA73E8C6A5687AB9 Exposure Time 1/200 sec F-Number f/3.5 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 160 Lens Aperture f/3.5 Metering Mode Spot Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash Focal Length 50.00 mm Image Width 648 Image Height 548
8 Posts / 1 Images
View this topic
>>
Do you wear glasses? EVF's usually have a diopter adjustment.
>>
Try adjusting the diopter next to the viewfinder
Anonymous
Retard-level question on focal length 2017-02-10 01:52:53 Post No.3019268
[Report] Image search: [Google]
Retard-level question on focal length 2017-02-10 01:52:53 Post No.3019268
[Report] Image search: [Google]
File: 61UVSdr6QVL._SL1500_.jpg (58KB, 1500x1200px) Image search:
[Google]
58KB, 1500x1200px
Retard-level question on focal length
Anonymous
2017-02-10 01:52:53
Post No. 3019268
[Report]
[View this topic]
Hey /p/, probably an autist-level question about a lens.
I have a Rebel T6i that I'm looking to get a new lens for, a 24-mm f/2.8.
Looking at the description on Amazon, there's a line that I'm not sure about.
>Wide-angle lens for Canon APS-C cameras (equivalent to 38mm on a full-frame camera)
Any way I can tell what the actual focal length would be? I'm still obviously learning and I don't wanna fuck it up before I buy it.
13 Posts / 3 Images
View this topic
>>
It will be a 24mm lens. No if's, and's, or but's about that.
It will shoot photos similar in field-of-view and depth-of-field to those shitty old fixed lens rangefinders with 38mm f4-or-so lenses.
>>
File: FX-and-DX-camera.png (33KB, 650x481px) Image search:
[Google]
33KB, 650x481px
>>3019268
The actual, physical focal length is exactly as the name implies, 24mm.
However on a APS-C camera such as yours the field of view will be more akin to that of a 38mm focal length lens.
This is because the area capturing light is smaller than that of a full frame camera. The image I've attached should explain how this works
>>
>>3019268
Basically, the lens will be 24mm but it will have the overall field of view of a 38mm lens. The depth of field will look like f/4 not f/2.8. It will let in the same amount of light as a f/2.8, it just won't have as smooth of a background.
Anonymous
comfy photo youtube channels 2017-01-10 04:32:43 Post No.2999245
[Report] Image search: [Google]
comfy photo youtube channels 2017-01-10 04:32:43 Post No.2999245
[Report] Image search: [Google]
comfy photo youtube channels
Anonymous
2017-01-10 04:32:43
Post No. 2999245
[Report]
[View this topic]
hey, /p/
I really enjoy watching people go shoot on youtube. Shit like AnalogRev(https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=77TGw-fXMk4&list=PLYF2uMtYcs-l--UBdus-7IwPZSoDvmY2V&index=1) or Nick Carver's series Photography on Location(https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3RanBtwmSoQ)
They're really comfy and I like just watching them shoot nice locations and talk about shit. Anyone have any reccs of other people I should be watching? bonus points if they shoot analog. I'm injured right now and can't really go out shooting so this is the next best thing
63 Posts / 7 Images
View this topic
>>
I just found this channel and I really like it. Very relaxing vibe lol. Only analog too!https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCTgaiv8YdmmNqI8STrpWc7w
>>
>>2999246
thank you! this is the kinda shit i've been looking for
>>
>>2999246
+1 for this guy, just found him this week.
File: nat1485778612609.jpg (148KB, 987x700px) Image search:
[Google]
148KB, 987x700px
>mfw the client gives you editing revision feedback
6 Posts / 2 Images
View this topic
>>
It really depends on the feedback. If they want something minor like editing a face then it doesn't hurt to do it, but if they want to do a Dutch Angle, lower the sharpness all the way, selective color the reds, and vignette the shit out of it, then they can fuck right off.
>>
>ITT: whores complain about getting fucked the wrong way
>>
>>3019247
Fuck, this was brutal
Anonymous
Capturing as much as possible from like 9'-0"(~3 meters) away. 2017-02-10 12:12:27 Post No.3019198
[Report] Image search: [Google]
Capturing as much as possible from like 9'-0"(~3 meters) away. 2017-02-10 12:12:27 Post No.3019198
[Report] Image search: [Google]
File: rarenikkor-0.jpg (29KB, 616x347px) Image search:
[Google]
29KB, 616x347px
Capturing as much as possible from like 9'-0"(~3 meters) away.
Anonymous
2017-02-10 12:12:27
Post No. 3019198
[Report]
[View this topic]
Okay so would it be possible to take a picture potentially from the floor of a 30'x30' room upward to approximately 9'-0" and get most everything within the room ceiling on the photo?
The only reason I am asking is because at work I've basically gotten the role of drawing drop ceiling acoustical tiles in CAD for an old building. If the picture is not distorted I can reference scale the picture up and basically draw over the image to match what is existing relatively easily.
I have got an EOS T2i with its stock 58mm lens. Is there is any fish eye lens on the market that might make this task easier or is what i am asking for like impossible?
11 Posts / 2 Images
View this topic
>>
>>3019198
medium format wide angles are super rectilinear. just sayin.
>>
>>3019198
Make a composite image. Google Brenizier effect, except you'd want to be shooting as stopped down as possible (like f22) to get the most depth of field. Essentially you just take 100 photos with your 58mm lens from different horizontal and vertical positions and have photoshop composite them into one larger wide angle image.
Might take a couple tries to get right. Keep the camera exactly level, not tilted up or down. You can move the camera vertically and horizontally of course, but it needs to remain level otherwise you'll get distortion
>>
>>3019200
So a basic wide angle lens should be capable of this?
My only concern is that from 9'-0" I wouldn't really be able to get everything on the camera I might get like 10 (2x2)tiles max or something.
File: img762.jpg (454KB, 767x1100px) Image search:
[Google]
454KB, 767x1100px
Version 3.0
You May (Not) Enter
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows) Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 767 Image Height 1100 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2017:02:09 18:40:43 Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 767 Image Height 1100
28 Posts / 15 Images
View this topic
>>
File: img737.jpg (544KB, 767x1100px) Image search:
[Google]
544KB, 767x1100px
>>
File: img741.jpg (485KB, 767x1100px) Image search:
[Google]
485KB, 767x1100px
>>
File: img733.jpg (469KB, 1100x767px) Image search:
[Google]
469KB, 1100x767px
File: fullsizeoutput_2b0.jpg (1MB, 1936x2592px) Image search:
[Google]
1MB, 1936x2592px
I used to do some photograph in high school and really enjoyed it, pic related. I want to start again, but i need a camera recommendation, advice to get started again, potential money making ideas, and advice with starting a blog.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Apple Camera Model iPod touch Camera Software Photos 2.0 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 33 mm Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2014:06:09 11:24:41 Exposure Time 1/2227 sec F-Number f/2.4 Exposure Program Normal Program ISO Speed Rating 32 Lens Aperture f/2.4 Brightness 11.2 EV Metering Mode Pattern Flash No Flash, Auto Focal Length 3.30 mm Image Width 1936 Image Height 2592 Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Digital Zoom Ratio 1.0 Scene Capture Type Standard
6 Posts / 2 Images
View this topic
>>
File: fullsizeoutput_4d.jpg (3MB, 2592x1936px) Image search:
[Google]
3MB, 2592x1936px
>>3018814
i also have a black cannon AE-1, but don't care to do film due to the lack of a dark room.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 2592 Image Height 1936
>>
Is there anything you wouldn't like handed to you on a silver platter?
>>
>>3018814
gear thread
reported
File: Capture.png (453KB, 702x581px) Image search:
[Google]
453KB, 702x581px
amateur filmmaker and photographer here. im currently torn between investing into a full frame body, like a sony a7s, but im also strongly attracted to the specs on the new GH5. does anyone have some dirt on either camera that could steer me in a better direction for what i need? i like to shoot with basic steadicam rigs and an external audio recorder. only lenses i have are 50mm f1.8 EF, an 18-55 ef-s kit lens, and a 75-300 ef lens
9 Posts / 1 Images
View this topic
>>
my current camera is a canon t3i. Should i stick with it and just focus on better lenses and lights? thats what my mind is telling me to do, but my body wants a new camera
>>
>>3017838
That image...
The background is not even. Also the lighting on the model is poor. This person needs to get their lighting ratios correct and moreso- stop fucking with gels.
>>
Don't go mirrorless. The a7s is awful in professional scenarios due to its complex menu system. If you're gonna get a camera for amateur filmmaking, I'd go for a Canon 5d mkiii or just rent or buy a C500. If you've got the money, get something that can shoot log. You want to be able to get as much information during shooting so you can grade easier in post. As far as lenses go, the only thing you need is manual control so you can hook up a wireless follow focus.
Anonymous
calling all shitposters 2017-02-04 07:21:44 Post No.3015672
[Report] Image search: [Google]
calling all shitposters 2017-02-04 07:21:44 Post No.3015672
[Report] Image search: [Google]
File: gearfag_by_quake_and_bake.jpg (69KB, 452x678px) Image search:
[Google]
69KB, 452x678px
Can we fight about focal length /p/? Specifically which would you choose if you could only have one do-it-all prime.
I shoot 28mm, but vote 35mm...
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make FUJIFILM Camera Model FinePix A820 Camera Software Capture NX 2.0.0 W Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.9 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Maker Note Version 0130 Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2010:05:12 02:42:16 Exposure Time 7692307/100000000 sec F-Number f/3.0 Exposure Program Normal Program ISO Speed Rating 400 Lens Aperture f/3.0 Brightness -0.2 EV Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 9.90 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 452 Image Height 678 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Sharpness Normal Subject Distance Range Unknown Sharpness Normal White Balance Auto Flash Mode Off Macro Mode Off Focus Mode Auto Slow Synchro Mode Off Picture Mode Auto Continuous/Bracketing Mode Off Blur Status Blur Warning Focus Status OK Auto Exposure Status OK
47 Posts / 9 Images
View this topic
>>
>>3015672
35mm no question
>>
>>3015672
18mm
>>
>>3015672
8mm