Anonymous
camera choice troubles 2017-02-27 08:59:46 Post No.3030354
[Report] Image search: [Google]
camera choice troubles 2017-02-27 08:59:46 Post No.3030354
[Report] Image search: [Google]
File: Vario-Tessar T* E 16 - 70 mm F4 ZA OSS SEL1670Z.jpg (35KB, 621x440px) Image search:
[Google]
35KB, 621x440px
I'm looking for a photo camera for traveling as my last one got stolen. When I was traveling alone, I really enjoyed taking pictures. It's a nice and time consuming hobby.
I was seriously considering the Sony α6000 with its APS-C sensor, but then found plenty of detailed reviews stating that the kit lens it comes with is supposedly utter garbage, so the alternative would be to just buy the body and add a better lens to it.
I'm looking for a zoomable wide angle lens starting at the equivalent of 24mm, but I have found only one for E mount, the Sony SEL1670Z, and that's a lens for full frame sensors, so there will be cropping which would not make it a wide angle lens anymore.
As the lens is also disproportionally more expensive than the α6000 body, the Sony α7 with a kit lens will be the cheaper deal and features a full frame sensor. But its kit lens starts at 28mm as opposed to 24mm, which for my use is heavily suboptimal. So buy the α7 body and add the better lens to it and I'm at over 1800 $.
Now it's not a compact camera anymore, mostly due to the lens, so I can't take it with me when I go running for example. There's the Sony rx100 mk3 which is really compact, but it only features a tiny 1 inch sensor but comes with a relatively good lens, at least better than the kit lens of the α6000, but it's a compromise at every corner, featuring far less dynamic range than the latter two and one can't attach a polarization filter.
How to resolve this dilemma? Is there an alternative compact camera with good kit lens that I haven't come to know yet?
16 Posts / 2 Images
View this topic
>>
>24mm (or equivalent)
>zoom
>compact
pick two my man. you won't get all three. kit zooms all start at 28mm.
>>
>>3030354
buy the body + kit, sell the kit.
>SEL1670Z
that's apsc. anyway, it's shit.
get the 10-18mm instead.
if you really want cheap sharp 24mm equivalent, you have to go fuji, get the 16-50 kit and use it at 16 exclusively.
>>
>>3030354
The kit lens is fine. It's a pancake zoom with ois and th3 same aperture range as any other kit.
Your only other options that small are the Panasonic lx100 as a compromise or maybe an m43 ilc with a kit lens - the new ones have pretty much the same dr as apsc, just ISO is still a stop worse, but you're fine up to 3200.
File: IMG_5163.jpg (2MB, 2446x2865px) Image search:
[Google]
2MB, 2446x2865px
Was APS film good or just a gimmick?
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Apple Camera Model iPhone 6 Camera Software 10.2 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 29 mm Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2017:02:27 08:51:11 Exposure Time 1/15 sec F-Number f/2.2 Exposure Program Normal Program ISO Speed Rating 400 Lens Aperture f/2.2 Brightness -0.8 EV Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 4.15 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 2446 Image Height 2865 Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard
11 Posts / 1 Images
View this topic
>>
>advanced
It was a desperate attempt by the film industry to fix 35mm which was not broken in the first place.
>>
>>3030115
garbage
I worked at a lab when this shit was out, the cartridges always jammed up. It was sold as better than but half the neg size of 35mm, and even worse if someone shot panoramic.
real shit all around
>>
Gimmick
File: IMG_0927.jpg (297KB, 2048x1152px) Image search:
[Google]
297KB, 2048x1152px
g'day cunts
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 2048 Image Height 1152 Scene Capture Type Standard
23 Posts / 9 Images
View this topic
>>
File: IMG_0930.jpg (281KB, 1000x562px) Image search:
[Google]
281KB, 1000x562px
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1000 Image Height 562 Scene Capture Type Standard
>>
File: IMG_0928.jpg (112KB, 1000x562px) Image search:
[Google]
112KB, 1000x562px
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1000 Image Height 562 Scene Capture Type Standard
>>
File: IMG_0931.jpg (288KB, 1000x562px) Image search:
[Google]
288KB, 1000x562px
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1000 Image Height 562 Scene Capture Type Standard
File: DSC_7133-01.jpg (514KB, 1620x1080px) Image search:
[Google]
514KB, 1620x1080px
I took some pictures. What do you think?
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make NIKON CORPORATION Camera Model NIKON D750 Camera Software Snapseed 2.0 Photographer Peter Swire - [email protected] Maximum Lens Aperture f/4.0 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Color Filter Array Pattern 970 Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 36 mm Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2017:02:26 21:05:32 Exposure Time 1/50 sec F-Number f/5.0 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 6400 Exposure Bias -1 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 36.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1620 Image Height 1080 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Gain Control High Gain Up Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal Subject Distance Range Unknown
26 Posts / 9 Images
View this topic
>>
File: DSC_6582-01.jpg (218KB, 1366x911px) Image search:
[Google]
218KB, 1366x911px
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make NIKON CORPORATION Camera Model NIKON D750 Camera Software Snapseed 2.0 Photographer Peter Swire - [email protected] Maximum Lens Aperture f/4.8 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Color Filter Array Pattern 970 Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 62 mm Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2017:02:26 14:51:37 Exposure Time 1/60 sec F-Number f/6.3 Exposure Program Aperture Priority ISO Speed Rating 800 Exposure Bias -1 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 62.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1366 Image Height 911 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Gain Control Low Gain Up Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal Subject Distance Range Unknown
>>
File: DSC_6625-01.jpg (244KB, 1620x1080px) Image search:
[Google]
244KB, 1620x1080px
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make NIKON CORPORATION Camera Model NIKON D750 Camera Software Snapseed 2.0 Photographer Peter Swire - [email protected] Maximum Lens Aperture f/4.8 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Color Filter Array Pattern 970 Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 62 mm Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2017:02:26 14:50:49 Exposure Time 1/60 sec F-Number f/6.3 Exposure Program Aperture Priority ISO Speed Rating 3600 Exposure Bias -1 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 62.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1620 Image Height 1080 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Gain Control High Gain Up Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal Subject Distance Range Unknown
>>
File: DSC_6866-01.jpg (461KB, 1620x1080px) Image search:
[Google]
461KB, 1620x1080px
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make NIKON CORPORATION Camera Model NIKON D750 Camera Software Snapseed 2.0 Photographer Peter Swire - [email protected] Maximum Lens Aperture f/1.7 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Color Filter Array Pattern 970 Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 50 mm Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2017:02:26 14:48:26 Exposure Time 1/40 sec F-Number f/1.8 Exposure Program Shutter Priority ISO Speed Rating 1600 Exposure Bias -2.3 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 50.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1620 Image Height 1080 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Gain Control High Gain Up Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal Subject Distance Range Unknown
File: MG_6738.jpg (120KB, 900x600px) Image search:
[Google]
120KB, 900x600px
Hey guys, as title suggests, what are the best books by Daido Moriyama?
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties:
19 Posts / 4 Images
View this topic
>>
>>3027060
In colour: now and never again
>>
>>3027071
Does it have any collector's value?
>>
>>3027075
Its brand new and mass produced.
So absolutely none
File: Screen Shot 2017-02-21 at 8.56.54 PM.png (169KB, 666x218px) Image search:
[Google]
169KB, 666x218px
Who is the worst photographer on Youtube
pic related
42 Posts / 4 Images
View this topic
>>
>>3026621
him or AP take it for first place, then northrup takes second.
>>
>>3026621
it just goes to show how important perseverance is.. He sucks at photography.. can't edit for shit..Never bohters to learn.. BUT... he keeps making videos... has hundreds of thousands of subs/ views... gets to play with nice camera equipment
>>
the Linus tech tips of cameras, but with less knowledge and more cringe.
File: maxresdefault.jpg (35KB, 1280x720px) Image search:
[Google]
35KB, 1280x720px
How do you meet people that are into photography? I tried joining local fb groups, they are trashy mum/dadtogs that shoot hdr. Which, yes, has its merits if you are into that, but i am not a 40 year old with 3 kids.
17 Posts / 2 Images
View this topic
>>
>>3030017
soon you will be a 40yo with no kids. so just be patient.
>>
>>3030035
Isn't 40 when you become a wizard for real?
>>
>>3030017
>How do you meet people that are into photography
You don't. It's a solitary pasttime. You labour in the dark, and then you die, so the next generation can discard your treasured lenses and rare vintage cameras as trash.
Don't seek companionship here, there is none.
>when your medium format scans are 500MB each
14 Posts / 2 Images
View this topic
>>
>>3030698
Just curious. I have an 8x10 camera, would the film scan well on a flat bed, and how big would the scans be?
>>
>>3030699
My scanner isn't big enough to do transparency large format scanning.
It depends on what DPI you scan at though. I actually probably don't need to scan these medium format negatives at 2400 DPI but I have been scanning 35mm negatives and just got in the habit.
It does produce beautiful scans though that have latitude for days (at least with portra)
>>
>>3030702
what kind of scanner do you have? I've got a Rolleiflex and wouldn't mind developing at home and getting some good scans
Anonymous
Images Compressed within Images 2017-02-28 04:57:51 Post No.3030685
[Report] Image search: [Google]
Images Compressed within Images 2017-02-28 04:57:51 Post No.3030685
[Report] Image search: [Google]
File: 20160904_091703.jpg (2MB, 4128x2322px) Image search:
[Google]
2MB, 4128x2322px
Images Compressed within Images
Anonymous
2017-02-28 04:57:51
Post No. 3030685
[Report]
[View this topic]
We were talking about image compression and file sizes among my more tech literate friends, when someone mentioned something disturbing and interesting.
>images within images
>illegal or joke files/image secondary content
>potential of screwed up shit on my computer/phone without me knowing
>needlessly large compressed images being this threat
Are the guys pulling my leg? I love collecting images, and I love taking pictures. I don't expect this degree of assholery from you guys, but yet again - I do browse /pol/...
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make SAMSUNG Camera Model SM-N900W8 Camera Software N900W8VLU2DPG1 Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.2 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 31 mm Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 4128 Image Height 2322 Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2016:09:04 09:17:03 Exposure Time 1/1144 sec F-Number f/2.2 Exposure Program Normal Program ISO Speed Rating 50 Lens Aperture f/2.2 Brightness 8.4 EV Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Center Weighted Average Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash Focal Length 4.13 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 4128 Image Height 2322 Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Unique Image ID C13QSGJ02SB
11 Posts / 2 Images
View this topic
>>
Yeah isi and some other tripfags are known to exchange doxx on other users this way
It's sickening
>>
File: MV5BMTg0ODYxOTE4Ml5BMl5BanBnXkFtZTYwMTAzODU0._V1_UY317_CR1,0,214,317_AL_.jpg (14KB, 214x317px)
14KB, 214x317px
>>
>>3030685
Just looking at the OP image I see various felonies depicted in the secondary picture. Good job anon, you're going to jail now
Anonymous
Color Correction/Calibration 2017-02-28 04:18:20 Post No.3030661
[Report] Image search: [Google]
Color Correction/Calibration 2017-02-28 04:18:20 Post No.3030661
[Report] Image search: [Google]
File: CGC7Z1E.jpg (107KB, 1280x720px) Image search:
[Google]
107KB, 1280x720px
Color Correction/Calibration
Anonymous
2017-02-28 04:18:20
Post No. 3030661
[Report]
[View this topic]
>trusty 32" Vizio LED TV I used as my main monitor literally exploded after 2 years
>a gift from my dad
>he didn't get a warranty because "TV's never break"
>out of panic due to deadlines I buy a cheap ($140) 32" LED monitor with good reviews from normies thinking it would be just the same and I could get back to work
>didn't even consider the possibility that the colors would be different on this new monitor
>everything looks off
>spend hours adjusting TV settings and using programs like calibrize to adjust color
>nothing looks quite right
>looks too blue
>now it looks too red
>too greenish blue
>fuck why is everybody's skin so RED???
>now the contrast is fucked
>NOW I CAN SEE GRADIENTS ON PEOPLE'S SKIN
>CANTWAKEUP
So dearest /p/, I'm in a bit of a pickle.
Color calibration is such an important issue for us yet you rarely ever see it mentioned or discussed.
How do you know when you've got accurate color? Do you use software or external devices that supposedly do all the work for you?
As you can probably tell from the amount I paid for the TV I'm not in a position right now to be buying expensive toys so that's a thing.
As always /p/ I value your input and advice.
20 Posts / 1 Images
View this topic
>>
>>3030661
you're fucked op, you get for what you pay, can't cheap out on a monitor and not even sure why your using a tv a monitor in the first place. as for the second question you need an external device that calibrates the correct color over your screen and those can cost quit a bit.
>>
>>3030661
To be fair, your earlier monitor was probably off too, Vizio is well known for its lack of color accuracy.
There is actual hardware for colo4 calibration, your eyes will always be off.
>http://xritephoto.com/colormunki-smile
Is a link to one of the cheaper well reviewed ones a simple google search gave me.
>>
>>3030667
The TV I was using before actually had really accurate color, I remember making a big deal about that when I got it (gg dad). But you're right, it was a stupid move to cheap out, I did it really fast without thinking about it.
>>3030671
Okay good to know this is an issue that must be corrected with hardware, and although $100 is steep for me right now it looks like a worthwhile investment, thank you for finding that for me.
It seems cheaper options are limited to just once device per license.
File: IMG_20160222_210757.jpg (136KB, 720x720px) Image search:
[Google]
136KB, 720x720px
Hello guys, i bought DSLR (Nikon D3200), specifically for filming, not shootin pictures, and i noticed this that the battery life is extremrly short while filming, like 10 minutes (on 24fps), and i dont know if problem with the battery or that is usual for this model. how it should be. Thank a lot.
13 Posts / 3 Images
View this topic
>>
>>3029691
pls guys
>>
Turn it on and off and reset to factory settings.
>>
File: [HorribleSubs] ReLIFE - 04 [720p].mkv_snapshot_05.19_[2016.07.02_09.19.32].jpg (260KB, 1280x720px)
260KB, 1280x720px
>>3029691
>i bought DSLR (Nikon D3200), specifically for filming
File: a (10).jpg (130KB, 800x531px)
130KB, 800x531px
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties:
28 Posts / 15 Images
View this topic
>>
File: a (11).jpg (145KB, 800x531px)
145KB, 800x531px
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties:
>>
File: a (9).jpg (79KB, 800x536px)
79KB, 800x536px
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties:
>>
File: a (8).jpg (210KB, 800x533px)
210KB, 800x533px
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties:
File: 093712.png (255KB, 360x314px) Image search:
[Google]
255KB, 360x314px
whats a good camera for someone who doesn't know really that much at all about cameras, doesn't want to spend a lot of money, and just wants to take some nice photos and maybe print them out or develop them and frame them
i'm thinking like 350-400 max.
thanks
23 Posts / 2 Images
View this topic
>>
>>3020974
your phone
>>
>>3020974
Here you go famalam.
https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1244709-REG/hasselblad_h_3013742_h6d_100c_medium_format_dslr.html
>>
>>3020974
Look at used cameras, I recently sold my entry level Nikon D3200 for 220 bucks when it cost twice that new because nobody wants to buy DSLRs anymore. Look into the Nikon D3200, D3300, D3400 or the Canon Rebel models. And remember that the lens you use makes a much bigger difference in how good your image looks than the body does, so it's worth spending a bit less on the body and get a good lens.
took my leica to the rally
shot a bunch of hp5+
1/7
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Epson Camera Model Perfection3200 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS5.1 Windows Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 9383 Image Height 1608 Compression Scheme Uncompressed Pixel Composition Unknown Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 1600 dpi Vertical Resolution 1600 dpi Image Data Arrangement Chunky Format Image Created 2017:02:22 11:54:43 Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 1000 Image Height 667
19 Posts / 7 Images
View this topic
>>
2/7
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Epson Camera Model Perfection3200 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS5.1 Windows Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 14208 Image Height 1608 Compression Scheme Uncompressed Pixel Composition Unknown Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 1600 dpi Vertical Resolution 1600 dpi Image Data Arrangement Chunky Format Image Created 2017:02:22 11:54:11 Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 1000 Image Height 667
>>
File: 3.jpg (123KB, 1000x667px)
123KB, 1000x667px
3/7
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Epson Camera Model Perfection3200 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS5.1 Windows Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 14262 Image Height 1760 Compression Scheme Uncompressed Pixel Composition Unknown Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 1600 dpi Vertical Resolution 1600 dpi Image Data Arrangement Chunky Format Image Created 2017:02:22 11:55:26 Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 1000 Image Height 667
>>
4/7
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Epson Camera Model Perfection3200 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS5.1 Windows Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 14262 Image Height 1760 Compression Scheme Uncompressed Pixel Composition Unknown Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 1600 dpi Vertical Resolution 1600 dpi Image Data Arrangement Chunky Format Image Created 2017:02:22 11:42:02 Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 1000 Image Height 667
File: Screen Shot 2017-02-21 at 9.13.38 PM.png (387KB, 606x351px) Image search:
[Google]
387KB, 606x351px
Can I create a 2nd camera man with a static 4k camera and simulated camera movement? Immediately I imagine it will still just look flat and cheap but I don't know if this is something that is done or not. Scoping for a youtube travel food show
7 Posts / 2 Images
View this topic
>>
>>3026631
Like if you had two cameras set up?
If so yeah, that would work. It would be a lot of additional work just to simulate some camera movement. Why do you need that?
>>
>>3026637
an actual person would handle one camera that would focus on the most immediate things happening, and the static camera would be taking a wider shot where different focuses can be zoomed in on. How hard is it to simulate camera movement? I haven't used video software in a while, seems like there should be presets for movement honestly
>>
>>3026639
Yeah, that should work. I think it would be best if its possible to get the secondary shots hand held by yourself afterwards.
I assume it's pretty easy to do, im sure it's just an effect you drop in, just more rendering time and time spent making the effect look natural