[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Search | Free Show | Home]

Archived threads in /p/ - Photography - 207. page

This is a blue board which means that it's for everybody (Safe For Work content only). If you see any adult content, please report it.

File: IMG_20170202_112838.jpg (2MB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]
IMG_20170202_112838.jpg
2MB, 3264x2448px
Hello. This saturday theres going to be a military parade where i live and the airplanes are quite literally going to fly in front of my window. Can you give me any tips to make some good shots? I know nothing other than point and shoot.
Pic related the camera i borrowed sony cybershot dsc-hx1.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera ModelGT-I9300
Camera SoftwareMOB30Z
Equipment Makesamsung
Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.6
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Created2017:02:02 11:28:41
Image Width3264
Image Height2448
Image OrientationRight-Hand, Top
Color Space InformationsRGB
F-Numberf/2.7
Exposure ProgramAperture Priority
Focal Length3.70 mm
Lens Aperturef/2.6
White BalanceAuto
Image Width3264
Metering ModeCenter Weighted Average
Exposure ModeAuto
CommentUser comments
Image Height2448
FlashFlash
Exposure Bias33504 EV
Brightness0 EV
Scene Capture TypeStandard
ISO Speed Rating75
Exposure Time1/30 sec
10 posts and 1 images submitted.
>>
>>3014229
You want a fast shutter speed. Something like 1/1000. I would try setting the camera to A (aperture priority) then set it to about f6 or f8 then raise your ISO in the settings until your shutter speed is at least 1/1000.
>>
>>3014237
Thank you. I have set it at iso 800 and f8 and my shutter speed when looking out the window is 2000. Do i leave it like this or do i lower settings until its at 1000?
>>
>>3014251
Not him but you might want a smaller iso, test it to see if It's a fast enough shutter speed at 1000

whats the most expensive camera you've used /p/?
pic unrelated
20 posts and 2 images submitted.
>>
1dxm2.
So basically nothing special.
>>
D4
So basically nothing special.
>>
T3i
So basically nothing special

File: 22768442057_d1c691e03d_h.jpg (736KB, 1600x1233px) Image search: [Google]
22768442057_d1c691e03d_h.jpg
736KB, 1600x1233px
What exactly gives film it's special look? Even medium format and up where there is no visible grain you can often tell the image is film. The colors, light and shadow just flow together so smoothly. What's the secret?
49 posts and 3 images submitted.
>>
The contrast and colour tones.
>>
>>3013966
What does that mean exactly?
>>
film is perfect and comfy.

File: 1421202483495.jpg (311KB, 1200x803px) Image search: [Google]
1421202483495.jpg
311KB, 1200x803px
Should i consider myself a photographer if my favorite step of making is the postprocessing?
7 posts and 1 images submitted.
>>
>>3013604
Yes.
>>
i would love to see a before-after post processing thread
>>
>>3013604
totally.

there are german """"""""""photographers"""""""" that have made their whole careers by making books and shows with archive photos that arent even theirs. compared to them youre a total protog.

File: _MG_8589.jpg (775KB, 1898x1898px) Image search: [Google]
_MG_8589.jpg
775KB, 1898x1898px
I did my first street photography shoot by myself. honestly i didn't expect it to be so presurisng, so many people would look at me or react once i brought my camera up and some one who looked like lil-wang comfronted me for taking a picture of him. but overall i think i did pretty good, It brought my confidence a bit up. critizes my photos please.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeCanon
Camera ModelCanon EOS REBEL T5
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.1.1 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.8
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Created2017:01:31 17:53:36
Exposure Time1/4000 sec
F-Numberf/4.0
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating1250
Lens Aperturef/4.0
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length50.00 mm
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
28 posts and 16 images submitted.
>>
File: _MG_8594.jpg (967KB, 2519x2519px) Image search: [Google]
_MG_8594.jpg
967KB, 2519x2519px
2

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeCanon
Camera ModelCanon EOS REBEL T5
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.1.1 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.8
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Created2017:01:31 17:53:37
Exposure Time1/4000 sec
F-Numberf/4.0
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating1000
Lens Aperturef/4.0
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length50.00 mm
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
>>
File: _MG_8613.jpg (889KB, 1333x1009px) Image search: [Google]
_MG_8613.jpg
889KB, 1333x1009px
3

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeCanon
Camera ModelCanon EOS REBEL T5
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.1.1 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.8
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Created2017:01:31 17:53:39
Exposure Time1/4000 sec
F-Numberf/4.0
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating2000
Lens Aperturef/4.0
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length50.00 mm
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
>>
File: _MG_8640.jpg (996KB, 3250x2438px) Image search: [Google]
_MG_8640.jpg
996KB, 3250x2438px
4

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeCanon
Camera ModelCanon EOS REBEL T5
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.1.1 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.8
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Created2017:01:31 17:53:54
Exposure Time1/1000 sec
F-Numberf/5.6
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating6400
Lens Aperturef/5.6
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length50.00 mm
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard

File: 1554805.jpg (19KB, 400x400px) Image search: [Google]
1554805.jpg
19KB, 400x400px
Hey fuckers

Can anyone suggest a decent (<£500) lighting kit for a small studio, for shooting people & products?

Just getting back into the photo game after a few years out. I've got Paul C. Buff Alienbees from Murica but I've no idea if they're any good? I can't even remember how to make them work in the UK, probably need a transformer since they're UK voltage? I barely know what I'm talking about.

Appreciate yo opinions
13 posts and 1 images submitted.
>>
>>3012987
Meant US voltage*
>>
bumpy
>>
>>3012987
Buy some Godox gear off China, that's just about the cheapest option for decent enough studio lights.

I'm really not sure <500GBP is enough anyhow.

Yea you can also use a transformer, I think it will cost like 1/4-1/3 of your budget though.

>the photo lab next door to my apartment charges $25 PER FRAME for high res 35mm scans
>6.50 for processing black and whites with a 2 dollar fee for push/pull
>prices so awful they're the reason I learned how to develop my own bw

Anyone else getting fucked over by labs?
12 posts and 4 images submitted.
>>
There's a professional darkroom/arthouse an hour from me that rents out for $10 with a $35 per year membership fee.
>>
>>3012672
you'll spend more on gas than on processing
>>
Look at it this way: once you've paid off your dev gear and scanner, you'll be saving money every time.

Scanning just a single roll would pay for a $900 scanner, for example. A D700 or some such and a rudimentary macro setup.

https://www.dxomark.com/Reviews/Sony-FE-70-200mm-f-2.8-GM-OSS-lens-review

Sony best 4ever
173 posts and 29 images submitted.
>>
i you will never have it.

N E V E R
E
V
E
R
>>
File: shitstorm.gif (940KB, 500x281px) Image search: [Google]
shitstorm.gif
940KB, 500x281px
>>
>sonycucks pay 2.5 grand for a shitty heavy unbalanced lens

keep believing in flawed e mount design


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m173_InWnaY

enlighten yourself sonycuck

File: MAGAKIDS.jpg (1MB, 1200x1204px) Image search: [Google]
MAGAKIDS.jpg
1MB, 1200x1204px
Posting a few of my images from the US Inauguration and the day before and after it.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CC 2017 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Created2017:01:23 23:01:02
Color Space InformationUncalibrated
Image Width1200
Image Height1204
104 posts and 35 images submitted.
>>
File: FLAG1.jpg (1MB, 1200x1204px) Image search: [Google]
FLAG1.jpg
1MB, 1200x1204px
>>3008531

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CC 2017 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Created2017:01:23 23:10:44
Color Space InformationUncalibrated
Image Width1200
Image Height1204
>>
File: RIOT1.jpg (1MB, 1200x1222px) Image search: [Google]
RIOT1.jpg
1MB, 1200x1222px
>>3008531

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CC 2017 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Created2017:01:23 23:23:36
Color Space InformationUncalibrated
Image Width1200
Image Height1222
>>
File: SELFIE.jpg (2MB, 1250x1263px) Image search: [Google]
SELFIE.jpg
2MB, 1250x1263px
>>3008531
I'll post some more tomorrow morning after I finish scanning.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CC 2017 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Created2017:01:23 19:51:43
Color Space InformationUncalibrated
Image Width1250
Image Height1263

File: GSW690.jpg (771KB, 2048x1365px) Image search: [Google]
GSW690.jpg
771KB, 2048x1365px
Anyone use this camera? What are your thoughts?
108 posts and 29 images submitted.
>>
>>3003108
I'm poor, OP, sorry.

I'm fine with my yashica rangefinder.
>>
>>3003148
There are two versions:

"GW690", with a 90mm lens (35mm equiv. is about 40mm i think)

"GSW690" with a 65mm lens.

Seems like the consensus on other forums is that the lenses on these cameras are extremely sharp and excellent, though every time I hear something like that I just assume its fan-boy shit and take it with a grain of salt. The sharpest MFs I have seen with my own eyes are the Mamiya 7 and Hasselblad. I am curious if these are on par or somehow better than the 7 (doubt it), because even if they are just on par, the price is really pretty great for these it seems. ~500 dollars USD for 6x9 in a rangefinder package seems like a great deal to me, but I want input on this first.

I also wonder about how monstrous this camera really is. RF cameras are usually cool because they are really low-key and easy to bring out into public without looking too awkward, especially when shooting. Does this camera completely ruin that? As opposed to a Hasselblad or RB67, I assume this is still better/more incognito compared to those huge things, but It's hard to tell from online photos or videos.

My overall question would be: Is this camera easy to travel with at all or am I underestimating it?
>>
>>3003116

Medium format is just another ballpark. 6x9 photographs are some of the largest you can get on roll film, so I think ~500 bucks is a pretty decent price if what they say about the lenses of these is true.

File: A gentle look.jpg (845KB, 1400x920px) Image search: [Google]
A gentle look.jpg
845KB, 1400x920px
Tell me what you think.
It's called 'A gentle look'.
7 posts and 2 images submitted.
>>
Underexposed.
>>
>>3013522
I'd call it "4 stops under"
>>
>>3013579
It's art

File: unkle.jpg (149KB, 864x1214px) Image search: [Google]
unkle.jpg
149KB, 864x1214px
It's on USA right now, fucking based.
10 posts and 4 images submitted.
>>
File: 1441236028535.jpg (614KB, 1200x900px) Image search: [Google]
1441236028535.jpg
614KB, 1200x900px
>>3013329

he ends up getting shot in the dick

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2015:09:03 00:19:39
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width1200
Image Height900
>>
File: readImage.jpg (79KB, 543x350px) Image search: [Google]
readImage.jpg
79KB, 543x350px
>>3013329
>mon oncle
>>
season + episode?

File: guide_i.jpg (51KB, 600x400px) Image search: [Google]
guide_i.jpg
51KB, 600x400px
How can you learn (advanced) color theory and editing for photography? Whenever I take photographs and edit them I don't have a clear idea of what I am doing. Color is one of the most important things in a photograph for me yet I don't really understand it. I will play around with the sliders in the image editor thinking that I got some nice colors but then people might tell me that the color looks terrible. Like in critiques I sometimes see people point out that a photo has bad white balance or a color tint when I don't notice anything wrong. I do just very basic 1-dimensional editing meaning I will just go through every setting and play with the slider until I get something I like without having a final result in mind and the idea of how every setting contributes to it.
13 posts and 1 images submitted.
>>
>>3013327

first, get a good display.

second, think about what you want to say with the photos, then add that aesthetic to them. its not difficult but you have to be aware of trends and how to dissect them so you can stick to one, or make your own built on elements of different ones.
>>
>>3013327
there isn't really anything advanced about color theory. you get different effects if you restrict the palette in all or part of your picture. contrast is highest between opposing pieces of the color wheel. people associate red with warmth and blue with cold. congrats, you just saved yourself four years of art school!
>>
>>3013327

who dinners with a big glass of whisky wtf.

File: NO_FILE_GIVEN (0B, 0x0pxpx)
NO_FILE_GIVEN
0B, 0x0pxpx
>no hobbies other than playing videogames
>no band
>no good concerts in my cityanymore
>no interesting lost places nearby
>shitty city with no interesting architecture
>no friends
>no sea nearby, boring forests
>no cool urban scene in my city
>no motivation to go out and "just shoot"

What should I shoot?
33 posts and 2 images submitted.
>>
>>3013056
yourself
>>
>>3013057
Fuck off.

You have to get creative bro. Start exploring. Got a car? A public transportation system?

Sorry bro, if you don't have a general idea in mind and you want to use your camera, you are gonna have to "just shoot"
>>
>>3013058
I have many ideas but this city/general area doesn't have good spots that fit those ideas.

File: 1483375704512.gif (24KB, 210x200px) Image search: [Google]
1483375704512.gif
24KB, 210x200px
I'm a hell of a good photographer, but I always worked B&W (digital). I seem to have trouble to maintain a picture-wide invariance in colours. When I post-process a colour picture, I have to correct the colours in regard to what looks best in this specific situation. But this leads to the pictures look inconsistent when hold next to each other.

How do you photogs achieve a monolithic look among you pictures?

>inb4 film ... I know.
26 posts and 4 images submitted.
>>
>>3012363
Just be more consistent.

You'll get there with practice.
>>
Just shoot JPEG and get it right in camera nerd
>>
>>3012363
You can use color cards and cameras that are not so variant with regards to ISO setting and colours to help you a bit.

Pages: [First page] [Previous page] [197] [198] [199] [200] [201] [202] [203] [204] [205] [206] [207] [208] [209] [210] [211] [212] [213] [214] [215] [216] [217] [Next page] [Last page]

[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Search | Top | Home]

I'm aware that Imgur.com will stop allowing adult images since 15th of May. I'm taking actions to backup as much data as possible.
Read more on this topic here - https://archived.moe/talk/thread/1694/


If you need a post removed click on it's [Report] button and follow the instruction.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com.
If you like this website please support us by donating with Bitcoins at 16mKtbZiwW52BLkibtCr8jUg2KVUMTxVQ5
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties.
Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from that site.
This means that RandomArchive shows their content, archived.
If you need information for a Poster - contact them.