[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Search | Free Show | Home]

Archived threads in /p/ - Photography - 340. page

This is a blue board which means that it's for everybody (Safe For Work content only). If you see any adult content, please report it.

File: balsamico20160731_2.jpg (184KB, 562x1000px) Image search: [Google]
balsamico20160731_2.jpg
184KB, 562x1000px
Last instagram less likers
Need advice
https://instagram.com/nicecotedazur1

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeSAMSUNG
Camera ModelSM-A500F
Camera SoftwareA500FXXU1AOC2
Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.0
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)28 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width4128
Image Height2322
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2016:07:31 20:36:13
Exposure Time1/17 sec
F-Numberf/2.0
Exposure ProgramNormal Program
ISO Speed Rating500
Lens Aperturef/2.0
Brightness-1.4 EV
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModeAverage
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash
Focal Length3.69 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width562
Image Height1000
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
Unique Image IDF13QSHJ01MM
11 posts and 5 images submitted.
>>
>>2903010
>Need advice
photograph your espresso when the cup is full, BEFORE you've drank it and slobbered all over the cup like a fucking disgusting pig.
Photographs of coffee and espresso are the most cliche meme out there, I don't know how in the hell you fucked that up.
>>
>>2903010
Wher arra yuu ina Italy mai frend?
>>
>>2903181
as an italian 10/10 post, amico

File: hoya-n-zykkor.jpg (91KB, 852x434px) Image search: [Google]
hoya-n-zykkor.jpg
91KB, 852x434px
I'm a bit into older, manual lenses. Since I have an entry level Nikon, M42 lenses are out of question (since the lack of infinity focus). I've found these two recently (factory f-mount lenses), but I don't know these lenses at all, and I could not really find enough on the net. (Right now THIS focal length would be nice to me, but Nikon lenses are just sooo expensive.) What is your opinion about these two lenses, /p/? Thanks. (Pictures are of the lenses.)
Hoya 24mm f/2.8
Zykkor 28mm f/2.8

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width879
Image Height960
Number of Bits Per Component8, 8, 8
Pixel CompositionRGB
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2016:08:14 11:34:18
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width852
Image Height434
30 posts and 1 images submitted.
>>
>>2903000
bump
>>
use the gear thread instead of making your own threads for crap like this
>>
>>2903105
it IS in gear thread too, but nobody answered. so shut the fuck up.

File: DSC_0708.jpg (285KB, 1440x960px) Image search: [Google]
DSC_0708.jpg
285KB, 1440x960px
I'm planning on buying either a 35mm or 50mm lens that's under $500 AUD for my D3100. I own the 18-55 kit lens and the 55-200. They're both rather shitty, but the kit lens pales in comparison to my 55-200. So I thought I'd get something that's significantly better closer up and in low light like the 35 or 50. If I'm wanting to do portraits and close-ups, which one would be better? Should I just save up for something more superior or what? Or would that be a waste of money?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATION
Camera ModelNIKON D3100
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperturef/5.7
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern794
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)300 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution240 dpi
Vertical Resolution240 dpi
Image Created2016:08:14 18:03:07
Exposure Time1/1250 sec
F-Numberf/5.6
Exposure ProgramNormal Program
ISO Speed Rating800
Lens Aperturef/5.6
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash
Focal Length200.00 mm
Color Space InformationUncalibrated
Image Width1440
Image Height960
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
Gain ControlLow Gain Up
ContrastNormal
SaturationNormal
SharpnessSoft
Subject Distance RangeUnknown
30 posts and 5 images submitted.
>>
go a 35 for crop, your zoom starts at pretty much 50 anyway

35 on crop is pretty much you standard everyday length imo
>>
28mm on crop

40-45mm master race
>>
43mm on FF master race

File: new clash frame.jpg (524KB, 780x585px) Image search: [Google]
new clash frame.jpg
524KB, 780x585px
Hello /p/ im the lowest level off noob to pictures and videos Im looking for a cheap DSLR possibly or bridge camera to record video in 720p i want to start filmimg bmx videos something that will do better than my samsung s4 :D thanks

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakePanasonic
Camera ModelDMC-ZS3
Camera SoftwareVer.1.2
Maximum Lens Aperturef/3.3
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)40 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution180 dpi
Vertical Resolution180 dpi
Image Created2013:02:09 10:52:04
Exposure Time1/30 sec
F-Numberf/3.6
Exposure ProgramNormal Program
ISO Speed Rating250
Exposure Bias-0.7 EV
Metering ModeCenter Weighted Average
Light SourceFine Weather
FlashNo Flash, Auto
Focal Length6.50 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width780
Image Height585
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
Gain ControlHigh Gain Up
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal
Image QualityFine
White BalanceDaylight
Focus ModeUnknown
Spot ModeUnknown
Image StabilizerMode 1
Macro ModeNormal
Shooting ModeUnknown
AudioNo
Flash Bias0.00 EV
Color EffectOff
ContrastStandard
Noise ReductionStandard
8 posts and 1 images submitted.
>>
forgot to say second hand on ebay all i can afford i just built a new bike on the frame the one is on the picture i can take some pictures if u want
>>
>>2902799
an iphone

fuck a camcorder, get some pegs
>>
>>2902799
whats your budget? I'd assume you would want slowmotion options as well. Also 1080p is the standard for quality these days so unless you deliberately want 720p you should spend the money.

File: gal_02.jpg (651KB, 1280x853px) Image search: [Google]
gal_02.jpg
651KB, 1280x853px
porn like this
nikon, pentax, sony.... are welcome

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Created2016-08-08T14:52:36+02:00
Image Width1280
Image Height853
7 posts and 4 images submitted.
>>
forgot video
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yLEAcu6E0c8
>>
>>2902699

fucc is film allowed too? commencing Japan dump
>>
File: Yodo2.jpg (213KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]
Yodo2.jpg
213KB, 600x600px
>>2902789
tfw youll never go to Japan kill me now senpai

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width2340
Image Height2340
Number of Bits Per Component8, 8, 8
Pixel CompositionRGB
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2013:06:04 17:44:42
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width600
Image Height600
Scene Capture TypeStandard

File: DSC_2133.jpg (323KB, 588x800px) Image search: [Google]
DSC_2133.jpg
323KB, 588x800px
Well as promised me and the same model are back. Some shit went down and i had to go for a used D7000 instead of a D750 like i wanted, still, some shots were taken by yours truly, the Ricoh GR.

As you guys pointed out, we tried to use more variety in the poses, and outfits, and settings. And hopefully ive gotten the processing down. Again, please tell me what i could improve on, its much appreciated!

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATION
Camera ModelNIKON D7000
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperturef/4.1
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern806
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)180 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Created2016:07:24 14:37:24
Exposure Time1/160 sec
F-Numberf/5.6
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating200
Lens Aperturef/5.6
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length120.00 mm
Color Space InformationUncalibrated
Image Width588
Image Height800
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
Gain ControlNone
ContrastNormal
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal
Subject Distance RangeUnknown
67 posts and 24 images submitted.
>>
File: DSC_2197.jpg (319KB, 680x800px) Image search: [Google]
DSC_2197.jpg
319KB, 680x800px


[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATION
Camera ModelNIKON D7000
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperturef/4.1
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern806
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)202 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Created2016:07:24 15:12:51
Exposure Time1/200 sec
F-Numberf/5.6
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating200
Lens Aperturef/5.6
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length135.00 mm
Color Space InformationUncalibrated
Image Width680
Image Height800
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
Gain ControlNone
ContrastNormal
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal
Subject Distance RangeUnknown
>>
File: DSC_2169.jpg (465KB, 1000x704px) Image search: [Google]
DSC_2169.jpg
465KB, 1000x704px


[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATION
Camera ModelNIKON D7000
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperturef/4.1
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern806
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)180 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Created2016:07:24 15:25:03
Exposure Time1/200 sec
F-Numberf/5.6
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating200
Lens Aperturef/5.6
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length120.00 mm
Color Space InformationUncalibrated
Image Width1000
Image Height704
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
Gain ControlNone
ContrastNormal
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal
Subject Distance RangeUnknown
>>
File: DSC_2223.jpg (206KB, 480x800px) Image search: [Google]
DSC_2223.jpg
206KB, 480x800px


[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATION
Camera ModelNIKON D7000
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperturef/4.4
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern806
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)232 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Created2016:07:24 15:08:46
Exposure Time1/200 sec
F-Numberf/5.6
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating200
Lens Aperturef/5.6
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length155.00 mm
Color Space InformationUncalibrated
Image Width480
Image Height800
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
Gain ControlNone
ContrastNormal
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal
Subject Distance RangeUnknown

What gear would I need to achieve picture quality like this? Love this 'style'.
4 posts and 2 images submitted.
>>
>>2902688
I give you three sugars out of 10 isis for the quality post.
>>
>>2902688
Pic related.

also this was a pretty good song off that tape https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y_3V3oYb2sU
>>
File: nokia_2760.jpg (25KB, 371x500px) Image search: [Google]
nokia_2760.jpg
25KB, 371x500px
>>2902772
oops forgot pic

File: image.jpg (40KB, 440x330px) Image search: [Google]
image.jpg
40KB, 440x330px
These threads are shunned, but I'm in desperate need of gear help.

I'm running a standard Canon T3i Rebel. And I'm about to start shooting for a Walking Dead fan film. And while I am not running film, and instead, digital (contrary to what The Walking Dead uses), what lens would you recommend going into a Walking Dead-esque project?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width440
Image Height330
Scene Capture TypeStandard
7 posts and 2 images submitted.
>>
File: image.jpg (299KB, 940x545px) Image search: [Google]
image.jpg
299KB, 940x545px
I know most of this photo is post work, but this is just a general reference.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS6 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Created2016:01:26 08:01:21
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width940
Image Height545
Scene Capture TypeStandard
>>
>>2902602
>>2902523
gear thread
>>
>>2902615
/vidya/ thread would be better

File: K-1.jpg (573KB, 2048x1536px) Image search: [Google]
K-1.jpg
573KB, 2048x1536px
Anything about Lenses, Cameras, mounts, Systems, buying, pricing, selling, etc. GOES IN HERE!

Don't open new threads for gear-related issues
No pointless (brand) arguments and dickwaving allowed! You have been warned! Just questions, answers and advice!

I repeat, ANYTHING GEAR RELATED goes in here!

And don't forget, be polite!

old thread: >>2899407

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CC 2014 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width2048
Image Height1536
Number of Bits Per Component8, 8, 8
Pixel CompositionRGB
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2016:05:06 16:10:10
Color Space InformationUncalibrated
Image Width2048
Image Height1536
322 posts and 36 images submitted.
>>
Friendly reminder that micro4/3 is full frame.
>>
File: 20160803_183612.jpg (151KB, 1000x562px) Image search: [Google]
20160803_183612.jpg
151KB, 1000x562px
First for Canikon D606D

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Makesamsung
Camera ModelSM-N910G
Camera SoftwareN910GDTU1DPF4
Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.2
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)31 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width5312
Image Height2988
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2016:08:03 18:36:11
Exposure Time1/10 sec
F-Numberf/2.2
Exposure ProgramNormal Program
ISO Speed Rating800
Metering ModeAverage
FlashNo Flash
Focal Length4.80 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width5312
Image Height2988
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeNight Scene
Unique Image IDH16USHH04SA
>>
>>2902528
>>2902526
Dammit, oh well, third for my kit;

Bodies
- Canon EOS 6D
- Nikon D600

Lenses
- Canon EF 17-40mm f/4L USM
- Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 STM
- Sigma 12-24mm f/4.5-5.6 HSM II
- Tamron 24-70mm f/2.8 VC USD
- Tamron 70-200mm f/2.8 VC USD
- Nikon AF-S 50mm f/1.8G

Flash
- Canon Speedlite 90EX
- Canon Speedlite 430EX II
- Nikon Speedlight SB-5000

Accessories
- Vanguard Espod CX 204
- Peak Design Capture Pro

Bag
- Pacsafe Camsafe Z16

File: image.png (1MB, 1242x2208px) Image search: [Google]
image.png
1MB, 1242x2208px
Now that two of our own are on ppixel, what's your excuse for not getting featured?
14 posts and 2 images submitted.
>>
5hoe hasn't posted on /p/ in a long ass time, though, so it's not really fair to say he's one of "our own".
>>
whos the other one?
>>
hey, I've been on Petapixel too

File: 1_2OSwEY0RTWzoeBFonAKoew[1].jpg (266KB, 2000x666px) Image search: [Google]
1_2OSwEY0RTWzoeBFonAKoew[1].jpg
266KB, 2000x666px
Is it just me or is this guy a pretentious faggot whose edits are complete shit, with washed out contrast and vomit inducing bloom and lens flares?

Holy shit these suck so bad. (Except for a couple of them)

Just wanted to get that off my chest because I didn't want to make an account to comment on the article and let this guy know how garbage his edits are.

https://medium.com/calebkerr/the-value-of-a-professional-photographer-or-can-i-have-all-the-unedited-photos-1e8dc9980a29#.ixmyfun7v

Anyway, discuss.
15 posts and 4 images submitted.
>>
File: 1-UhAfWZFeCX-Rk0GDN6_Bhw.jpg (219KB, 2000x666px) Image search: [Google]
1-UhAfWZFeCX-Rk0GDN6_Bhw.jpg
219KB, 2000x666px
lol I like this -

you can tell that he has clone stamped the left side of the image to hide the riverbank, but he has done such a shitty job (even leaving repitition in the foliage) that he has had to cover it up with a massive light bloom that looks more like he got his finger in the shot.

This guy enjoys hitting the contrast sliders and photo filters hard.

Some of his shots arent too bad at all, but he needs to lay off the sliders and, damn, lay off the LIGHT BLOOMS TO COVER UP SHIT I DONT LIKE.
>>
>>2902400
Ffs, the unprocessed one looks a lot better and that's saying something.

That bloom is like a child finding his first PS torrent at age 11
>>
First one is total gore

File: 1216x818x2-1.jpg (79KB, 818x550px) Image search: [Google]
1216x818x2-1.jpg
79KB, 818x550px
Well Lomography have been up to their usual fart-knockery once again.

They have just brought out a dreamy, creamy, squirty, farty 64mm f2.9 Art Lens

Heres the trailer
http://www.designboom.com/technology/daguerreotype-achromat-art-lens-08-12-2016/

Heres the Shop
https://shop.lomography.com/en/lenses/daguerreotype-achromat-art-lens

I actually think it looks pretty good in black.
16 posts and 3 images submitted.
>>
this is a literal fucking meme
>>
File: noot.png (105KB, 414x317px) Image search: [Google]
noot.png
105KB, 414x317px
>>
>>2902123
>I actually think it looks pretty good in black.

So good it costs an extra hundred bux

I have $500 set aside to buy film cameras.

What should i buy /p?
I am hoping to get a range of them, not just one.
Also not medium format.

I already have a dslr but i want to shoot film as well.

And finally preferably manual cameras, not auto or too modern as it can end up looking to similar to my dslr.
19 posts and 1 images submitted.
>>
Are you serious, or is this a troll thread?
>>
>>2902054

im guessing you are a feminist.
>>
>>2902055
I'm pretty sure you're an idiot.

Just go and buy whatever looks neat to you after searching on ebay for "35mm mechanical camera". It won't make any difference what you choose to blow your money on.

>inb4 MANUAL CAMERAS ARE GREAT. Retard, that's not the point.

File: 5901054408_39429464a2_b.jpg (279KB, 1024x892px) Image search: [Google]
5901054408_39429464a2_b.jpg
279KB, 1024x892px
The great benefit of MF film camera systems is that the backs are interchangeable. There are digital backs for Hasselblad and Mamiya, but they are so expensive you'd have to sell a kidney to buy one.

Now, I was thinking, how feasible would it be to make one yourself? I have elektrotechnical knowledge and experience with PIC programming and RPi. I was looking at one of my spare film backs and when you would tale out the insert (but keep its sides), you'd have a light tight box with quite some space.

Would any /diy/ people here like to brainstorm on how to build one? The possibilities would be very great, essentially building a MF digital camera for not too much money, with ready access to great lenses.

Thoughts?
19 posts and 1 images submitted.
>>
>>2901978
>Thoughts?
I think you haven't done even a single google search.
>>
>>2901979
I have though. What are you aiming at? Bronica digital backs do not exist as such. There are adaptors, but they're expensive themselves and still wouldn't help the problem of existing backs being very expensive.

I have seen people making digital backs for 35mm themselves, so the concept isn't unthinkable. The biggest problem would be to obtain a large enough sensor, or else it would be cropped to a postal stamp

But what am I doing here, youre just here to whine and not to help
>>
>>2902004
it would be cheaper if there were several smaller sensors than a single large one. Would need stitching in camera. There are also digital backs for large format.

File: ae-1.jpg (21KB, 469x329px) Image search: [Google]
ae-1.jpg
21KB, 469x329px
I've never been interested in photography before, but recently after finding a new interest in films and the making of them I realized that picking up photography wouldn't hurt, plus it's fun. I'd like to get an old film camera because they're cheaper and aren't too big.

Now, knowing that I'm clueless about these things. What advice could /p/ give me in regards to the film used, brands of cameras to avoid, and just advice in general?
19 posts and 2 images submitted.
>>
>>2901973
any film slr will work for your purposes. I recommend pentax for cheap lenses. most color film is okay to shoot, various ones have different quirks so I suggest trying a bunch out before you settle on one or another. Kodak tri-x is in my opinion leagues better than other B&W films. Photography is an expensive hobby but can be made less so. Cost per shot with film, assuming someone else is developing and scanning is roughly .50$, obviously depending on a lot of factors. I'd suggest buying a cheap camera like a fuji x10 and see if you like it, or use your phone. Once again I'll say that photography is expensive, film costs stack up quickly, look into developing yourself and dslr scanning to get costs down. Marry lenses and date bodies.Should you choose to go digital at some point, don't underestimate mirorrless cameras. older lenses are as capable as their newer counterparts for most situations. That's all I've got
>>
>>2901977
Thank you for this info. I was wondering if older lenses fit new dslr's. I'll be careful spending my money, and keep all of this in mind. Thanks.
>>
>>2901982
I shoot nikon so I don't know about canon but with higher end dslr's, they can focus older AF lenses and can autoexpose for them. Pentax supposedly has good support for older lenses but I have no knowledge or experience with it

Pages: [First page] [Previous page] [330] [331] [332] [333] [334] [335] [336] [337] [338] [339] [340] [341] [342] [343] [344] [345] [346] [347] [348] [349] [350] [Next page] [Last page]

[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Search | Top | Home]

I'm aware that Imgur.com will stop allowing adult images since 15th of May. I'm taking actions to backup as much data as possible.
Read more on this topic here - https://archived.moe/talk/thread/1694/


If you need a post removed click on it's [Report] button and follow the instruction.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com.
If you like this website please support us by donating with Bitcoins at 16mKtbZiwW52BLkibtCr8jUg2KVUMTxVQ5
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties.
Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from that site.
This means that RandomArchive shows their content, archived.
If you need information for a Poster - contact them.