Is it just me or is this guy a pretentious faggot whose edit

File: 1-UhAfWZFeCX-Rk0GDN6_Bhw.jpg (219KB, 2000x666px) Image search: [Google]

219KB, 2000x666px

lol I like this -

you can tell that he has clone stamped the left side of the image to hide the riverbank, but he has done such a shitty job (even leaving repitition in the foliage) that he has had to cover it up with a massive light bloom that looks more like he got his finger in the shot.

This guy enjoys hitting the contrast sliders and photo filters hard.

Some of his shots arent too bad at all, but he needs to lay off the sliders and, damn, lay off the LIGHT BLOOMS TO COVER UP SHIT I DONT LIKE.

>>2902400
Ffs, the unprocessed one looks a lot better and that's saying something.

That bloom is like a child finding his first PS torrent at age 11

First one is total gore

File: 1-GungVxlikMbrDVzokrUUaw.jpg (251KB, 2000x666px) Image search: [Google]

251KB, 2000x666px

the bloom shit looks atrocious

but i really liked what he did with this pic.

i guess it's his "style". dont like it, don't hire him. dont need to go out of my way to shit on photogs

>>2902880
>but i really liked what he did with this pic.
no way, the sooc is A E S T H E T I C as fuck

>>2902880
i don't mind this one although i'm pretty sure he's just hit the dehaze slider and fixed his white balance. the other two are unbearable.

>>2902400
>>2902588

Looks pretty good to me, yall are freaking out about small shit. most people cant tell the diff. And the bloom looks like a lens flare, not a finger but I guess I can see that

>>2902898
Are you fucking kidding me?
>>2902400 Looks atrocious. Eat shit.

File: dank.png (1MB, 1001x666px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1001x666px

>>2902395

He reminds me of all the fauxtographers who abuse the clarity slider and think photos should all be crunchy as fuck.

>>2903381
Hes a grower not a shower !

>>2903620
250lbs of dynamite with a quarter inch fuse

>>2902928

whoooAAAoAAOaAOAaahh chill

>>2902898
/p/