File: bnw_demand-20160812-0001.jpg (104KB, 752x754px) Image search:
[Google]
104KB, 752x754px
How to achieve this effect?
Double exposure or reflex?
9 Posts / 4 Images
View this topic
>>
Double exposure by the looks of it.
>>
File: mlfs_g.jpg (13KB, 500x500px) Image search:
[Google]
13KB, 500x500px
A focusing screen with grid lines will help too.
>>
>>2901659
Why? I don't get it
File: FILMFerrania-logo-red.jpg (99KB, 1000x1000px) Image search:
[Google]
99KB, 1000x1000px
any day now...
8 Posts / 2 Images
View this topic
>>
They have twitter don't they?
>>
>>2901436
I really want to believe.
But I can't.
>>
>>2901436
there's literally no way it's coming out before 2017, and even then its a stretch
File: 1470957957632.jpg (4MB, 4160x3120px) Image search:
[Google]
4MB, 4160x3120px
So I just hadsome film developed and they told me they couldn't print the pictures because the film was too light, like they couldn't see t the pictures so they couldn't print them. I don't know what the problem is. Is it them or my camera? Pic unrelated.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Model VS985 4G Equipment Make LG Electronics Image-Specific Properties: Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Orientation Right-Hand, Top Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Altitude 0.00 m Color Space Information sRGB F-Number f/2.4 Focal Length 3.97 mm White Balance Auto Image Width 4160 Metering Mode Center Weighted Average Image Height 3120 Flash No Flash Exposure Bias 0 EV ISO Speed Rating 500 Exposure Time 1/17 sec
7 Posts / 1 Images
View this topic
>>
>>2901275
If you do some research about how film works you'll realize why it could be both but probably your fault if this is a mini lab you went to and if it's colour film.
>>
My light meter is fine, if it's my fault I don't know how it could be.
>>
>>2901275
try another lab, if it happens again your camera is fucked
Anonymous
what is the best way to take photos yourself? 2016-08-11 22:18:07 Post No.2901234
[Report] Image search: [Google]
what is the best way to take photos yourself? 2016-08-11 22:18:07 Post No.2901234
[Report] Image search: [Google]
File: Gary-Oldman.jpg (252KB, 1600x1200px) Image search:
[Google]
252KB, 1600x1200px
what is the best way to take photos yourself?
Anonymous
2016-08-11 22:18:07
Post No. 2901234
[Report]
[View this topic]
I mean, there is some technical practice? I have a Nikon D7100
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop 7.0 Image-Specific Properties: Image Created 2006:04:08 23:22:31 Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 2500 Image Height 3121
10 Posts / 2 Images
View this topic
>>
>>2901234
I guess there is some technique and gear plus software operating behind getting shots as you want them.
But it varies with what you do.
For example, if you want to do studio shots of people. It could easily be that preparations with makeup, studio lighting and stuff plus post work with software are the harder parts, and operating your camera extremely easy (if it's a suitable enough camera).
There are a bunch of gear and techniques behind this, but it usually has not THAT much to do with a "Nikon D7100" beyond knowing the settings and choosing somewhat obviously adequate ones.
>>
>>2901234
1-Put camera on tripod.
2-Set focus. Don't go too shallow.
3-Get remote radio trigger.
4-Sit in front of camera.
5-Take picture.
>>
get a selfie stick just as any other normal person
File: DSC_1618.jpg (623KB, 1500x1000px) Image search:
[Google]
623KB, 1500x1000px
So every so often, I end up with a photograph that has some edges that really "glow" and I'm not sure why. I was wondering if someone could tell me why this happens and how to avoid it? Also, I'm tired of doing some long anf tiring bullshit in gimp to fix, is they any way to fix this in lightroom? But mainly, I want to know why it happens so I can shoot and never have to deal with it in post processing. Thanks in advance. And pic related.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make NIKON CORPORATION Camera Model NIKON D5200 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.0 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/3.2 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Color Filter Array Pattern 802 Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 40 mm Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2016:08:10 15:27:02 Exposure Time 1/160 sec F-Number f/14.0 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 100 Lens Aperture f/14.0 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Cloudy Weather Flash No Flash Focal Length 40.00 mm Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Manual Scene Capture Type Standard Gain Control None Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal Subject Distance Range Unknown
10 Posts / 1 Images
View this topic
>>
Shameless self bump.
Also no sharpening or clarity was used. I know that is usually the cause, but not I this case. I did not increase the exposure or anything in post processing either. It only happens every so often. It did not happen on my other shots in the same place with same settings.
>>
Are you shooting JPEGs in hdr mode? If you are, STOP
>>
>>2901235
No, I am shooting RAW, and not hdr mode
File: Snapseed_zps8g4mvmwc.jpg (268KB, 1024x1024px) Image search:
[Google]
268KB, 1024x1024px
ITS HAPPENING
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand
25 Posts / 4 Images
View this topic
>>
don't get it. sage
>>
File: XF23mmF2-WR-Leaked-1024x944.jpg (93KB, 1024x944px) Image search:
[Google]
93KB, 1024x944px
>>2900751
New XF 23mm f/2 WR
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 2403 Image Height 2215
>>
I'm gonna buy it. Can't wait.
File: 1470858348448.jpg (207KB, 1680x1050px) Image search:
[Google]
207KB, 1680x1050px
How to get this effect, /p/?
11 Posts / 1 Images
View this topic
>>
>>2900685
slow shutter speed, move head
have you ever even used a decent camera before?
>>
>>2900687
no. i don't have a camera.
>>
>>2900689
how do you plan to get a picture then?
File: 2016-05-30 01.58.51 1.jpg (2MB, 3264x2448px) Image search:
[Google]
2MB, 3264x2448px
How does one graduate from the smartphone-VSCO filter meme photography?
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Model A33w Camera Software VSCO Android Version Equipment Make OPPO Image-Specific Properties: Image Created 2016:05:29 09:56:06 Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Color Space Information sRGB F-Number f/2.0 Focal Length 3.50 mm Light Source Other Exposure Mode Auto Image Height 2448 Scene Capture Type Standard Exposure Program Not Defined White Balance Auto Image Width 3264 Metering Mode Center Weighted Average Flash No Flash Exposure Bias 0 EV ISO Speed Rating 111 Exposure Time 1059/200000 sec
13 Posts / 2 Images
View this topic
>>
>>2902080
learn composition.
>>
FUNdamentals!
>>
>>2902087
Sounds fun, although looking at my images before feels shameful
File: Landscapes & Building's.jpg (2MB, 4608x3456px) Image search:
[Google]
2MB, 4608x3456px
(I'm only beginner)
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon PowerShot SX530 HS Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/3.4 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 4608 Image Height 3456 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 180 dpi Vertical Resolution 180 dpi Image Created 2016:03:05 17:06:47 Exposure Time 1/250 sec F-Number f/4.0 ISO Speed Rating 160 Lens Aperture f/4.0 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 4.30 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 4608 Image Height 3456 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard
13 Posts / 4 Images
View this topic
>>
no. keep posting more of this please?
>>
i only have this one photo so far but i plan going downtown again very soon
>>
>>2901473
oh cool. please add a bokeh photograph on this one. i wanna see more of this type of photograph
File: NO_FILE_GIVEN (0B, 0x0pxpx)
0B, 0x0pxpx
>tfw the sky is clouded af and theres a major meteor shower going down tonight
15 Posts / 1 Images
View this topic
>>
Perseids suck anyway.
>>
It "goes down" every year.
Are you 12? How are you excited about the Perseids?
>>
>>2901114
>Are you 12? How are you excited about the Perseids?
No I'm 18, otherwise I wouldn't be allowed using this board silly :^)
>It "goes down" every year.
Exactly and I want to take some pictures of them this year.
Anonymous
Sugar Appreciation Thread 2016-08-10 19:07:11 Post No.2900465
[Report] Image search: [Google]
Sugar Appreciation Thread 2016-08-10 19:07:11 Post No.2900465
[Report] Image search: [Google]
File: 24454323645431.jpg (183KB, 1000x667px) Image search:
[Google]
183KB, 1000x667px
This board has gotten way too salty lately. Everybody's all up in arms about silly stuff. So, what do you do when things get a little too salty? You add a little C12H22O11.
General Sugar Appreciation Thread! Feel free to post your favorite Sugar shots!
84 Posts / 28 Images
View this topic
>>
File: 23454323445432.jpg (80KB, 640x960px) Image search:
[Google]
80KB, 640x960px
Nothing says "Sugar" like the classic Sugar Sky.
>>
File: 23454323645432.jpg (35KB, 1300x867px) Image search:
[Google]
35KB, 1300x867px
But not all of Sugar's skies are Sugar Skies.
>>
File: 24454323640431.jpg (159KB, 1000x667px) Image search:
[Google]
159KB, 1000x667px
File: IluwfXlh[1].jpg (214KB, 1024x685px) Image search:
[Google]
![IluwfXlh[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/p4CtSLw.jpg "IluwfXlh[1]")
214KB, 1024x685px
posting muh nature photos from a recent hike
11 Posts / 9 Images
View this topic
>>
File: 1lV3rqlh[1].jpg (253KB, 685x1024px) Image search:
[Google]
![1lV3rqlh[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/WVqLf0k.jpg "1lV3rqlh[1]")
253KB, 685x1024px
>>2899956
my precious D60 with 18-55 kit and 50 f1.8.
if you can see a face in the first photo in the rock, this is most likely this piece. was amazed when I found it, it was obvious to me right when I saw it.
>>
File: b28t2L4h[1].jpg (281KB, 685x1024px) Image search:
[Google]
![b28t2L4h[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/2ZZFzQ5.jpg "b28t2L4h[1]")
281KB, 685x1024px
using imgur to resize, how lazy is that?
>>
File: UpzonKxh[1].jpg (129KB, 685x1024px) Image search:
[Google]
![UpzonKxh[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/OMxtTxp.jpg "UpzonKxh[1]")
129KB, 685x1024px
and in the middle of the wilderness
Anonymous
Nikon 18-55mm DX VR II lens 2016-08-08 20:20:32 Post No.2898957
[Report] Image search: [Google]
Nikon 18-55mm DX VR II lens 2016-08-08 20:20:32 Post No.2898957
[Report] Image search: [Google]
File: nikon_d3200_18_55_vrii.jpg (52KB, 501x494px) Image search:
[Google]
52KB, 501x494px
Nikon 18-55mm DX VR II lens
Anonymous
2016-08-08 20:20:32
Post No. 2898957
[Report]
[View this topic]
Here's my amateurish, beginner problem. I have this kit lens (18-55mm DX VR II) came /w my D3200. I've used it for about a year in all different circumstances, and I really can't say it is sharp enough. Needless to say, I'm not a perfect photographer (I have a D3200 + kit lens, duh!), far from it, but I thought when I bought this pack, my pictures will pop (sharpness wise, I mean). I always shoot RAW, I post process carefully (yes, sharpening too), but in 100% magnification I can't say it is dead sharp. I mostly make landscape photos (but also indoor, some portrait, etc.), I use a tripod when I can do, I always switch off VR (though manual says the lens knows when it is on a tripod), then I switch to LV and manual focus to just get the "right there" sharpness - but I can't achieve the "right there" sharpness. So here are my questions:
- I've read that D3200 has AA filter which not really good for sharpness - is it true?
- should I use a different lens?
- is a kit lens that crap?
- where to go from this lens?
- is my whole camera equip not enough (at least for me)?
Thanks for any input. (I know, I know, I didn't put this into the gear thread - reason: my questions are always get lost/unanswered amongst the gazillion posts, sorry.)
70 Posts / 6 Images
View this topic
>>
>>2898957
Most of the problem is probably you, but you haven't posted any of the pictures that you're having a problem with, just a fucking stock image of the camera like that's of any use to any goddamn body.
Further, I'll also 100% guarantee you that your photography isn't hampered one bit by suboptimal sharpness. It's hampered by you being a shit photographer. Stop worrying over shit that's not the reason your pictures are bad and fix what's making them bad.
>>
>>2898957
>- I've read that D3200 has AA filter which not really good for sharpness - is it true?
Yes, it's true.
But the difference with no AA is quite small.
>- should I use a different lens?
>- is a kit lens that crap?
It's not crap but most other lenses are better.
Superzooms are worse.
Try shooting at f/8 or f/11.
It should be sharpest around these apertures.
Shoot in bright sunlight. (landscapes in the sun look much sharper than landscapes in the shade)
Use a fast shutter speed (1/200 or so) to eliminate any motion blur.
Even on a tripod the shutter slap alone can cause some blur from vibration.
>- where to go from this lens?
35mm DX
>- is my whole camera equip not enough (at least for me)?
No.
>>
>>2898973
thanks.
>35mm DX
will it be wide enough for landscapes?
File: cloth_134002.jpg (599KB, 1012x569px) Image search:
[Google]
599KB, 1012x569px
Which culture?
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make samsung Camera Model SM-N920W8 Camera Software paint.net 4.0.10 Maximum Lens Aperture f/1.9 Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 5312 Image Height 2988 Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2016:08:06 13:40:02 Exposure Time 1/388 sec F-Number f/1.9 Exposure Program Normal Program ISO Speed Rating 40 Lens Aperture f/1.9 Brightness 6.6 EV Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Center Weighted Average Flash No Flash Focal Length 4.30 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 5312 Image Height 2988 Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard
15 Posts / 1 Images
View this topic
>>
Upper Lusatia ca. 1850
>>
>>2897615
Seems Mongolian.
>>
Something from the Balkans
File: jimmy-eat-world-bleed-american-album-art.jpg (45KB, 467x467px) Image search:
[Google]
45KB, 467x467px
I m in a band ffo Jimmy Eat World, The Starting Line, The Early November. We are looking to use a photo for artwork. Anyone got any work for sale, or know any photographers open to anything. Thanks
12 Posts / 2 Images
View this topic
>>
>>2897609
what kind of photo do you want, dipshit?
>>
>>2897846
Post what you got jackass. We are the band not the photographers.
>>
>>2898353
Nigger, any photographer that's been in the game for even a handful of years has a catalog of at least 10k images with a wide variety of styles and subjects.