Archived threads in /p/ - Photography - 332. page

nah m8, you're fine

just b urself

>>2911361
>only enough savings to tie me over for about one month.
>Vancouver

so actually about 3 days then.

>>2911393
thats like 2 hours in LA

File: 88990001.jpg (318KB, 1024x1398px) Image search: [Google]

318KB, 1024x1398px

I have the rz67 with 110mm all shot on ektar 100

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Model	QSS-32_33
Camera Software	Google
Equipment Make	NORITSU KOKI
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Created	2016:08:25 20:31:34
Image Width	1024
Image Height	1398
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1398
Image Height	1024

File: 88990003.jpg (811KB, 1398x1024px) Image search: [Google]

811KB, 1398x1024px

I also light metered with my Sony a6k. What do y'all use?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NORITSU KOKI
Camera Model	QSS-32_33
Camera Software	QSS-32_33 8.01.001 2008.01.15
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1398
Image Height	1024

File: 88990005.jpg (1MB, 1024x1398px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1024x1398px

I send my stuff off to the darkroom.com and they develop and scan it for $11.

File: 20160825_173142.jpg (497KB, 2560x1440px) Image search: [Google]

497KB, 2560x1440px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Model	LG-K330
Equipment Make	LG Electronics
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	0 mm
Sensing Method	Unknown
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Created	2016:08:25 17:31:42
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Altitude	0.00 m
Color Space Information	sRGB
F-Number	f/2.6
Focal Length	2.66 mm
Lens Aperture	f/2.5
Exposure Mode	Auto
Image Height	1440
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Exposure Program	Not Defined
White Balance	Auto
Image Width	2560
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Flash	Flash
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Brightness	3.3 EV
ISO Speed Rating	100
Exposure Time	1/40 sec

File: 20160825_173145.jpg (756KB, 2560x1440px) Image search: [Google]

756KB, 2560x1440px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Model	LG-K330
Equipment Make	LG Electronics
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	0 mm
Sensing Method	Unknown
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Created	2016:08:25 17:31:44
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Altitude	0.00 m
Color Space Information	sRGB
F-Number	f/2.6
Focal Length	2.66 mm
Lens Aperture	f/2.5
Exposure Mode	Auto
Image Height	1440
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Exposure Program	Not Defined
White Balance	Auto
Image Width	2560
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Flash	Flash
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Brightness	1.7 EV
ISO Speed Rating	200
Exposure Time	1/40 sec

File: 20160825_173147.jpg (699KB, 2560x1440px) Image search: [Google]

699KB, 2560x1440px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Model	LG-K330
Equipment Make	LG Electronics
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	0 mm
Sensing Method	Unknown
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Created	2016:08:25 17:31:47
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Altitude	0.00 m
Color Space Information	sRGB
F-Number	f/2.6
Focal Length	2.66 mm
Lens Aperture	f/2.5
Exposure Mode	Auto
Image Height	1440
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Exposure Program	Not Defined
White Balance	Auto
Image Width	2560
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Flash	Flash
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Brightness	1.6 EV
ISO Speed Rating	200
Exposure Time	1/30 sec

>Don't focus the camera on anything in general
>Blur camera slightly when taking it too.
>Open Lightroom and fuck with the sliders

It looks like shit by the way

Use a lomo f8 plastic toy lens and throw VSCO 03 warm presets on it.

rub vaseline on your $5 manual focus lens with fungus growing inside.

File: chopped.jpg (742KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

742KB, 1000x1000px

>>2910739
Tried another crop

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS 60D
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.6 (Macintosh)
Photographer	Feldspath
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.8
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2016:08:25 22:12:02
Exposure Time	15 sec
F-Number	f/16.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	200
Lens Aperture	f/16.0
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	100.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard

Not enough DOF
boring ass flower

I like how it looks like a pair of lungs though.

The composition is almost symmetrical, but not perfectly, so the composition ends up between two chairs. Also, it's not sharp or well lit enough to justify the boring subject. f16 is usually not the sharpest aperture, and there's also some noise in there.

Since the background is all black, you should be able to recompose, extend the frame etc with ease, maybe giving it some more air around will help. You can also try either brightening the stem to give some color contrast, or just clone it away to simplify.

35 f/2

>>2910585
Use the fucking gear thread.

>>2910604

but this is a gear thread

>>2910420
And that's why it's not a professional tier camera. If you can't point it off a cliff without it fucking up, it is not going to meet the demands of a pro in the field. And that is BEFORE you even factor in their shitty customer service

>can't handle a bit of water
FUCKEN LOL

>>2910426
>And that's why it's not a professional tier camera.

It isn't supposed to be. It is pro-sumer.

That is what the a9 is for.

File: ERWITT SPAIN.jpg (133KB, 960x643px) Image search: [Google]

133KB, 960x643px

can this just be a street classics thread?

File: klein-kid-gun.jpg (59KB, 488x660px) Image search: [Google]

59KB, 488x660px

>>2910280

Erwitt is not really a masterclass in 28mm

William Klein is one of them too

28mm is basically the worst focal length.

Printing

>>2910177
explain

>>2910175
>Why the fuck would I use an inconvenient dslr which will require me to edit my photos later anyway, over this beauty?
Ummm... If you're happy with the results, then don't?

>>2909861
I christen it "Joey".

>>2909861
>made before 1950
To the trash it goes.

>>2909869
>not wanting to shoot and develop glorious expired B&W emulsion

pleb

They're sharper.

>>2909701
only thing they really offer is good build quality, small size , and excellent image quality

>>2909701
When talking about their film cameras: they did what they were supposed to do very fucking well and with a precision that makes them feel good to use. If you don't know what it's like to use a precisely tooled instrument to achieve a task, then there's not really a good way to describe it. Hasselblad kinda has the same thing going on. It's just an excellently designed machine that works the way it's supposed to. Whether or not you want that is another matter entirely.

In the digital age, they're mostly a boutique brand that lives in the same kind of market space that brands like Rolls Royce live in. They aren't for those who want the pinnacle of performance, but want performance with a cachet of style and legacy that other companies just can't provide.

take pictures see what works and what doesn't

there's a sticky
read it

drop the nikon and go sony or canon

>>2909616
being this late to the party

>>2909621
I posted this thread when the video first came out but it got reported and deleted by sonylovers

File: sony anus.jpg (13KB, 500x281px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 500x281px

Their shitty customer support is global

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Google
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	500
Image Height	281

...or is it even more that I should look at approaching a cinemagraph as a composite? use the same camera, take a well-lit picture, and then composite the moving elements filmed?

>>2909299
just googled cinemagraphs and that shits cool

watched a 5 min youtube vid and it seems very simple

shoot video on tripod
use a combination of layers and masks to achieve result
save as .gif

im not sure why you made this thread as a simple google tell you everything you need to know

File: image.gif (193KB, 652x652px) Image search: [Google]

193KB, 652x652px

>>2909434
im asking because the information ive found on google, while there's a lot of it, is all the same and all very basic. i feel like the best cinemagraphs ive seen online are a lot more complicated than all the basic how-to's make them out to be. but I guess this style of photography/video really is more unknown than I thought. which is a shame because it seems like a no-brainer commercial tool for websites.

some say gif format but a few say HTML5, which makes sense for a smaller format size and more native framerate. also regarding framerate, would a conemagraph look more "pleasing" as a series of burst photos at 10fps or just a 1080p video shot at 60fps?

really? nobody on here has experimented with this type of photography?

File: color1.jpg (285KB, 1280x782px) Image search: [Google]

285KB, 1280x782px

>>2909212
Original pic

File: 729bbc4ad3a8b1ce300dcc78fe783bb4_c122e3a2-b2be-469e-ad4a-716938b83294_1471955108970.png (872KB, 800x456px) Image search: [Google]

872KB, 800x456px

Algorithmia thinks differently

File: 1471955108971.jpg (489KB, 1280x782px) Image search: [Google]

489KB, 1280x782px

Colorize the picture eh?