Film General Thread, aka FGT.
>SCAM EDITION
>This listing (201632970916) has been removed, or this item is not available.
>not a registered user
Post your film snapshits and ask about how to take better film snapshits and what gear you need to take your film snapshits
Previous Thread: >>2891008
331 Posts / 72 Images
View this topic
>>
I actually saw this yesterday, I strongly felt that I would too good to be true.
>>
>>2894161
Sometimes it is and you get burned.
Sometimesmit isn't and you luck out.
>>
>>2894152
>tfw scammed
>tfw can't open case after 30 days
feels bad mango
I recently bought a Bronica SQ-A, here's a bunch of snapshits I've made with it. Composing squares has been a fun little challenge, I hope I did alright.
Comments and critiques are always appreciated. Rectangles need not apply.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Epson Camera Model PerfectionV550 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.6 (Windows) Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2016:08:01 19:32:25 Color Space Information sRGB
59 Posts / 32 Images
View this topic
>>
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Epson Camera Model PerfectionV550 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.6 (Windows) Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2016:08:01 19:32:25 Color Space Information sRGB
>>
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Epson Camera Model PerfectionV550 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.6 (Windows) Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2016:08:01 19:32:29 Color Space Information sRGB
>>
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Epson Camera Model PerfectionV550 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.6 (Windows) Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2016:08:01 19:32:32 Color Space Information sRGB
File: IMG_0898_1.jpg (317KB, 1000x689px) Image search:
[Google]
317KB, 1000x689px
Last one is 174 replies, last reply being like two hours ago. So I'll start it off:
Critique please
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS 5D Mark II Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Macintosh) Photographer Cooper Adamo Maximum Lens Aperture f/1.4 Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2016:08:01 16:35:53 Exposure Time 1/40 sec F-Number f/5.6 Exposure Program Aperture Priority ISO Speed Rating 1600 Lens Aperture f/5.6 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Flash Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 50.00 mm Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 1000 Image Height 689 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard
285 Posts / 151 Images
View this topic
>>
File: IMG_0923_1.jpg (959KB, 1000x1158px) Image search:
[Google]
959KB, 1000x1158px
>>2894039
2/3
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS 5D Mark II Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Macintosh) Photographer Cooper Adamo Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.8 Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2016:08:01 16:57:54 Exposure Time 1/50 sec F-Number f/3.2 Exposure Program Aperture Priority ISO Speed Rating 1600 Lens Aperture f/3.2 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Flash Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 31.00 mm Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 1000 Image Height 1158 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard
>>
>>2894040
3/3 I really liked this one, maybe a tad too much post production?
>>
File: IMG_0935_1.jpg (444KB, 1000x898px) Image search:
[Google]
444KB, 1000x898px
>>2894041
forgot image...
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS 5D Mark II Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Macintosh) Photographer Cooper Adamo Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.8 Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2016:08:01 16:46:36 Exposure Time 1/125 sec F-Number f/2.8 Exposure Program Aperture Priority ISO Speed Rating 1600 Lens Aperture f/2.8 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Flash Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 18.00 mm Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 1000 Image Height 898 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard
Who else here is /Billingham/ masterrace?
114 Posts / 19 Images
View this topic
>>
Dude, these are really gay. There is no manly handbag, accept you're a fashion victim.
>>
>>2893848
>poorfag detected
Let me guess you are the type of person that uses the bag that came free with your shitty crop censored turd?
>>
>>2893860
I can easily afford one of these ugly bags, but apart from having money, I also got taste.
File: 10073850903_86323f85b9_h.jpg (172KB, 1000x657px) Image search:
[Google]
172KB, 1000x657px
My local lab recently became a dry lab and i am now in search of online labs. anyone have any go-to trusted labs?
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand
4 Posts / 2 Images
View this topic
>>
>>2893602
like, for developing film?
>>
>>2894236
Cooking meth
>>
File: 1426506926752.gif (2MB, 325x244px) Image search:
[Google]
2MB, 325x244px
>>2894806
File: sample.jpg (166KB, 2048x887px) Image search:
[Google]
166KB, 2048x887px
Anyone know why my higher pixel camera takes a worse photo than the lower pixel one?
Here is a picture. The one on the left is my old phone, and I upgraded to a far superior phone but it masks most blemishes almost makes you look not real. I liked the realness of the camera before because it didnt hide anything. It even looks like I have color in my eyes too. Any idea whats going on?
19 Posts / 1 Images
View this topic
>>
Aggressive noise reduction.
>>
>>2893258
>higher pixels takes worse quality
When are people gonna learn that high megapixels is a gimmick
>>
>>2893262
How do I turn that off? Never heard of it
Hi /p/ I make a thread not so long ago.
And here is a bunch of new shitty photos, but i really like some of this snaps. Let me know what you think!
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make FUJIFILM Camera Model FinePix S4400 Camera Software Digital Camera FinePix S4400 Ver1.01 Maximum Lens Aperture f/3.1 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Maker Note Version 0130 Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2012:01:05 05:09:17 Exposure Time 1/250 sec F-Number f/5.6 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 64 Lens Aperture f/5.6 Brightness 8.6 EV Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Shade Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 24.20 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1674 Image Height 1254 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Manual Scene Capture Type Standard Sharpness Hard Subject Distance Range Unknown Sharpness Hard White Balance Cloudy Chroma Saturation Normal Flash Mode Off Macro Mode Off Focus Mode Auto Slow Synchro Mode Off Picture Mode Manual Exposure Continuous/Bracketing Mode Off Blur Status OK Focus Status OK Auto Exposure Status OK
28 Posts / 14 Images
View this topic
>>
File: DSCF2557.jpg (2MB, 3072x2304px) Image search:
[Google]
2MB, 3072x2304px
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make FUJIFILM Camera Model FinePix S4400 Camera Software Digital Camera FinePix S4400 Ver1.01 Maximum Lens Aperture f/3.1 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Maker Note Version 0130 Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2012:01:01 00:16:14 Exposure Time 1/1200 sec F-Number f/4.8 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 64 Lens Aperture f/4.8 Brightness 10.4 EV Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Shade Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 13.25 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 3072 Image Height 2304 Rendering Custom Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Manual Scene Capture Type Standard Sharpness Hard Subject Distance Range Unknown Sharpness Hard White Balance Cloudy Chroma Saturation Unknown Flash Mode Off Macro Mode Off Focus Mode Auto Slow Synchro Mode Off Picture Mode Manual Exposure Continuous/Bracketing Mode Off Blur Status OK Focus Status OK Auto Exposure Status OK
>>
>>2893224
In case there are more, resize them before the autists find the thread
>>
>>2893224
>Let me know what you think!
you fucking suck.
File: whynot.jpg (35KB, 807x404px) Image search:
[Google]
35KB, 807x404px
Is there a way to make a lens projected image smaller, so the camera gets full image coverage (ie. actual focal length) regardless of sensor size?
There should be an optical way to do this.
24 Posts / 4 Images
View this topic
>>
>>2893220
Yes, there already is: http://www.metabones.com/products/?c=speed-booster
Focal condensers are not a new concept, it's just there hasn't been a good reason for anyone to manufacture them, until the spread of MFT and APS-C cameras for video.
Historically, Stanley Kubrik had a custom one made for him when he shot Barry Lyndon, giving his lens an effective aperture of f/0.7, for shooting a scene lit entirely by candle light.
>>
You're describing a metabones speedbooster
File: download.jpg (7KB, 225x225px) Image search:
[Google]
7KB, 225x225px
Reviews on the Canon 70D anyone?
15 Posts / 1 Images
View this topic
>>
I can answer you on /gear/ thread...
>>
>>2892381
80d is better.
/thread
>>
>>2892381
The 7D is better.
/thread
File: a233333.jpg (384KB, 1000x668px) Image search:
[Google]
384KB, 1000x668px
Hi /p/
I'm struggling with the pic related picture. I want to erase the parts that I've marked in red, but I have failed since I'm not very good with PS and LR. I was wondering if you guys know how to remove that parts using PS or LR. And which software amongst them you prefer.
I've tried with the PS clone tool, but it is not working for me due to the different tone of the "sky" (the cloned parts are more clear than the parts that I want to cover).
Any suggestion will be highly appreciated.
Thank you.
p.s.: girl on pic related is my gf.
NEF file: http://www52.zippyshare.com/v/etuzjVsk/file.html
JPEG file: http://www75.zippyshare.com/v/F7Y2dvGU/file.html
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make NIKON CORPORATION Camera Model NIKON D600 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.8 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Color Filter Array Pattern 966 Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 28 mm Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 6016 Image Height 4016 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2016:07:28 23:47:46 Exposure Time 1/15 sec F-Number f/2.8 Exposure Program Not Defined ISO Speed Rating 100 Lens Aperture f/2.8 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 28.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1000 Image Height 668 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Gain Control None Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal Subject Distance Range Unknown
25 Posts / 7 Images
View this topic
>>
>>2891694
Bump!
>>
>>2891694
it can only be done with the clone tool. it's hard. next time compose with this in mind
>>
>>2891717
I took other pictures, but I actually liked this capture since it is broader.
When I took this one I was thinking on editing and deleting those objects, but didn't know that It would be that hard.
Whats the deal with this guy? I cant tell if hes a total autist or worthwhile
48 Posts / 5 Images
View this topic
>>
Dork with a big following. Needs to get over himself.
>>
autist
>>
FRO
File: received_10155027863119622.jpg (220KB, 2048x1365px) Image search:
[Google]
220KB, 2048x1365px
So I've posted a few of my beer shots here before and I've gotten awesome feedback and advice. I've taken all of it and I have my best shot to date. Here is a 100% unedited shot taken on my nikon d3300 with a kit lense.
40 Posts / 6 Images
View this topic
>>
>>2891171
post more
>>
also, doesnt matter if edited or not lol its not too much of a big deal; editing.
>>
>>2891171
Man, I can honestly see that you took advice from those previous thread. I think that this is by far the most pleasing shot you've given us.
Since this is unedited, I won't go nuts with comments, but a couple of things jump out at me:
1) That blade of grass in the top right corner cuts off the whole corner. It's weird since it's in the OoF background, but it's still distracting.
2) I'd editing is to that the can is a little bright and the colors on the can a little truer to natural colors. There seems to be some color casts dulling it.
3) The glass in the background is leading. I wish it was straight.
4) I feel like the composition is a little heavy on the left end of the frame. But, I do like the relationship between the can and the glass.
Seriously, though, you've gotten better.
File: my sister and I.jpg (400KB, 1080x1329px) Image search:
[Google]
400KB, 1080x1329px
I want to take pictures of women naked.
I'm a big dude and can be charismatic when I try, not Uncle Terry status but maybe a young uncle terry...
I aspire to be like him so much, taking pictures of beautiful women naked and who knows what it may lead to.
I live in southern california, how do I go about finding women to shoot naked?
How do I carry myself as an amateur photographer when it comes to shooting nude women?
Do you guys have any suggested readings or any famous photographers who shoot naked women?
I would be willing to pay women to shoot them nude, but I would like to find a way to have them open up to me and want to express their inner desires of exhibition.
33 Posts / 2 Images
View this topic
>>
>>2889228
It would seem to me you're trying to take pictures of naked women for the wrong reasons.
You sound creepy to be honest.
>>
>>2889231
hence my reference to uncle terry
>>
Maybe you should just hire hookers and shoot them desu.
Then you can whip out your micro four thirds for them.
Anonymous
How does /p/ bring home the bacon. 2016-07-20 03:21:01 Post No.2886477
[Report] Image search: [Google]
How does /p/ bring home the bacon. 2016-07-20 03:21:01 Post No.2886477
[Report] Image search: [Google]
File: Screen Shot 2016-04-25 at 12.08.29 AM.png (388KB, 716x672px) Image search:
[Google]
388KB, 716x672px
How does /p/ bring home the bacon.
Anonymous
2016-07-20 03:21:01
Post No. 2886477
[Report]
[View this topic]
We all love photography, we are all familiar with gear, and we know how to shitpost. But how the fuck do we make money. Do you make money on shoots? What do you do, how did it start? Do yo u make money elsewhere and snap shit on the side?
I thinks /p could benefit from a intelligent thread and share our business knowledge to make photography a living like so many others do.
That being said I am interested in the commercial side, so products and studios and whatnot. I have assisted for a little bit, but fucked up somewhere and have not been called back. Networking is a huge aspect of the photo biz (anyone interested in starting a /p Slack ch.??) but how do you talk work as a lover of photography as well? Do you even talk about potential gigs, and if so when?
I have so many questions and think that there may be more you out there with similar ones.
25 Posts / 3 Images
View this topic
>>
I suck more dick networking and trying to network than I do taking photos. Go to wedding shows, photography meet ups, email photographers in your town, if your in college out university than check if there any clubs.
>>
>>2886477
I think that where do you live has a great influence in which kind of photography you´ll be able to make a profitable business of. The sad truth is that most of commercial work is focused in LA and NY. Not only most big companies, with real budgets, the ones we all dream with are in those places but the production companies, eq rental houses, etc are there too. Many companies fly just to shoot even if they´re not located there.
You wanna play with the big boys? You have to move to the big cities.
Assisting is a great way to start, probably your best chances are there. You´ll probably something every single time you get a gig, if you don´t, it means you´re working for the wrong people.
Ideally you´ll freelance assisting while building you´re own portfolio on the side, now you have a team of professionals looking to expand they´re own skills (the people you meet while assisting) and you have better and more refined skills.
Once you have a decent portfolio is time to knock doors and sell, sell sell.
It sounds like a long run, but somebody said.."don´t worry if something will take a very long time to be accomplished, the time will pass anyway" or something like that
>>
you´ll probably LEARN something*...
File: W_HISTORIC_BH-1.jpg (1MB, 5472x2736px) Image search:
[Google]
1MB, 5472x2736px
Post your automotive pics and ask questions about automotive photography here.
Previous thread hit image limit. >>2820189
Old School Edition
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.5 (Windows) Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2016:05:29 09:04:09 Color Space Information sRGB
273 Posts / 151 Images
View this topic
>>
File: HISTORIC_BH_RE-3.jpg (2MB, 4398x2199px) Image search:
[Google]
2MB, 4398x2199px
Been working on film style edits in preparation for a classic F1 meeting yesterday.
Thoughts?
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.5 (Windows) Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2016:05:29 12:06:40 Color Space Information sRGB
>>
>>2850742
Nice, I like it. Pls post process guidelines.
>>
File: RE_EDIT-10.jpg (3MB, 5472x2736px) Image search:
[Google]
3MB, 5472x2736px
>>2850745
Edited in Lightroom.
>Sharpened and luminescence first.
>Added contrast, clarity and vibrance, removed some saturation.
>Added shadows and dropped blacks a little.
>Went in to split toning, kept highlights as is, but changed shadows to a more "yellowy" effect and played about with the balance.
>Went to HSL/Colour/B&W and clicked B&W
>Added "graduated filter to areas around cars.
>Dropped whites and added some highlights.
Basically spent the last week playing about with B&W and colour editing to try get some film style effects. Did pic related a few days ago too.
Just give it a go and see how it comes out, you can always start over fresh in Adobe suites with no issues.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.5 (Windows) Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2016:05:29 12:36:03 Color Space Information sRGB