never shot a gun. the bullet isn't supposed to be like this right?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lWKxd4vrlXo
@2:40 and 3:50
>>31615183
No it isn't
>>31615183
That is not a bullet, that is the entire cartridge.
>>31615200
so its just like an editing goof?
>.338 Lapua Magnum for $720
Am I missing something /k/, or does that seem right for a used Savage 111? Is this too good to be true? Pic related.
Also, post Armslist funnies.
>>31615057
They run about $900-1K new IIRC.
>>31615090
Ah, that is looking about right. I feel like I'd be spending double that on optics just to use it correctly.
Can be had brand new for <$1200 OTD. $720 is not too far off. Price alone doesn't set off my scam detector. Being on armslist, who knows if it is legit?
How used? Most likely less than 20 rounds, when owner decided they have no actual use for it, ammo is extremely expensive, and everyone at the range absolutely hates you now.
And, do you have an actual use for a 338lapua hunting rifle?
Who would win in a fight of nazi military vs 10 millions colossal titans?
>>31614857
>Not 10 million ordinary titan lead by the Ape Titan and by the Armored Titan
Nigga, do you even read the book
>>31614857
A stick obviously.
>>31614857
the marines I think right?
Because the winning move is not to play
Hey /k/, just bought this DL-44 for 500 credits.
Did I do good, or should I have gone for a DC-15 instead?
>>31614768
>thinking about buying Empire exclusive equipment
It's like you want your droids shot.
>That fat limp-dicked bastard thought defiling a broomhandle was the best way to make a prop for his shitty space opera.
>>31614768
>Star Wars
So, /k/. If the US were to become an evil dictatorship and declare war on the rest of the world, who would win?
Obviously that would never happen, given that the US isn't only the major military power but also the major economic power, and given that the US props the rest of the world up with its spending habits. We know that, autists, thank you. Just a for fun question.
>>31614724
>winners in a nuclear holocaust
dunno maybe Barbados cuz no one nuking barbados
>>31614767
Shit. Yeah, I meant to put no nukes. I assume that in the event of a massive modern war nobody would use nukes except for loose cannon countries in order to preserve at least some of the species.
>>31614791
One person uses nukes, everyone uses Nukes. There is no winning in WWIII. We got too good at killing each other
/k/ringe and rage thread
>That dented heatshield
>That bent barrel
>>31614774
>SPAS-12 with a full stock
Nothing of value was lost
Can anyone tell me who makes this plate carrier, or any helpful information about it?
bump
kinda looks like a banshee
>>31614254
Hey you got my pic, its an R-Karbid Cubano Cortes
http://www.r-karbid.com/katalog/razgruzochnye-sistemy/plejt-kerriery/plitonosec-cubano-cortes
Why did Spain and Portugal join NATO? Considering their location Soviets were hardly any threat to them.
>>31614247
Because everyone but Serbs Russians and slavaboos absolutely hate Russians.
>>31614247
Because Francisco Franco hated communists more that you can possibly imagine.
Portugal has been in a 700 year alliance with Britain and Spain is still extremely butthurt that the soviets stole their gold and never gave it back.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moscow_gold
This needs to happen. I'll start:
Bulgarian Commercial Model with East German grip
>Makarovs are just shitty Walthers
this thread is rightful deutsch clay
>>31614116
Bulgarian with custom grips
>>31614141
>paying money for someone to bubba a P1
>calling it a P38k
Low energy
Intermediate Rifle General
All intermediate caliber rifles allowed. ARs, Minis, AKs, HK93s, you name it!
>Diversity Edition
Old thread not found.
>>31614138
So fucking jelly of that SG... Can you post more of it pls?
>>31614089
>So fucking jelly of that SG... Can you post more of it pls?
Hello /k/
I've been doing my research, and for my first gun, I've come down to two choices: Maverick 88, or an SKS. Mav 88 is cheap and looks like a nice shotgun, but I've always had a thing for surplus rifles (Mosins, SKSs). But with SKS prices only going up, should I shell out more money for one before they get even more expensive, or stick with the shotgun?
>>31614068
shotgat as firstgat is bestgat
http://www.cabelas.ca/product/78682/russian-sks-semi-auto-rifle-w-laminate-stock
>>31614068
sks aint worth it anymore
just buy shotblat and an ar15 when u av money
Im looking for a cartridge that can hunt and kill anything from squirrels to mountain lions, to the occasional black bear. Only the squirrel cant get destroyed by the shot, i want to still be able to eat it.
With one caveat: it'll get fired out of a short barrel (10" or less), and without a stock bc muh atf. Meaning preferably not a round that will make a fireball out of a short barrel and give away my position
Pic related is what the gun would look like in theory
>>31614003
You would be far better served with a 10/22 + a .44mag revolver than trying to get one caliber to do everything.
>>31614003
Let me tell you from experience that squirrels are absolutely vaporized by .30 carbine. The parameters you've set are unrealistic. Abandon the pistol/sbr/aow idea, get a 20ga shotgun and suddenly the taking of tiny to large game much more feasible.
>>31614032
hell make that a takedown 10/22 and you will be gtg
Has the idea of laser weapons been completely dropped for rail guns and caseless ammo?
No, but there are still major problems and lasers will never be used against anything but soft targets.
>>31613906
lasers, rail guns, and caseless ammo are all memes
The problem with rail guns and lasers is that the batteries aren't there yet. They're too large and expensive.
Rail guns are going to be a thing, but they are going to basically need an entire ship built around them. Lasers won't be a thing for a very long time since you just need absurd shitloads of power to have any range on them, and caseless ammo currently has so many problems with it that I have no idea when it's going to be a thing, if ever.
Here's my retarded and uneducated complete guess at when these things will become viable military munitions:
Rail guns - 2020
Lasers - 2080
Caseless ammo - ???
>>31613972
Haven't DEW been deployed already?
Sunday Battle Rifle Thread!
here is mine. replacing the shitty walmart 1-4 and rings, maybe with a vortex strike eagle 1-6 - and the stock with an archangel. open to suggestions.
>>31613850
if you put one of those shit fuck archangel stocks on it, you should have your gun taken away, the wood stock put back on, and then have your teeth bashed down your throat with the proper metal butt of that rifle.
>>31613850
Kill yourself
>>31613850
what is that? it looks pretty good. I dont know much about rifles
i'm curios if anyone out there has heard about the welrod pistol used by the british
>>31613700
I also played medal of Honor Frontline.
Most OP weapon ever built
No, never ever in my life have I heard about it, tell us more!