Archived threads in /gd/ - Graphic Design - 174. page

>>262036
binbox
.io/vre4S#FO3HAWO8

>can't even pirate photoshop

>>262038
Okay but i already used up my free trial so its to late to do that
(right?)

>>262036
Go on any decent torrent site like kickasstorrents and find the most popular photoshop torrent (current if possible) and follow the directions provided with the torrent.
CC may be somewhat more difficult than CS6 to crack but it's worth it.

File: gator_made.pdf (1B, 486x500px)

1B, 486x500px

First of all, there too much details.
Do you know what minimalist is?

It's basically the for-front of modern design, using little to no detail to create a visually stunning logo. [3]

If you need more insight, see half the posts on this board, otherwise here's an example of your improved logo.
>pic related

Using basic geometries shape I outline the face of the lizigator and using basic, sans-serif type (that means no spikey hard line). Next time do not try too hard and make a minimal logos.

Depends on what it is and how you are going to use it.

As a corporate logo it sucks ass.

As a clothing brand it's ok. Would try to simplify the colors and make the mark and type work separately to ensure more options when it comes to clothing.

>>260885
Wow, not even sure if trolling

Guess that says more about the state of /gd/ than anything.

>>260752
A story of a king who loves his daughter so much he keeps her locked away in a dungeon under his house.

>>260753

I've read a similar story from Greek Mythology.

I think it will be best if it's something like The Boy Who Cried Wolf

>>260762
Yes but instead of a boy make it a girl and instead of wolf make it rape.

Logos are about recognition, above all else. Could someone visually improve upon the Starbucks logo? Yeah, probably. But at the cost of losing brand recognition, its just not worth it.

>>260317
only Mercedes logo could work, the rest are bad.

>>260317
In a vacuum, I don't think the Nike, Starbucks, Mercedes or Coke logos are bad, but I don't think they work with the brand for various reasons, mostly what >>260319 said (especially for Coke and Disney).

The Apple logo is regressive, the Target logo doesn't really say anything, the Disney logo just doesn't look right and the FedEx logo tries too hard to preserve the arrow of its predecessor.

>>259679
needs tweaking

File: BLEACHLOGO.png (803KB, 6500x3216px) Image search: [Google]

803KB, 6500x3216px

IVE BEEN WAITING FOR SOMEWHERE TO POST THIS BABY

http://www.toxel.com/inspiration/2011/07/26/companies-swapped-logos/

https://www.printsome.com/blog/2016/brand-logo-swap/

ayy someones into good music

>>261785
You could work on the bulb a bit. In the thumbnail it's passably recognizable, but it doesn't hold up well at larger sizes, because it doesn't do a good job of implying a screw-in base. The "production" part looks kind of odd just centered like that. I'd try setting it at a larger size and make an attempt to integrate it with the Just light, or I would set it slightly smaller and alight it flush left after where the descender in the g would be.

>>261789
I'll try that, thanks.
production was insisted by customer so I had no idea where to put it so it would fit

I think the bulb would be nice on top of the 'i' instead of it being incorporated into a 'g', since it currently looks more like "Just Lioht" to me. You could also try putting the bulb to a bit of a slant, but I don't know if that would work as well.

File: adobe_photo_shop.jpg (65KB, 450x320px) Image search: [Google]

65KB, 450x320px

>>261625

Oh, and aside from that, freelance feels in general I guess.

scrubby zoom has you now, learn to love it.

>>261629
this...

This may not be /b/ but...

>The stories and information posted here are artistic works of fiction and falsehood.
>Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact.

>>260571
how come there isn't any black people on gd? i've been doing stuff for almost 5 years and never seen or heard about any black gd'ers.

how come graphic desgin is my passion if i havent even bought a logo in the photo-shop?
sry to disprove you

>>261681
Could you elaborate that question please?
I don't really understand what you're trying to get at, maybe post a prototype you've made?

>>261681
http://www.lmgtfy.com/?q=logotype

Are you moving them between Illustrator files? I'd be double-checking what your colour settings are and making sure they're the same. Generally, if you're working in an RGB colourspace and moving into a CMYK colourspace, the colours may not appear as vibrant as they do in RGB because they'll be outside the colour's gammut range, and will instead look less saturated/duller.

Hopefully that makes sense!

>>261829
perfect, I just had to change it to RGB. thank you so much!

>>261832
No worries! Its an easy mistake to make and its even easier to fix. If you are planning on printing whatever it is you're working on though, your colours will be dull.

But if you're work is going to be online/digital, then its no worries!

check the current photo printer bundle deals. Then search for those specific models on eBay. People usually buy the deals for the laptop/dSLR and sell the printer for cheap.

I got a $500 13x19 photo printer for $150 this way.

>>261085
I have it. It's quality is pretty good, can print A3, I shove all kinds of paper in there and it prints like a pro. Price/quality-wise, it's pretty gud.

I got it and i love it so much. You can get cheap inks on amazon too.

>>260719
Nobody cares. Just use it

As long as you're not sending the font file, you'll probably be fine. And if you just recreated it in Illustrator, then you're golden. The license is literally only for the use of the font file itself.

>>260739
That is only true in certain countries.

Op why don't you contact dafont

File: tumblr_ni2wu5G4b11rzim2co1_500.jpg (101KB, 467x750px) Image search: [Google]

101KB, 467x750px

>>261669
You will find a large list of free stock sites here
>http://enboard.co/webdesign/

There is a lot of good stuff on Unsplash
>https://unsplash.com/

Thank you very much.