Archived threads in /fit/ - Fitness - 4441. page

bump you cucks.

We dont have these u british wank

>>39929332
And?

I don't have AIDS, but I can still console you regarding your faggotry.

protip: if a girl tell you you look bad it means your looking better than her and its making her uncomfortable

>>39928151
oh, so when a girl tells me i'm ugly i'm actually model tier looking and she is the one that is ugly and insecure?

got it

>>39928154
Yeah I'm really glad he cleared that up for me

>>39928132
Not in the am bro

>>39928132

That's cause you're a cookie cutter.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QA_3TGKExnE

File: IMG_20170107_082702.jpg (376KB, 1944x2592px) Image search: [Google]

376KB, 1944x2592px

*will lose

Whether you have moobs is up to your genetics.

Only way to get rid of em is to cut bodyfat. The gym will help, but you gotta diet. Get a good calorie counting app and stick to it.

if you have no chest muscles, especially pecs, you will look like you have tits when you are fat

You can't account for the marginal changes in your TDEE due to activity every single day. Lean bulking is inefficient purely because it relies on calorie counting as an exact science; proper bulking just entails eating enough to gain and not worrying about calories at all. Eat big and eat often. It works, whereas lean bulking categorically doesn't, otherwise it'd be the practice of every sucessful person in fitness trying to gain mass, even on steroids, which don't absolutely preclude fat gain.

>>39928086
>1.Muscle cannot be gained when cutting

This is not correct. When people say this, they are referring to how bodybuilders training for years cannot gain muscle on a cut.

You OP, can gain muscle on a cut.

2. Correct, when done properly. 33% is actually ideal.

>Now, instead, let's say you eat just above maintenance (say 50 calories over per day) ALL year round, so in a very small surplus thus a "clean bulk" and rarely if ever being required to cut, what would the gains be like compared to the typical bulk/cut method as listed above?


Minimal gains.

First of all, lean bulk, is the ideal. A lean bulk refers to +250 though.

Your body has a lot of trouble putting on muscle mass at a tiny surplus (+50). It will greatly slow the process for beginners. If you aren't a beginner, then, it is actually totally impossible.

Much, much more progress can be made in 3 months by +250 x 2 + 1 month -500 than matiencne +0 for 3 months.

>>39928110

disregard this dyel's ravings

It is either a bait post or seriously misguided.

The ideal bulk is calculated, slow, and steady. If you try to eat at a gigantic +1000 surplus like he does, you are gaining maybe an extra 1% muscle mass (maybe), trading it for having to cut exactly FOUR times longer.

This obviously fucks up your progress.

The body can only really benefit from a 250-500 surplus, anything over that is getting fat needlessly.

This board is very toxic around new years. Beware anyone saying stuff that doesn't make sense logically like

>proper bulking involves not worrying about calories at all

>>39928110
What you are saying makes a lot of sense, I guess part of what I'm getting at is the nominal value of the typical calorie surplus

500 calories is a lot to be adding on per day - 250 seems to make more sense and won't be subject to the issue you raised, in addition to the fact it will probably reduce the cutting phase, resulting in an overall efficiency nearer to 80% (excuse my overuse of these calculations - just hard to communicate what i'm trying to say without them)

Plus the face you'll be looking how you want to look for more of the year round

Pin to win faggot

File: 754322_370.jpg (34KB, 320x240px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 320x240px

yes they are
pic related is the average australian

>>39928091
Dingo chewed off her arms when she was a baby

File: Screenshot_2017-01-07-22-15-37.jpg (93KB, 1075x260px) Image search: [Google]

93KB, 1075x260px

Can't stand this cunt.

File: Capture.png (415KB, 1510x469px) Image search: [Google]

415KB, 1510x469px

Can't stand this cunt.

File: 1483137764122.jpg (27KB, 489x499px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 489x499px

You mad because he is natty?

Deadlifts, squats, ohp, benchpress if your lack of height is a posture issue. increased my height from 6' king of manlets to 6'1

Exercise won't improve your genetics though.

File: ManletMantra.jpg (574KB, 1842x1594px) Image search: [Google]

574KB, 1842x1594px

>>39927957
The manlet mantra comes to mind

>>39927957
If you are young and still growing doing any kinds of exercises (swimming, boxing, basketball), getting loads of sleep and eating healthy will help you reach your maximum potential height. Stretchings also work only if you are young, as you bones aren't very dense then, so you can stretch them which may give you max up to 1 inch

please ease tell me why you always hatin x2
why you? x2
please ease tell me why you always hatin x2
why you x2

drake

too real and too different than what people who lift weights tell themselves for 99.9% of /fit/ to actually admit it's true

>>39927918
This is pretty accurate actually.

ife youve got any money, got to some asian superstore and get red lentels theyre dirt cheap and you can survive easily on them

m8 those feet are fucked up


still would tho

>>39927852
You don't even have enough staple food in your home to survive a couple of days? Wtf man get a fucking fridge, buy oats and rice in bulk. What are you gonna fucking do if there is ever some kind of natural disaster and you need to survive a couple days before help arrives..

the idea that food can be healthy or unhealthy is actually literally THE most stupid meme in the whole fitness and health world. just forget about it

>>39927777
>The fat molecules are the same in chicken versus junk food. (Just different quantities)
no they're not
take your quads and fuck off with your shit b8

>writing all this out for a 2/10 b8

People realy try hard these days

how many eggz?

File: 0003028_real-food-egg-white-crystals.png (595KB, 578x921px) Image search: [Google]

595KB, 578x921px

>>39927766
>scooping eggs when you can scoop this

>>39927770
A gorillion.

>>39927722
You should have waited another 6 months.

>>39927722
>shit tattoo
>lives in some kind of public toilet
>no back

1/10

>>39927781
Love 4chan,where all the bullied boys can express their anger,More usefull than a 100d/h psychologist

>>39927707
>ohp 98

Are these measurements in lbs or kgs?
Because how tf did you get 98 lbs ohp?

>>39927714
Gotta be a calculated 1rm

>>39927714
Not OP but they look like lbs to me also OP youre doing something severely wrong if 3 months in youre at 110lbs(50kg) bench and 98lbs(45kg) ohp unless youve never lofted before. Have you tried lowering reps with higher weight? Worked for me to get past plateau then up the reps again. Sure its not a pyschological problem of not being able to break the barrier?

File: IMG_0851.jpg (170KB, 750x1334px) Image search: [Google]

170KB, 750x1334px

>>39927706
In terms of testosterone only, you're correct. There's about a 10% margin in strength difference between enhanced and natural lifters using only testosterone.

Your concepts are flawed regardig gear use; gear creates permanent physiological adaptations. Also lol it still takes years to get big on gear, I'm only 255.

DESU don't gear up unless you make money with your body.

>>39927719
You have a solid physqiue; you're probably tall bro.

Honestly, I'd prefer a big roided look over a strong natty look. I may consider the enhanced option in my mid to late 20s; if i don't have much going for my life around those times.

Anyways what your end goal from all this gear usage?

>>39927736
To be big. If I can't hit a solid 275 lean in 2 years, I'll stick to just 500 test cruise.