Archived threads in /3/ - 3DCG - 153. page

>>521701

If you want to see if you like jewellery start by making wax then attach a feeder and cup then make a plaster cylinder around that and you can pour liquid silver in that. Then just melt it and start another one to save money. Way cheaper than any other way to do it. Can even make your own centrifuge if you want

>>521701
>I'm a cinematographer. Award winning, better than many.
proof?

for jewelry design, a lot of people use Rhinoceros, rhinoceros+zbrush, or rhinogold

its only good if heavily modded with scripts.

My advice : use zmodeller until a good VR modeller comes out.

it's good

>Would you consider the workflow for hard surface modeling any better than Max

yes

it takes longer to git gud though

>>519459

I use max and Modo

If you don't heavily use the stack in max its fine to switch to.

It doesn't have splines really and I think the material editor in max is better. The next edition is going to be game focused and should bring a lot of improvements.

>>522398
mari used to be good, then the updates turned it into noodle tier.

substance is low tier.

photoshop is the real shit, god tier

>>522400
I went from Photoshop to substance designer.
Texturing in photoshop feels archaic in comparison.
>Not being able to see what you're working on as you make chamges across the albedo, metallic, roughness, normal, and emissive maps.

But Mari is
>Industry standard
right?
And was expensive as hell for years.
Can I use Mari to texture game props, characters etc?

>>522398

It's not good for pbr yet. Painting channels is super convoluted.

use alpha sheets for hair
fix the face
use flat shading

>>520906
It looks like shit, anon.

>>520906
face and hair looks bad, the rest looks mediocre but not bad

File: Road Diffuse.jpg (48KB, 1024x512px) Image search: [Google]

48KB, 1024x512px

>>521964
here is the original road i tried to use in 3ds max, but only the yellow lines would appear

>>521965
Look up unwrapping tutorials.

>>521964
In the picture you going to have to rotate the uvs or scale them down on the x axis. I don't what you are talking about in regards to the road though

File: that's a name I have not heard in a long time.jpg (21KB, 454x330px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 454x330px

Bryce...

File: XanadesFjord.png (3MB, 2560x1440px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 2560x1440px

Nevermind, I figured it out. You have to go to the preferences section and click on "expert mode." This unlocks the larger rendering sizes.

Only problem is that I cannot get it to export 3840 x 2160 successfully as it hangs in an infinite loop when I export the .pict file.

2560 x 1440 works though, derp.

File: 001.jpg (527KB, 1490x1089px) Image search: [Google]

527KB, 1490x1089px

>>522660

at first i thought u were talking shit about my name, but then I googled Bryce 3D.


Jesus

>>520213
preety simple, try to subdivide that model.
Tris and quads are both correct, but for diferent purposes

>>520213
> being this fucking retarded

Did you ever export anything ever into any fileformat op?
You're a fucking idiot.

>>520217
it deforms like hell when I subdivide it

>>522632

>He used blender

show the model

also when unwrapping a big model never unwrap everything at once

File: model.jpg (67KB, 830x752px) Image search: [Google]

67KB, 830x752px

>>522635
>show the model
pic related. i got it separated into a couple of objects. exterior, interior and furnishing are different objects

Whats the difference ?

>>518778
mostly in terms of the workflow.

>>518778
also, there's a chance you may end up with very fucked up topologies and a lot of unnecesary detail and extra vertexes if you do vertex modelling for low poly shit.

meanwhile if you try to do box modelling, you will end up with a cleaner topology and using only what is needed.

Theferore box modelling is the correct approach for low poly models.

its like asking 'is porn still a thing ?'

>>519273
Okay, I know teenagers who are spaming sadpanda with shit tier cgi porn use it, but should someone who generaly makes scenery and environment modeling but still likes to make the livelier with costumized human models use it, change it to daz, or is it some better alternatives which doesn't require pirating teh thousan add-on and model to actually being usable?

>>519272
>>519276

How is this a question?

If you can't model for shit and still need make sceneries for whatever reason you use Poser and if you don't even have money, Daz. Wasn't that fucking hard, was it?

I guess there's also stuff like iPose or whatever that shit is called and of course the SFM if you want to make shitty MLP 3D or Heavy vs. Scout porn.

>>522039
I bought a $500 video card once. I felt really dumb when I got it desu. A few years later it was so worthless I just threw it away.

>>522039

Why did I buy this crappy 970. Getting a 1070 and 2tb ssd by the end of the year.

>>522040
>A few years later it was so worthless I just threw it away.
That's any technology.
Based on this logic you shouldn't be buying a SSD ever because the prices are coming down like the Hindenburg all the time

>>522566

As much money as you can make making a low poly animu original OVA.

Well, no one is going to invest in you're unknown and have no track record. So let's scratch that possibility.

Your only other option at that point is ad revenue, most likely from having your video youtube.

If you're using simple shaders etc, you won't have to worry about a render farm assuming the PC you are using isn't complete shit. Otherwise you'll have to pay for that.

You'll also have to pay for any software licenses since you using them commercially. So either work with free programs or factor that into your cost.

You'll need someone to compose music for you.
You'll need a foley artist.
You'll need voice actors.

Granted you COULD do all these things yourself, but you'll need the equipment to do so, otherwise your work will look/sound like shit & will never go viral in any shape or form.

And you pretty much NEED to have your video go viral, because otherwise there is no way an unknown youtube channel is going to make any money at all.

Then you have to factor in time, and wether or not making this will help you in the future. If you spend 6 months making something presentable, could you have been using your time in another way?

Minimum wage is $10/hr where I live. Estimate how many hours you'll spend making this + the cost of everything involved & then ask yourself if you honestly think you'll make that cash back in ad revenue.

Not saying don't do it, but I wouldn't expect to make anything off it realistically.

>>522566
You mean like RWBY? It all boils down to how appealing your Chinese cartoon girls are. This is the law of all anime.

reading comprehension/10

>>521645
I know it needs 8 track points between frames, but I already put over 200 around the video.

still can't find which frames are the ones that have less than 8.

press a on markers window press track reconstruct solve camera

>>522485
If you want I can fuck your mom and we'll mocap it.

File: BWAHAHAHAHA.png (10KB, 231x218px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 231x218px

>>522485
BWAHAHAHAHA, good luck with that.
Illusion software has recently released another sexy beach with motion capture data... of the girls WALKING AROUND, the fucking were all hand animated, as always.
Or either you get your girlfriend getting up in the ass on mocap, or you´ll have to keyframe the whole thing by hand. I know i´ll have to do it on my upcoming hentai game.

>>522488
> ur mum
jesus christ this guy is everywhere

>>519301
I hope he didnt pay for that

>>519301
Oh cool, I've actually heard some of his music before. Retrowave ftw.

>>519302
this