Archived threads in /3/ - 3DCG - 154. page

File: image.jpg (73KB, 1124x885px) Image search: [Google]

73KB, 1124x885px

>>521856

Calling us niggers then using nigger tier software.

File: white-noise2[1].jpg (315KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]

315KB, 1024x768px

blender is awesome. just look at the kickass render I made. I don't get why nobody switches to blender

File: 1453052662365.jpg (25KB, 579x329px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 579x329px

>>521872
It only counts as Nigger software if it's stolen.

>>522404
after effects is for retards
nuke is for real brehs

>>522404
Im AE vet but Nuke is probably better anon.

Nuke is infinitely better than AE. They don't even compare.

>>522498

Uncharted 3? Do you mean 4.
If not the models are already on xnalara deviant art

Are the originals on xnalara DA? if so, then perfect, but if theyre remakes, its not the ones im looking for though. I was hoping to open these .pak's and use the originals

>>522506

http://luxox18.deviantart.com/art/Uncharted-3-Nathan-Drake-Desert-587751061

It's the original Drake. Sorry I confused uncharted with the last of us so that's all that's available. Maybe ask the guy how he extracted it. He probably used an extractor from xentax.

more like wat to 10

>>522013
Why?

>>522010

No wire frame?

3 years for me.

You'll never be a good modeler if you only have one program in your work flow too.

>>522385
What else do you recommend then?

>>522384
To do what?

renders

>>522057
>without textures
>with broken specular effects

Easy as shit to use booleans now, but I haven't used blender. Perhaps the devs haven't implemented updated algorithms.

>>522348
cgpeers.
registering opens on the 15th

>>522349
i know, but i need them DESPËRATELY, any place not private where i can find them?

>>522353
http://rutracker.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=4747496

Because nobody really gives a shit and Blender Org has no means to enforce their rules.

>>522282

Blender users are just grateful for anything that makes their software usable.

>>522284
>i'm too dumb to remember a handful of commands
then you should probably go back to play-doh

too much chromatic aberration (why would this shot even have CA?)
camera position and FoV makes it feel like a security camera. Generally interior shots are more believable the closer the shot is to a human eye.
Too much bloom on the light to the left.
The carpet looks too "new". Try add some wear around the edges, like flattened parts.
reflections and basically everything feels too clean. add a mask to smudge some of the reflections.
Add some water in/on the sink / bath / tiles around the bath.
the edge of the window has some weird linear dodge effect.

>>521533
What a depressing bathroom

>>521533
>reflections and basically everything feels too clean.
Not everyone is a disgusting basement dweller like you.

>>521861
you'll get reported very quick and you'll lose all you put into it and thousands more

>>521862
People sell fanwank bullshit at cons all the time. Artists sell drawings of copyrighted characters, for instance. They don't really give a shit.

Make a few for yourself, show them off on a website, and make more on commission. That's much safer. Cons are risky and a gray area. Some companies care, others don't. Some care about certain things and not others.

Yeah, people do it all the time, but con booths get shut down more often and get in more trouble than bloggers making commission work.

This is fucking retarded dude. If you want to learn how to do shit from the 90's, study hand drawn animations, cel animation, use a VCR to run footage through. Don't waste your money on shit like this. You can create anything in new systems

>>518676
some people want a self contained retro solution that they can just plug in and go without booting up some retarded nu skool programs / os

File: 0fJqRZy.gif (1003KB, 500x269px) Image search: [Google]

1003KB, 500x269px

>>518665
speaking as someone who happen to do stuff in the 1990's.

I'll explain how you model something, you either use a very expensive program that was very hard to use.

Or.

You write the model in a text editor, You write out each point for the model assuming you did everything correctly it should work.

File: A.png (18KB, 250x671px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 250x671px

>>522069
low poly

File: B.png (20KB, 371x671px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 371x671px

>>522070
high poly

they look exactly the same.
why the fuck are you baking?

>>>/g/

The main thing you should be looking at is the precision of the printer. 50 microns is about the width of an A4 paper but there are printers that can print with 10 micron precision. It's literally impossible to see any stepping artifacts with those. Some of the 200 micron printers are good and cheap as well but they show clear stepping artifacts so you'll have to decide what kind of tradeoff you wanna do.

I suggest you look at the series for Makerbot, Replicator, Zortrax and Ultimaker.

File: 21861330221_1f45902e58_b.jpg (102KB, 768x1024px) Image search: [Google]

102KB, 768x1024px

>>521890
Couldn't you just use the 200~ and sand it a bit?

File: 13036453_10209417010730686_1866057515_o.jpg (60KB, 1134x720px) Image search: [Google]

60KB, 1134x720px

>>519723
Here's a cockpit thingy that goes in front of the first pic

All of that stuff can be modeled using primitives, the bend modifier and splines. No plugins needed.

need it for what exactly?

File: frog.png (120KB, 960x540px) Image search: [Google]

120KB, 960x540px

5000 hours in blender

>>510425

Rare pepe.