Archived threads in /tg/ - Traditional Games - 1951. page

I don't recall any that start off with any kind of Taur except for that sci-fi furry RPG.

Besides, what type of culture and settings stuff would they offer players to pick them?

This thread will end in horse pussy

Setting: Animorphs
Game: Make a game in the Animorphs setting.

File: 126573177837.jpg (222KB, 800x800px) Image search: [Google]

222KB, 800x800px

>>51258343
>Letting dragons, undead, demons, constructs, and the other various shit adventurers fight on a daily basis be affected by a petty 150gp poison.

Wow, it's almost like you don't realize the DM can say no to that shit, or make it more expensive, or make enemies immune, or various other ways to reign it in. Sorry this isn't Pokemon where you can Spam Toxic>Protect>Recovery Move to beat legendary creatures.

>>51258343
>Such mortal drugs I have, but Mantua's law. Is death to any he that utters them.

Go ahead and buy that poison anon and have fun dealing with the consiquenses

>>51258543
So you're saying that a GM would have a vested interest in not allowing cheap (in the literal and figurative sense) access to poison in fights against demons, dragons, and so on. That's actually pretty valid, and I have to agree with you in that most GMs would rather not have poison become a major factor in combat.

But I'm saying, what if some crazy GM does? How does the game change if any asshole can dose their weapons with contact poison at any time?

also,
>Toxic on a pokemon with a very low capture rate
The goal is to take the legendary *alive.*

>>51254854
Depends on the Paladin Order, God Worshiped, and setting.

>>51254863
But what can a good paladin order/God let paladin do without questioning his morality

>>51254922
A clean death in honorable combat is ok.

Cold blooded murder of the evil in question or their minions/apprentices/whatever you want to call them is ok but the pally should feel bad about having to do it.

Tricking them is ok.

Torture and manipulation (the extended emotional kind(unless its something that is generally funny, not just funny to a select group of sociopaths)) is not ok.

Ask the GMs banning them.
If I had to guess though it'd be because people think druid means zophile.

>>51253046
Because furfags ruin everything

What system? In 3.5, Druids basically get to do everything other classes do at the same time at no cost. They're not the absolute most broken class at high optimization levels, but they're probably the most idiot-proof, and the most likely to break the game by accident.

Other systems may or may not have other problems, so you should specify.

ultramarines are cool, I hope they save us from the dumb stuff happening in 40k right now

>>51252909
you should not have posted this

>>51252903
call for the devastators brother, call for the first company too, send the terminators, we need heavy flamers to cleanse this foul infestation

File: IMG_3243.png (1MB, 841x794px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 841x794px

>>51252903
Ultramarines are dumb and I like it when they get eaten by Maulerfiends, even though Maulerfiends don't even need to eat.

I think Ultramarines are just okay. Even if I am Word Bearer.

File: mr_krabs.jpg (38KB, 551x594px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 551x594px

>>51252479
u wot? swear an me mum I'll give ye a right krumpin

Time to spend another hour cleaning bits before crashing for the night.

>>51252567
>he only has one power klaw

What a git

>>51252586
Look at the file name m8. Thats a proper ork freebooter

My GM has a box set of "Gangbusters" which is basically that setting except you play the cops. Never played it.

>>51251584
No, but I've played a 1930s pulp campaign set in Warlords-era China. It was actually surprisingly fun

>>51251584
I demand storytime!

File: the_collector_by_ae_rie-d88qp6z.png (904KB, 800x1440px) Image search: [Google]

904KB, 800x1440px

I need apprentices (magically obvious or not) and/or scholars. Scholars can be serious, bumbling, or just cutely nerdy.

My bard has a brownish skin tone, light but still notably dark (think Hispanic), short curly black hair that's long enough to cover the ears. He wears purple frilly dress clothes because bard. It'd be cool if you could draw this for me as my DM prefers to have a reference to our characters.

File: 1483915258307.jpg (108KB, 770x1038px) Image search: [Google]

108KB, 770x1038px

>>51250578

>>51250171
In /tg/?
Lack of imagination and not enough fun robots cartoons to watch.
For other aspect, visit
>>>/m/

>>51250171
They'd be in the same position as the Air Force's top planes: way too expensive to actually field because some fuckface with a cheap RPG could wreck a multi-billion dollar machine.

>>51250171
Training a pilot for it, assuming it has a full range of 3d motion. Thats not even getting into how you'd actually control it.

How short is your hair

Can you wear a skullcap without looking like you're heading to your bar mitzvah

I wear a tricorn but that's beside the point

File: rZi4vVi.jpg (137KB, 900x900px) Image search: [Google]

137KB, 900x900px

>>51250165
Just as long as you also have a small vest and periodically bang together cymbals

>>51250222
Unfortunately I have fairly thick hair. I don't keep it overly long, but skullcaps don't fit quite right.

>>51247127
D&D

>>51247164
Any specific edition? Is D&D flexible enough?

File: Y4gzYH5.png (855KB, 1012x1445px) Image search: [Google]

855KB, 1012x1445px

bump for possible help

>>51207638
I don't think that's what "partisan" is supposed to mean.

>>51207672
I think he meant partition.

>>51207638
>Player refuses to partisan player knowledge

what

what the fuck does partisan mean as a verb

>>51256642
>Pixies are overpowered
In other news: electricity, newfangled invention or witchcraft?

>Hell, looking at them now in the Monster Manual, how come they haven't just taken over all the elf forests?

Same reason the dragons didn't.

File: Pathfinder and 5e.jpg (283KB, 983x911px) Image search: [Google]

283KB, 983x911px

>>51256642
> Playing pathfinder
You deserved it to be quite honest family

>>51250253
For the CSA being independent I would say recognition from France and the UK and other European states, in particular perhaps other states that would still have slavery at that time like the Empire of Brazil or Spain, but British recognition as a major trading partner would mean the most, this could also mean perhaps an alliance that the USA wouldn't want to risk further conflict with, but European recognition in that time frame = legitimacy.

As for Mormon state, no clue.

>>51250253
>The general idea is that the two Americas are so preoccupied with one-another that the Mormons remain unmolested long enough to successfully create their nation, thereby allowing for a lot of political intrigue and a much wilder Wild West.

What's preventing the rail barons from finishing the trans-continental railroad system?

>>51250253


Hard to say, you'd probably need material aid from a great power in Europe or two, which follows with a weaker push in the south, McClellan winning the 1864 election, and a truce being arranged. Bear in mind, I don't think such a peace would last, and 1876 would be right about the right time for Civil War Round 2; given that the Union is still considerably stronger than the confederacy and is not likely to give up whatever territory they've occupied at date of the peace treaty.
>>51250478


Presumably ongoing warfare between the CSA and whatever the Union is calling itself.

>>51231665
> ITT Best characters

>>51231665
did you mistake archetype for cliche?
the provided list alone could make an interesting party

The non-straight/non-white x that has multi coloured hair that exist just to be edgy but actually brings nothing new to the table and is the definition lf a cop-out?