[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Search | Free Show | Home]

Archived threads in /p/ - Photography - 220. page

This is a blue board which means that it's for everybody (Safe For Work content only). If you see any adult content, please report it.

File: Canon EOS 5d Mark III.jpg (31KB, 500x412px) Image search: [Google]
Canon EOS 5d Mark III.jpg
31KB, 500x412px
Imagine you could buy a Canon EOS 5D Mark III for €900, but it had a shutter count of over 450.000 (while still working perfectly). Would you do it?
48 posts and 4 images submitted.
>>
[_] No.
[x] Fuck no.
>>
would you fuck a girl that was with 100 different guys before you? shes still able to fuck some more. would you?

yeah, i thought so.
>>
>>3002149
Would you care to explain? Replacing the shutter would cost between €200 and €300 and, needless to say, give you a fresh shutter.

File: IMG_0001.jpg (795KB, 2414x1609px) Image search: [Google]
IMG_0001.jpg
795KB, 2414x1609px
get a load of these b/w shots of a city + two different parties

I shot a kodak tri-x 400 roll @ 1000iso, then I had it sent it to the lab for developing saying I wanted these pushed and there's obviously been some misunderstanding somewhere

some I left dark, some I brightened in post
all have been scanned with a canon canoscan F9000, resized, most have been sharpened a bit, and everything was compressed

enjoy
35 posts and 27 images submitted.
>>
File: IMG.jpg (629KB, 1604x2199px) Image search: [Google]
IMG.jpg
629KB, 1604x2199px
>>3001974
>>
File: IMG_0002.jpg (676KB, 1609x2420px) Image search: [Google]
IMG_0002.jpg
676KB, 1609x2420px
>>3001975
>>
File: IMG_0008_crop2.jpg (240KB, 1196x1609px) Image search: [Google]
IMG_0008_crop2.jpg
240KB, 1196x1609px
>>3001978

File: 4249490_orig.jpg (143KB, 1100x355px) Image search: [Google]
4249490_orig.jpg
143KB, 1100x355px
So, I recently upgraded to an A7II from an a6000. I have the zeiss 55 1.8 and am looking to get more glass for my a7ii. My a6000 is in pretty good condition (just some scratches on the screen) and has a Samyang 12mm f/2.0 and the 16-50mm kit lens. I saw online the body/kit lens combo is going anywhere from 300 - 500 bucks used. The lens is in the range of 200 - 300 used.

I was wondering if you think it would be reasonable/doable to list it on eBay with a starting price of around 550 / 600 USD. Am I going to high or too low for this? If I can only get 400 bucks for it then I'll just keep it.

I should also mention it wouldn't include a battery because I use all of them on my new A7II.

>Fuck Sony's battery life, honestly... fuck that.
20 posts and 1 images submitted.
>>
Can I have it?
>>
>>3001652
Nobody is going to buy your fucking meme without a battery you moron, and nobody will pay a premium for your samsong trash to go with it.
Kill yourself, delet this thread, post in the gear thread.
>>
>>3001661
Dude
Do you not buy all new batteries for a used camera when you buy it?
WTF are you doing with your life?

File: 90s.jpg (185KB, 905x605px) Image search: [Google]
90s.jpg
185KB, 905x605px
Hello /p/

I know the rules. It's just that I want to know how to edit a photo to make it look like it was taken in the 90s/80s. Not necessarily by PS.

I have only two photos to describe what I mean

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS5 Macintosh
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width1024
Image Height685
Number of Bits Per Component8, 8, 8
Pixel CompositionRGB
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2013:09:22 09:25:05
Color Space InformationUncalibrated
Image Width905
Image Height605
21 posts and 11 images submitted.
>>
File: 90s2.jpg (217KB, 905x739px) Image search: [Google]
90s2.jpg
217KB, 905x739px
>>
>>3001589
why do you care?
>>
>>3001589
Just dick around in Photoshop

hey so does anyone know how to add the fibonacci spiral to pictures??

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Created2009:07:04 12:42:55
29 posts and 5 images submitted.
>>
Step 1. Google the keyswords "fibonacci spiral transparent background"
Step 2. Save one you like and use in your photo editing software (GIMP, Photoshop etc).
Step 3. Win
>>
What the heck, here ya go:
http://dariobusch.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/fibonachi-3.png
>>
You just have to kill yourself my man

Transportation Thread
21 posts and 17 images submitted.
>>
File: 2016120468.jpg (567KB, 1280x960px) Image search: [Google]
2016120468.jpg
567KB, 1280x960px
Some shots from a stakeout at the Helsinki-Vantaa airport.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeOLYMPUS IMAGING CORP.
Camera ModelE-M10
Camera SoftwareGIMP 2.8.18
Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.0
Color Filter Array Pattern1308
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution350 dpi
Vertical Resolution350 dpi
Image Created2016:12:04 17:34:17
White Point Chromaticity0.3
Exposure Time1/320 sec
F-Numberf/0.0
Exposure ProgramAperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating400
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceFine Weather
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length0.00 mm
Color Space InformationUncalibrated
Image Width1280
Image Height960
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceManual
Scene Capture TypeStandard
Gain ControlHigh Gain Up
ContrastNormal
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal
>>
File: 2016120446.jpg (577KB, 1280x960px) Image search: [Google]
2016120446.jpg
577KB, 1280x960px


[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeOLYMPUS IMAGING CORP.
Camera ModelE-M10
Camera SoftwareGIMP 2.8.18
Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.0
Color Filter Array Pattern1308
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution350 dpi
Vertical Resolution350 dpi
Image Created2016:12:04 17:24:22
White Point Chromaticity0.3
Exposure Time1/250 sec
F-Numberf/0.0
Exposure ProgramAperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating400
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceFine Weather
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length0.00 mm
Color Space InformationUncalibrated
Image Width1280
Image Height960
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceManual
Scene Capture TypeStandard
Gain ControlHigh Gain Up
ContrastNormal
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal
>>
File: 2016120460.jpg (473KB, 1280x960px) Image search: [Google]
2016120460.jpg
473KB, 1280x960px


[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeOLYMPUS IMAGING CORP.
Camera ModelE-M10
Camera SoftwareGIMP 2.8.18
Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.0
Color Filter Array Pattern1308
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution350 dpi
Vertical Resolution350 dpi
Image Created2016:12:04 17:31:04
White Point Chromaticity0.3
Exposure Time1/800 sec
F-Numberf/0.0
Exposure ProgramAperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating400
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceFine Weather
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length0.00 mm
Color Space InformationUncalibrated
Image Width1280
Image Height960
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceManual
Scene Capture TypeStandard
Gain ControlHigh Gain Up
ContrastNormal
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal

File: edward-weston-pepper-30-1930.jpg (245KB, 1000x1261px) Image search: [Google]
edward-weston-pepper-30-1930.jpg
245KB, 1000x1261px
One of the excitements of photography is the balance of meaning and form. On the one hand you have the formal point of view which is nothing but the sum and all its details within a configuration of colors, lines and volumes which compose the image. On the other hand, you have meaning, brought forth by what these images represent. A photograph of a human may appeal to mere formal perception, or it can enter into the realm of subject matter and meaning. My preference is to maintain an equilibrium of both.
22 posts and 6 images submitted.
>>
File: Nude_(1936)_-_Edward_Weston.jpg (85KB, 300x379px) Image search: [Google]
Nude_(1936)_-_Edward_Weston.jpg
85KB, 300x379px
A good example would be of a balance between the two would be Nude (Charis, Santa Monica) by Edward Weston. It is both beautiful in its formalist attributes as well as its potency in its representation of what a human is - that is to say, not seeing the human simply as a visual object, but the humanity that it represents. We see the beautiful form, the shapes that comprise it, the delicate gradation of tones, the nuances of texture and the movement of lines that lead us around the image to visit every part of this well designed composition. From a distanced and dispassioned appreciation of the image, this is the aesthetic value we can find in the image: it is beautiful simply for how it looks, never mind what it is. That same mindset is behind all formalist photography - things are beautiful for how they appear, regardless of what they are. But Weston’s nude is not purely formalist, regardless of his intentions as a photographer. His photographs Nautilus and Pepper No. 30 succeeded as beautiful photographs in the strictly formalist sense, because the potential meaning of the subjects he photographs never emerges in the composition as a point of interest. The pepper is not a pepper, it is a convoluted and dynamic form of light and shadow, powerful and struggling. The shell is not a shell, but a smooth, delicate, symmetrical form that has nothing more to do with the ocean than it does with a flower. But the subject in Nude (Charis, Santa Monica) is not a mere form, no matter how beautiful that form may be.
>>
>>3001155
Despite how well Weston holds a dispassioned and disinterested eye toward his subject, and how well he captures the beauty of his subject’s form, the subject itself is too easily recognizeable as a human being to be seen as a mere composition of lines, shapes, tones, and textures. We can never underestimate the human mind’s ability to conceptualize and attribute meaning to an object, and the moment that the figure of Weston’s subject became recognizable as the figure of a human being, It has transcended into the realm of form to subject matter. A floodgate of meaning associated with the subject in Weston’s Nude is opened up the moment we see that the subject is a human, and that the human is female, and that she is nude, and that she is holding her body, and that her body is contorted, and that she is hiding her face. It is now much more than the aesthetic beauty of the form in Weston’s photograph that attracts us, it is the emotional potency in the recognizable humanity that it represents. This is the balance of meaning and form.
>>
File: 1280[1].jpg (258KB, 1052x1280px) Image search: [Google]
1280[1].jpg
258KB, 1052x1280px
>>3001155
>>3001157

not the best example
it's obvious that nude is pure formalism: deliberate effortful pose, deliberate light (the shadows on the right arm are crucial for the pose/whole photo to work), no (human/behavioral/ambiental) spontaneity, i.e. elements of the frame which cannot be easily controlled. I believe it's easier to derive meaning from something spontaneous. in nude, the human element is just used to exploit it's (i.e. the female body) inherent aesthetic value.

there are many examples of meaningful formalism in street photography, photojournalism and even fashion photography. In early posed photography, that spontaneity is best observed in facial expressions.

(both are great great photos)

File: my_e_tablet.jpg (151KB, 1000x666px) Image search: [Google]
my_e_tablet.jpg
151KB, 1000x666px
Here is a macro shot I took of some pills? How could I improve my macro shooting abilities? I am using a Nikon D7200 and an el-cheapo macro lens. I need budget ideas on how to improve my macro shots. Please critic my photo for me so I can improve my skills with my camera. I hate to use Photoshop and would rather get the picture.

I want from my camera, so I don't have to manipulate the image on my computer unless It is absolutely necessary to use Photoshop to make the picture look good.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATION
Camera ModelNIKON D7200
Camera SoftwareVer.1.01
Maximum Lens Aperturef/3.4
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern17978
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)60 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Created2016:09:30 15:59:56
Exposure Time1/60 sec
F-Numberf/4.0
Exposure ProgramNot Defined
ISO Speed Rating1800
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash, Auto
Focal Length40.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width6000
Image Height4000
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
Gain ControlHigh Gain Up
ContrastNormal
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal
Subject Distance RangeUnknown
57 posts and 23 images submitted.
>>
File: macro1.jpg (204KB, 1000x666px) Image search: [Google]
macro1.jpg
204KB, 1000x666px
>>3000338
bump

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeCanon
Camera ModelCanon EOS DIGITAL REBEL XT
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2016:09:22 22:22:25
Exposure Time1/15 sec
F-Numberf/0.0
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating100
Lens Aperturef/inf
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length0.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width3456
Image Height2304
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
>>
>>3000358
That picture is awesome. What lens did you use to get that close up to your subject?
>>
File: LED-ringLight-test.jpg (166KB, 800x600px) Image search: [Google]
LED-ringLight-test.jpg
166KB, 800x600px
>>3000338
Short answer: light.
Light your subjects like the surface of the sun, preferably with a flash and reflectors/diffusers. But you will also need some always on light source so you can see what you are doing and focus prior to using the flash.
Ring lights are good. Several cheap LED ring lights and a transformer can be useful, but are not ideal. Many companies that make always-on led ring lights try to make them look like they are strobes, they usually aren't.
An actual strobe type ring light with a 'modelling light' that can be turned on so you can see what you are doing prior to the shot, is ideal.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakePENTAX
Camera ModelPENTAX K-5
Camera SoftwareRawTherapee
PhotographerAndrew Wade Eglington oh-hi.info
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)75 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width400
Image Height600
Compression SchemeUncompressed
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Data ArrangementChunky Format
Image Created2015:02:26 13:09:12
Exposure Time1/180 sec
F-Numberf/8.0
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating200
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
FlashFlash
Focal Length50.00 mm
Color Space InformationUncalibrated
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
ContrastHard
SaturationNormal
SharpnessHard
Subject Distance RangeClose View

File: IMG_2627.jpg (5MB, 3888x2592px) Image search: [Google]
IMG_2627.jpg
5MB, 3888x2592px
quick question /p/.

What's up with my camera?

I saw my friend selling his, and he was mentioning shutter count, and his is 60.000
After finding out what it means, I wanted to check mine as well.

I used a few websites where you upload a pic so it can read the shutter number, but the webpages were displaying errors.

I also tried downloading a program that detects when I turn my camera on, and it detects when I shut it off.

But for the shutter count, it displays 0. If I snap a picture, the program refreshes, but still displays the number at 0.

The camera I'm using is a Canon 400d.
Any help?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeCanon
Camera ModelCanon EOS 400D DIGITAL
Lens Size18.00 - 200.00 mm
Firmware VersionFirmware 1.1.1
Owner Nameunknown
Serial Number2081121839
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2016:12:26 19:31:27
Exposure Time1/20 sec
F-Numberf/4.5
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating1600
Lens Aperturef/4.5
Exposure Bias0 EV
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length28.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width3888
Image Height2592
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
Scene Capture TypeStandard
Exposure ModeManual
Focus TypeAuto
Metering ModeEvaluative
SharpnessUnknown
SaturationNormal
ContrastNormal
Shooting ModeManual
Image SizeLarge
Focus ModeOne-Shot
Drive ModeSingle
Flash ModeOff
Compression SettingFine
Macro ModeNormal
Subject Distance0.580 m
White BalanceAuto
Exposure Compensation3
Sensor ISO Speed288
Camera Actuations-928776144
Color Matrix129
12 posts and 2 images submitted.
>>
>>2999781
thanks for your input

next
>>
>>2999811

nice vocabulary, do you kiss your white kids with that mouth?
>>
If you use Lightroom, you can view the metadata of all your images. The Metadata will tell you what your shutter is. Your baby is very cute btw.

File: IMG_3463.jpg (63KB, 1920x1280px) Image search: [Google]
IMG_3463.jpg
63KB, 1920x1280px
I'm going to shoot my first nude set today, but I'm a complete noob on this, have no advanced techs and I have this thing for only shooting on BW.

I'm here humbly asking for some tips. Did anyone here ever shoot a nude set (better, a BW nude set) befor?

I have a Nikon 5200, and a 1.8/f 50mm. Basic gear. The lights at my apartment are yellow. At the balcony there are white lights.

Here an example from the photographer "Gessica Hage". It's not an "Erotic" set, it is to be a female form capture, and all that.
34 posts and 7 images submitted.
>>
>>2999676
Do it like a true man would.
Copy Araki in a vain attempt to be artsy and fuck the bitch. Not raw though, you don't want an STD.
>>
>>2999680
>araki
>not terry
pleb
>>
>It's not an "Erotic" set

File: 1400.jpg (58KB, 960x768px) Image search: [Google]
1400.jpg
58KB, 960x768px
My family has this big "tradition" thing where once you turn 18 you have to spend 30 days solo travelling around Europe as a life experience or whatever.

I turned 18 last week, and my 30 day European tour is gonna be in the summer. I havent ever travelled on my own before - any tips on not getting my camera stolen/smashed up while travelling?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width960
Image Height768
53 posts and 10 images submitted.
>>
>>2999129
>any tips on not getting my camera stolen/smashed up while travelling?

SS+gomad.
>>
>>2999139
go back to bed Mark
>>
File: carry strap.jpg (22KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]
carry strap.jpg
22KB, 500x500px
1) Keep your camera hidden as much as possible; only take it out when you're going to take a photo.
2) Buy an anti-theft strap for the camera and the bag (ex. pic related).
3) Always wear the strap when taking photos.
4) Never walk away from your camera (ex. for self-time photos of yourself).
5) Always carry your camera as a carry-on in any transportation.
6) Never let someone else take a photo of you, or if you have to, make sure its someone who works at the location (ex. a security guard, a waiter), or a very trustworthy tourist (ex. slow-looking senior American tourist).
7) If you're on the train with your camera bag, make sure its secure (ex. hold it on your lap, or even better, tie a bicycle lock around it and through your belt -- this may sound autistic but I did it when I was sleeping in second class trains in southeast asia).
8) Never ever ever talk to the gypsies. Never. You'll see them at a lot of the iconic photo location (ex. Eiffel Tower). Watch out. If someone asks you to sign their petition, or asks if you speak english, or anything else like that, then immediately do a 360 degree spin with your foot out to trip any pickpockets and check your pockets and yell "BACK THE FUCK UP".

File: IMG_8685.jpg (939KB, 5184x3456px) Image search: [Google]
IMG_8685.jpg
939KB, 5184x3456px
I started out and trying to get a feel for how I want to portray the way I see the world I guess. Be my own artist.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeCanon
Camera ModelCanon EOS REBEL T2i
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.8 (Macintosh)
PhotographerMichael C Cook
Maximum Lens Aperturef/5.7
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution240 dpi
Vertical Resolution240 dpi
Image Created2017:01:07 03:46:40
Exposure Time1/60 sec
F-Numberf/5.6
Exposure ProgramNot Defined
ISO Speed Rating400
Lens Aperturef/5.6
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
FlashFlash, Compulsory
Focal Length55.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
16 posts and 5 images submitted.
>>
File: yugiyamiv4bluesketch.jpg (11KB, 125x93px) Image search: [Google]
yugiyamiv4bluesketch.jpg
11KB, 125x93px
I started out and trying to get a feel for how I want to portray the way I see the 3M GET I guess. Be my own artist.
>>
File: 1468122674201.jpg (83KB, 571x571px) Image search: [Google]
1468122674201.jpg
83KB, 571x571px
>>3000000
>>
>>3000000
This is what I (do not) get for trying to make my get as a thread.

File: Quentin_Taratino.jpg (75KB, 1024x683px) Image search: [Google]
Quentin_Taratino.jpg
75KB, 1024x683px
Going to recreate these (2 more under this) portraits in studio for a task in media class.
Any help when it comes to lighting, focal length etc.?
15 posts and 4 images submitted.
>>
>>
>>
>mfw I just finished watching Reservoir Dogs and this is the first thread I see

For those of you who pursue photography as an art form: does it eat you up inside knowing that you don't have the will power to actually learn how to draw?
93 posts and 19 images submitted.
>>
>>2994300
>>>/ic/2801965
Why are you so mad lmao, did a photographer fuck your girl??
>>
>>2994308
Hey, they told me to come here and I did. I didn't even know this place was a thing; I guess it's good that photographers have their own containment board.
>>
>>2994300
No, why would it?
Photography is the least explored medium in art, while painting is the most overdone

File: _MG_5610 (Custom) (Custom).jpg (287KB, 750x1000px) Image search: [Google]
_MG_5610 (Custom) (Custom).jpg
287KB, 750x1000px
Hi /p/, some second opinions required on this dilemma.
I took a series of photos a few years ago and they are meant to be a series. The context behind them isn't apparent unless they are all together and in the correct order.
After speaking with another photographer about it I was asked if I'd like to be part of a collaborative book being made, so I submitted them.
Now I am being told that 'some' of them will be in the book.
I'd much prefer the entire series be in there, even as a one page collage. Otherwise I'm thinking I ask not to be part of the book.

I feel like my integrity as an artist is about to be compromised and I don't like that shit.
Am I being too much of a tosser about this?
What would you do?

(Pic somewhat related in that the trees visual aesthetic has been compromised by some stupid power lines.)

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS5.1 Windows
Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution240 dpi
Vertical Resolution240 dpi
Image Created2014:04:03 20:02:17
Exposure Time1/125 sec
F-Numberf/8.0
Lens Aperturef/8.0
Exposure Bias0 EV
Focal Length100.00 mm
Image Width2532
Image Height3377
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
Scene Capture TypeStandard
8 posts and 1 images submitted.
>>
>>3002632
hmmm yea i see what you mean that first photo doesnt make sense at all .
>>
>>3002634
Lol.. that photo isn't part of the series I'm talking about.
>>
>>3002636
o well then at least you got that goin for you . hmmm yea i would probably just not publish parts of the series because it might be really embarrassing to be misunderstood lol

Pages: [First page] [Previous page] [210] [211] [212] [213] [214] [215] [216] [217] [218] [219] [220] [221] [222] [223] [224] [225] [226] [227] [228] [229] [230] [Next page] [Last page]

[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Search | Top | Home]

I'm aware that Imgur.com will stop allowing adult images since 15th of May. I'm taking actions to backup as much data as possible.
Read more on this topic here - https://archived.moe/talk/thread/1694/


If you need a post removed click on it's [Report] button and follow the instruction.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com.
If you like this website please support us by donating with Bitcoins at 16mKtbZiwW52BLkibtCr8jUg2KVUMTxVQ5
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties.
Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from that site.
This means that RandomArchive shows their content, archived.
If you need information for a Poster - contact them.