Hello, I am using a nikon d3200 as a body. I am looking for a budget, decent lens that can make some decent bokeh. Can you guys suggest or recommend me some lens for the nikon d3200?
>>3006237
I got a used 50 mm 1.8 G for a little less than $200, though that may be expensive. The D version has ever so slightly different image quality and doesn't autofocus with the d3200 but it's like half the price.
Took this image with a d3200 and 50mm 1.8G but I probably overprocessed it lol.
i. get blur like this woth nikkor 28mm f2.8 ai lens about 150 usd
all manual though so you need a focus prism
>>3006243
pic
Who will develop my artless smut?
peter ur lewd as fuck.
love, the derproom.
>>3005758
Dev your own shit fuckboy
>>3005795
That's like saying I should grow my own crops because some manager at Whole Foods doesn't like my cooking.
My cousin will be baptized next week
>anon, you have a bunch of cameras, don't you?
>won't you photograph your cousin's baptism?
Help, /p/, I just collect old cameras and take some pictures with my DSLR. How to proceed? Is this the same shit as a wedding? Post some tutorials, please.
My gear:
>D3300
>18-55 crappy kit lens
>55-200 crappy kit tele lens
>50 f1.4
>55 f3.5 macro
>old analog manual flash
Should I say fuck digital and go full analog?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dPjW75fIbUo&t=9s
>>3005435
You tell them in no uncertain way that you are not a professional photographer and that if they want professional photos they need to hire one.
you stick with the 200mm, stay as far out the way as possible and fucking spray the whole event but mainly the kid. you tell them you need a specific vantage point for then the baby is being drowned so you can actually get the moment captured.
Ask someone with some more skills than you to PP a couple of the best photos, if youre 'EXTREMELY' lucky /p/ might even do this for you.
I've been the family photographer, so for my niece and nephews baptism I was a given choice, wasn't asked, just a default option.
So, you're probably that guy in the family.
I was asked to shoot a wedding, but I strongly declined, several times. That shit is a whole different thing.
Anyway, as for you OP, going analog will take time. They'd most likely want to post that shit on facebook.
My brothers wife wanted my photos straight out of the camera, but I told her, also several times, that that's not how it works.
So ask if they can wait for the photos till they are done on your end, or just go full digital.
You can also have both with you.
If possible, ask everyone involved if you can be up close clacking away.
I wasn't until the whole procedure was done. So I sat kindly in the front row with tele lens.
But that was a while ago, so I'd day those poor priests are used to have them being in selfies, they might not mind if you don't ask.
Who here /polarizer/
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make FUJIFILM Camera Model X-T1 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.5.1 (Windows) Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2017:01:19 00:14:01 Exposure Time 1/250 sec F-Number f/1.0 Exposure Program Aperture Priority ISO Speed Rating 800 Lens Aperture f/1.0 Brightness 1/20 EV Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Spot Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Color Space Information sRGB Rendering Custom Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Sharpness Hard Subject Distance Range Unknown
>>3005351
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make FUJIFILM Camera Model X-T1 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.5.1 (Windows) Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2017:01:19 00:12:35 Exposure Time 1/180 sec F-Number f/1.0 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 800 Lens Aperture f/1.0 Brightness 0 EV Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Spot Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Color Space Information sRGB Rendering Custom Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Sharpness Hard Subject Distance Range Unknown
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make FUJIFILM Camera Model X-T1 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.5.1 (Windows) Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2017:01:19 00:11:00 Exposure Time 1/500 sec F-Number f/1.0 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 800 Lens Aperture f/1.0 Brightness -0.5 EV Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Spot Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Color Space Information sRGB Rendering Custom Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Sharpness Hard Subject Distance Range Unknown
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make FUJIFILM Camera Model X-T1 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.5.1 (Windows) Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2017:01:19 00:09:52 Exposure Time 1/500 sec F-Number f/1.0 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 1600 Lens Aperture f/1.0 Brightness 1.3 EV Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Spot Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Color Space Information sRGB Rendering Custom Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Sharpness Hard Subject Distance Range Unknown
Uniwb walkthrough. Went ahead and did it after hearing a few had used it when I asked in SQT >>3004902
Took picture of this and imported into rawdigger and looked at the raw composite, which is not rgb rendered
>>3005259
Eventually you end up with a magenta color. This magenta hue is what the camera 'sees' as grey (2x green photosites)
RGB values are 172,64, and 91, respectively
Now results. Here is the raw over exposure displayed in rawdigger. This is with slight OE [image 19, 1/10]
>>3005264
And here is the blinkies using the jpeg on back of camera [image 19].
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Apple Camera Model iPhone 6s Plus Camera Software Snapseed 2.14.141428617 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 29 mm Image-Specific Properties: Pixel Composition Unknown Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2017:01:18 22:59:39 Exposure Time 1/4525 sec F-Number f/2.2 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 400 Lens Aperture f/2.2 Brightness 4.9 EV Exposure Bias 0.3 EV Metering Mode Pattern Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 4.15 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 800 Image Height 567 Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard
I have a bunch of mediocre snapshits in DNG format that I want to back up to my Google Photos account as JPEGs, and then delete from my hard drive to free up a couple TB of disk space.
Is there an optimal way to batch process these pics before exporting them to JPEG, so that in the unlikely event that I'll need to dig one up later for post processing, I'd be able to do so with minimal further degradation to image quality? Would it be a bad idea to just apply Auto WB and Auto Tone to every photo in LR prior to exporting as JPEG?
If you were to do that you'd be completely defeating the point of shooting them in raw format in the first place. Unless you're retarded with WB during shooting I wouldn't bother with gambling on LR's auto tone/wb.
>>3005254
IIRC the unlimited backup to google photos is JPEGs which they compress. If you want to backup uncompressed JPEGs then you eat into your drive space.
Re: your question - no idea, I just buy external HDDs and store all my raw files. I used to delete my raw files for useless snapshits and experiments but recently I've wanted to play around with some of that stuff and regretted not having the raws.
I shoot RAW
Do you guys have any suggestions for a starter 35mm film camera?
get da good Kodak disposable camera. very good very good. u r welcome/////
Yes.
I recommend GET THE FUCK OF 4CHAN U FUCKING CUNT DONT ASK FOR SHIT KODAK DISPOSABLE CAMERAS
>3:00 am LN
>Trying to sleep
>Hear yelling in next apartment complex
>Look out window
>See lady with shopping bags running behind my unit to hide
>Can hear her muttering to herself though the wall
>5 cops show up and circle complex several times
>Grab Mini 8
>Find lady hiding
>Snap this
>Says "What the bitch?"
>Bolt back into my unit and lock the door
Has anyone else experienced something like this?
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows) Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 1272 Image Height 2032 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Compression Scheme Uncompressed Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 600 dpi Vertical Resolution 600 dpi Image Data Arrangement Chunky Format Image Created 2017:01:18 12:57:18 Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 1272 Image Height 2032
your an stupid
>>3004875
what the fuck are you saying
>>3004910
elaborate
> Want to be unique snowflake
> End up taking photos that are relatively boring and don't bring anything new to the table
> Hate post processing
> Dream of being fashion photographer
What should I do?
Pic related, taken over the weekend.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Color Space Information sRGB
Post processing is a crucial part of photography my man. I would wager that 99% of the photos that you considered so good that they drew you to photography in the first place probably had a disappointing (to you, inspiring to others) amount of processing.
You're still stuck in the "a camera is a magic box" phase of your photography. Persist, press on. You won't be less disillusioned about your aspirations, but you'll at least have some perspective.
Thanks for the advice. I feel that maybe I hate post processing because I never know what I'm doing, and two weeks later I always end up hating my edits and they look way too overdone from my new perspective.
I guess I'll do some research and buy some books on post processing to better understand the art and hopefully learn to enjoy it.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Color Space Information sRGB
>>3004565
Just wait a day or two before editing them.
First time with a camera this year. Very foggy very dark. Some serious issues with ISO and underexposure etc but some came out ok I think.
Also Need more practice with editing tbqh. I dont have any formula yet just wave sliders about randomly until I find something so any tips would be welcome.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS 1000D Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS4 Windows Maximum Lens Aperture f/4.6 Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 1426 dpi Vertical Resolution 1426 dpi Image Created 2017:01:17 21:24:01 Exposure Time 1/100 sec F-Number f/4.5 Exposure Program Shutter Priority ISO Speed Rating 400 Lens Aperture f/4.5 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Center Weighted Average Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 12.00 mm Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 1000 Image Height 667 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Manual Scene Capture Type Standard
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS 1000D Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS4 Windows Maximum Lens Aperture f/5.7 Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2017:01:17 20:57:20 Exposure Time 1/80 sec F-Number f/5.6 Exposure Program Shutter Priority ISO Speed Rating 800 Lens Aperture f/5.6 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Center Weighted Average Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 20.00 mm Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 1000 Image Height 667 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Manual Scene Capture Type Standard
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS 1000D Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS4 Windows Maximum Lens Aperture f/5.7 Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 1413 dpi Vertical Resolution 1413 dpi Image Created 2017:01:17 21:50:15 Exposure Time 1/100 sec F-Number f/5.6 Exposure Program Shutter Priority ISO Speed Rating 400 Lens Aperture f/5.6 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Center Weighted Average Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 20.00 mm Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 1000 Image Height 667 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Manual Scene Capture Type Standard
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS 1000D Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS4 Windows Maximum Lens Aperture f/4.0 Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 1520 dpi Vertical Resolution 1520 dpi Image Created 2017:01:17 22:24:42 Exposure Time 1/80 sec F-Number f/4.0 Exposure Program Shutter Priority ISO Speed Rating 800 Lens Aperture f/4.0 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Center Weighted Average Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 10.00 mm Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 667 Image Height 1000 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Manual Scene Capture Type Standard
What do you think about this photo? I kinda like it but the stupid girl totally ruins it..
>>3004232
The processing is godawful. Stay the fuck away from that clarity slider.
The bimbo is the least of its problems.
use dehaze about 65%, lower the clarity (way to much noise, artifacts) , Don't crop so tight.. bump up the vibrance but not to much,
That post is way more of a problem than the girl.
Yo it's been a while
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows) Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 2975 Image Height 4561 Pixel Composition Unknown Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 3200 dpi Vertical Resolution 3200 dpi Image Created 2017:01:16 23:57:09 Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 767 Image Height 1100
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows) Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 3057 Image Height 4598 Pixel Composition Unknown Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 3200 dpi Vertical Resolution 3200 dpi Image Created 2017:01:17 12:01:53 Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 767 Image Height 1100
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows) Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 3093 Image Height 4630 Pixel Composition Unknown Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 3200 dpi Vertical Resolution 3200 dpi Image Created 2017:01:17 11:41:30 Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 767 Image Height 1100
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows) Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 3020 Image Height 4542 Pixel Composition Unknown Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 3200 dpi Vertical Resolution 3200 dpi Image Created 2017:01:17 00:44:06 Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 767 Image Height 1100
The lenses they're using in The Man in the High Castle are producing that circular bokeh on almost every shot. Any idea of similar lenses that give you that effect?
most 50mm f/1.7 primes with a circular rather than hexagonal aperture :^)
>>3003563
could be 50 or an 85, idk since Cine lenses are different
Is the bokeh only like it is in this still or does it also have a bit of a swirl to it? Because the helios lenses from good ol' USSR creates a similar bokeh but with a swirl as well. Not that I think that they would be using those old lenses for something like a tv-show though.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC 2017 (Windows) Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2017:01:16 21:52:42 Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 1422 Image Height 942
I know it's more of a "mobile photography" question but how do they get this aesthetic in their pictures?Looking white and stuff
I also have an iphone 6s but i can't achieve it
https://www.instagram.com/style.above/?hl=el
Natural window light, white balance and vsco, my man.
there's more to looking white than the skin tone, that can't be fixed in Photoshop
>>3003391
Literally there's a filter on Instagram called "fade" and that's all they use if it's this white screen on their images you're talking about.
So I bought a Pentax K1000 off of ebay for $55 with the 50mm lens included. The camera is in awesome condition, looks beautiful, everything works except for the light meter. It's always stuck in the middle.
I installed a new battery in it, still wasn't working.
I even tried wiping the battery contact thing with my shirt but it didn't do anything.
Has anyone had any experience with getting the light meter to work?
I tried the test thing where you put the camera in Bulb mode ASA 100 and the meter was still in the middle.
Seller refunded my money and surprisingly just said I could keep the camera as well.
>>3003104
Just use sunny 16 if you're outside or use your smartphone as a meter with the proper app. A meter isn't a big deal, half of my cameras doesn't have one and the other half are without batteries anyways.
Metering light is a meme people were fine without a meter until the end of the 60's.
>>3003104
the cable that connect the light meter to the battery must be fucked up because a sulfated battery.take the bottom off and remove the battery cradle, there should be a black cable attached to it.if the cable is long enough you might be able to fix it, if not you need to disassemble the camera and recable the thing....or just don't use the light meter.
>>3003109
I could use my t3i or iPhone as a light meter, which I will probably have to do, but I was really hoping I could rely on the camera itself. unfortunately, I think the problem is what >>3003172 is talking about.
The light meter needle is stuck in the very middle, but it DOES move veryyyyy slightly when I change my exposure settings, but when I say very slightly, I mean it only moves up or down like 5 degrees.