Sup /p/, dipped a 35mm film in a caffenol developed and bath it salt water for longer than 24 hours.
How much longer?
About half a year
Now It's finally and I'm curious to see how it turned.
While I check this out, /p/ guesses how the film turned out.
>>2999250
It's probably trashed. Although, i could be wrong since my photo classes were all digital.
>>2999250
I think i understand what the fuck you are trying to say. Lets just see it.
>>2999255
kek just reread it, i meant I bath in it salt water and that it's finally out.
it's always good to proofread
How difficult is it to gain access to the inside of the front element on the Canon 100-400 mkI?
Pic is of a lens I'm trying to sell, but along with the dust you see, there's what looks like lots of small circular specks, which I assume is marks from condensation, on the inside of the front element.
I've found this how-to: https://petapixel.com/2013/05/16/a-few-easy-lens-dustings/
But it only goes as far as to gain access to small openings in the lens barrel to remove dust with a rocket blower.
I'm trying to sell the damn thing, and despite constantly dropping the price, nobody wants it. And Canon wants about $500 to clean/repair it.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS 5D Mark III Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.8 Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 5760 Image Height 3840 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2016:10:17 00:15:34 Exposure Time 1/50 sec F-Number f/8.0 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 3200 Lens Aperture f/8.0 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Flash Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 67.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1200 Image Height 800 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard
Sell it as it is, not dusty AND bubba'd
>>2999122
Two questions
>how much are you trying to sell it for?
and
>does the inside element wiggle a bit? Mine does, it doesn't affect image quality, but it does concern me a bit.
>>2999122
>circular specks
Sounds like fungus
Can we have god-tier advertisement photography thread? Why the fuck this picture is so good
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 1600 Image Height 900
>>2998866
i love this one, been trying to recreate the colours and feel of it ever since i saw it here on /p/
>>2998874
I remember there was some talented lore pasta behind it
>>2998874
that is fucking incredible
Hi fags, I am selling this Leica Minilux Tintin limited edition, it comes with the blue carrying pouch but I don't have the watch.
Number 48 of 200
How much should I ask for it? I was thinking 3000-4000€ as Tintin fags and Leica fags are autistic.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make SONY Camera Model ILCE-7 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.1 (Macintosh) Maximum Lens Aperture f/1.0 Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2017:01:09 16:42:28 Exposure Time 1/6400 sec Exposure Program Aperture Priority ISO Speed Rating 100 Brightness 7.1 EV Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Color Space Information sRGB Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal
you should ask over nine thousand
>>2998803
maybe $400 max
who the fuck wants some faggy belgian cartoon character on their overpriced point and shoot
>>2998814
>normal ones selling for 1000$
>asks 400$ for the limited version
sell me your gear, fag
Is this a good picture be fully honest like you guys always are
>>2998795
It's alright but idk if I would have centered the dude.
>>2998800
>buy pristine K1000's off gumtree from clueless grandpa for pennies
>resell to hipsters
Who else /hoarding/ here?
>>2998737
more of a /film/ hoarder recently. scored a pack of 25 rolls of portra 160 NC. a pack of 20x Reala 220.
almost got 20x 35mm ektachromes from the 90s, but kodak slides age like shit, so i did a pass on that.
>>2998755
You think 45 rolls of 35 mm. is "hoarding"?
>>2998737
made my entire equipment that way
Bought this at BestBuy open box for $499. It's an RX100 IV.
How bad did I fuck up?
Also I'm pooping.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Model LG-H901 Camera Software pplus_tmo_us-user 6.0 MRA58K 161941658f805 release-keys Sensing Method Unknown Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2017:01:09 01:15:56 Exposure Time 1/24 sec F-Number f/1.8 Exposure Program Not Defined ISO Speed Rating 233 Lens Aperture f/1.8 Brightness 0 EV Metering Mode Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 4.42 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 5312 Image Height 2988 Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard
>>2998561
>Zeiss for $500
Sure you did, pal
I'm pooping too.
That's a really good camera, usually they cost more than that. I honestly have no idea what version they're on now but every version since the evf has be just ridiculously nice for a point n shit
They're about $675 used on amazon, so you did pretty good.
It'll make for a good everyday pocket camera.
Saw this topic posted on another board but I thought it would be cool to see where you guys took it. Post a pic of your coolest collectable, doesn't need to be a piece of kit. I'll go first, here's a bit of hipster bait I spent a long time fixing up.
>>2998549
nice IIIf you got there, is that a Cron you got on it?
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make RICOH Camera Model GXR MOUNT A12 Camera Software GXR Firmware Maximum Lens Aperture f/1.0 Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2017:01:09 00:41:41 White Point Chromaticity 0.3 Exposure Time 1/60 sec F-Number f/0.0 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 200 Lens Aperture f/1.0 Brightness 0 EV Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 0.00 mm Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 1280 Image Height 960 Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Sharpness Normal
>>2998556
I wish, it's a modified industar. I just removed half of the grip so it didn't obstruct the viewfinder when I was changing the grease on it.
As far as value goes I guess it would be the film scanner. Other than that, probably pic related. I don't buy anything for purely collecting. I don't think any single piece of equipment that I own is worth more than 100e.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make OLYMPUS IMAGING CORP. Camera Model E-M10 Camera Software GIMP 2.8.18 Maximum Lens Aperture f/1.0 Color Filter Array Pattern 1308 Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 350 dpi Vertical Resolution 350 dpi Image Created 2016:11:12 19:30:50 White Point Chromaticity 0.3 Exposure Time 1/100 sec F-Number f/0.0 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 500 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 0.00 mm Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 1141 Image Height 1280 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Gain Control High Gain Up Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal
I'm trying to find the best film SLR for under $50 and I came across a Minolta X-370 with a 50mm lens for $30. Is this camera any good? I would love the canon AE-1 but I'm too poor.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 144 dpi Vertical Resolution 144 dpi Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 550 Image Height 492 Scene Capture Type Standard
>>2998296
yea it's good, now delete this thread
>>2998296
>too poor
You know you have to spend money on film and developing (and scanning), right?
>>2998296
I bought the same camera from goodwill for 16$ plus shipping, so it cost me around the same price as yours.
I have to say that this camera is great but you have to check a few things before you buy it.
Firstly make sure that the lens is in great condition.
Mine has a slightly orange color to it which i actually like,i use it both on my x-370 and my Gh7.
Then check if the camera is clean too and that all the switches work well enough(mine has a slightly hard to turn ss dial) and make sure that the inside is clean too and the focusing screen has no dust or scratches.
I would recommend buying this camera with this lense however i did see a canon with a faster lense for the same price however i dont think it would be very sharp if you use it wide open.
In my high school there is a photography club that Im part of, and every month we are given a theme for which we have to take a photo. This month's theme is "Culture", and they said to be creative and original. What can I take a photo of that would fit this theme and be really good?
>>2998046
Your dick
Dick pics are the perfect representation of patriarchal culture.
>>2998046
>they said to be creative and original.
>What can I take a photo of?
Wear a BLM T-shirt and torture mentally disabled white people. Take a photo of you pushing their head into a toilet.
A friend of mine has given me a list of everything I need to begin home developing with prices. I will dump these now.
Any suggestions or tips or cheaper/better alternatives are welcome.
So here’s a run down of what you’ll need to start developing B&W film at home. Once you’ve got the set up and used it a few times it’s super easy. This is the set up that I started out with that allows you to develop two rolls of 35mm at once or one roll of 120 roll film.
Patterson film developing kit: http://shop.silverprint.co.uk/Paterson-Film-Processing-Kit/product/1775/PTP573/
Contains most of the chemical equipment you’ll need apart from an additional graduate as below, which isn’t totally necessary but allows you to have your developer, stop and fixer all line up and ready to go
Additional 600ml graduate: http://shop.silverprint.co.uk/Paterson-600ml-Graduate/product/50072/PTP304/
Changing bag: http://shop.silverprint.co.uk/Kaiser-Changing-Bag-16x17-Inch-6390/product/757/K6390/
This is needed to unspool the film onto the developing reel in the dark
Film leader retriever: http://shop.silverprint.co.uk/Kaiser-Film-Leader-Retriever-4132/product/87609/K4132/
For retrieving the end of the film from the canister.
Chemicals
Ilford Ilfosol 3 Developer: http://shop.silverprint.co.uk/Ilford-Ilfosol-3-Film-Film-Developer-500ml/product/481/1131778/
Developer, will develop about 16 rolls depending on dilution
Ilford Ilfostop Stop Bath: http://shop.silverprint.co.uk/Ilford-Ilfostop-500ml-Stop-Bath-500ml/product/20578/1893870/
Stops the developing process, will cover about 15 films worth
Ilford Rapid Fix: http://shop.silverprint.co.uk/Ilford-Rapid-Fixer-500ml-500ml/product/923/1984253/
Fixes the film for archiving
Ilford Ilfotol: http://shop.silverprint.co.uk/Ilford-Ilfotol-Wetting-Wetting-Agent-1L/product/73018/1905162/
A wetting agent that helps the film dry quickly and helps stop drying marks.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make FUJIFILM Camera Model X100T Camera Software Digital Camera X100T Ver1.00 Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.0 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2016:05:26 19:13:06 Exposure Time 1/420 sec F-Number f/5.6 Exposure Program Aperture Priority ISO Speed Rating 200 Lens Aperture f/5.7 Brightness 8.9 EV Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 23.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1000 Image Height 658 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Sharpness Normal Subject Distance Range Unknown
You also might want to get hold of some negative sleeves to store them in: http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/391595740655?_trksid=p2057872.m2749.l2649&ssPageName=STRK%3AMEBIDX%3AIT
So once you’ve got all that stuff it’s good to get familiar with the process. YouTube will be your best bet, here are a few videos to look at: https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=black+and+white+film+developing
Also, Ilford have a brilliant PDF with step by step instructions: http://www.ilfordphoto.com/Webfiles/200629163442455.pdf
Also, this one is great: http://theartofphotography.tv/episodes/photography-lessons/the-ultimate-guide-to-developing-black-and-white-film/
The most useful and invaluable thing I use is the Digital Truth Massive Dev Chart app. It lets you select the film, developer and film speed and gives you a timer and cue sheet with visual and audible warnings to work to. Makes the whole process so much easier! It’s £6.99 but totally worth it.
If you want to scan your own film then it’s best to get a dedicated scanner to do the job. I use an Epson V330 which has just been updated - https://www.amazon.co.uk/Epson-Perfection-Scanner-ReadyScan-Technology/dp/B009EOPQD4/ref=dp_ob_title_ce Pretty cheap and reliable!
I've worked out that I would need to spend £230 for all the stuff and a scanner. This amounts to the cost of around 11 rolls of film in my local photo developers..... Developing is so expensive.
The drawback is that I could only develop black and white at home but I'm okay with that.
>>2998047
you can do colour at home too, but it's a little bit more involved - i.e. generally requires more accurate (and higher) temperature and time control. it's still pretty cheap, maybe 1-2€ per 35mm roll. i've found colour film to be generally cheaper than b&w, too, so that partially makes up for the higher chemical costs.
it's still much cheaper than developing film professionally. scanning does take time though.
What polarizer should I buy for taking photos of cars?
A round one. Circular, even.
Hoya HD3 polarizers are very good. I believe it's also +1.5 stops +/-
Hi! I'm Tony Northrup and in my book Stunning Digital Photography you can learn all about replacing filters within Lightroom.
Here's a quick sample:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YcZkCnPs45s
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 228 Image Height 200
I'm not sure if this is the right board to ask, but I'm in the market for an action cam. Mostly for stuff like bow mounting and hunting, or motorcycle helmet mounting.
My questions is - is GoPro a meme, and are there way better options for an action camera? I know GoPro's have hundreds of mount options; do other action cameras have the same versatility and waterproof capabilities as a GoPro?
I got a hero4 silver for Christmas and an accessory kit (body mounts, etc...) It's fantastic. The camera is top notch. The video quality is amazing. The weatherproof case is really well made.
I think they're a good choice.
Gopros are very good however if you are willing to dig and can stomache sometimes supobtimal UI you can find very good chinese brands that perform as well for half the price.
>>2997710
That's a gamble. And I can afford a gopro. For what it is, it's amazingly cheap.
https://techcrunch.com/2017/01/05/dji-acquires-hasselblad-the-iconic-swedish-camera-company/
HassleBAD AMIRITE
>>2997653
Finally, the "muh moon" meme is dead.
SWEDEN KEKED AGAIN
Can anyone give me a good estimate on the mm of lens used in Cosmopolis?