Archived threads in /p/ - Photography - 94. page

Is it appealing to look at? Meh, not for me. Is it interesting, definitely not. Is it technically good? Yea I guess. So yes it's good, but it's also shit.

>>3100913
What did he meme by this?

>>3100866
There's a vision and purpose to it, so yes I would call it good photography because it set apart from random snapshits.

>>3100857
>what trickery is this?
cropping

>>3100857
Wide angle lens????????
Cropping????

>>3100857
f/16 28mm

Except for the thousands of wealthy pro photographers who use them daily. Yes.

Digital had a significantly higher financial barrier of entry than film does.

Film is definitely for poorfags. Sorry kid.

If anything film is the poor, but clearly better format and digi is greedy, excessive yet inefficient capitalist scum format. Extreme poorfag but I was able to go 645 for less than a ricoh gr. Try that, digicucks.

Can you be more specific ? What film would you like to develop ? Your picture show B&W but C-41 is for color. Would you like brands ? Or chemicals like sodium sulfite and borax and stuff like that to do your own developper and fixer ?

>>3099756
look (in an archive website) for a polish guy, trip was something like "kurwa", who wrote a thread on how to make rodinal @ home

>>3100091
Google teaches how to make d-76 and rodinal.

1. your mom

2. kys

3. this thread is shit

4. kys again

>>3095162
Fujinon XA101x8.9BESM/PF
Gaofen 4
1990-037B

Gotta get something interesting if it's just 3.

File: hqdefault.jpg (13KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 480x360px

1. Sagelux 35mm f/0.69
2. Sagecron 14-88mm f/4.20 aspherical
3. Super Multi Coated Sagelar-M 9001mm f/0.04

>>3094148
dont buy bad memes.

>>3094148
Dont buy into it.

File: JCH5.jpg (1MB, 1500x996px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1500x996px

>>3094163
>>3094173
I disagree, shit is cool.

I think it's temporarily out of production atm, but he's having more rolls manufactured I believe

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi

File: DSC_6757.jpg (1MB, 1350x1080px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1350x1080px

But sparrows are cool, anon.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NIKON CORPORATION
Camera Model	NIKON D750
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.9 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/6.3
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern	814
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	600 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2017:04:26 18:04:25
Exposure Time	1/640 sec
F-Number	f/7.1
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	400
Lens Aperture	f/7.1
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	600.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	Low Gain Up
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Unknown

File: _DSC0596-3~01~01~02~01.jpg (4MB, 3062x4569px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 3062x4569px

>>3085921

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NIKON CORPORATION
Camera Model	NIKON D5300
Camera Software	Retouch
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/4.0
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern	758
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	105 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2017:05:30 02:34:11
Exposure Time	1/640 sec
F-Number	f/4.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	100
Lens Aperture	f/4.0
Exposure Bias	-0.7 EV
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash
Focal Length	70.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	None
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Unknown

File: _DSC0242-2.jpg (1MB, 2563x3844px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2563x3844px

>>3086004

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NIKON CORPORATION
Camera Model	NIKON D5300
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.9 (Macintosh)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/5.7
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern	816
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	450 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2017:05:30 02:23:27
Exposure Time	1/400 sec
F-Number	f/5.6
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	100
Lens Aperture	f/5.6
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash
Focal Length	300.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	None
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Unknown

File: 2017-06-22 10.41.10 1.jpg (4MB, 2864x1911px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 2864x1911px

>>3100252
Not really a fan of anything on this roll but what ever. Feel like we need more actual photo taking here.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Model	EZ Controller
Camera Software	VSCO Android Version
Equipment Make	NORITSU KOKI
Image-Specific Properties:
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	3089
Image Height	2048

File: 2017-06-22 10.41.07 1.jpg (3MB, 1817x2726px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1817x2726px

>>3100253
Ho team!

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Model	EZ Controller
Camera Software	VSCO Android Version
Equipment Make	NORITSU KOKI
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Created	2017:06:21 16:19:14
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	3089
Image Height	2048

File: 2017-06-22 10.41.04 1.jpg (2MB, 2427x1619px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2427x1619px

>>3100254

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Model	EZ Controller
Camera Software	VSCO Android Version
Equipment Make	NORITSU KOKI
Image-Specific Properties:
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	3089
Image Height	2048

>>3100225
It's a classic.

>>3100230
so you saing it's descent?

>>3100225
This is pretty much the best camera to start film photography with

>>3099873
It's both a crutch and an overused effect, when done in moderation it's fine - when someone's portfolio is just overblown backgrounds it just means they don't know how to separate a subject.

Unless you're a jap gravure professional photog I don't want to see it.

I don't think deliberate artistic use is anybody complains about. At least not anyone who isn't dumb.

People point it out when it's the result of carelessness and lack of understanding what the camera is doing.

And yes you can usually tell the difference.

>>3099878
> Has the thought occurred to you guys that people are looking at the subject
Of course not. Thanks for telling us!

> I think it can be a good effect for drawing more attention to the subject of the photo
It is usually more distracting than shallow DOF bokeh, or the actual "distracting" background you had before you overexposed it.

Of course it can be used. But it is rarely a good, never mind the best option.

That specific model was semi-disposable.
You'll have to find a way to change batteries as I doubt fuji will.

http://camera-wiki.org/wiki/Fuji_DL-200

>>3099515
A roll of film will cost about $3 if you get a good deal. Processing the film will cost about $12 if you get a good deal. So you will have about $18 in it to take some decent photos. But that's assuming you buy in bulk and process in bulk. You'll probably end up spending about $50 at least to take some photos you want to keep.

$50 will buy a nice used portrait lens with an aperture of f/2 or better. And will also go a long way towards a camera to fit it onto...

One of those Fuji's recently sold on ebay for $50, you know.

>>3099551

I don't know where you get those numbers anon.
$50? Yeah, no.
$18 sounds more realistic if you choose someone like thedarkroom.com and factor in that decent film is at least $5.

File: maxresdefault.jpg (134KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

134KB, 1280x720px

How do you guys get the white balance and colors right when you scan your negatives with a dslr? I'm personally experiementing with colder balanced light source to compensate for the orange cast in negatives. Any more tips?

File: which_one.jpg (51KB, 783x452px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 783x452px

Halp me /p/, please!

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Photographer	luk
Image-Specific Properties:

>>3095719
use vuescan to get a reference image.

File: tttt (5).jpg (388KB, 1000x666px) Image search: [Google]

388KB, 1000x666px

>Sigma
>Expensive

Choose one poorfag.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Photographer	Skint cunt!
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB

>>3100508
a 1.8 zoom is pretty good, now you can spend less time changing lenses and "zooming with your feet"

>>3100508
Fuxk's the matter with you? It's the perfect blend of iq and functionality.

Looking for an excuse not to shoot is my bet.

>>3100491
Flickr, keyword search
https://www.flickr.com/search/?text=landscape

>>3100492
thanks, that's great for filtering through a ton.

Any ideas on who I could look up that takes good shots though? Like specific photographers that take really good landscape shots?

>>3100495
Absolutely no idea. I don't know the flickr community. They have "featured photographers", maybe start there.

square for maximum hip

2.39:1

>>3099949
/Thread