Daymn this hobby: I thought i'd spent enough time researching before I made my, expensive, purchase; but, I fucked up.. I bought a sigma 18-35, f/1.8 - expensive lens. I should of bought two primes for a fraction of the price. Can anyone make me feel better about this lens, I am a newb and not a pro yet.
>Sigma
>Expensive
Choose one poorfag.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Photographer Skint cunt! Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Color Space Information sRGB
>>3100508
a 1.8 zoom is pretty good, now you can spend less time changing lenses and "zooming with your feet"
>>3100508
Fuxk's the matter with you? It's the perfect blend of iq and functionality.
Looking for an excuse not to shoot is my bet.
Yeah the lense is great, its probably because this is my first time ever using dslr of this ability - d7200. Thinking about getting a 50mm because this lense is huge and a prime will be more agile, or a zoom just to get more shots with more convenience. OP/Here
>buys stellar lens
>welp not good enough for my amateur ass, i guess i wont be shooting with it!
heh
nice GAS fag
>>3100508
That's a nice sounding lens. Never used it, but it sounds great. 18-35 at 1.8 should give you a nice general walk around lens for 90% of scenarios, you can even do some portraiture at the 35 end to be honest.
>>3100508
That lens is absolutely good for video, but in no way a photo lens
Get a hobby that's not for bottom feeder nerds with delusions of artistic excellence whilst they fiddle about adjusting values in LR.
Painting for example. That's the REAL deal.
>>3100509
quality post, bro. pat yourself on the back
>>3100508
You didn't even say what's wrong. Where you expecting skill to be batched together with it?