[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Search | Free Show | Home]

Archived threads in /p/ - Photography - 102. page

This is a blue board which means that it's for everybody (Safe For Work content only). If you see any adult content, please report it.

File: DSC_4936 small.jpg (5MB, 5520x3684px) Image search: [Google]
DSC_4936 small.jpg
5MB, 5520x3684px
i need some help with my d800. it is back focusing, usually around 10-20 ft. multiple lenses and with any settings. but most prominently with the sigma 50mm 1.4. i have been using the camera for about 4 years, and never had this problem untill recently,about 15,000 shutters. i took it to a camera shop, the service guy took a few in focus pictures with it and said he has no clue...

so wtf is up? anyone else have this problem?

>pic unrelated

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATION
Camera ModelNIKON D800
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.4
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern852
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)50 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution240 dpi
Vertical Resolution240 dpi
Image Created2015:03:14 23:12:47
Exposure Time1 sec
F-Numberf/2.0
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating500
Lens Aperturef/2.0
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModeSpot
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length50.00 mm
Color Space InformationUncalibrated
Image Width7360
Image Height4912
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
Gain ControlLow Gain Up
ContrastNormal
SaturationNormal
SharpnessHard
Subject Distance RangeUnknown
8 posts and 2 images submitted.
>>
>>3095222
The problem seems to be that you're an inbred backwards moron who can't resize his images as designated in the sticky
>>
>d800
>4 years
>15,000 shots
Did you notice when you started using it?
>>
what a bunch of fags

File: 1475106181011[1].jpg (44KB, 1000x730px) Image search: [Google]
1475106181011[1].jpg
44KB, 1000x730px
Does anyone have this/is it worth getting for portraiture? It's a pretty steep asking price.
6 posts and 1 images submitted.
>>
>>3095026
nothing in posing is game-changing or new within the last decade, so if it's got a steep asking price it's entirely for brain-dead suckers too stupid to google the 500 other posing videos and guides.

Don't bother replying if you're the faggy owner who was trying to make a living suckering people on 4chan into buying an entirely pointless book.
>>
>>3095042
It's more of a prompt guide to make photos look candid and genuine I think. I'm not the owner bc I wouldn't charge hundreds of dollars for some fucking flash cards but I am curious about what the prompts actually are
>>
>>3095182

>"EEF DA PICSHA LOOG GOOOT PAWREHSS DA SHAHTA"

File: fuct.jpg (2MB, 4256x2660px) Image search: [Google]
fuct.jpg
2MB, 4256x2660px
ALright, motherfuckers,

Here types an ancient and never really bothered to hit up /p/ despite it being a hobby. I have decided that the time has come to step my photography game up into the digital age.

For something on the order of 15 years I have been shooting a getting older but I feel still respectable Canon getup as follows.

Elan 7e
Mp-e65 Macro
70-200mm f/2.8L IS original ed.
50mm f/1.0

I am thinking the EOS 5d Mark IV is the right choice if I jump now mainly because I am a natural light kind of person whenever possible. The 5Ds-R sounds neato but I know I'd rather have the low light and the video edge reading has me believing the mk IV has.

Maybe I should just sell off what I have and move to a Nikon system? If I were to go this route after thorough compelling I would want to keep the net cost to sub $5k USD to retain similar glass.

Concise thoughts welcome and sought.

Impetus? Family, some loose change, and my film's current state of cost when I want to go color.

Reason for Pause? The 5d mk IV is getting a smidge long in the tooth

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width869
Image Height575
Number of Bits Per Component8, 8, 8
Pixel CompositionRGB
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution266 dpi
Vertical Resolution266 dpi
Image Created2017:06:13 15:31:17
Color Space InformationUncalibrated
Image Width4256
Image Height2660
8 posts and 1 images submitted.
>>
>>3094768
>I hope I don't get banned for bumping.

I am going to eat dinner and if no responses i will fuck off.
>>
>>3094871
/p/ can be a very slow board which can be both a good and a bad thing, so hang in there. Wish I could help, but I know jackshit about Canon.
>>
>>3094768
you'd be shelling out for pretty much top of the line equipment. I get by fine on my 5dm2 but the m3 is pretty reasonable these days.
Wouldn't switch to canon as I bet most of your lenses will work just fine on the new system.

File: efcb6cc216d8b9fa29094ddb760b71a4.jpg (188KB, 1280x853px) Image search: [Google]
efcb6cc216d8b9fa29094ddb760b71a4.jpg
188KB, 1280x853px
Hey guys, I recently tried to participate in a contest and the first stage is going on right now, and it's based on people's votes. I haven't gotten much votes (the contest isn't that popular either, no one seems to have many votes). I'm not here to ask for votes, I simply wish to show you my flickr and ask for advice, such as:

What am I doing good/wrong?
I would like to try photographing the milky way, any tips?
My camera is a Canon 700D, with a 18-135mm, f/3.5-f/5.6. Any sort of questions, feel free to ask, and thanks a lot for your time in advance.

https://www.flickr.com/photos/146123453@N05/
6 posts and 1 images submitted.
>>
I really like your pictures just please don't be that "photographer" that takes pictures of flowers and shit but I like your other pics though , hope you win.
>>
>>3094636
Thank you, I'm glad you like them.

I try to photograph everything of interest that I come across, as to get some experience, not sure if that makes sense or is right but I thought it did when I first started out.
>>
you are really quite wonderful at exposure, but i find that the nature photography is a bit boring.

File: IMG_6320.jpg (40KB, 690x661px) Image search: [Google]
IMG_6320.jpg
40KB, 690x661px
>tfw not talented
>tfw all your pictures are shit

I now understand gearfags. I've taken maybe a handful of pics I think are decent.

It's frustrating. Sometimes you feel like you'll never make any respectable or meritable art.

So all you can do is gearfag.

I get it now. Let's hug.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width690
Image Height661
Scene Capture TypeStandard
9 posts and 1 images submitted.
>>
So what, whenever I go out to take pictures I take so many shit ones I'm genuinely surprised afterwards, but it's still fun just going out and looking for stuff

Who the fuck cares anyway, it's a hobby for almost all of /p/, enjoy it for what it is
>>
>>3094592
A handful of half decent shots is infinitely better than none at all.
>>
>>3094592
If you think of all the great photographers of the past and all the thousands upon thousands of pictures they each must have taken during the course of their careers. Why is it you only ever see a small handful? A few books worth at most.

I'll tell you why. Because the rest of the pictures were shit. They recognised their shit and learned from it. And they got where they are because they worked very hard on their work and didn't give in to gear fagging

File: 20170605_183950.jpg (502KB, 2576x1932px) Image search: [Google]
20170605_183950.jpg
502KB, 2576x1932px
Not much really but it's something. An abandoned beach shack I found near a Floridian beach.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareGoogle
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
CommentUser comments
Image Width2576
Image Height1932
7 posts and 1 images submitted.
>>
boring as fuck
looks like the photos i would take accidentally while scratching my ass or trying to take creeps
>>
>>3094421
What does this photo mean to you?
>>
>>3094421
Have you considered:
>managing to take an outdoor photo without noise
>adjusting the levels to have actual contrast
>using a tripod so it looks like you at least tried to keep your camera level

File: IMG_0502.jpg (1MB, 3232x4310px) Image search: [Google]
IMG_0502.jpg
1MB, 3232x4310px
reminder that youtubers have a big part in the death of /p/.

TAP vs JL shootoff. you fuckers follow youtubers like they're gods and get involved with gearfaggotry so much you bother trolling here about it.

extensive knowledge doesn't mean shit if you can't apply it, literally every major youtuber is a worse photographer than what /p/ has/had to offer, stop brandfagging and gearfagging and get out and shoot, reddit and dpreview are still alive for your daily shitposting needs so get the fuck off /p/, were lucky to have isi, sugar, catsby and NG around to still post photo threads, literally the only thing keeping this shithole alive.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwarePhotoshop Express 5.4.1.467
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width1077
Image Height1436
Scene Capture TypeStandard
25 posts and 3 images submitted.
>>
>>3094273
This
>>
>>3094273
>were lucky to have isi, sugar, catsby and NG

nice one, gonna get a lot of (you)s, here's mine
>>
>>3094273
Fuck off theo,
Stay mad that jl showed you up tho.

File: Charlotte-Hornet.jpg (147KB, 1052x536px) Image search: [Google]
Charlotte-Hornet.jpg
147KB, 1052x536px
Is wildlife photography or any kind of photography a meme career?

Since I was a kid I've been obsessed with photography, psychology, and the great outdoors. Leaving the field of psychology behind, I thought mixing those 2 into a career would make me happy. But I hear people say photography along with journalism died when the computer came along. Is this true? Are there good jobs to get as even a photographer of any kind that's not just taking kids high school pictures?
23 posts and 6 images submitted.
>>
To succeed at photography these days you need vision and originality, technology has gotten to the point where an 8 year old on a full auto iphone can grab better shots than some fuck on a DSLR, obviously technical skill is important but there's diminishing returns in the field of "Simply being competent"

There's still work in this field, but you should consider yourself blessed to get the year book picture job, it's solid work that pays well.

Other than that there's Weddings which can be good money, and the art grant game will always be ripe (Once you get your first one, which will always be the hardest)
>>
>>3094227

>I am a typical millennial, please help

You fucked up by not getting into business, medicine, or trade. And I mean real medicine, not psychology.

>leaving psychology behind

Yet here you are again, going down the other retarded millenial avene of art... for fuck's sake, Anon. Work where the money is, play where the fun is. It's simple.

Why is it always the psych majors who are the most mentally retarded? I know 3, and they all work at grocery stores. One is a nocturnal suicidal lesbian with daddy issues, and another is literally insane. Batshit fucking crazy. The last one is pretty normal, just misguided.
>>
>>3094414
>only millennials ever tried to be artists

File: DSC_7205.jpg (752KB, 2000x1215px) Image search: [Google]
DSC_7205.jpg
752KB, 2000x1215px
so /p/ i think i took one of my favorite pictures yet. I'm still learning photoshop and obviously there could be some modifications added to this photo.
Could anyone suggest what to modify or help me make the picture even better?
Thanks

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATION
Camera ModelNIKON D750
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.8 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperturef/4.0
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern814
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)78 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution75 dpcm
Vertical Resolution75 dpcm
Image Created2017:03:19 12:34:07
Exposure Time1/160 sec
F-Numberf/5.0
Exposure ProgramAperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating280
Lens Aperturef/5.0
Exposure Bias-1/3 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length78.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
Gain ControlNone
ContrastNormal
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal
Subject Distance RangeUnknown
13 posts and 4 images submitted.
>>
File: IMG_20170604_184415_250 (1).jpg (965KB, 1999x1214px) Image search: [Google]
IMG_20170604_184415_250 (1).jpg
965KB, 1999x1214px
oh and this is the photo modified in the instagram app. I know insta for image modifications is shite but i just wanted to see how it would look.
>>
I've shot the exactly same tree. How's going your stay in Banff?

Do you have any idea about what do you want in your photos? Maybe watch some Lightroom tutorials on youtube, it could help you
>>
>>3093883
Piss off Mirari, you macaco fuck

File: 5520308595_b5c33d243d_b.jpg (347KB, 1024x673px) Image search: [Google]
5520308595_b5c33d243d_b.jpg
347KB, 1024x673px
Last Thread: >>3090131

Anything about lenses, cameras, mounts, systems, buying, pricing, selling, etc. GOES IN HERE!

Do not open new threads for gear-related issues.
No pointless (brand) arguments and dick waving allowed! You have been warned! Just questions, answers, and advice.

And don't forget, be polite.
314 posts and 30 images submitted.
>>
What are the pros and cons of going with the following systems:


>nikon

>canon

>sony

>pentax

>olympus

>panasonic
>>
>>3093699
for a beginner:
pros: you get a camera that takes photos
cons: none you should care about

for a pro:
you should already know what you need, stop asking stupid questions
>>
>>3093675
i am using ZENIT 12xp daily and i need a replacement, because 1/30 to 1/500 shutter speeds are very poor. i would like something similar to this zenit - a solid metal slr, m42 mount, preferably a non-battery-powered shutter mechanism. any suggestions?

ABSOLUT MADMAN!

He got a sonygger to test.
171 posts and 31 images submitted.
>>
>the typical sony fag
>>
This fucking guy is pure comedy.
>>
>>3090584
...says the white flag fetishist snail fucker.

File: pol comes to town 05.jpg (3MB, 4896x3672px) Image search: [Google]
pol comes to town 05.jpg
3MB, 4896x3672px
Pictures of 4channers at the big political rally in Portland yesterday

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Pixel CompositionRGB
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width4896
Image Height3672
355 posts and 95 images submitted.
>>
File: hello from the pol family.jpg (3MB, 3907x2775px) Image search: [Google]
hello from the pol family.jpg
3MB, 3907x2775px


[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Pixel CompositionRGB
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width3907
Image Height2775
>>
Christ.
>>
File: pol comes to town 01.jpg (3MB, 4896x3672px) Image search: [Google]
pol comes to town 01.jpg
3MB, 4896x3672px


[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Pixel CompositionRGB
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width4896
Image Height3672

File: Lighthouse edit.jpg (3MB, 1950x2924px) Image search: [Google]
Lighthouse edit.jpg
3MB, 1950x2924px
Last one is already getting pretty full.
Old Thread >>3078425

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATION
Camera ModelNIKON D3300
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.7 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperturef/3.5
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern826
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)27 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution250 dpi
Vertical Resolution250 dpi
Image Created2017:04:29 14:55:54
Exposure Time25 sec
F-Numberf/3.5
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating6400
Lens Aperturef/3.5
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash
Focal Length18.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
Gain ControlHigh Gain Up
ContrastNormal
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal
Subject Distance RangeUnknown
228 posts and 151 images submitted.
>>
File: rose 2+.jpg (815KB, 1734x2286px) Image search: [Google]
rose 2+.jpg
815KB, 1734x2286px
Did a shoot for a friend recently. First time doing portraits.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATION
Camera ModelNIKON D3300
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.7 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.7
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern826
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)52 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution250 dpi
Vertical Resolution250 dpi
Image Created2017:05:08 01:07:50
Exposure Time1/2000 sec
F-Numberf/1.8
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating100
Lens Aperturef/1.8
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash
Focal Length35.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
Gain ControlNone
ContrastNormal
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal
Subject Distance RangeUnknown
>>
File: cloud views.jpg (2MB, 1884x2626px) Image search: [Google]
cloud views.jpg
2MB, 1884x2626px
Planned to do galaxy this day, ended up being too cloudy. Decided to settle with this.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATION
Camera ModelNIKON D3300
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.7 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperturef/3.5
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern826
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)27 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution250 dpi
Vertical Resolution250 dpi
Image Created2017:04:23 14:40:54
Exposure Time20 sec
F-Numberf/3.5
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating3200
Lens Aperturef/3.5
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash
Focal Length18.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
Gain ControlHigh Gain Up
ContrastNormal
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal
Subject Distance RangeUnknown
>>
File: _MG_2645.jpg (3MB, 2007x3008px) Image search: [Google]
_MG_2645.jpg
3MB, 2007x3008px
Give your honest opinion please.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeCanon
Camera ModelCanon EOS 80D
Camera SoftwareRawTherapee 5.0-r1-gtk3
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width4014
Image Height6016
Compression SchemeUncompressed
Pixel CompositionRGB
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Data ArrangementChunky Format
Image Created2017:05:19 11:25:48
Exposure Time1/80 sec
F-Numberf/0.0
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating6400
Lens Aperturef/inf
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length0.00 mm
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard

File: 30399366205031359_8Ds7LtOl_c.jpg (64KB, 554x369px) Image search: [Google]
30399366205031359_8Ds7LtOl_c.jpg
64KB, 554x369px
Thoughts on him, /p/? Talented, or a hack?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareGoogle
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width554
Image Height369
80 posts and 13 images submitted.
>>
File: 1491069856457.jpg (179KB, 1280x853px) Image search: [Google]
1491069856457.jpg
179KB, 1280x853px
A bit of both.
>>
Uncle Terry is a disciple of the Holy Trinity; Fro, Kai and Our Father in Holy Satrimony Ken Rockwell

People trash him on here but secretly we all wanna bang the girls we shoot and get away with it
>>
>>3079239
hack photographer, talented in bribing/coercing models into fucking him

Is there any point in buying a Fuji X100F if I already have a X-T1 with a 23mm f2? Does anyone own both and how often do you use them?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeSONY
Camera ModelILCE-7
Camera SoftwareCapture One 10 Macintosh
Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.8
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)50 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Exposure Time1/80 sec
F-Numberf/3.2
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating320
Lens Aperturef/3.2
Brightness-1.7 EV
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceDaylight
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length50.00 mm
Image Width1200
Image Height800
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceManual
Scene Capture TypeStandard
ContrastNormal
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal
15 posts and 3 images submitted.
>>
>>3093585

It depends.

Do you want another overpriced camera with a gimmicky sensor and soft lens that has no advantage over, and is actually inferior to, your current one?
>>
>>3093585
Kind of redundant, but they'll be a little different. Do you want the OVF that much?
>>
x100f user here

only if you really feel like you need the size difference, ovf, and dont care about weather sealing

Pages: [First page] [Previous page] [92] [93] [94] [95] [96] [97] [98] [99] [100] [101] [102] [103] [104] [105] [106] [107] [108] [109] [110] [111] [112] [Next page] [Last page]

[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Search | Top | Home]

I'm aware that Imgur.com will stop allowing adult images since 15th of May. I'm taking actions to backup as much data as possible.
Read more on this topic here - https://archived.moe/talk/thread/1694/


If you need a post removed click on it's [Report] button and follow the instruction.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com.
If you like this website please support us by donating with Bitcoins at 16mKtbZiwW52BLkibtCr8jUg2KVUMTxVQ5
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties.
Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from that site.
This means that RandomArchive shows their content, archived.
If you need information for a Poster - contact them.