File: e3t6fcuuvgxsxyeiku6s.jpg (964KB, 1690x1267px) Image search:
[Google]
964KB, 1690x1267px
Hey /p/ this is my first time visiting this thread so bear with me. Can anyone explain or at least try to describe how these photos were edited? I'm working on a project and I'd like to attempt a similar visual such as that of these images. How did the photographer/editor make the skin of the models look so animated and what programs other than photoshop do you think were used in the process?
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Width 1690 Image Height 1267
5 Posts / 4 Images
View this topic
>>
File: 77a7932c33ac26776034c28e27fe9632.jpg (29KB, 736x551px) Image search:
[Google]
29KB, 736x551px
2/3
>>
File: cottweiler1-compressor.jpg (168KB, 1180x600px) Image search:
[Google]
168KB, 1180x600px
3/3
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows) Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 1180 Image Height 600 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2015:12:02 05:31:57 Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 1180 Image Height 600
>>
>>3100135
looks like it might have been shot on an IR converted camera
File: IMG_2465.jpg (1MB, 3024x3024px) Image search:
[Google]
1MB, 3024x3024px
this okay?
3 Posts / 1 Images
View this topic
>>
So this is the power of Sony
>>
>>3100039
if you drew it with crayons, yes
File: 41A24F8E00000578-4628682-image-a-9_1498131764582.jpg (12KB, 306x254px) Image search:
[Google]
12KB, 306x254px
Mirrorless is so last year, the new fad is lensless camera
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0qR7SU87So0
Discuss
5 Posts / 1 Images
View this topic
>>
>>3099998
> Currently experimental technology COULD be the future in the future
Yea, maybe. Probably not though. Like 99% of promising prototypes never beat the existing solutions for diverse uses.
>>
>>
>>3099998
It can't. The light needs to be converged otherwise it will just "capture" random """"photons""""
File: 1497985989246.jpg (3MB, 6461x4209px) Image search:
[Google]
3MB, 6461x4209px
What is the best film slr that I could get for less than $300 canuck bucks?
2 Posts / 1 Images
View this topic
(photography newbie here)
how are these kind of stereoscopic photo gifs created? what gear do you use?
5 Posts / 3 Images
View this topic
>>
it's a new feature that comes with Sony a9
>>
also this from D.R.A.M - Broccoli
>>
>>3099932
I've seen an app on the play store some months ago, but i don't remember the name.
Anonymous
Is this a tasteful lens flare? 2017-06-22 10:04:26 Post No.3099847
[Report] Image search: [Google]
Is this a tasteful lens flare? 2017-06-22 10:04:26 Post No.3099847
[Report] Image search: [Google]
File: _DSC2505downscale.jpg (2MB, 2000x3000px) Image search:
[Google]
2MB, 2000x3000px
Is this a tasteful lens flare?
Anonymous
2017-06-22 10:04:26
Post No. 3099847
[Report]
[View this topic]
I took this picture innawoods and it made me ask the age old question, is this a tasteful lens flare? What constitutes such a thing? Can they ever be tasteful?
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make SONY Camera Model NEX-7 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC 2017 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/3.5 Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 27 mm Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 4000 Image Height 6000 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 350 dpi Vertical Resolution 350 dpi Image Created 2017:06:22 02:53:55 White Point Chromaticity 0.3 Exposure Time 1/60 sec F-Number f/4.5 Exposure Program Aperture Priority ISO Speed Rating 250 Lens Aperture f/4.5 Brightness 3.6 EV Exposure Bias -0.3 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Cloudy Weather Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 18.00 mm Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 2000 Image Height 3000 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Manual Scene Capture Type Standard Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Hard
2 Posts / 1 Images
View this topic
>>
>>3099847
I don't know it it's tasteful, but I sure like it. Reminds me of all the great camping trips my grandfather took me on as a child.
File: DSC03593-1.jpg (530KB, 1903x2627px) Image search:
[Google]
530KB, 1903x2627px
Need help figuring out what mount this is. Lens is a auto aubell 28mm
Seller said its for a konica but I'm not 100%
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Model ILCE-6000 Equipment Make SONY Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Unknown Image Width 1903 Image Height 2627 Image Created 2017:06:21 09:58:58 Focal Length 0.00 mm Flash No Flash White Balance Auto
3 Posts / 1 Images
View this topic
>>
>>3099768
Didn't you just post this thread? Fuck off.
>>
>>3099768
I don't fucking know
Anonymous
35 mm (and 40 mm) focal length general 2017-06-22 04:01:51 Post No.3099734
[Report] Image search: [Google]
35 mm (and 40 mm) focal length general 2017-06-22 04:01:51 Post No.3099734
[Report] Image search: [Google]
File: D3S_9198-1200[1].jpg (277KB, 1200x1230px) Image search:
[Google]
![D3S_9198-1200[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/px9Vv1u.jpg "D3S 9198-1200[1]")
277KB, 1200x1230px
35 mm (and 40 mm) focal length general
Anonymous
2017-06-22 04:01:51
Post No. 3099734
[Report]
[View this topic]
Hey, Can I get a photos taken with 35 mm focal length (or equivalent) and 40 mm focal length (or equivalent). thread? I want to know what the framing generally looks like for these lenses. Basically I want to see photos that have been taken with a 35 mm lens on a full frame or like by a 17.5 mm lens on a m43 or what ever (22 mm?) you would use on a crop to simulate a 35 mm lens
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties:
4 Posts / 1 Images
View this topic
>>
>>3099734
Why don't you just do a search on flikr? That shows all the exif data and there are a few sites and apps that will do even that simple leg work for you if you look.
>>
there's literally millions of 35mm shots out htere. just fucking look some up on google or (>>3099748) flickr.
>>
check flickr or pixelpeeper faggot
File: 1488753323795.jpg (283KB, 1008x720px) Image search:
[Google]
283KB, 1008x720px
I have a non bought Photoshop 2015 CC
I want to use Image > Layer > Smart Objects > Stack Mode
But Stack Mode is grayed out... Is this b/c it's illegitimate Photoshop?
Is it grayed out for any of you anons?
1 Posts / 1 Images
View this topic
No replies in the DB for this post!
Anonymous
Olympus omd em10 mk ii vs fujifilm x-a3 2017-06-21 07:17:50 Post No.3099171
[Report] Image search: [Google]
Olympus omd em10 mk ii vs fujifilm x-a3 2017-06-21 07:17:50 Post No.3099171
[Report] Image search: [Google]
File: IMG_1360.jpg (25KB, 249x590px) Image search:
[Google]
25KB, 249x590px
Olympus omd em10 mk ii vs fujifilm x-a3
Anonymous
2017-06-21 07:17:50
Post No. 3099171
[Report]
[View this topic]
Hey guys, newbie here. Planning on buying a camera but idk which one is better. Helmp me out?
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 249 Image Height 590 Scene Capture Type Standard
2 Posts / 1 Images
View this topic
>>
>olympus has fallen
>broken camera's a fuji
shit meme is shit
Also, go to the gear thread with gear questions, don't clutter the board.
File: stock-photo-deliberately-overexposed-light-shining-down-a-pedestrian-underpass-in-dublin-ireland-to-create-a-624214373.jpg (46KB, 450x352px) Image search:
[Google]
46KB, 450x352px
Is overexposure always bad? I like sometime to deliberately overexpose something like this, or a light.
My print shop told me they are not able to print overexposed/burned parts. And I have quite a few good photos like that. Why can't printers print pure white?
4 Posts / 2 Images
View this topic
>>
>>3098073
They sound like either they're full of shit, they're idiots, or you're an idiot and didn't understand what they're saying
>>
well, printers DON'T print white to my knowledge, except for rare occasions. Really you just use the whiteness of the paper. But someone who can't print those either A) has no logic or B) has a shit printer that can't transition from those light points.
At least to my knowledge. I do digital art mostly, so I might be a retard, but that's what I know. Try an online source (Catprint.com for the win, my go to company before I bought a printer!)
if nobody can do it, maybe they have a point.
Also are you bringing in physical photos, film, or digital files? I didn't think of that at first, but that might change a lot.
>>
File: Capture d’écran 2017-06-19 à 13.49.12.png (575KB, 842x614px) Image search:
[Google]
575KB, 842x614px
File: Happy_Fathers_Day.jpg (120KB, 807x819px) Image search:
[Google]
120KB, 807x819px
Enjoy a happy fathers day.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Photographer SRobbins Image-Specific Properties:
1 Posts / 1 Images
View this topic
No replies in the DB for this post!
File: 11037637_361779444025494_1490840048161443605_n.jpg (93KB, 960x813px) Image search:
[Google]
93KB, 960x813px
Yo, P. I'd like to start selling my photography. What I'm interested in doing is pricing my size. What is the easiest way to figure out how large of a print I can make before the resolution of the photo gets distorted or grainy? Is there a web site that'll tell me my limit or is there a fast, easy way to do this? (pic unrelated)
2 Posts / 1 Images
View this topic
>>
>>3097826
AdoramaPix shows you when you upload your files to print.
File: DSC_7174.jpg (463KB, 1706x2560px) Image search:
[Google]
463KB, 1706x2560px
I've been doing photography for a little while now and I've wanted to dip some money into a couple softboxes for home portait type pictures and I don't know what I should invest in. I've read around that some lights are better on skin but i don't know if the hardness of light can be edited through lightroom or other apps -- thanks for the help
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make NIKON CORPORATION Camera Model NIKON D7200 Image-Specific Properties: Exposure Time 1/8000 sec F-Number f/1.4 ISO Speed Rating 100 Focal Length 50.00 mm Image Width 1706 Image Height 2560
1 Posts / 1 Images
View this topic
No replies in the DB for this post!
How do you guys make the most out of your area when it doesn't offer much in terms of traditionally dynamic landscape to shoot?
I've hiked around every park within 3 hours of home and none of them have that reliable 'pop' you look for in landscape photography. No towering mountains, humbling forests, gushing waterfalls in sight.
My favorite photos have come from vacations to actually interesting states. The only interesting parts of tx are far enough away from central that reaching them might as well be a vacation.
I want to make interesting landscape shots but feel restricted by the area. What can I do compositionally to make the most of what I've got?
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS 5D Mark II Maximum Lens Aperture f/4.0 Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2010:08:02 20:33:18 Exposure Time 1/8 sec F-Number f/22.0 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 100 Lens Aperture f/22.0 Exposure Bias 0 EV Subject Distance 3.72 m Metering Mode Pattern Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 17.00 mm Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Manual Scene Capture Type Standard
3 Posts / 2 Images
View this topic
>>
File: Christianson_Pipeline-1024x819.jpg (241KB, 1024x819px) Image search:
[Google]
241KB, 1024x819px
Towering mountains, humbling forests, gushing waterfalls are easy-mode anon. Stop wishing for easy-mode and start trying you represent your state for what it is. Landscape photography shouldn't be easy-mode. I think time of day and weather trump landscape features when it comes to landscape photography.
You live in Texas, you get AMAZING thunderstorms. The light of a sunset just after a thunderstorm has passed is the most beautiful light in the world. Take advantage of that. Go out before sunrise and after sunset and capture the earth's shadow as it slowly rises above the horizon. Wait for days with nice clouds or strong winds. Look for trees that cast shadows seductively across the ground. Wait for birds to be flying through the frame or for deer to come out into the fields. Adding a few smaller, less exciting moments to each other within a frame can create an image just as exciting as a glacier lake.
Glacier lakes and all that shit are so played out right now anyway. I'd be way more interested in checking out a set of well-shot central TX landscape photos than a set of well-shot photos from Lake Louis or Yellowstone.
You also have many industries in your state that you could shoot as landscape photos. Oil and agriculture could be hugely interesting and just as beautiful as any waterfall photo if you shoot it right and with passion. The attached picture is part of a N. Dakota photographer's winning submission to a photo contest that just ended that saw 4,700 entries. They're proposal is telling the story of the pipelines and industry that has boomed in their state in the past few decades and it's affect on the land and towns. That shit is way more interesting than a one-liner photo of a waterfall.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS5.1 Windows Photographer Sarah Christianson Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 3900 Image Height 3120 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Compression Scheme Uncompressed Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Data Arrangement Chunky Format Image Created 2017:06:11 12:09:13 Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1200 Image Height 960
>>
>>3097855
Wow, i appreciate the incredible response anon, this is just what i needed.
Its hard to remember the difference in circumstance can be beneficial when every landscape photographer and their mother seems to constantly show off the national park in their backyard.
Guess I'll look for new spots to wait around for those texas conditions- everything feels flat without interesting weather.