File: bvlstreet.jpg (345KB, 1185x1462px) Image search:
[Google]
345KB, 1185x1462px
ITT: Underrated Photographers
Bart van Leeuwen
https://www.instagram.com/bartvanleeuwenphotography/
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS4 Windows Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2011:03:23 22:27:34 Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 1185 Image Height 1462
9 Posts / 2 Images
View this topic
>>
File: FB_IMG_1497917437891.jpg (446KB, 1319x2048px) Image search:
[Google]
446KB, 1319x2048px
>>3101438
Gregory Freidrich Hael
>>
>>3101438
rip
Anonymous
Noob videography question 2017-06-24 10:16:30 Post No.3101350
[Report] Image search: [Google]
Noob videography question 2017-06-24 10:16:30 Post No.3101350
[Report] Image search: [Google]
File: 12530715_1093042264079614_906344855_n.jpg (47KB, 640x640px) Image search:
[Google]
47KB, 640x640px
Hey guys, total noob here.
I am trying to make a low quality live music video for one of my songs with a Canon Powershot G11 and a Tripod.
How do you edit together different camera angles like in the video below? Do you need multiple cameras?
Also, are there any decent free camera editing softwares to adjust contrast and put filters on the video?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_IQa05Z1QZ4
9 Posts / 1 Images
View this topic
>>
>>3101350
why not delete this thread and ask in the /vid/eo general thread instead?
>>
You can do multiple cameras or you can do different angles with the one camera and move it around for each take.
Anonymous
Henry Cartier-Bresson interview (2000) 2017-06-24 03:41:49 Post No.3101209
[Report] Image search: [Google]
Henry Cartier-Bresson interview (2000) 2017-06-24 03:41:49 Post No.3101209
[Report] Image search: [Google]
File: henri_cartier_bresson_bicycle.jpg (153KB, 828x555px) Image search:
[Google]
153KB, 828x555px
Henry Cartier-Bresson interview (2000)
Anonymous
2017-06-24 03:41:49
Post No. 3101209
[Report]
[View this topic]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aKBSkNuUqAc
Geometry and the undefinable. Go explore life. Let photography happen through you.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2010:04:16 06:53:19
13 Posts / 5 Images
View this topic
>>
File: 7f9fe346f0773f27d3c0d209aa79a632.jpg (69KB, 736x488px) Image search:
[Google]
69KB, 736x488px
>expecting replies
>having expectations
/p/hilosophy thread I guess.
What's the purpose of photography? Film/digital/prints will eventually fade or be destroyed anyway. Why do anything at all if it's all going to be destroyed (10, 100, 1000 years or more from now)
>Go explore life. Let photography happen through you.
Why?
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows) Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 736 Image Height 488 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2017:06:09 22:12:54 Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 736 Image Height 488
>>
>>3102007
>Film/digital/prints will eventually fade or be destroyed anyway.
palladium prints can live 1000 years.
film negs can wait 100 years before dev, and can come out pretty fine.
digicuckold tecknology is the most feeble of all. if you turn off the camera in the wrong time it can erase all your pics, corrupt the card and shit itself on all your "photos". so fuck digiworms and fuck digicams lol.
>>
>>3102007
Most things created today will be destroyed within 100 years.
A photograph can still affect a generation, even if it disappears after 100 years.
File: 1498282416403.png (975KB, 1572x764px) Image search:
[Google]
975KB, 1572x764px
God Cinestill is a shit film.
26 Posts / 4 Images
View this topic
>>
>>3101064
C U C K
>>
>>3101071
if anything, he's a cuck for hesitating. a non-cuck would not give a damn and post it regardless.
>>
>>3101064
Is it because of the shit DR?
Anonymous
Microsoft Surface Appreciation 2017-06-22 03:46:15 Post No.3099970
[Report] Image search: [Google]
Microsoft Surface Appreciation 2017-06-22 03:46:15 Post No.3099970
[Report] Image search: [Google]
File: Microsoft Surface.jpg (62KB, 383x447px) Image search:
[Google]
62KB, 383x447px
Microsoft Surface Appreciation
Anonymous
2017-06-22 03:46:15
Post No. 3099970
[Report]
[View this topic]
Listen, I know that all you canikonfags are sucking Apple's dick pretty hard, but I think it's time that you really considered jumping to the Microsoft ecosystem. They've made some real technological gains over over the past few years to the point that even pro 8x10 LF photographers are shooting tethered with a Microsoft tablet.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Width 383 Image Height 447
27 Posts / 5 Images
View this topic
>>
>>3099970
Where is that red cable going, exactly?
>>
>>3099970
okay surface-serf
>>
>>3099970
isn't surface pro non-fixable if it has a hardware issue? it was on a thread on /g/ once
Anonymous
/fgt/ - Film General Thread 2017-06-21 08:02:44 Post No.3099448
[Report] Image search: [Google]
/fgt/ - Film General Thread 2017-06-21 08:02:44 Post No.3099448
[Report] Image search: [Google]
File: maitani-pen-f.jpg (31KB, 521x700px) Image search:
[Google]
31KB, 521x700px
/fgt/ - Film General Thread
Anonymous
2017-06-21 08:02:44
Post No. 3099448
[Report]
[View this topic]
Supreme Film Camera Master Yoshihisa Maitani Edition
>Old Thread >>3096459→
>This is a place to post about anything film related. Processing, scanning, developing, gear, etc is all fair game. Let's fill this thread with images so please include an image with your post.
>Have fun! Remember, there are no stupid questions, only stupid answers.
>People looking to get their photos critiqued please include the film, lens and camera used to give some context.
>Any post without an image attached should be ignored because the poster is obviously incompetent.
326 Posts / 90 Images
View this topic
>>
File: untitled1.jpg (885KB, 1200x815px) Image search:
[Google]
885KB, 1200x815px
>>
File: photobotch.jpg (520KB, 1400x911px) Image search:
[Google]
520KB, 1400x911px
/film/, amrite guise?
>>
File: filename_goes_here.jpg (165KB, 900x613px) Image search:
[Google]
165KB, 900x613px
like, photos and shit, right?
Anonymous
Micro 4/3rds m43 four thirds 2017-06-20 08:09:07 Post No.3098893
[Report] Image search: [Google]
Micro 4/3rds m43 four thirds 2017-06-20 08:09:07 Post No.3098893
[Report] Image search: [Google]
File: maxresdefault[1].jpg (62KB, 1280x720px) Image search:
[Google]
![maxresdefault[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/n7r2Y2F.jpg "maxresdefault[1]")
62KB, 1280x720px
Micro 4/3rds m43 four thirds
Anonymous
2017-06-20 08:09:07
Post No. 3098893
[Report]
[View this topic]
Micro 4/3rds general?
Why is M43 the best format? And why do I have all these fucking lenses?
153 Posts / 21 Images
View this topic
>>
>>3098893
This is a meme right?
>>
it's small, more than good enough and has many lenses.
>>
just stumbled to this on the web. its a collection of 5 books, each with a photographer paired with a writer. photog provides the photos and writer tells a story based on them. theres hido, ballen, and some other pretty decent guys. would have loved the same collection without the dumb text. im sort of mad because its cheap, but its ruined too, so wont buy.
photobook thread i guess. hope this one goes beyond 30 posts.
13 Posts / 4 Images
View this topic
>>
>>3097373
>ruined too
What do you mean?
>>
>>3097779
the insertion of text, the whole concept, is distracting and forced. maybe it COULD have worked better with original pics, but there are already seen photos inside, so its lazy too.
>>
File: beep bepep.png (189KB, 1652x985px) Image search:
[Google]
189KB, 1652x985px
I bought all these and no one cares but in this thread just 1 person might care and find it neat so it's good enough.
I got all these, they should be coming in handy. Every time i look at these professional photographers I feel more and more significant.
File: IMG_2695.jpg (29KB, 644x429px) Image search:
[Google]
29KB, 644x429px
How do you shoot erotic photography? I hired a model for a nude erotic shoot and I've never done one before. Do you basically pose her in ways that would make your dick hard or is there more to it? I feel like it will be distracting trying to focus on getting good shots when I'm looking at her and thinking I want to fuck her (she's young and very pretty), but on the other hand, if I rub one out before the shoot I don't think I'll be able to really tell what's erotic and what isn't if I'm not horny.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 644 Image Height 429 Scene Capture Type Standard
44 Posts / 8 Images
View this topic
>>
I think you might use a camera to do it. The camera might need batteries though, or so I've heard. Also something about a lens maybe.
>>
File: 7c276d24c0abd9559597cccdbc7435db.jpg (44KB, 600x315px) Image search:
[Google]
44KB, 600x315px
>>3092974
Modigliani was a pro at pictorial eroticism
might be a little dated but still very helpful in terms of inspiration/ideas
>>
Just because i'm curious: what is your plan and why? You want to sell those pics, private porn collection or is it more for artistic purposes?
File: vid gen leo.jpg (191KB, 1154x2184px) Image search:
[Google]
191KB, 1154x2184px
Here we discuss techniques, gear and anything else related to capturing video footage. Please don't pretend to be an expert if you don't know what you're talking about.
Posting short films or other work you've done is encouraged.
We tend to use and recommend DSLRs/mirrorless cameras because they provide phenomenal picture quality for their price, have large sensors (ie the same size used in high-end cinema cameras) and have interchangeable lenses.
Sticky below
> - READ THE STICKY IF YOU'RE NEW
https://pastebin.com/BdXChqwP
Previous thread
>>3057636
314 Posts / 23 Images
View this topic
>>
>>3080120
Silly anon, actors are the brushes
>>
hello m8s
im /r/ing the link to a short movie posted here some months ago. i believe it was called "joy of creation" or something along those lines and was about an autist with a neon room that masturbated to a porly made scketch he hid under the bed.
ty
>>
Is using LUT's to color grade the proper way to color grade? It feels amateurish to just load up some pre made settings, slightly twik them and call it a day. Nearly every tutorial on YT has this workflow but don't want to be meme'd.
How do professionals color grade?
Catsby (ID: !RqPRxvq4p6)
Catsby's April threads: Climbing edition 2017-05-03 07:16:39 Post No.3068632
[Report] Image search: [Google]
Catsby's April threads: Climbing edition 2017-05-03 07:16:39 Post No.3068632
[Report] Image search: [Google]
File: climbing.jpg (354KB, 1000x799px) Image search:
[Google]
354KB, 1000x799px
Catsby's April threads: Climbing edition
Catsby (ID: !RqPRxvq4p6)
2017-05-03 07:16:39
Post No. 3068632
[Report]
[View this topic]
Went to Sweden to climb cracks and drink cheap beer.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi
213 Posts / 98 Images
View this topic
>>
File: climbing-2.jpg (736KB, 1000x667px) Image search:
[Google]
736KB, 1000x667px
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi
>>
File: climbing-3.jpg (616KB, 667x1000px) Image search:
[Google]
616KB, 667x1000px
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi
>>
File: climbing-4.jpg (475KB, 667x1000px) Image search:
[Google]
475KB, 667x1000px
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi
File: IMG_20170625_172341.jpg (1MB, 4160x3120px) Image search:
[Google]
1MB, 4160x3120px
Howdy /p/, /diy/ requesting assistance. I know your sticky says gear threads are discouraged, but the only QTDDTOT I could find is some numbnut asking dumb questions about pirated photoshop, so here I go.
In a deceased estate I got pic related, a Pentax P30 and a "Calypso" Nikonos II underwater camera. I am perfectly comfortable pulling these down and restoring them to function for sale (assuming they're dead, I have not really played with them short of brushing dust off and making sure 30 year old batteries haven't raped them) but I'm not sure if I should bother. Pricing seems all over the shop for both models. To me, the Nikonos seems like a neat unit, but for all I know it's next to useless in a practical sense, plus, this unit looks like someone has had at it with a screwdriver, unaware you need to remove the lens to lift the body from the shell.
Are these cameras noteworthy in any way or should I dump them and save myself some time?
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make HUAWEI Camera Model HUAWEI RIO-L02 Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 28 mm Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2017:06:25 17:23:42 Exposure Time 1/33 sec F-Number f/2.0 ISO Speed Rating 64 Lens Aperture f/2.0 Flash Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 2.96 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 4160 Image Height 3120 Exposure Index 265 White Balance Auto Gain Control Low Gain Up Time (UTC) 07:23:41 Date (UTC) 2017:06:25
6 Posts / 2 Images
View this topic
>>
>>3101591
The nikonos is pretty much fucked by now.
What a shame.
>>
File: IMG_20170626_191423.jpg (1MB, 3120x4160px) Image search:
[Google]
1MB, 3120x4160px
>>3101623
Eh, it's definitely had a rough life but it's clean as a whistle inside, no mold in any of the optics, all seals soft and accounted for, and the drive gear and film path is clean and free. I'd suspect it would be perfectly functional if I threw a roll in it.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make HUAWEI Camera Model HUAWEI RIO-L02 Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 28 mm Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2017:06:26 19:14:24 Exposure Time 1/100 sec F-Number f/2.0 ISO Speed Rating 69 Lens Aperture f/2.0 Flash Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 2.96 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 3120 Image Height 4160 Exposure Index 230 White Balance Auto Gain Control Low Gain Up Time (UTC) 09:14:23 Date (UTC) 2017:06:26
>>
>>3102385
The seal looks ok, can you test it in a bathtub?
File: gty_hubble_telescope_wg_150424_12x5_1600.jpg (123KB, 1600x669px) Image search:
[Google]
123KB, 1600x669px
>ITT shit camera
I'll start
>Fixed lens
>Essentially just a gigantic point and shoot
>Mirror lens
>F24
>Low res CCD sensor
>Only displays b&w
>Way overpriced
>Designed only for Astro photography
>Is a stupid unitasker
What a waste of money
9 Posts / 4 Images
View this topic
>>
...
>>
File: Hubble_before_after.jpg (413KB, 2000x1070px) Image search:
[Google]
413KB, 2000x1070px
>>3101523
>muh bokeh
>spend milions of dollars on gear
>can't even take a sharp image on the first try
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 Vertical Resolution 72 Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 2000 Image Height 1070
>>
>initially fuck up the lens
>It's literally a giant mirrorless camera
It's basically a Sony
File: 19221843_10100547978970321_2204974897476172735_o.jpg (433KB, 2048x1365px) Image search:
[Google]
433KB, 2048x1365px
Anyone have this actions for download ?
http://fineartactions.com/
5 Posts / 1 Images
View this topic
>>
>>3099534
>fine art
fuck this whole industry, seriously
>>
>>3099534
>that
>fine
>art
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAAHHA
HOLY SHIT LMAO THIS PEOPLE AND THEIR TACKY FANTASY. REMEMBER THAT FAGTRON FROM REDDIT THAT DID """"SURREAL"""" FINE ART? WE NEED AN ART PURGE.
>>
>>3099534
>http://fineartactions.com/
typical white girl
File: 2016-comedy-wildlife-photography-awards-winners-10.jpg (50KB, 770x1019px) Image search:
[Google]
50KB, 770x1019px
Say something about photography which you believe - but which others might find controversial.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 900 Image Height 1191
77 Posts / 4 Images
View this topic
>>
Level horizon OCD and symmetry fetishism is overrated
>>
>>3101310
Fucking triggered. The only person allowed to shoot tilted horizons is Koudelka.
The symmetry thing is pure */p/ though, and I'm grateful to all the autists who developed my appreciation of it.
>>
small format photography is too easy to be considered fine art