>drill instructor starts yelling at you and screaming at your face
>start crying
>>32527844
maybe the army isn't for you...
>>32527844
Just leave then?
It's alright pal. You're helping out your countries' armed forces when you pay your taxes.
Could the Iowas be refitted to deploy railguns?
>>32527767
Our already sky high debt would become an non-computable high number
>>32527767
>>>/pol/ drumpkin
This is a progressive board no Nazis allowed
>>32527828
This is low quality b8
What do you think will be the next big "thing" at Shot Show will be? Like where the industry moves.
I think revolvers will be big next year.
the next big thing will be "budgeting" as manufacturers who have been used to an 8yr growth have to survive when the bubble pops.
>>32527624
I was going to wait to unvale my big anounsement but sinse I seen this thred i will say that I will be daybewing my new collectons of sheths at the next gun show. I will be their to anser questons and tour my sheths so make sure to stop by my both
>>32527624
>Single-stack
>Subcompact
>9mm
>With low bore axis
>Solid metal construction
>And doesn't completely suck
Reliable builds edition.
Old >>32520454
You guys should try to get ten posts in a row without a tripfag
>>32527283
Seems like ar-15s are allergic to water.
>>32527495
Only if you don't let the water drain out.
Noone is gonna dunk their M4 in water and immediately fire it.
Prove me wrong.
>Protip: You can't.
>>32527249
No argument from me. Part 1
Mmm look at that juicy square butt
>>32527265
Part 2
>Take a modern high-end 1911 (WC, Les Baer, Ed Brown)
>Send it back in time to WW1 and trench conditions
>Must feed from WW1 mags and ammo
Will it still be reliable? Or will the loose tolerances of WW1 era mags and ammo fuck it up?
Very reliable with ball ammo.
It'll be fine, the design as a whole is fine. The GI guns were "loose" because it made life easier on anyone doing parts replacement in a time before CNC, not because a 1911 needs to be loose.
I would I would say the lw hammers could be an issue with debris, but primers were softer then too so it's a wash
>>32527082
I don't know about WW1 but my dad still uses 1911 mags his father used in WW2 with no problems.
any stories of small or short drill instructors?
also any funny drill instructor stories
>>32527076
>2007
>go to basic
>have short DS
>leave 9 weeks later
>who cares because it was fucking basic and only faggot ass privates tell basic stories
Had a DS who would keep us standing there for ridiculous long times. That's not unusual but he would always talk about the weirdest shit. His favorite topic was his own dating/love life. He would tell us about dates he was planning, who the girls were, what he thought of them, and how it ended up going. Sometimes he would walk around with his phone and show people his tinder matches. He was genuinely a weird guy.
>his military experience peaked at bootcamp so he still reminisces about it
Don't be that guy
Hey, /k/. Is there any advantage in RCS if one rounds-off certain parts of the airframe, like pic related?
Or in the hypothetical F-19 design?
>>32527015
>hypothetical
kek
>>32526938
rounded edges are detrimental to reducing RCS.
I'm starting school in Arizona in a week, moving from California. Obviously this is the land of uncucked magazines and scary salt weapons, so of course I'd like to enjoy those freedoms.
I figure I'll have to get an AZ license/ID card since I'll probably be getting a job in the near future as well, but I still won't be considered a resident of AZ. With that being said, does the background check via form 4473 check for residency?
I'm trying to stay within the bounds of the law here, any help would be nice.
pic unrelated
>>32526777
Yes. The 4473 will require current residence.
>>32526777
The 4473 just cares about what address you have on your ID card.
>>32526787
>>32526801
So if I get my AZ license/ID and it has my current Arizona address on it, I should be good to go?
Also, do I need the AZ license itself, or will an ID card suffice? I read somewhere that AZ licenses aren't required for out of state students, even if they have a job. But my car is registered in California, along with the insurance and all that bullshit. The last thing I want is to be denied a sale because of some miscommunication between all the paperwork.
Anyone heard anything about production beginning? Rumors? Think they'll have any announcement at SHOT?
>>32526723
Just get a 1911 best gun out there
>>32526743
please end your own life.
>>32526723
The fuck is the point of this?
>baffle strike
hurr gotta go buy a new slide now
http://www.colt.com/Catalog/Revolvers/Cobra
So it looks like the MSRP is $700. Is that worth a shit, /k/?
>700 doll hairs
>For a pony rollmark
I'd rather get a smith
>>32526712
Get a S&W.
If for no other reason than the fact that the cylinder release goes the correct way.
>>32526712
Or get a Ruger. I've got a 3" SP101 and a 5.5" Redhawk. Both are fucking tanks, and IMO are less flashy than the S&W's
S&W's are classic revolvers which look beautiful and perform great, like a midnight blue 1973 Plymouth Barracuda.
Rugers are well-built workhorses which take pretty much anything you feed them, like my ex-girlfriend.
Soon.
That's real fucking disgusting.
Also what is it?
>>32526740
>Can't recognise a m249s
>reeeee normie
Why you on this board if you don't know
>>32526707
>semi auto SAW
How much they charge for this neutered thing.
What happens if a tanker or a pilot has to poop/pee really bad when they are doing their mission?
>>32526542
idk, also sauce on gif??
>>32526554
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aDaOgu2CQtI
>>32526542
Diapers, tube in the ass, hang it out the window.
Let's talk about the Space Shuttle and it's often-downplayed potential as a weapons delivery system.
I know the official story is that the only military shuttle flights were the ones from Canaveral carrying KH-11's, TDRS's, LACROSSE's, and the odd MENTOR, but something feels a little incomplete there.
The Russians were well known for copying US systems and capabilities, and rarely did they design a new weapons system that wasn't a direct response to something we were already operating. We all know what Polyus was, and the question I have is what was Polyus built to counter. The US defense industry leaked like a sieve in the 80s, so there had to be something good.
What were the odds that the US had some sort of insertable mission module for the Space Shuttle carrying either MIRVs, rods from god, or a MIRACL-style chemical laser? The pad at Vandenberg (with it's upright payload assembly building for rapid payload-mating to a shuttle stack on standby) HAD to have been designed around a lot more than just launching satellites into polar orbit to justify the costs of building it, right?
And furthermore, what new capability or system did we get in the late 80s that convinced the USAF to walk away from their own dedicated shuttle and its expensive new Californian launch pad?
The USAF only gives up hardware when they have something better, so it must have been something pretty spectacular.
>>32526431
It's pretty obvious that the Shuttle was not a military weapon.
>>32526431
Its illegal to put weapons of mass destruction into orbit.
>>32526469
Not true, I knew a guy who was the door gunner on the Endeavor.
What's the American equivalent of the SKS?
>>32526188
M1?
m14
>>32526196
winrar