Archived threads in /k/ - Weapons - 2092. page

File: JaKdo__SR16.jpg (270KB, 1592x1600px) Image search: [Google]

270KB, 1592x1600px

>>32868107

File: bundesheerkfor2.jpg (37KB, 620x350px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 620x350px

>>32868117

File: 1485995263652.jpg (343KB, 1588x1600px) Image search: [Google]

343KB, 1588x1600px

>>32868125

>>32868054

.44 special

>>32868054
look thats a lightweight bullet it WILL kick less than a 125, dependes on the speed tough, if its a hot 110gr load and a mid 125 gr load come other factor in mind, like muzzle blast, noise, and psychological effect of those, of a faster proyectile and which will kick more, depends.

In .357 buffalo bore loads 180gr them up to soaring at 1400 Fps!! now thats a hunting load

>>32868187
When I said the same effect I meant the same recoil

This is a board on 4chan notorious for having some of the dumbest mother fuckers you'll ever meet.

That being said, I'm not afraid, just paranoid.

>>32868019
Its along the same sort of mental lines as not wanting to die a degrading/bitch death, like being raped then murdered. Most people here dont wanna be shot and killed by some dumb libtard who thinks because the person supports X they deserve to die because of the libtards retarded views.

File: tinfoilfaggot.jpg (28KB, 400x300px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 400x300px

How many people do you think are forcing this new 'afraid' meme?

I think there's about 3-6 individuals, probably not from 4chan.

>>32868077
There's literally nothing wrong with being paranoid, the only other option is ignorance.

File: 75.jpg (53KB, 316x729px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 316x729px

WW1 guns were used in WW2. WW2 guns would be useful today. WW1 guns would have lower performance, especially in range, but could still be used, provided we have the ammunition.

Mind you, artillery has improved a lot since WW1 : extended range (+50Km), better mobility, better accuracy, dual purpose cluster munitions, and above all, much, much better communication which allows more precise guiding of the strikes. All in all that means today's artillery plays in another league than WW1 gun, but those older guns could still be used with some effect, hypothetically. At the end of the day, melinite is melifuckinglite.

And you actually can see WW1 guns still being used to day : they are called mortars. Syrians rebels are using very crude guns that aren't any more sophisticated (even less) than WW1 guns, and apparently they have had some success.

>>32868121

TL;DR:

It worked then and it can work now

>>32868013
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xjS8j2PWtK4

>>32868005
>need

Fuck off faggot

File: 1464565804970.jpg (846KB, 1840x3264px) Image search: [Google]

846KB, 1840x3264px

>>32868005
>silencer
exit the thread fucktard

>>32868005
WHATEEEEEEEE? HuhEEEEEEE?

>>32867928
Sounds like you want the usp. And rightly so, a lot of people have them and they're solid guns.

Personally, if I get another .45 it'll be a Colt 1911. But then again, I'm a 28 year old fudd that likes the older funs.

File: p220carry.jpg (68KB, 802x600px) Image search: [Google]

68KB, 802x600px

1911's unironically suck ass, whatever you do, not that.

I'd personally go with some Sig, but that's just me. P225 or P220 carry preferably, but if you don't have that kind of dosh it's understandable.

File: 20160628_152632-1.jpg (3MB, 2799x1786px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 2799x1786px

I own the coach and the tactical, both in .45. They are both fucking amazing, if you want to carry it I'd pick the compact of course. Otherwise I'd start with the fullsize. The recoil on the compact is pretty low too, no idea how they do it.

File: sorry anon.png (231KB, 1912x848px) Image search: [Google]

231KB, 1912x848px

>>32867909
I can't even respond seriously. The ad made me die of laughter.

>>32867936
>*teleports behind you*

File: 1419475296580.jpg (79KB, 500x423px) Image search: [Google]

79KB, 500x423px

>>32867936

File: 1473708495777.gif (1001KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

1001KB, 640x480px

>>32867793
>it's another underaged airsofter thread

File: Sept.jpg (188KB, 960x720px) Image search: [Google]

188KB, 960x720px

>>32867818

File: b.jpg (2MB, 2262x702px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2262x702px

why turkish special forces perform so bad at Al Bab?

>>32867707

Ppl think what they do is actual testing? A lot of the shit they do is retarded, you should only watch it if you're drinking.

>>32867707
>>32867939
this
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_hfLZozBVpM
>almost 10 straight minutes of uninterrupted Autism

>>32867939
>implying I'm not always drinking

>>32867547
An additional mag per firearm as last precaution

>>32867554
Well I'd have 7+1 for my rifle and 2+1 for my pistol so if I throw in an extra mag for both in my ruck. That sounds reasonable and shouldn't add to much weight.

>>32867561
Yeah basically what I was getting at

>>32867525
Desert Eagles don't shoot anal plugs.

>>32867525
the safety has to be on to load it

>>32867525
50 BMG in pooper to verify

A horsecock dildo with a steel rod on the middle.

File: 3551.jpg (34KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 500x500px

>>32867456

So what's the tl;dr of all of this? It doesn't effect me but it suck to hear about it happening.

>>32867419
Build guns
Bury guns
Bury ammo

There has been significant resistance to it and at this point i simply hope that it will not pass. However as a member of the national guard, I should be immune to this shit, even if it does. Sucks though.

>>32867389
Look at the head stampings. Are they all the same?

They might be someone's shitty reloads they threw out after they had a double charge that blew their gun to shit.

If they're factor ammunition though they're probably fine.

>>32867389
They should be, most dangerous case with those could be a hangfire, and most likely dud or a jam.
If your handgun is steel frame, it should not harm you anyway.

>>32867389
I wouldn't risk it. They have probably had a lot of water on them, etc. You will probably get a lot of duds and possibly hang fires, which are super dangerous.

>>32867340

you'll put your eye out kid.

File: 1479763793387.jpg (68KB, 633x758px) Image search: [Google]

68KB, 633x758px

>>32867345
Says you!

>>32867340
Are these humans squirrels? If yes then yes.