Nazi "What If" Thread.
>>32861855
It would have made Hitler black
>>32861855
>What is Nazis were given 1000 T-64BV
>>32861855
What if Nazi Germany and Israel went to war with eachother?
>maniacal laughter
>>32861822
>m1911.jpg
But that's wrong
>>32861822
>cocks head in confusion and slight arousal
Nice, hand tooled?
Why didn't/doesn't the US military adapt/adopt the AR-10 in 7.62x51 as their battle rifle?
>>32861793
because of Winchester and Springfield
Because during the tests the barrel on the test model banana peeled. By the time Stoner figured out the problem everyone was done with battle rifles so he shrank it and now we have the ar15.
>>32861793
Logistics idiot.
Nice thread. I'm sure you and other guys dad's that didn't pull out will thoroughly enjoy.
All he did was attempt to smash a terrorist uprising
What did he do wrong?
>>32861466
Lose.
>>32861471
Good guys don't always win.
They tried to paint him bad but in the end he was just a faithful gallant knight of His Royal Highness King George III
>>32861466
Be a limey faggot
Is it a bad idea to find some really rural forest in ohio to target shoot in?
nope
>>32861367
what do you mean by "find"? shoot on it without the landowner's permission?
No. I do the same in New Mexico.
ITS HAPPENING!!!
bump , i guess everyone is working...
>>32860946
So it's not the hpa or repeal of the nfa so who cares?
>>32860946
>Sandy Vag parents collectively shit pants
welp, making a pic of Obama crying next to Trump laughing now
How is .380 for concealed carry? I'm thinking of getting pic related, because I like the size, way it feels in the hand, and the fact that I'd have 16 shots of it.
I have heard complaints about .380 being underpowered though, though the gun should be a soft one to shoot right? Possibly I could convince my mother to finally learn to shoot.
>>32860794
Bump
>>32860794
.380 ACP is good for CC.
>>32860794
.380 is adequate
In a few years the US created and populated enter towns, and created a weapon that people still at the time weren't sure could exist. Nukes.
Today... nothing. All anyone is ever doing is just trying to improve existing technology. A little polish here, rounding out the edges there. No new tech is being created.
What gives?
Where's the 4 stage bullet that refires everytime it penetrates something? Or the bomb that liquefies materials that are magnetic?
>>32860133
Where's the 4 stage bullet that refires everytime it penetrates something?
For what purpose?
>>32860149
Because reasons stfu
>>32860133
Turns out fusion is as close as we'll ever get to making physics our bitch.
Sorry fampai.
So I got my first cz. P09. So far I'm a fan. Tell me how much of a fag I am and how badly I fucked up. Cz thread, btw.
>he bought a plastic cz
>>32860014
I own 3 CZs, so not a hater.
I think they have flimsy sights and are getting flimsier with the P07/'P09 gen
My SP-01 was dropped from hip height on to wooden flooring and the front post loosed up.
Then on my brand new in box P-07 the front post fell off on the 4th pull of the trigger.
CZ was good to me each time on the fix but I just can't take them seriously as "fighting" guns anymore
>>32860014
how much was the pmc 7.62x39? i have a feeling it was pricey for 7.62x39
Alrighty guys I need some good opinions on what pistol caliber carbine to get, ive been really considering one of the mech techs and a full size glock, but cant decide which of the 3 big calibers (9, 40, 45) I want. would probably prefer something that takes glock mags. fire away!
this is mainly something Id like for hiking, plinking, maybe as a trunk gun
if you take into account price per round, i think that takes 45 out of the running IMO.
i vastly prefer 9mm but in a carbine, 40 would be ok as well.
as far as possible rifles off the top of my head: the mech tech (and other glock) conversions, AR styled pcc, just right carbines, kel tec sub2000, and the kirss vector
>>32859804
The only quality PCC that takes Glock mags currently is the Vector.
I have an MPX currently and love it, but mags are expensive. 1000rds through it so far without a failure.
pic unrelated
I'm looking at buying an SKS from my local gunshop. No, I've never bought a gun before, and no, I don't own any guns. However, I am no stranger to them, having grown up with them all my life.
>am poorfag
>inb4 newfag or some shit.
The SKS in question is a Romanian model, and all serial numbers are matching (according to the dude behind the counter last I spoke with him). Because it's all matching numbers, the price is a bit higher than what I've normally seen for an SKS, which I'm willing to accept. I want to say it was around $600 USD, but I could be wrong. It's been a while since I've had an opportunity to visit. However, my main concern is that it's missing the bayonet.
If I were to buy this SKS (irregardless of how overpriced it may or may not be; this is all hypothetical) could I purchase a replacement bayonet for the thing?
That gunshop is trying to rip you off. If you really want an overpriced SKS, here ya go faggot.
http://www.gunbroker.com/item/617160776
>>32859553
>$600 SKS
>>32859553
>irregardless
>go to range
>"no rapid fire (more than 1 shot every 3 seconds)"
>turn 360 degrees and walk away
>>32859517
>go to range
>they rent out a gatlimg gun from the 1880s
I like my gun range.
>>32859517
This is unironically good for SSAA ranges here. Most only let you load one round at a time and my local banned me from bringing anything without wood furniture.
>>32859689
>my local banned me from bringing anything without wood furniture
Really? There are fuck ton of bolt action fudd special rifles that are synthetic though. Even "muh remington 700."
building a Recoilless gun.
Im bored and I have money, a welder, a plasma cutter 35 acres of land and time.
I want a 3 inch(76mm) smoothbore gun that fires fin stabilized shells atleast at 600fps
Any ideas? suggestions?
Also is this considered a destructive device?
>>32859391
>35 acres of land and time.
you're gonna mine the metal?
>>32859391
Go to DTIC and read the Recoilless Rifle Engineering Design Manual.
It is a title II destructive device.
>>32859391
>600fps
Uh a black powder canon would suffice.In which case follow this fun little read:
http://www.buckstix.com/howitzer.htm
Now back on point, a recoiless rifle would be considered a DD at best, possibly an AOW.
My idea would be stick to the BP canon and have fun. Unless you can attain a complete set of prints with all applicable parts lists, this is something no novice should attempt.
t.defense contractor that manufactures weapons, fuck off, I'm on my lunch break.
So we can all agree that the T34-85 was the best tank of WW2?
shitty sights, no radio, usually poorly trained crews. you can make a billion of these though
>>32859142
>best tank of WW2
>agree
First time on /k/?
>implying
Also, didn't we just fucking have this thread?
Sup /k/,
I'm looking to buy a Makarov to CCW.
>inb4 "but its underpowered"
What's the best price out there?
>classicfirearms has 'em for $299 but I know a lot of anons hate shopping there.
>>32859094
$299 is probably going to be the best price you find out there for a decent condition Makarov. I got my Bulgarian (pic related) from Classis, and it's fucking gorgeous. I CC it in the summer time when I'm wearing lighter clothing. Just make sure you keep it oiled up.
>>32859094
Have no clue why anons would hate shopping there. Ive never had a problem with them besides their phone etiquette.
Besides that, everything i get has come in great condition, shipped and arrived quickly, and the prices are pretty reasonable, especially if youre not in a hurry and wait for a special and then use coupons they email you. If i wasnt in school and poor right now i would jump on one of their maks.
>tfw I got one of those $250 Maks from Sportsman's Guide for Christmas