Archived threads in /k/ - Weapons - 2082. page

We don't know because nobody cares about your shithole country

>>32881170
other than the fact literally everyone talks about israel, sure.
go back to mcdonalds

>>32881181
Here's a whole fucking list of recources

http://www.gunpolicy.org/firearms/region/israel

go eat your balaclava or whatever

>425
Not at that price. You'll be overpaying by a good 50 dollars

>>32881129
Id rather buy an fn.hell for lil less you can get a canik and it will be a better pistol.

They're heavy for what they really are, a re-engineered SR with the new edgey frames. Sadly it overshadowed the sr45 on release so we never got the compact.

>>32881069
Yes. The V-hull and uparmoring for a patrol vehicle is now a baseline for a modern combat vehicle. Even lighter offroading vehicles like the MATV-SF and JLTV have fuckloads more armor and interior space than humvees.

>Not effective against 'x'
They aren't invincible. No vehicle is invincible. But they GREATLY improve survivability and force the enemy into using heavier or more complex methods which are more time consuming to build and place.

>>32881069

They stop people losing their lives.

I doubt fuel economy is really on the list of things to worry about for most militaries.
The people we were fighting in Afghanistan and Iraq didn't have EFPs. When fighting a modern army they might not be as useful but still they offer more protection than a Hummer or a snatch landrover.

>>32881069

>Not very effective against Explosively Formed Penetrator (EFP)

Still very effective against the rest of the stuff.

It's like saying aircraft may not be very good because SAM systems exist.

>>32881040
>Assault Rifle

>>32881040
God I am so glad to be away from the Northeast.

He turned them in for safe keeping. To the cops. What an idiot.

>>32880896
Happens every day. If you make someone cringe, you have momentarily subdued them.

>>32880896
Yes post story

You're looking at it, kid.

>>32880873
If it's not a Hi-Power it's shit.

>>32881397
This desu

File: question dog.jpg (29KB, 447x369px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 447x369px

Alternatively, what's the cheapest holster that won't ND into my ass?

>>32880652
Overhyped unoptimized peace of shit
Can't expect more or less from Ubisoft

>>32880652
>Ubisoft

> /k/ approved

Who cares? /v/ has its own board for obvious reasons.

On the contrary, Escape from Tokrev has a much more /k/-related, gun porn driven weapons management system.

thats a lightning link

>>32880585
I don't know for sure, but this seems like a really cheap way to euthanize your dog.

>>32880629
except this seems to work with a m16 BCG not SP1

>>32880223
To kill marines.

File: V-22 IDWS.webm (1MB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1280x720px

>>32880223
because the MOD is full of nerd

>>32880223
Because you're mom wanted a child that wasn't a disappointment so bad that she got double teamed by a CH-56 and a C-123 and shot that thing out of her old, rusty cooch.

>>32880107
Actually shit.

>>32880107
Most of their shit is decent.

Their mags are excellent.

Though several of their other offerings are pure memes.

Their AR stuff is GTG. AK stuff is hit and miss.

Saladin

>>32879813
>Has there ever been a time where Muslim forces (military, paramilitary, militias, etc) have treated their prisoners according to established wartime law?


yes, whatever you think isis style executions are exception not a norm

>>32879820
Fiction

File: Nuke train.jpg (3MB, 3888x2592px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 3888x2592px

Britain only has 250 warheads afaik, and France has around 300, but I have no idea what type they are and how good their delivery systems are. Russia has about 1500 usable weapons total.
Either way, unless most Russian weapons are actually in a terrible state and mostly unusable, Europe won't be able to suppress Russian weapons with a counterforce strike. Russians have enough missiles (if they work) to suppress the French and British silos and nuclear command and control centers to risk sparing some of their weapons for later countervalue strikes. Europe doesn't have that, the only ace up their sleeve is the Trident missiles on any submarines out on patrol during the strike. Either way, it'll get nasty, way worse than an American-Russian nuclear exchange.

>>32879600
I would say the bigger threat is from Immigration but Russia is still a threat to Eastern Europe. I think NATO has done enough to reinforce the Baltic's. It's enough to deter any hybrid warfare stuff and limits Russia's play book.

NATO other than dumb bombs and maybe a few nuclear cruise missiles doesn't really have any tactical nukes. Besides the US, France probably has the best tactical nuclear weapons in NATO. However, it doesn't pale in comparison to the Russians.

>Arty

Russia has a lot of it and is getting a lot of practice in Ukraine. However, it's not very accurate and to destroy a target it requires a crazy amount of ammo compared to NATO.

>Air force

NATO has the advantage if they can manage the S-400 and S-300. And if the airfields can survive tactical ballistic missiles.

Is it just me or is the fact of Europe freaking the fuck out about Russia a bit silly at this point? They don't have the might of the combined Warsaw pact anymore. Eastern European satellites states are friends and even allies to western Europe and America now.

We own what was once the Russian buffer zone. The EU and just the Eurasia members of Nato could it seemingly defeat Russia alone.

File: 1475442961364.jpg (75KB, 570x845px) Image search: [Google]

75KB, 570x845px

>>32879594

Why are they sitting on the same side of the booth?

Why didn't the photographer just take a pic of them at the end of the table?

Are karl and ian..a couple?

So many questions

>>32879594
>Arby's for a date
I'm calling Stephanie to pick me up

>>32879594
I can't exactly conceal under a slim fit dress, so

>>32879525
>"A super profit-maker!"

What did they mean by this?

File: 1258582116339.jpg (56KB, 500x379px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 500x379px

>>32879525

>mfw Intratec made a Glock 42 and 43 twenty years before it was cool.

>>32879761
Probably that you can sell them for a decent markup rather quickly, and make a profit.

Chemistry and metallurgy are more important than the mechanical complexity.

>>32879457
>what is rifling
>what is smokeless powder
>what are metallic cartridges
>et cetera

Because all the prerequisite technology and knowledge wasn't invented or acquired yet, you retard.

There is a lot more going on in a rifle than what you can see when you simply take one apart.

To create viable repeating rifles, we needed:
-Tremendous advances in steel making, and the Bessemer process had to be invented.
-Stamping/milling technology
-Ability to harden metal with consistency
-Advances in chemisty to make smokeless powder (BP fowls actions very quickly)
-Metallic cartridges with primers technology
-Gas checked jacketed projectiles
-A doctrinal need for such a firearm was not present until post WWI arguably