Archived threads in /k/ - Weapons - 1845. page

Since you're in Canadia you probably don't have to worry about looking over a century vz2008 before you buy it, although those do have a fix for the vz gremlin.

>>33083117
Canada doesn't have any weird import laws besides bans on specific firearms.
Yours is Czech made. You should be good to go.

File: vz58.webm (3MB, 600x338px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 600x338px

>>33083117
If it was imported from czech republic, it should be good to go. It's my favorite rifle I've ever held personally.
I'm torn between whether a vz58 or sks would be a better rifle for your country with the 5rd mag restrictions.
I have both, love both. But the vz58 is a lot easier to take apart and easier to clean all around. It's basically a heavily upgraded sks in a lot of ways.

>>33083078
Then just buy 1930s stuff and stfu.
Problem solved.

>>33083078
>Plastic tipped bullets
Higher ballistic coefficients and more reliable feeding in military arms.
>Bonded bullets
New bullet tech is where it's at. After all, we're kind of stalled otherwise.
>HV magnums
Kind of the point. 300WM will kill a bear just as dead (if not deader than 30 years ago) but a 338 LM is delivers a lot more power at range
>"tactical"
I agree.
>ballistic reticles
Not enough FFP mil reticles, far too much BDC reticles
>yuge scopes
Optics quality has improved greatly. My gripe would be about people that put 30x scopes on a <500 yard rifle. The old rule of 1x/100yd is still true. In capable hands and with sharp eyes, you can do more than ever with the same magnification.
>hyped up triggers with heavy pull weights
Which triggers are these?
>msr
AR-15's, AR-10's, AK's, and others are cool and have their place. I love that a Ruger AR-556 is capable of MOA accuracy--which as accurate as my grandfather's old .25 Remington and with a longer effective range.

>>33083153
>Higher ballistic coefficients
Barely. The difference is very slight.
>and more reliable feeding in military arms.
Show me a gun that won't feed softpoint and FMJ bullets.
>New bullet tech is where it's at. After all, we're kind of stalled otherwise.
Cup and core bullets work fine when driven at the proper velocity

https://www.buffalobore.com/index.php?l=product_list&c=86
>power
You use that word, but it's not defined and there is no way to measure it, so it's essentially meaningless.
>Not enough FFP mil reticles, far too much BDC reticles
Neither are needed, and both are useless except at known ranges.
>Optics quality has improved greatly
That's true, but the improvement has been in the clarity and coatings of the glass, not the size of the scope.
>Which triggers are these?
Remington X-mark pro, Winchester MOA, and Browning Feather trigger. All of these are heavy. The only brand that sells good triggers out of the box is Sako/Tikka.
>AR-15's, AR-10's, AK's, and others are cool and have their place.
It's not that these designs don't have potential. It's that people buy them for the way they make them feel, not for how they perform.

File: picher.jpg (73KB, 565x428px) Image search: [Google]

73KB, 565x428px

hers a picher of my famlee

>>33082931
Hell that was from before auntie mamma had sister cousin, where did you find that pic?

>>33082931
I find white trash girls to be very hot before the pregnancy/drug addiction ruins them

File: 1484945392624.png (461KB, 870x722px) Image search: [Google]

461KB, 870x722px

>>33082790
That's some good bait, anon.

>>33082790
I spend hours formatting the perfect bait whenever I want to troll and you have the fucking gall to post something like this? Go fuck yourself dude, if I had no self respect I would take the path of least resistance too

File: 1487723124973.png (84KB, 4000x4000px) Image search: [Google]

84KB, 4000x4000px

>>33082790

you've still got one in the chamber, and any time used dropping the mag is time batter spent shooting.

Incredibly specific application
More chances for it to fuck you over rather than save
Impedes trigger pull by at least a pound in all implementations and adds grit and creep

Not worth it
Remove

>>33082386
This...

>>33081567
While bait these are fun so lets enjoy the show

Someone will fall for it.

>>33081567
>10 round clips
I thought the M16 uses a 29-round clip

>>33080852
I've seen a /k/ommando post one before

>>33080891
>I've seen a /k/ommando post one before

yeah i saw him around a year ago i was hoping hes still around to post porn,

>>33080891
I've seen a thread for them before, but the $900 price tag for what it is I find unreasonable

Litterally cheaper than aks

>>33080573
The ar market is flooded and if you build instead of buy then it isn't overpriced.

File: 20170222_103817.jpg (4MB, 4128x3096px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 4128x3096px

I've built all mine for under $450 but they still are in the $700 and up range at all the gun shops around me. They are definitely cheaper then AK's to build but at gun shops they are about the same. I just picked up my AK for $429 and found this SKS for $329 around the time Sandy Hook happened and every AR was at $1,200 and up for basic garbage AR's.

I doubt they have some kind of master list. The reason being, theres no purpose to have one and if such a list did exist, it would be a huge liability. I would guess theres a lot of compartmentalization for security's sake.

Are you talking some Cerberus from Mass Effect defect where they are trying to help their old allies but use questionable methods or full turncoat?

>>33080533
If it turns out something like South Korean situation where people who actually call the shots are some shadowy moguls.

With the crossbreed you might be able to get about 350 for it.

>>33082008
tree fiddy.

>>33082022
Ill probably list it at $380 or something then

I'll check the lgs and report back on what's on the shelf there. I think I paidb $389 at my store for it

>>33080362
depends where.
yes in the west, no in sandland.

>>33080362
Missiles have pretty much made them obsolete everywhere that matters.

>>33080362
Mostly. They were questionable during WW2. Modern tanks can take at least 90mm shots to the front and anti-tank guns aren't maneuverable enough to ensure flank shot. The weight of a 120mm cannon is just too much to make infantry lug around with reloads.

Without the ability to move an anti-tank gun by hand it's basically a static gun emplacements and modern artillery and air strikes makes that pointless without a fortified position.

The whole idea was basically an ad hoc measure to use light artillery pieces against tanks.

File: 12038245_886779298038041_8201919730484571098_n.jpg (83KB, 960x639px) Image search: [Google]

83KB, 960x639px

>>33080313
There aren't any good semi .30-06
If you insist on getting one, the hcar is about the least worst.

Or step up to .300wm or .300 norma

>>33080313
>Semi-auto
>In .30-06

Why though? Going to .308 would give you so many options that are less than 70 years old.

>>33080333

I don't want to add another Caliber of munitions to the stock pile.

Are you a fucking idiot? You can look this shit up. In most states he gets the gun and you get the cash. Done deal.

If you ship it across state lines it has to be sent to an FFL.

my only advice is you demand he signs a bill of sale basically a sheet of paper that says "I, faggot, sold this weapon sn xxx-xxxx, to my faggoty-ass coworker, on this day, xx of x, xxxx.

both of you sign, and this means that weapon is ever used in a crime and they come looking for original owner, you can show them the bill of sale and pass the police on to the next guy

>>33080024

Have a bill of sale

>manufacturer
>model
>caliber
>serial number
>buyers license number from his drivers license
>get it signed by a notary public

The whole point is to cover your ass if the cops knock on your door saying that your gun was used in crime

Does it shoot when you pull the trigger? If so, 10/10
If not, 0/10

Next question

kys/10, I responded. Remember to sage.

I would shift the scope forward to where the dials are in front of the mount rings so you dont become a pirate.

>>33079234
Under what circumstances? In a European theater or on American soil?

>>33079234
Modern ECM systems can jam 1983 planes to point of absolute useless. And I don't think that USAF were so good in dogfights.

>>33079313
This. The euros would enjoy so much information dominance they would wipe the floor with 1983 USAF.