meme
>>2787715
so does your retardation, kek.
you are gay
>>2787721
>said the guy that has penis pics saved on his comp
kek
This man draws better than anyone on this board ever had. Hell, this man draws better then a lot of "inspirations" people have here.
And he draws child porn. Thild porn artist could get jailed in a lot of western countries and straight out murdered in 3rd land shitholes for what he does and he still draws better than you ever will.
I genuinely don't know how to feel about it.
okay
>>2786685
Mark Crilley draws child porn?
>>2786685
>and straight out murdered in 3rd land shitholes
heres a way to be a popular artist
girl artists tend to be popular with less effort, right ?
let's assume that you are at a good level already
>take a pic of yourself
>fire up photoshop
>import it
>paint over it 'til you look like a hot girl
>put it on your blog
enjoy the sweet, sweet e-fame and the countless commission demands that come with it
>>2787592
>another autistic thread
not gonna make it
>>2787593
>implying i want to "make it'
>>2787595
>makes a thread about making it
>doesn't like to make it
not gonna make it
WIP thread
Show me what you're wipping on.
>>2782521
Her tail begin on here buttock. The overall perspective is a bit off, as a result the pose look unatural. She is a fennec but have frog legs. Also beware of tangents, especially on her hand/face
>>2782521
Why is her tail on her left butt cheek
Yeeeee
It's out now, free to update. Download it if you're a CSP user as it will complete the software.
Big changes:
-Reduced file sizes
-Set Opacity to pen pressure
-12 new blending modes (including Color for greyscale workflows)
-Materials marketplace
fuck me, forgot the link
http://www.clipstudio.net/en/dl
>>2777007
>tfw I think I missed my prompt to download it earlier today when my comp crashed
Thanks a million op.
>>2777007
Will I risk fucking anything up if I am using a cracked copy?
How hard is it to set up a hangout for other like minded artists to just draw&chat the /ic/ way(throwing bants)?
no bs just draw
join the /ic/ discord and see for yourself
>>2770581
link
>>2770586
read the sticky
Weird, funny, strange stuff.
shadman is literally tracing live on youtube.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vgWxBIPU_gs&feature=youtu.be
>>2786849
>this video is private
He's already starting to damage control
>>2786849
lol skull bandana and sunglasses. what a moody white boy bitch.
>>2786849
why would you redraw something if you could just trace it? why is everyone on here such a fucking weeb who thinks anyone better than them is a "cheater" because they use the available tools to them because what's important is the art they produce not the rep they have on an austro-prussian hanggliding forum.
Just started acrylic painting, it's quite hard and I can't do anything decent
Do you have any tips/tutorials to help a beginner and to improve fast ?
>>2787821
dont hope for quick answer, everyone here is a drawfag
but anyways google for those
All I can say is that Acrylic dries quickly and is also waterproof after it dried, so I advise you to shake your colours carefully , and get the colours up in layers
>>2787855
>All I can say is that Acrylic dries quickly and is also waterproof after it dried, so I advise you to shake your colours carefully , and get the colours up in layers
This guy knows what's up. Get some matte medium(you can dilute with water but I've always found it doesn't stick as well to previous layers) so you can apply paint transparently. Blending is a bitch so you have to work pretty fast/have a spray bottle on hand to keep the paint wet.
You can use them like watercolor(dilute with water, washes on paper) or like oil paint(thickly on a sealed surface), and the same things that work for those will generally work for acrylics, so long as you keep in mind that it dries fast and once dry you can't rework it.
Work big on large canvas if possible and use as many different colors or pigments as possible. It's easier to pin down correct color that way and also not dilute the color as much by mixing too much
If I paid for a commission in full five months ago and the artist has yet to sketch it, and the idea of the project is a time sensitive/ original at the time of payment idea... do I have the right to request a new idea and or characters along with that? Since the time sensitive project is well past five months old at this point.
I would say of course, for example if a movie, video game or cartoon series had just come out five months ago and is now already forgotten about and no one likes it then I figure you can ask. It's not your fault the artist is taking forever.
>>2787454
Sounds like you got duped
> the time sensitive project is well past five months old at this point.
I would just move on. Your money is gone.
It's not your fault, but next time try and hire a more professional artist.
so do i have to uninstall the wacom bamboo drivers to install the cintiq drivers?
yes, and then after a few months you install yourself into the chiropractor.
>>2787187
thanks , i got the ergo stand with it . so i can stand and use it and shift it around. i always try to keep good posture and stuff and get up after a few hours or so and stretch and walk a little .
>>2787187
>falling for the chiropractor meme
So, is the point of drawing/painting an accurate depiction of the thing being depicted or is it an expression of the painter's feelings/ideas/character? Surely they are not exclusive to each other, but one has to be the one that gives painting its meaning and value over the other.
>>2786349
It's whatever the fuck you want.
If you can make money being abstract or expressing yourself, go ahead.
If you simply like drawing and want to showcase your raw talent, then strive for that.
>but one has to be the one that gives painting its meaning and value over the other.
If it adds something to the painting, then use it. If it takes away from the painting, don't. It's that fucking simple.
Your question is confusing by the way.
>>2786349
Photorealism can be sometimes nice to observe to see where artist put more detail and where not. Seriously it's closer to me in that regard to very abstracted paintings and abstract expressionism than to most people. At such point it's really more about individual strokes and such.
If it comes to realism/classicism, it's rarely about being really accurate, usually you put more detail in the place of focus and you became more lose outside of that field of vision. Also choice of pallette isn't without importance.
It's easier to see when you do photomanipulation in LAB space in Photoshop - you will see that with same values but different saturation or hue you can have totally different feeling from photo/collage/photomanip.
Even such simple things like putting your portrait on simple background, abstracted, heavily blurred one or "full" can give different meaning/response to the painting.
P.S. I don't even like realism and what /ic/ preaches most of the time
Ok so I was really excited to start using 3D.sk again for a new figure-drawing series. A few months ago you could access the nude figures for free (the only exception were the detailed closeups of genitals which required an account). Now I can't even look at a breast or a bottom without paying for a prohibitively expensive account.
Is there a similar site that doesn't charge money? Please don't say porn because I've tried and it's not good.
looks like proko's head silhouette from that stream
>>2787708
sketchfab.com
>>2787708
Nobody knows of anything else?
I'm trying to get used to the rules of perspective, freehanding them and applying them to my common work. The only issue is, for the life of me, I cannot wrap my head around 4 and 5 point perspective (honestly, fuck 6 point). The others, its easy to place the vertical and build around that, but for 4 point, the vertical is curved? whats the best way to get a reliable curve that fits the flow with the rest of the curves? I know there is probably a tool out there for doing it, but have any of you mastered it freehand? is it really worth it?
Also, how the fuck to do Scott's 4 point? shit bends my mind, and I have the fucking book and have no clue how to get what hes getting
>>2787030
scott literally breaks this shit down using the power of math....it's sort of daunting as a result....
>>2787030
Thats 5 point. Scott doesnt cover 4 point in the how to draw book.
A big sentiment among the tech elites down to the average factory worker has been uneasiness around the role of robotics in our lives, and the future of the work force.
I think currently we are in the worst possible position to create good artwork and it reflects in current artwork. A lot of modern art is crap. And it has been for a while.
I think what has contributed to this has been the lack of free time. There's been too much work to get done around making our lives easier, but our lives haven't caught up with the ease of living technology is attempting to create.
We have too many distractions, we have too little time to create art, we are still struggling to create enough food and shelter and medicine and jobs to satisfy the growing demands of a growing population.
The fruits of our labor are starting to show. Promises of robotics taking jobs are leave us hopeful that our children will live in a world where all of their basic needs are met.
So what does that mean for art? A lot of great artwork of the past was created out of struggle and pain and uncertainty. I'm sure we've all walked through a museum and thought "If I had no distractions and a healthy fear of death I could've made this too" and I think that's true.
I think a lot of art from the Italian Renaissance could've only be created because of how bad they had it, and we are fast approaching a world where I think art can only be created because of how good our lives will be.
What do we do when we don't have to worry about food and work? We will have more artists. The more time we have the more artists, the more great art we can create. Soon we will all have nothing but leisure time.
I think art will start bouncing back from painting a canvas a single color because that's all we have time for, to ease with which the greatest images of the Renaissance were created.
We'll have new great painters in the tradition of the old masters, except they'll be created from the opposite circumstances.
>I think art will start bouncing back from painting a canvas a single color because that's all we have time for
>I think art will start bouncing back from painting a canvas a single color because that's all we have time for
The biggest flaw in your absurd, naive rant.
Do you actually think that famous artists paint single color canvases because it's all they have time for?
>>2783945
god damn, you are an idiot. unfortunately you're not the kind of idiot that I can quickly point out why you're wrong because you are wrong on so many levels it's kind of impressive.
ironically I don't have time to tell you how wrong you are because I need to go practice 10 hours of art to make it, so in that way you are right I guess.
sage
>>2783955
yes. there's a fear in people that they need a gimmick in order to create the most expensive art they can as quickly as they can.
Artists have a fear of death more than ever, and think at any moment they could be ripped from their comfy world of creating artwork and thrown into the workforce. There's a fear that people don't need artists.
So with all of the distraction and fear comes a need to produce the most leisurely paintings they can. To sell things that embody the idea of a masterpiece can be a single brushstroke on a canvas. Capitalism and meritocracy, basically.
Once there is no more fear of working, or fear of providing for themselves, artists will create good artwork again.
I mean look at that Irakli Nader guy. He doesn't even paint. But he creates things with as many shortcuts as possible because he needs money to survive