Archived threads in /p/ - Photography - 43. page

File: bokeokeokeokeoke.jpg (3MB, 2240x3441px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 2240x3441px

Yes.

>>3128618
Look at this fucking disgusting busy as fuck background. Can't you into framing. Those meme balls don't make you any less of a shit photographer. Kys.

File: rsz_12016-10-22_083339.jpg (232KB, 666x664px) Image search: [Google]

232KB, 666x664px

>>3128621
Yes.

Pretty sure he uses an actual film camera

>>3128310
wow so underexposed what centered subject so mastery of light
if you think this photograph was difficult to take you need to git gud. the mountain and its reflection highlight a certain area of the photo. push your giraffe in that direction and BAM! masterpiece

File: IMG_20170806_001925_322.jpg (709KB, 1777x1280px) Image search: [Google]

709KB, 1777x1280px

in the garage

File: IMG_20170806_002352_773.jpg (356KB, 1920x1280px) Image search: [Google]

356KB, 1920x1280px

technically trespassing, if I really want to I could pick some locks and get into the rest of the building

File: 170719_163154_5D3_6175.jpg (422KB, 640x960px) Image search: [Google]

422KB, 640x960px

Oh man, so, the other day, I was doing a shoot in an abandoned church. We'd barely started when I heard the sound of car wheels on the gravel alley next to it. I peek my head out and there's a fucking police car there.

So, first thought, if they come in, we'll just try to be all "Oh, I'm sorry, I didn't realize we weren't allowed in here what with the door being entirely gone." So I keep taking pictures and wait for The Man to come take us down.

But hey, it doesn't happen, so I think that maybe the cop was just using that as a shortcut and I peek out the window again--no luck, cop car is still there, parked at the end of the alley right by the entry to the building and between me and my car.

So next thought: Escape. Unfortunately, there's not an easy egress to the building other than the lack-of-door where we came in. We search a bit and find stairs that would potentially lead down and out the back, but they're in really rough shape and end about five steps from the ground. I decide to risk it and climb/jump down.

Fortunately, they are sturdy enough still to hold my weight.

Even more fortunately, there is indeed an exit to the back, since the lack of steps at the bottom meant there was no going back once we'd jumped down.

Less fortunately, the back is just choked with weeds and bushes and trees. We really would have benefited from a machete to get through there, but we managed to claw our way through with some difficulty.

Even less fortunately, there's a fucking neck-high wall around the back. I'm able to hoist my model over it easily (she weighed like a pound and a half), but my fat ass had a lot more difficulty with it. If you'd asked me in the abstract, I'd have said I couldn't ever get over that wall. In the moment, though, I was highly motivated to get out the back, so I managed to do it. Fuck yeah, go me.

We went around the block and got in my car and drove the hell out of that cop's jurisdiction. Pic related.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS 5D Mark III
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.10 (Macintosh)
Photographer	A K Crain
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/4.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2017:08:06 01:29:01
Exposure Time	1/160 sec
F-Number	f/4.0
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	800
Lens Aperture	f/4.0
Exposure Bias	-1/3 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	33.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard

>still no dof
>still worse noise performance
>still oversized lenses, considering the system


who fucking cares? just take pictures and stop letting other peoples cameras make you insecure

>>3127352
Its still just mirrorless. If you want something to compete with the autofocus speed of a rebel you need an a9. Everything else falls short unless you're a shill. There's no reason not to go m43 since they have the better image quality, lenses, and video vs apsc sonys. Just buy whatever you need and use it to take photos. There is no perfect camera.

File: 36139918002_bccd76d34c_z_d[1].jpg (70KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

70KB, 640x480px

>>3127355
You can get pretty good shallow dof depending on the lens. Also lenses like the panasonic 20mm f1.7 and the olympus 45mm f1.8 are tiny as fuck

a really big fatcoque

a subject and a camera.
maybe some lights.

A house with a metric-fuckton of natural light and a reflector, lights would probably help but depending on budget all-natural is probably a solid starting point.

A lens that hits 1.8 or 2.2 that's north of 70mm (Equiv) and while not entirely necessary an ND filter never hurts when you're just beaming light in at 1.8

File: 09211.jpg (60KB, 1083x720px) Image search: [Google]

60KB, 1083x720px

>>3126338

File: _PNT1860.jpg (698KB, 798x1200px) Image search: [Google]

698KB, 798x1200px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	RICOH IMAGING COMPANY, LTD.
Camera Model	PENTAX K-3
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.6 (Windows)
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	75 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2017:07:25 14:14:35
Exposure Time	1/750 sec
F-Number	f/6.7
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	100
Lens Aperture	f/6.7
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	50.00 mm
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Distant View

File: DSC_0328small.jpg (369KB, 1000x667px) Image search: [Google]

369KB, 1000x667px

Latest boring flower snapshit from my garden

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NIKON CORPORATION
Camera Model	NIKON D3300
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/5.7
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern	866
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	82 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2017:08:01 10:49:49
Exposure Time	1/160 sec
F-Number	f/11.0
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	100
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	Flash, Compulsory, Return Detected
Focal Length	55.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1000
Image Height	667
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	None
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Unknown

Post examples.

File: Du8fDHGkuk0[1].jpg (296KB, 2560x1707px) Image search: [Google]

296KB, 2560x1707px

>>3125876
It's just a bigger part of the culture. Russians in particular really enjoy photography. Go on any random profile of vk.com and the men will have nice amateur photos they've taken, and the women will have decent amateur modeling photos of themselves. The hipster filter culture hasn't taken over either, lots of really sharp images.

>>3125900
Suck my motherfuckin cock bitch, suck it and fuckin ride it these big meaty balls

The Think Tank TurnStyle is probably my favorite, but these days I use a normal backpack with a camera insert. Shoulder bags tend to get uncomfortable after a while, and having an insert gives you the flexibility to use the bag for other stuff, not just cameras.

File: NG2345.jpg (11KB, 300x300px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 300x300px

>>3124310
NG2345 off Aliexpress.

That's the small bag. It deliberately does not have much extra space at all.

Messenger bags are gay and stupid. Get a fucking backpack you normie autist.

File: DSC05936-03.jpg (261KB, 1369x1077px) Image search: [Google]

261KB, 1369x1077px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	ILCE-6000
Camera Software	Snapseed 2.0
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	0 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	350 dpi
Vertical Resolution	350 dpi
Image Created	2017:07:20 20:53:59
Exposure Time	1/1250 sec
F-Number	f/0.0
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	100
Brightness	4.2 EV
Exposure Bias	-0.3 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	0.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1369
Image Height	1077
Rendering	Custom
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal

File: DSC05782-02.jpg (640KB, 1593x1065px) Image search: [Google]

640KB, 1593x1065px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	ILCE-6000
Camera Software	Snapseed 2.0
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	0 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	350 dpi
Vertical Resolution	350 dpi
Image Created	2017:07:20 20:24:44
Exposure Time	1/4000 sec
F-Number	f/0.0
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	100
Brightness	7.2 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	0.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1593
Image Height	1065
Rendering	Custom
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal

File: F1000026.jpg (660KB, 1840x1232px) Image search: [Google]

660KB, 1840x1232px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	FUJI PHOTO FILM CO., LTD.
Camera Model	SP-2000
Camera Software	FDi V4.5 / FRONTIER350/370-7.7-0E-300
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2017:07:13 14:01:29
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1840
Image Height	1232

>>3128192
dunno, never used 'em

/thread

Because it's some pod people cuckoldry.

>>3128192
it's not fun. i mean they look great, but the other day i tried using photoshop and i actually made my photo looks like one of those VSCO filters and it made me happy. it's way more fun that way

i can tell you're going to fuck this up just because you used the ;_; face

you're probably some pathetic robot faggot who will only embarrass himself

>>3127995
Of course I am faggot, I'm going to a convention after all.
Pls tell me how to not embarass myself

>>3127992
Imagine the picture you want to end up with, look at the scene and what you have, then make the changes you need in the scene to get the picture you want.

Your equipment is more than adequate. Many photographers have made brilliant work with far less.

File: IMG_20170805_140556.jpg (234KB, 1236x927px) Image search: [Google]

234KB, 1236x927px

I use this.

No, really.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Google
Image-Specific Properties:

>>3127739
This. I make an omelette and just roll all my ad cards in, the finish it Japanese style. That done, its sealed and impervious against the elements.

I take a spare body cap and rear lens cap and store SD cards inside

It's easier to adjust your dark shit as opposed to your bright shit, so if clouds or waves or white stuff is blown the fuck out, fix it in camera even if it means making everything else really dark,

>>3127651
So basically like I posted? Just wasn't sure if I understood. Also white balance in camera. Leave it on auto or change it for every situation?

>>3127658
yeah you want the bright part to be properly exposed in camera. the dark part can be super dark.

then in post you can reduce shadows and the dark part will look normal.

if you do it the other way around the highlights will be fked beyond repair

I just used a spare UV filter I got with some lens - unscrewed the inner ring, popped out the uv glass, used it as a stencil to cut out different filters. used UV/old film filters are a dime a dozen.

>>3127516
in 82mm size they're quite a bit harder to find

>>3127517
fair enough but I'd imagine still easier than "empty frames" - speaking of which, why won't you just get a Cokin filter mount? Seems like the best solution for multiple sheet-sized filters.

Btw, how'd you get it modified to monochrome, as some service or DIY? You can see remains of the filter on the frame edges, made me curious how it was taken off.

Sigma DP1 Merrill

>>3127493
nikon 3100 my man

>>3127493
pentax k-50