Archived threads in /p/ - Photography - 47. page

lrn2exposurecomp faggot

>>3125340
Use spot metering

>not training the bitch to hold a grey card

>>3125310
some cameras are just cameras

>>3125314
Some cameras are more than cameras though.

I prefer cameras that camera

By getting gud

>>3125116
You answered your own question OP. He uses Photoshop. Learn Photoshop and you'll be able to do it too

>>3125116
More saturation+shadows+contrast= second pic

But i think that the main diffference is saturation, maybe the first pic is edited so the saturation is less then the original. You may want to take a good picture with good light and THEN edit it with photoshop.

Have fun

Make sure she pays you the johns fee before she goes in, that way she can't run with your money she just earned.

Might have to ease yourself into it? unless you cut right to the chase with her

>>3125003
Have been pretty flirty so far but I became kinda autism and cold when she asked for an escort. Felt like a trap

Has anyone ever shot for porn before?

^this^

>>3124832
You're just a moral fag that hates brand and gear discussions. Also you're cucked by your camera brand by several statements which are easy to find on several threads on this boards page one.
Get a life and off my /p/.

>>3124840
fak off niba

>>3124786
"Best"
Lmfao
Fuji lenses are atrocious, you're better off getting a second hand 5dc and nifty fifty, it will cost less than any one of these lenses too.

>>3124786

The 'best' fujifilm lens is the 56mm.

Everything else in x-mount is pretty soft.

>>3124786
NEWFAG

>Google
>Gear thread
>Sticky

Which one is the best literally? Please post elsewhere with any of these propositions.

Thanks!

File: 20597586_1827228130640276_297923335_o.jpg (174KB, 887x1334px) Image search: [Google]

174KB, 887x1334px

2)

File: 20590798_1827228117306944_407460905_o.jpg (138KB, 682x1024px) Image search: [Google]

138KB, 682x1024px

3)

All photos taken on good old delta 400 pushed to 800

File: 20590522_1827228120640277_683370984_o.jpg (149KB, 889x1334px) Image search: [Google]

149KB, 889x1334px

4)

I'm not particularly concerned with the comp or how much you like the photos, I know they're pretty shit as most were hip-fire, feel free to let me know regardless.

M - magic

>>3124325
A because I am Autistic.

C for cucked
It's a mode which helps you get better pictures while your models pose for other (better) photogs

>>3123173
Should be okay, unless you want professional rather than "professional" in which case you better get a FF camera.

You can always wait, but where is the point in that? They'll release new cameras until they fold the company, right? Just get a new camera later if you need a new one.

Also, I myself went with a Sony.

If it fits your wants or needs, then sure, go for it. The high ISO performance and DR isn't all that great, but that shouldn't be much of a surprise, since this is Canon we're talking about here. Otherwise, it's a great camera.

File: Screen Shot 2017-07-30 at 12.20.39 AM.png (239KB, 794x432px) Image search: [Google]

239KB, 794x432px

>>3123312
>Should be okay, unless you want professional rather than "professional" in which case you better get a FF camera.

NEGLIGIBLE!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PHYidejT3KY

File: rsz_lighthouse.jpg (1002KB, 948x1418px) Image search: [Google]

1002KB, 948x1418px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	FUJI PHOTO FILM CO., LTD.
Camera Model	SP-3000
Camera Software	FDi V4.5 / FRONTIER355/375-1.8-0E-016
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2017:07:28 13:00:33
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	3637
Image Height	2433

File: rsz_house.jpg (964KB, 1418x948px) Image search: [Google]

964KB, 1418x948px

>>3122381

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	FUJI PHOTO FILM CO., LTD.
Camera Model	SP-3000
Camera Software	FDi V4.5 / FRONTIER355/375-1.8-0E-016
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2017:07:28 12:50:13
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	3637
Image Height	2433

File: rsz_church.jpg (1MB, 1418x948px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1418x948px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	FUJI PHOTO FILM CO., LTD.
Camera Model	SP-3000
Camera Software	FDi V4.5 / FRONTIER355/375-1.8-0E-016
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2017:07:28 12:50:15
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	3637
Image Height	2433

>>3121255
oh good, it's this thread again.
just wait for bridge camera guy and m4/3 fags to come and be like muh pen-f is so compact and better than everything else
then the same fuji/sony shills to come and argue about their specs

>>3121297
I think what hurts his fragile ego most is that it will still outsell that shitty A9 by a considerable amount

>>3121255

The lack of dynamic range compared to current generation cameras issue is nothing new, it has plagued most of their cameras for several generations now. Canon also owns a ridiculous number of patents relating to camera tech as well but most of it goes unused. They're a very conservative company.
Their current camera releases (the 6D mk 2 is a prime example) fall far short in terms of features of what has been available for similar or lesser prices on the market and that is totally inexcusable.
It doesn't mean that their cameras are suddenly worthless pieces of junk, I'm sure good images can be made with them. After all, back in the early 2000's magazine photographers were using 4 or 5 megapixel DSLR's with far worse sensors and they were still creating amazing pictures that made the front cover of TIME and National Geographic. However, even with that said its very disappointing to see Canon fall so far behind that I simply can't recommend their products to people looking to invest in a camera when there's better options available for the same or lesser price. The sad part is that Canon will still sell a ton of cameras because the average joe who isn't a nerd doesn't care about current camera tech advancements or the dynamic range of the sensor, they probably won't be able to tell the difference anyway.

Do you ever cringe so hard that you just hear white noise and your face hurts? Like you're trying to physically lift a boulder but you can't get it above your knees?

>>3116381
Toygraphytoygraphytoygraphytoygraphy toygraphytoygraphytoygraphyourwelcum

File: SI_20170718_094318.jpg (29KB, 718x1080px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 718x1080px

>>3116380

File: 2ea8bf20cebf1151434de4a24853815b--hoop-skirt-white-photography.jpg (45KB, 400x387px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 400x387px

I have a request for artistic nudes (or close to). I don't really do bodies, mostly landscape and pets. What sort of settings should I aim for? Light? I typically do all natural light but I want to have that softness that you get in boudoir shots. What steps can I take to make it not cringe?

Should I shoot with constant ISO or put it on auto?

>>3114391
im no pro but maybe id suggest getting experience with bodies in clothing before shooting nude

>>3125795
Very niche lens that's usually quite expensive and it's unlikely to have many uses.

>>3125795
I bought the Olympus 9mm f/8 for 89$, sharp in the center, not bad in the corners
I use it in bright light or with a cobra
Sometime I "defish" the picture
I can post some

>>3125800
yea sounds interesting, i'd like to see some

File: Sheet 2.jpg (172KB, 1626x721px) Image search: [Google]

172KB, 1626x721px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Photographer	Tom Smith
Image-Specific Properties:

File: DSCF2543.jpg (546KB, 1500x1500px) Image search: [Google]

546KB, 1500x1500px

Please help me choose a few and let me know if you'd like full size.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	FUJIFILM
Camera Model	X100F
Camera Software	Windows Photo Editor 10.0.10011.16384
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.0
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Maker Note Version	0130
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2017:06:17 17:16:25
Exposure Time	1/125 sec
F-Number	f/2.0
Exposure Program	Normal Program
ISO Speed Rating	640
Lens Aperture	f/2.0
Brightness	2.8 EV
Exposure Bias	0.7 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash
Focal Length	23.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1500
Image Height	1500
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Unknown
Sharpness	Normal
White Balance	Auto
Chroma Saturation	Normal
Flash Mode	Unknown
Focus Mode	Auto
Slow Synchro Mode	Off
Picture Mode	Program AE
Continuous/Bracketing Mode	Off
Blur Status	OK
Focus Status	OK
Auto Exposure Status	OK

Argh I won't have a model release so I guess I can't have any distinguishable faces which removes a few of these.