Archived threads in /p/ - Photography - 40. page

good lord you are fucking stupid

the image you posted literally answers your own question

>>3129337
>>3129338


That isn't what I am asking you fucking retards. What I am asking is, what does the camera do inside the camera to have that different aspect ratio. Am I getting more image in a 4:3 ratio on a m43 or a 3:2 ratio on a full frame?

File: DSC01200.jpg (949KB, 1970x1314px) Image search: [Google]

949KB, 1970x1314px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	DSC-RX100M3
Camera Software	DSC-RX100M3 v1.00
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.8
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	52 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	350 dpi
Vertical Resolution	350 dpi
Image Created	2017:06:18 08:05:08
Exposure Time	1/80 sec
F-Number	f/3.2
Exposure Program	Normal Program
ISO Speed Rating	125
Brightness	5.7 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Auto
Focal Length	18.89 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	5472
Image Height	3648
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal

File: DSC00059.jpg (967KB, 2299x1724px) Image search: [Google]

967KB, 2299x1724px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	DSC-RX100
Camera Software	DSC-RX100 v1.10
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.5
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	33 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	350 dpi
Vertical Resolution	350 dpi
Image Created	2017:07:11 17:22:49
Exposure Time	1/40 sec
F-Number	f/2.5
Exposure Program	Normal Program
ISO Speed Rating	320
Brightness	2.3 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	12.32 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	3648
Image Height	2736
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal

File: DSC00083.jpg (1012KB, 2919x2189px) Image search: [Google]

1012KB, 2919x2189px

annoyed about the shake on this one but still one of my favourites

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	DSC-RX100
Camera Software	DSC-RX100 v1.10
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/3.2
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	50 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	350 dpi
Vertical Resolution	350 dpi
Image Created	2017:07:11 17:41:46
Exposure Time	1/10 sec
F-Number	f/3.2
Exposure Program	Normal Program
ISO Speed Rating	800
Brightness	-1.2 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	18.45 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	3648
Image Height	2736
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal

>>3129088
Kys

>>3129088
Probably about right.

Awesome picture OP!

>this thread again
0%

File: IMG_9088.jpg (908KB, 3685x2176px) Image search: [Google]

908KB, 3685x2176px

I can't tell if these pictures are snapshits or half decent, Also what general advice do people have for shooting wildlife?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS 40D
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.5.1 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/5.4
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2017:08:06 22:12:31
Exposure Time	1/800 sec
F-Number	f/5.6
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	400
Lens Aperture	f/5.6
Exposure Bias	-0.7 EV
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	190.00 mm
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard

File: 1502124pppppp093073.jpg (229KB, 1222x815px) Image search: [Google]

229KB, 1222x815px

>>3128957
Underexposed

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS 40D
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/5.7
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	3888
Image Height	2592
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2017:08:07 19:25:12
Exposure Time	1/800 sec
F-Number	f/5.6
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	400
Lens Aperture	f/5.6
Exposure Bias	-0.7 EV
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	250.00 mm
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	1222
Image Height	815
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard

>>3128962
Do you even like them?

>>3128576
Try to keep you're M4 in direct sun light when no in use/ "Cleanly with a body cap on so you don't run the shutter. Do the same with lenses too. UV light kills fungus and can prevent it.

>>3128579
>>3128576

Also check this out https://www.dpreview.com/forums/thread/2939179

Just put a couple packs of silica gel in your case and it will be a-ok anon.

>>3128137
higher ISO means more noise. set it to 100 and only shoot when your eyes can see the object, or use flash, or shoot RAW so you can edit without reducing the quality

>>3128137
>gh4
>garage sale

nice try, m43 troll

>>3128137
>>3128139
>only shooting at ISO 100

meme 4/3 BTFO

vsco

File: eqweqqeweq.jpg (39KB, 246x292px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 246x292px

Further reading; Crushed Blacks, VSCO, S Curves

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CC 2017 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2017:08:06 10:12:45
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	246
Image Height	292

>>3128165
>>3128133
these
and orange shadows and blue highlights
add a lot of grain, mah du

File: Carolina_MPLS_Imagine This_012.jpg (2MB, 4000x2668px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 4000x2668px

>>3127831
Same gal, different lighting.
You get the idea, right?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi

Op I think you are colour blind.

>what's your favorit trashtier shit editing app :^))))

you edit photos on a computer if you shot digital. you edit photos in a darkroom if you shoot film.

Lightroom mobile -even the free shit one- is pretty goat. Other than that VSCO. Then again, I'm talking about apps for phone snapshits.

>>3127798
>being that guy

>>3127798
How is a simple curve adjustment on a phone shittier than a photoshop curve layer?

You'd be surprised how much better these apps have gotten over time, but that's not what I was trying to talk about anyways.

>>3127494
>adapt my current lenses
why bother? the whole point of m43 is small lenses

>>3127494
GX85 if you like video, O-M5 Mk.I if you want photoy only
Everything else is either too new or too old. That's the sweet spot right now

>>3127494
Why do you need a secondary camera?

>>3127451
I considered it since it was in my price range, but I ended up going for the Nikon D7200 - cheaper and better - like, INFINITELY better.

http://cameradecision.com/compare/Canon-EOS-80D-vs-Nikon-D7200

I'll never understand why the piece of shit still has buyers at that price.

>>3127480
>Comparing 2 cameras solely on the base of some website
>Only talking about some characteristics
>Not trying both on hand before purchasing
ISHYGDDT

>>3127685
"some" website? a website that compares literally every relevant aspect of the cameras? besides, i wanted to offer a little insight, not list him every physical comparison possible

you are a retarded fucking pleb if you think that testing the cameras at a store irl will help. limited environment and time for an investment that will last years? ok then

why would you ignore specs you fucking shitbrain

File: IMG_20170804_155854.jpg (3MB, 3024x4032px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 3024x4032px

Got it anyways

>>3127046
G L
L

>>3127046
>>3126955

>he actually bought it

wew

File: IMG_20170724_082626_567.jpg (267KB, 1024x694px) Image search: [Google]

267KB, 1024x694px

I've been pretty busy shooting shit with my Nikon F. I got a 105 f2.5 which I enjoy using.

its what i ask myself everyday. maybe in 50 years?

at least i hoarded a hundred kilos of mammography xray film so i can endure the wait.

I feel like a solution (I'm not an expert on sensors so this is pretty simple minded) would to have something of a multi-ISO sensor. As in an ISO value for a bright part of a photo and an ISO value for a darker value of a photo. And I'd guess the user would be able to set a minimum and max for each. Obviously there would be multiple settings for contrast, etc. and what not, and it would probably be a RAW format only option. It would also be pioneered mainly by mirrorless cameras. Like I said, im not expert so does anyone think that's actually possible? It'd fix a hell of a lot of dynamic range problems that's for sure.

>>3130748
What's the fucking issue here? Why hasn't it been done yet?

if you want it as an all rounder as well as a macro sure, but if it's just for macro AF is pointless and an older manual focus lens might even be better.

>>3130807
I agree.

If you just want to do macro, use an old manual lens with a reversal ring, extension tubes or possibly even bellows.

>>3130807
>>3130823
>for macro AF is pointless

This depends on application. For high-magnification macro yes, for something like 1:2 it can still be useful.

Also, even if you don't use AF, having the camera automatically zoom in on the focus point when you touch the focus ring is a nice feature.