Archived threads in /lit/ - Literature - 2655. page

>>8655146
no faggot they only sell 1970 editions

my roommates ordered physics textbooks that were new

the waiting time is fucking long, so keep that in mind

>>8655604
This. It does depend on where you live, but if you're ordering from the US, then it WILL take the 5-8 business days (more like 8 from my experience) to get your stuff, after the 1-2 days to get dispatched.

Probably Terra Nostra Carlos by Fuentes but shit I've actually read that I'd recommend: Down The Rabbit Hole and Quesadillas by Juan Pablo Villalobos.

>>8654975
Pedro Paramo

>>8654975
Taco by Enchiladas Sopa

I am readingTthe Monk right now.

>>8656495
*reading The Monk

File: scary-stories-to-tell-in-the-dark-book-covers.jpg (122KB, 578x290px) Image search: [Google]

122KB, 578x290px

>>8654890
I do a performance of the Raven ala The Simpsons every year for my kids.

Also pic related.

Never seen another one. But hey, might as well make some, for fun.

Schopenhauer
>Study philosophy and metaphysics extensively, elaborating a great critique on Kant's Tanscedental Idealism and a following metaphysical theory that posited that without life, the universe does not exist, alongside many other great ideas.
>"Schopenhauer? Oh, he's depressive and mysoginistic hur dur get on with the time"

>>8654888
nice

>>8654888
>be young naive artist
>work tirelessly in a corrupted and degenerate society to try to bring beauty in to the world
>see your country and people slowly die
>began to give passionate speeches to crowds, convincing them of their greatness and by extension making them great
>give your people a reason to live, clean up the streets and the airwaves
>attain power and make Germany great again
>be attacked by the Jew and his cronies, the Anglos and Amerifats for your rejection of a slow death
>70 years later people use you as a personification of Evil while a fat lady gives away your country to niggers

>>8654827
I'd go with Melville's "Isle of the Cross," assuming it was a novel.

File: IMG_0233.jpg (184KB, 622x800px) Image search: [Google]

184KB, 622x800px

Gilgamesh completely restored with no missing lines desu

The restoration of Sappho is a very good choice, and perhaps the most responsible, but for me it's Cardenio, assuming the information passed down to us about it is correct. Shakespeare meets Cervantes is just too good to pass up.

>>8654723
>He didn't even gulag them for disagreeing with him, such was his respect for non-pleb literature.

and we should praise him for this

>BBBUT MUH CULT OF PERSONALITY!!!

Stalin did not make such a thing nor did he want it.

>I am decidedly against the publication of Tales of Stalin’s Childhood.

>The book teems with a mass of factual inaccuracies, distortions, exaggerations, and undue praise. The author was led astray by hunters of fairy tales, fibbers (though perhaps “conscientious” fibbers), and bootlickers. I pity the author, but facts are facts.

>But that isn’t the main point. The main point is that this book has a tendency to plant the cult of the chief’s, the infallible hero’s personality in the consciousness of Soviet children (and of people in general). This is dangerous, harmful. The theory of “heroes” and the “crowd” is not a Bolshevik, but an SR theory. Heroes make the people, transform them from a crowd into a people—say the SRs. The people make heroes—the Bolsheviks reply to the SRs. This book adds grist to the SRs’ mill. Any such book will add grist to the SRs’ mill, will harm our common Bolshevik cause.

>I advise you to burn the book.

>J. Stalin, 1938

As you can see Stalin was opposed to building the cult of personality and only allowed it to happen during the great patriotic war because he felt it helped the war effort.

>>8654723
True. The comrade we needed but not the comrade we deserved.

just use Google

I have been reading SF for forty years, and I think my favourite under-appreciated writer is Neal Asher. I particularly loved his Spatterjay trilogy.

read Dune you faggot

its THE sci-fi book

i had hops growing outside in pots but then wallabies ate the sprouts and they died

is this book good

>>8654306
Yes.

>>8654293
I wish Willie hadn't died in '98. It'd be interesting to see what he'd have to say about this shitshow of a millennium.

>>8654282
my diary to be dishonest

>>8654282
my twitter, to be sincere

Gravity's Jest

File: ed.jpg (32KB, 600x338px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 600x338px

Prem ejac? Tell us about better fucks you've had.

>>8654129
blame dads across america who eat this shit up.

>>8654129

These kinds of books are for idiots who have never served in the military and see stuff like Transformers and American Sniper as what it's like to be in a military unit. It's basically the same people that watch "bushcraft" videos on Youtube or let's plays. It's living vicariously through someone else.

That said, the only good war memoirs are One Bullet Away, Storm of Steel, David Kenyan Webster's book about being in the 101st (along with the addition of Beyond Band of Brothers), and Helmet For My Pillow.

Honourable mentions are Rifleman Harris's book about the rifle brigade, and a book I can't remember the name of about a Bavarian in Napoleon's army.

>Hitler
>Nietszche
>Stefan Molyneux

>John Green
>Homer
>that guy who wrote Undertale

File: 562.jpg (67KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]

67KB, 600x600px

>>8654108

viper x3

File: 1476450119088.jpg (165KB, 800x800px) Image search: [Google]

165KB, 800x800px

>>8653989
It's the respectful thing to do.

This is what happens when you give prestigious literary awards to artless hippie rock stars.

>>8653989
Silence equates to humility to us Americans.

Ambiguity isnt always creative laziness, but its a common way for poor art to hide itself.

>Somebody takes a shit on a canvas with the word "Love" written underneath
>"You just dont get it, man!"

>if it has one meaning it's not lazy
>if it has two or more it's lazy
Finnegans Wake is often lazy because it has two bland meanings where it could easily have several more if Joyce had spoken Irish well.

File: chess.jpg (645KB, 2246x1778px) Image search: [Google]

645KB, 2246x1778px

>>8653985
Its funny because often I see it the other way around. People who are incapable or too lazy to examine a piece of art will chop it up to ambiguity. A good example is Birdman, a great film but one of my friends said it lacked because "it meant nothing." When I tried to address some of his issues by referring to parts of the film that i thought were full of meaning he would just pass me off with his tired replies.
I do think the line is very thin between ambiguity and artistic merit, and for a piece of art to mean something the artist shouldn't have to directly speak it in the work. Its suiting that you used 2001 as your example; the ending is so open to interpretation that its hard to say what Kubrick really meant. However, if we pay attention to the rest of the film and try and define all its parts together we can reach something which "makes sense" ; reoccurring themes and motifs can give us more insight. In other words, if a piece of art is worth its merit it has to have some sort of structure, it doesnt need to shout out what its trying to say, it doesnt need to be obvious, but if you pay attention and know what to look for you can be confident in your analysis. A good artist who wants to say something has to have some way of directing us there.
A whole lot of art falls into the ambiguity category, where what is presented is so unstructured that the artist has done a poor job at directing us anywhere. A good example for this is 'Sirens of Titan' by Vonnegut, a funny book but in the end it meant nothing because of how highly ambiguous each part was. In college a professor of mine taught this and you could tell the entire class was uncertain how to interpret it in any personal way. I mean there's so much presented in it, its like everything is a symbol or a metaphor and you know this but since the book is unstructured you don't know what they are symbols and metaphors for.

Here is what I have read from him in order of preference:
Ada
Lolita
Invitation to a Beheading
Pnin
Transparent Things
The Enchanter

Ada and Invitation are the big standouts in my mind. Lolita is brilliant but a lot of the techniques it uses (Unreliable narrator, conflicting perspectives, temporal/sensory relationships) were implemented more robustly in Ada. Ada also gave Nabokov a greater variety of characters, settings, and subjects, which allowed the book a greater emotional range. I also think he strikes a more satisfying balance between uneventful stretches of time, and what he refers to as the novelistic elements of the story.

For those who have read his early work, which of his Russian books should I prioritize? A friend told me I would like The Eye so I was going to read that next.

>>8653942
I haven't read Pale Fire, or else I would ask why you felt underwhelmed. I will recommend that you don't give up on cornkov, and when you are ready for another of his books try Invitation to a Beheading. It is a short book and its machinations occur much closer to the surface, although there is no lack of discussable material.

Did anyone pick up the Nabokov chart that was posted a few days ago? It was pretty lame but still, something to work on

pale fire is absolutely stunning

File: 22-14-38-0_ad1ac_74d22952_XL.jpg (67KB, 640x800px) Image search: [Google]

67KB, 640x800px

>>8653877
>was he good
>was he a person

File: 1462719098518.gif (2MB, 189x189px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 189x189px

How come his dick is so small

>>8653981
>was