File: scanners.jpg (62KB, 420x500px) Image search:
[Google]
62KB, 420x500px
This will be out of the realm of most of you /p/ros though some of you are quite knowledgeable.
I recently went from 120 (6x6) to 4x5 and now need a way to scan the LF film (DSLR scans don't cut it when it comes to the prints I am doing). The closest shop with a drum scanner is 1000km away and the local guy has gotten out of the biz after his machine went down.
I have a guy who is willing to sell me his drum scanner and teach me how to use it.
Locally there would be about 5-10 clients who shoot LF and scan to print, that could potentially help to justify the cost of maintenance and ownership of such a machine.
Is this the stupidest idea ever?
74 Posts / 19 Images
View this topic
>>
>>2882768
Potentially, yes, if you don't want to stitch shots together.
>>
File: every time.gif (568KB, 200x136px) Image search:
[Google]
568KB, 200x136px
>>
Do you really wanna deal with running a scanning business just so you can justify an exorbitant splurge?
Anonymous
Real Estate / Interiors 2016-07-06 23:52:54 Post No.2877923
[Report] Image search: [Google]
Real Estate / Interiors 2016-07-06 23:52:54 Post No.2877923
[Report] Image search: [Google]
File: Kitchen.jpg (494KB, 1000x667px) Image search:
[Google]
494KB, 1000x667px
Got to photograph this beautiful home for a realtor. Left the kitchen for the last shot to take my time and get it right.
So there I was thinking I'm at f/7.1 (should have been at f/8) but my finger must've hit the dial because I was actually at f/6.3, and that was enough to ruin the background sharpness.
I do 360 panoramas with a Ricoh Theta S. I had just balanced it on a tripod when out of nowhere, a gust of wind knocked it over and the Theta landed on its lens, a complete loss. Been one of those days.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS 5D Mark III Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.4 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.8 Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2016:07:06 19:35:26 Exposure Time 1/4 sec F-Number f/6.3 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 160 Lens Aperture f/6.3 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 27.00 mm Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard
99 Posts / 59 Images
View this topic
>>
>>2877923
No lens correction?
>>
>>2877941
yes, I always do lens correction for barreling distortion. Did I miss some problems?
>>
>>2877923
Sorry bout that 360 cam
I wouldnt beat yourself up over the kitchen shot, no realtor or homebuyer would notice it, and even a photographer wouldnt notice unless you pointed it out to them
How well does reality photography pay?
Anonymous
You are given these. How do you feel? 2016-07-24 15:52:34 Post No.2888938
[Report] Image search: [Google]
You are given these. How do you feel? 2016-07-24 15:52:34 Post No.2888938
[Report] Image search: [Google]
File: 13840621_1644278225890459_1890882506_o.jpg (258KB, 1136x1136px) Image search:
[Google]
258KB, 1136x1136px
You are given these. How do you feel?
Anonymous
2016-07-24 15:52:34
Post No. 2888938
[Report]
[View this topic]
Olympus Trip 35
Nikkormat FT-2
55mm/1.2
70-200mm/4.5
11 Posts / 2 Images
View this topic
>>
>>2888938
The Trip is all I need
Sell all the Nikon stuff to buy a Nikon FE and a 55mm F2.8 for backup if I need fine control that I can't get from the Trip.
>>
I'd be very excited about the 55 1.2, and the 70-200 is probably really nice too. I would think that would be generous of whoever gifted it, even though I would never use either camera, and mostly only one of the lenses.
>>
satisfied
File: dsc03620.jpg (2MB, 4912x3264px) Image search:
[Google]
2MB, 4912x3264px
I have an issue where photos that I have on my phone look really good with intense colors, when viewed on my laptop will look less intense, almost lower contrasted, and a little brighter.
Is this my particular laptop screen? Or is this a function of images on a phone being smaller and thus denser?
How do I make sure that what I'm seeing on my phone is what's seen across everyone's devices?
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make SONY Camera Model NEX-5N Camera Software NEX-5N v1.01 Maximum Lens Aperture f/1.0 Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 0 mm Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 350 dpi Vertical Resolution 350 dpi Image Created 2012:07:14 15:39:12 Exposure Time 1/2500 sec F-Number f/0.0 Exposure Program Aperture Priority ISO Speed Rating 100 Brightness 4.9 EV Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Spot Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 0.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 4912 Image Height 3264 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal
12 Posts / 1 Images
View this topic
>>
>>2888379
>when viewed on my laptop will look less intense, almost lower contrasted, and a little brighter.
That's expected, phone screens are often made to appeal to consumers who think that crazy saturation and contrast are visually appealing, and obviously your computer display will have a much more powerful backlight than your phone.
It's the same reason that most TVs and displays in stores are run in Demo modes which crank up all the settings to make the picture "appealing" on a brightly-lit show floor.
To be frank, I never trust the LCD screens on proper cameras either, and only use them to check the histogram or see if I nailed focus. Try to avoid editing or enhancing images directly on the phone and wait until you have them on your computer.
>>
>>2888379
because laptop screens are garbage and phone screens are high end (because you pay so much for a small one)
>>
>>2888410
Explain the OnePlus 3 then. You can get either nice displays on flagship phones or shit ones, and laptop displays can be shit or decent as well, some even have calibrated displays. I don't think it's right to make blanket statements about which is better without knowing what phone and laptop OP has.
Should I buy a used Fuji XT 10 from amazon? If so what should I look for in a used camera?
24 Posts / 1 Images
View this topic
>>
>>2888010
You should buy a used camera, but you shouldn't buy from Amazon. Buy from KEH. Their grading system is second to none, and their customer service is fucking awesome.
>>
>>2888016
>KEH
Thanks, I only see a xt1 for $740
Is it worth it buying a new camera?
>>
>>2888021
Mirrorless cameras are good up to an insanely high amount of actuations. Just go ahead and get a used one.
File: 32540032-foresta.jpg (110KB, 600x398px) Image search:
[Google]
110KB, 600x398px
Mr Rockwell accepts your apologies in this thread.
12 Posts / 2 Images
View this topic
>>
>>2887973
Sorry for making fun of you ken, when you're just a hobbyist and don't claim to be a professional photographer but I still held you to pro standards
>>
I'm sorry I fucked your wife ken
>>
>>2887976
Don't talk to me, my wife, or my wife's children ever again
File: 8397428371_fa05710b48_b.jpg (202KB, 1013x570px) Image search:
[Google]
202KB, 1013x570px
Now that ``small size'' is no longer the sole domain of small sensors. APS-C and FF sensor cameras can now be as compact as cameras with compact sensors. ~This kills the MFT~
Besides, there's an ergonomic limit to how small a camera should be. We needn't resort to camera the size of a tiny Minox camera for small sensors to stay relevant.
I think Pentax had an idea in the right direction, but horrible execution. If you can't compete on size, compete on unique styling. So they made the MX-1 compact. Which unfortunately looks like a half-ass MX. Where's the pentaprism?! So they went for unique retro style, but then threw it out the window halfway. They ended up with a product that didn't please any crowd.
They could've made it a compact sensor SLR, that's actually about the same size as the original MX. Usually when companies do retro style, the big sensor forces them to make the bodies HUGE compared to the original designs of old. Autofocus on a lens also adds significant bulk to the lens design. This is where compact sensors got the edge against APS-C and FF. They have smaller lenses even with modern AF design, on account of having normal focal length equivalents at much shorter actual focal lengths and less glass needed to produce a smaller image. For this reason, APS-C and FF will never ever successfully miniaturize their lenses as much as they have with their bodies.
Can you imagine what the MX-1 could've been if it had a TTL optical viewfinder, separate dials for shutter speed, exposure compensation, and ISO? Even with a compact sensor, at this size with a fixed compact zoom, it would've been amazing. Certainly no Fuji mirrorless, but still unique enough to set itself apart. There's so many neat interesting things you can do with compact sensors that would be prohibitive with APS-C and FF.
What are you backseat camera dev ideas?
35 Posts / 3 Images
View this topic
>>
>What are you backseat camera dev ideas?
I'd make a contax g2 with a full frame sensor that has a better viewfinder that can still use the godly g-mount lenses
>>
>>2887889
>APS-C and FF sensor cameras can now be as compact as cameras with compact sensors.
Gearfags only looking at body size again, I see. It's all about system size. Body size isn't even a consideration until you look at the big magalloy chassis DSLRs.
>>2887999
So an autofocusing Leica. Leica BTFO when?
>>
File: download.jpg (340KB, 1000x667px) Image search:
[Google]
340KB, 1000x667px
>>2888006
>So an autofocusing Leica. Leica BTFO when?
1996, when it was released
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make FUJIFILM Camera Model X-T1 Camera Software Digital Camera X-T1 Ver1.00 Maximum Lens Aperture f/1.4 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 53 mm Maker Note Version 0130 Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2014:07:24 19:48:24 Exposure Time 1/250 sec F-Number f/4.0 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 1600 Lens Aperture f/4.0 Brightness 2.9 EV Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Spot Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 35.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 3456 Image Height 2304 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Sharpness Normal Subject Distance Range Unknown Sharpness Normal White Balance Auto Chroma Saturation Normal Flash Mode Off Macro Mode Off Focus Mode Auto Slow Synchro Mode Off Picture Mode Manual Exposure Continuous/Bracketing Mode Off Blur Status OK Focus Status OK Auto Exposure Status OK
File: leicaglow1.jpg (306KB, 917x603px) Image search:
[Google]
306KB, 917x603px
I've never known what to think about this lens..
A few years ago, I found someone's Leica IIIF setup at my local antique/estate sale shop. I assume the guy died. He was a pilot, as I found some photos of him and his lady from the war near the camera, and a slip stating that he bought the set while based in Japan, presumably. I wound up with an old IIIF body (with a bad curtain), a few lenses that were either bad (the Summacron 50 is well scrached up) or long telephoto lenses that seem awkward on such a small rangefinder. It even came with a large attachment that allows one to look through the lens, though it was dusty and dim. Anyways, the only thing that seemed usable was the Leitz Summaron 35mm 3.5.
I wound up buying a Bessa-R to be able to shoot with it reliably. When I started using it, I noticed right away that it was a real mixed bag. Some of the time I would get a decently clear shot, but other times I had this tremendous haze that cut the contrast so badly that things almost seemed mis-focused. I put the lens down after that for a few years.
In the past year, I have taken an interest in using it again, as I like the portability of RF and way of shooting it entails. I began looking into getting it cleaned...but something has kept me from going through with it... I almost feel like if I have it cleaned, it will lose some of its essence. I recently found a few threads that mention this myth of the "Leica glow", which has gotten me interested in the subject. The strange thing is that this "glow", for me and many others, seems to happen only by chance. I do realize that it gets more distinct the wider open the aperture is, and the longer the shutter speed....but sometimes that doesn't seem to matter at all..
I guess I'm starting this thread to see what anyone else thinks about this subject of the "glow", and if anyone, from looking at the photo's I am going to post, thinks this lens is fucked or not. Feel free to post any "glow" photos of your own.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS5 Macintosh Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 4500 Image Height 2961 Number of Bits Per Component 16, 16, 16 Compression Scheme Unknown Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 220 dpi Vertical Resolution 220 dpi Image Data Arrangement Chunky Format Image Created 2016:07:21 21:54:45 Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 917 Image Height 603
24 Posts / 7 Images
View this topic
>>
File: 1469074241379.gif (443KB, 400x296px) Image search:
[Google]
443KB, 400x296px
It's a faggy ephemeral thing that people assign to leica to try to assure other people that they did the right thing by spending so much on camera and lens. Leica is luxury brand with luxury pricing. It doesn't do anything magical and people who tell you otherwise have either drank the kool aid or don't know what they are talking about.
>>
>>2887644
I HOLD IT IN MY HANDS I CAN FEEL A REAL DIFFERENCE WITH LEICA CAMERAS AND LENSES COMPARED TO OTHER BRANDS
t. leicamen
>>
File: leicaglow2.jpg (315KB, 1000x668px) Image search:
[Google]
315KB, 1000x668px
Again, Leitz 35 3.5
shot at 3.5, 1/60
Tri-x 400, d-76 @68 8m45sec
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS5 Macintosh Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 4632 Image Height 3201 Number of Bits Per Component 16, 16, 16 Compression Scheme Unknown Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Data Arrangement Chunky Format Image Created 2016:07:21 22:25:22 Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 1000 Image Height 668
File: Tamron28mmF251.jpg (13KB, 239x299px) Image search:
[Google]
13KB, 239x299px
how would would you guys go for a prime you'd be using exclusively in many situations?
pic related, i have a 28mm but i dont like how wide it is. ill probably get a ~50mm soon and stick with that for a while
63 Posts / 12 Images
View this topic
>>
*how wide would you go
>>
40mm imo closer to natural focal length than a 50
>>
28mm or 32mm are the only prime you ever need.
Source: Roger Fucking Deakins
File: photo_2016-07-21_23-58-37.jpg (289KB, 1280x720px) Image search:
[Google]
289KB, 1280x720px
what do you think?
14 Posts / 2 Images
View this topic
>>
My Flickr:
https://www.flickr.com/photos/143654072@N07/
>>
>>2887513
stop changing your trip all the time isi
>>
>>2887537
which trip dude?
File: pattern.jpg (1MB, 1818x1228px) Image search:
[Google]
1MB, 1818x1228px
I shot a roll of film recently that has developed a weird web like patina. Does anyone know what causes this? It's quite an interesting effect. To be clear this is a blank frame.
19 Posts / 4 Images
View this topic
>>
>>2887276
Might be fungus growing on your gear, looks like a growth pattern.
>>
>>2887276
Did you wait a long time to develop this? Has this roll ever been in a wet area?
Is this roll expired?
Was this roll inside the air tight capsule or was it laying around?
It's most likely fungus or bacteria
I once had something similar occur, but instead of a web texture, it was a whispy long tailed bacteria thing
Here's a blank shot from that roll
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1484 Image Height 984 Scene Capture Type Standard
>>
>>2887293
lmao what the fuck
File: P7189468.jpg (1MB, 900x1200px) Image search:
[Google]
1MB, 900x1200px
I've lurked here quite a bit, posted a fair share in rpts and been mean to gearfags, but never done a photo thread..
most of these is from Veidholmen, a remote fishing community off the coast of norway..
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make OLYMPUS IMAGING CORP. Camera Model E-M5 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.6 (Macintosh) Photographer Daniel R. E. Maximum Lens Aperture f/1.8 Color Filter Array Pattern 818 Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 90 mm Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 70 dpi Vertical Resolution 70 dpi Image Created 2016:07:20 23:29:00 Exposure Time 1/800 sec F-Number f/7.1 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 200 Lens Aperture f/7.1 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Spot Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 45.00 mm Color Space Information Uncalibrated Rendering Custom Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Manual Scene Capture Type Standard Gain Control Low Gain Up Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal
57 Posts / 46 Images
View this topic
>>
File: P7189474.jpg (661KB, 1200x675px) Image search:
[Google]
661KB, 1200x675px
>>2886887
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make OLYMPUS IMAGING CORP. Camera Model E-M5 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.6 (Macintosh) Photographer Daniel R. E. Maximum Lens Aperture f/1.8 Color Filter Array Pattern 818 Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 90 mm Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 70 dpi Vertical Resolution 70 dpi Image Created 2016:07:20 23:29:17 Exposure Time 1/800 sec F-Number f/9.0 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 200 Lens Aperture f/9.0 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Spot Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 45.00 mm Color Space Information Uncalibrated Rendering Custom Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Manual Scene Capture Type Standard Gain Control Low Gain Up Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal
>>
File: P7169131.jpg (964KB, 1200x1200px) Image search:
[Google]
964KB, 1200x1200px
>>2886887
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make OLYMPUS IMAGING CORP. Camera Model E-M5 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.6 (Macintosh) Photographer Daniel R. E. Maximum Lens Aperture f/1.8 Color Filter Array Pattern 818 Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 90 mm Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 70 dpi Vertical Resolution 70 dpi Image Created 2016:07:20 23:51:26 Exposure Time 1/4000 sec F-Number f/4.5 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 400 Lens Aperture f/4.5 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Spot Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 45.00 mm Color Space Information Uncalibrated Rendering Custom Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Manual Scene Capture Type Standard Gain Control High Gain Up Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal
>>
File: P7219953.jpg (928KB, 900x1200px) Image search:
[Google]
928KB, 900x1200px
>>2886891
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make OLYMPUS IMAGING CORP. Camera Model E-M5 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.6 (Macintosh) Photographer Daniel R. E. Maximum Lens Aperture f/1.8 Color Filter Array Pattern 818 Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 90 mm Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 70 dpi Vertical Resolution 70 dpi Image Created 2016:07:20 23:31:01 Exposure Time 1/320 sec F-Number f/10.0 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 200 Lens Aperture f/10.0 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Spot Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 45.00 mm Color Space Information Uncalibrated Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Gain Control Low Gain Up Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Soft
File: ferrari-458-italia1.jpg (195KB, 1600x1200px) Image search:
[Google]
195KB, 1600x1200px
What do you think of my new Ferrari 458 Italia video, filmed with my Phantom 4 DJI
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mkbk8jyYfpM
21 Posts / 3 Images
View this topic
>>
>>2886631
Learn how to fly the drone properly before making a video and wasting someones time with this trash.
>>
>>2886634
we don't need people like you . he tried his best idiot
>>
>>2886631
Is this you first video?
enthdegree
update on the fuji demosaic thing 2016-07-20 09:59:00 Post No.2886619
[Report] Image search: [Google]
update on the fuji demosaic thing 2016-07-20 09:59:00 Post No.2886619
[Report] Image search: [Google]
File: untitled.png (187KB, 1917x334px) Image search:
[Google]
187KB, 1917x334px
update on the fuji demosaic thing
enthdegree
2016-07-20 09:59:00
Post No. 2886619
[Report]
[View this topic]
im making progress on a good free demosaic (AHD) for fuji xtrans
Here is an initial try at the interpolation step. Each of these little subimages are results of interpolating using only sensor data from a certain direction. This is only the first part of AHD, next comes a step where at each pixel, the best one is chosen from one of these five candidate images. You notice on the NE/SW SE/NW images, different parts of the caution circle are smooth. There is a way to quantify this smoothness, and that's how you decide which image to choose each pixel from. I still have to implement that part.
After that there is a color smoothing step that I also still have to implement.
This part still needs improvement on a number of things:
> Part of the process involves a naive spatial interpolation to regularize the irregular xtrans data so that we can take an FFT. The interpolation is assumed to only add high frequency noise to the image, bit the interpolator I am using is nearest neighbor bc it's fast and easy, but in real life it adds a ton of HF noise. I should be using some kind of spline fit.
> I might be making some wrong assumptions
Already I think this is going to be worlds better than what Rawtherapee, LightZone and DarkTable already use. Even in these half-baked sample images I'm seeing none of the false color that is present in those other demosaicers.
11 Posts / 3 Images
View this topic
>>
>>2886619
I have no suggestions, because you appear to be on the right track here, but I wanted to tell you I applaud your dedication.
>>
Not better than photoninja?
Pass
>>
>>2886619
what's the goal here, a stand alone program that converts them to dng or something before passing them to an editor?
Muhmegapickels (ID: !!0Z+XAssRGPW)
Recent Photo Thread 2016-07-19 22:00:13 Post No.2886301
[Report] Image search: [Google]
Recent Photo Thread 2016-07-19 22:00:13 Post No.2886301
[Report] Image search: [Google]
File: L1012857 (Custom).jpg (166KB, 1000x1487px) Image search:
[Google]
166KB, 1000x1487px
Recent Photo Thread
Muhmegapickels (ID: !!0Z+XAssRGPW)
2016-07-19 22:00:13
Post No. 2886301
[Report]
[View this topic]
The world is burning. Let's masturbate.
resize ur snapps and read the sticky
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Leica Camera AG Camera Model M8 Digital Camera Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.7.1 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/1.0 Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2016:06:25 18:43:50 Exposure Time 1/250 sec F-Number f/8.0 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 320 Lens Aperture f/8.0 Exposure Bias 0.3 EV Metering Mode Center Weighted Average Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash Function White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Unique Image ID 00000000000000000000000000004094
232 Posts / 151 Images
View this topic
>>
>>2886301
No chin
>>
>>2886301
Goitre/10
>>
File: DSC_3015.jpg (383KB, 1000x669px) Image search:
[Google]
383KB, 1000x669px
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make NIKON CORPORATION Camera Model NIKON D80 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.6 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/4.1 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Color Filter Array Pattern 736 Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 48 mm Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 500 dpi Vertical Resolution 500 dpi Image Created 2016:07:19 12:23:03 Exposure Time 1/60 sec F-Number f/5.0 Exposure Program Aperture Priority ISO Speed Rating 400 Lens Aperture f/5.0 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Center Weighted Average Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash Focal Length 32.00 mm Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Gain Control Low Gain Up Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal Subject Distance Range Unknown