[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Search | Free Show | Home]

Archived threads in /p/ - Photography - 362. page

This is a blue board which means that it's for everybody (Safe For Work content only). If you see any adult content, please report it.

File: image.jpg (2MB, 1350x1600px) Image search: [Google]
image.jpg
2MB, 1350x1600px
Redpill me /p/ on this advertisement.
The poster was published by JWT and Campari. (Whom i asked and never actually gave any info about). So I need the experts of /p/ to give me all the information possible such as photographers in the 80's with similar shots and styles. Kinds of cameras to give the same result. Lighting and color control used for this.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width1350
Image Height1600
Scene Capture TypeStandard
25 posts and 7 images submitted.
>>
File: ShowImage.jpg (44KB, 758x530px) Image search: [Google]
ShowImage.jpg
44KB, 758x530px
>>2885643
I happen to know a bit.

This ad almost brought J Walter Thompson down.

Luca Garavoglia from Campari met a key account person from JWT in 1982 in Rome, seemingly by chance. He was in Piazza Navona getting a gelato with his wife's son. JWT copy writer Bill Lane was there working on the Eastman Kodak account and recognized Luca, struck up a conversation. One thing led to another, and JWT won the account.

Campari was mainly convinced by the work JWT USA had done with the manischewitz wine brand ("There's a Seder in Every Bottle"

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwarePhotoFiltre 7
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2015:02:26 12:12:39
Image Width758
Image Height530
>>
>>2885671
Now, we all know that William Eggleston shot Manischewitz, but refused to travel to Italy for Campari

He used 6x7 Pentax cameras and Kodak Gold 400 film exclusively in this era pushed +2 stops for his commercial work (which is not often discussed, as it's eclipsed by his dye prints etc).

The interesting thing about the Eggleston Commercial style is that it subbornly requires only direct sun, cloudless days, and basically 1pm-2pm light (equivalent to 1-2pm light in the summer months, Northern Hemisphere below the Tropic of Rockwell (69°34′N)
>>
>>2885674
Silver reflectors and large mercury mirrors were used to create a hard light look.

This was incredibly expensive and quite dangerous, especially the mirrors.

The photographer for the Campari shoot basically had to find this location where the light would be perfect at 1-2pm, import a Pentax 6x7 camera and get a bunch of rolls of Kodak Gold 400 color film from Eggleson (it wasn't available in Europe due to the Communism issue in Germany).

Anyway, they bring in this giant bar looking thing, paint a wall in this industrial park and start shooting.


What happens is a production assistant braks one of the mirrors and mercury goes fucking everywhere. A total disaster.

A bunch gets on Luca Garavoglia's wife's son and they call her at her boyfirend's house and she's pissed. She leaves her boyfriend's place and drives like MAD to the studio to ream the photographer out and then she sees him.

It's a young Ken Fucking Rockwell. Before the growing family - he was a commercial photographer. She knew him from a few international competitions.

Long story, short - the bomb is diffused, but the wife ends up sleeping with Rockwell. So now JWT and Campari are all at odds.

File: NO_FILE_GIVEN (0B, 0x0pxpx)
NO_FILE_GIVEN
0B, 0x0pxpx
This is what we made its all gone be safe for work so here we go

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
9 posts and 5 images submitted.
>>
File: 333.jpg (67KB, 668x836px) Image search: [Google]
333.jpg
67KB, 668x836px
Welp there it is but were not through yet

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
>>
>>2885597

just kys my man!
>>
File: forgodssake.jpg (537KB, 1440x1440px) Image search: [Google]
forgodssake.jpg
537KB, 1440x1440px
More is here m9 and there's still more

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareAviary for Android 3.2.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Created2016:07:18 15:23:20
Light SourceUnknown
Image OrientationUnknown
Scene Capture TypeStandard
Exposure ModeAuto
SaturationNormal

File: Mewsy.jpg (32KB, 500x334px) Image search: [Google]
Mewsy.jpg
32KB, 500x334px
What do you tend to listen to while you edit. Does the particular shot dictate the genre or is it something you dont even think about?
26 posts and 10 images submitted.
>>
File: cover.jpg (122KB, 400x405px) Image search: [Google]
cover.jpg
122KB, 400x405px
I tend to put on pretty mellow music
>Tycho
>Boards of Canada
>Tim Hecker
>Loscil
>Emancipator

Sometimes I do a complete 180 though
>In Flames
>August Burns Red
>Electric Wizard

So no, the particular shot doesn't dictate the genre. More what my general mood is.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareACD Systems Digital Imaging
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Created2008:07:13 11:57:38
Color Space InformationUncalibrated
Image Width400
Image Height405
>>
>>2885342
I tend to listen to relaxing music that i put together on youtube playlist, sometimes ambient, classical, jazz and trip-hop
>Steve Reich
>Brian Eno
>Philip Glass
>Ryuichi Sakamoto
>Joe Hisaishi
>Shlohmo
>Ludovico Einaudi
>Erik Satie
>Michel Petrucciani
>Jdilla
>Flylo
>Nujabes
>>
>>2885401
>Steve Reich
The ultimate editing music.

File: Untitled.jpg (70KB, 948x362px) Image search: [Google]
Untitled.jpg
70KB, 948x362px
Anyone know what mount this is?
15 posts and 1 images submitted.
>>
>>2885109
Canon EF.
Couldn't have been easier.
>>
>>2885110
Literally the most plebs mount out there (albeit there are some great glass out there)
>>
>>2885110
>>2885112
Someone had put a Sigma 400mm APO up on ebay without knowing the mount. I was hoping against hope it was a K-Mount.

File: 6692747403_80cf9d9361_b.jpg (284KB, 1024x827px) Image search: [Google]
6692747403_80cf9d9361_b.jpg
284KB, 1024x827px
I wanna start shooting medium format (120) black and white, mostly because of quality of grain and sharpness

however I'm really married to the style of photography that comes with a 35mm SLR camera. realistically, are there any decent 120 cameras that would be more like a 35mm SLR?
I'm talking in terms of size, weight, portability, being able to handhold it and use an internal meter. in other words, being able to take a spontaneous shot "somewhat" quickly. i almost always shoot in manual
14 posts and 3 images submitted.
>>
Size? Portability? Lol no- there are some Fuji and Mamiya rangefinders that may fit the bill there. However in terms of internal metering and quick use, I'd recommend a 645n, and in terms of the slr experience I'd recommend a Pentax 67.
>>
>>2884941
Mamiya 7 your only choice
Or hassy x-pan, if you literally want shoot wide medium format on 35 film
>>
File: allahu-intensifies.jpg (1MB, 1920x709px) Image search: [Google]
allahu-intensifies.jpg
1MB, 1920x709px
Size and weight in an SLR style if where you'll be let down. Tho a lot of cameras have AE prisms and grips available, they're still moderately heavy and bulky. You may be better off with a folder.
>>2884971
>7
>only choice
fuck you tbqh.
There are other rangefinders out there.

>Xpan
>135
Just shooting an Xpan doesn't give you less grain. You're still using 135 film at the end of the day and you're still limited by the negative area being 24mm tall.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeSEIKO EPSON CORP.
Camera ModelEPSON scanner
Camera SoftwareEPSON Scan
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution2400 dpi
Vertical Resolution2400 dpi
Image Created2016-07-06T18:29:05+01:00

File: Zeiss-10-100-10473-large.jpg (48KB, 620x449px) Image search: [Google]
Zeiss-10-100-10473-large.jpg
48KB, 620x449px
Hey /p/,

I was curious if someone could offer advice on adapting threaded filters (77mm DSLR filters) on older cinema lenses? The lens I'd be using it on would be this Zeiss 10-100 T3 for starters but I will be using older lenses which threaded isn't possible. I'd like to avoid anything that would include a matte box because I simply don't have the budget for one. So specifically anything that can take these filters and attach directly onto the lens or 15mm rods.
5 posts and 2 images submitted.
>>
>>2884540
I once stuck on an incorrectly sized ND using blu-tack once lel
>>
>>2884678
Hah I've considered just using gaffer's tape but I'd like something a little more stable
>>
>>2884540
Why you even bought it
I'm pretty shure m43 analogs are cheaper and shure have better quality for using on your bmpcc

File: 28252769272_db4b6d6198_c.jpg (214KB, 532x800px) Image search: [Google]
28252769272_db4b6d6198_c.jpg
214KB, 532x800px
Since there was a few threads asking for C&C I thought I'd just make a general.

>post a photo
>tell /p/ what you like about it
>tell /p/ what you dont like about it/unsure of
>ask /p/ why youre such a faggot who cant take good photos
>????
>profit

To kick things off, what do you guys reckon of these photos I shot yesterday? Personally I like the framing of this first one, but I'm not convinced on the edit.
10 posts and 7 images submitted.
>>
File: 28252767862_4e5ee473dd_b.jpg (308KB, 1024x681px) Image search: [Google]
28252767862_4e5ee473dd_b.jpg
308KB, 1024x681px
>>2884518
And I'd love some brutally honest critique on this one too. I like the framing and the contrast of the colours, but i'm still not conviced its actually that interesting of a photo.
>>
>>2884519
looks like a giant lego man about to eat some old dude
>>
>>2884518
the vignette on the left side especially is way too hard imo. make it less noticable and it will be a solid shot

>>2884519
good colors
have you tried cropping just above the garage door

File: DSC_0473.jpg (443KB, 1000x667px) Image search: [Google]
DSC_0473.jpg
443KB, 1000x667px
Recent Photo Thread

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.6 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution94 dpcm
Vertical Resolution94 dpcm
Image Created2016:07:16 22:27:18
Color Space InformationsRGB
265 posts and 151 images submitted.
>>
File: DSC_0479.jpg (390KB, 1000x667px) Image search: [Google]
DSC_0479.jpg
390KB, 1000x667px


[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.6 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution94 dpcm
Vertical Resolution94 dpcm
Image Created2016:07:16 22:29:54
Color Space InformationsRGB
>>
File: DSC_0483.jpg (459KB, 1000x667px) Image search: [Google]
DSC_0483.jpg
459KB, 1000x667px


[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.6 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution94 dpcm
Vertical Resolution94 dpcm
Image Created2016:07:16 22:31:33
Color Space InformationsRGB
>>
File: IMG_2809.jpg (730KB, 1000x667px) Image search: [Google]
IMG_2809.jpg
730KB, 1000x667px
I'll keep self-bumping for now, took this from a dam

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.6 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution94 dpcm
Vertical Resolution94 dpcm
Image Created2016:07:16 22:41:26
Color Space InformationsRGB

File: Kodak 8mm.jpg (38KB, 633x507px) Image search: [Google]
Kodak 8mm.jpg
38KB, 633x507px
http://petapixel.com/2016/01/06/kodak-is-bringing-back-the-super-8-as-a-film-camera-with-digital-features/

The camera is estimated to be $400-$750.

50ft of film, with developing and digital scanning included, is estimated to be $50-$75.

So, shooting at 18fps, you get 3m20s of footage, and you have to wait however many days for Kodak to process and scan the film to get your results, and it costs you $50-$75, for EVERY 3m20s??!?

Let's think about that for a moment. We'll assume the bottom of the estimate, $50 for 3m20s of footage.

For an hour of footage, that comes to $900.

Who does Kodak think is going to buy this camera?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Pixel CompositionRGB
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width633
Image Height507
21 posts and 4 images submitted.
>>
>>2883980
>january 6th
>>
>>2883980
rich ppl
>>
>>2883980
Hipsters

and boy will they buy this

8mm has always been super un-economical. This isn't a new thing, if you wanted to use the format these were always the costs involved.

File: maxresdefault.jpg (141KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]
maxresdefault.jpg
141KB, 1920x1080px
What does /pee/ think about recent instant cameras? I'm considered purchasing pic related.
I'm in love with the look of film and I just want to shoot and not think.
28 posts and 4 images submitted.
>>
>and I just want to shoot and not think.
Bait?

Personally I think they're hugely overrated and more to the point overpriced. However the former is because I'm in a film ivory tower and the latter because I've no second-hand nostalgia or want for a physical photograph, which some of the younger folks using these things probably do.

IQ wise I remember them being basically alright. If you're comfortable paying whatever it is for 8 shots, then go for it.
>>
>>2882309
You may as well get a 35mm film SLR that has auto modes on it

I recently got a Pentax p30 for £30 and it has a full auto mode, or aperture/shutter priority on it, plus you have the manual option incase you wanna use it too
>>
>>2882311
>Bait?

No, just an uninformed retard/pleb. It just seems like an easy gateway to film point and shooting to me.

File: sony_a7r_mark_ii_digital_1159878.jpg (304KB, 2000x2000px) Image search: [Google]
sony_a7r_mark_ii_digital_1159878.jpg
304KB, 2000x2000px
Daily reminder that this is the best camera in the world.
96 posts and 22 images submitted.
>>
But I've never seen this thread before. How could it be daily?
>>
File: g69L8.jpg (42KB, 500x376px) Image search: [Google]
g69L8.jpg
42KB, 500x376px
Daily reminder you're a delusional shill


Maybe Sony will release a paid firmware update to give you some common sense
>>
>>2881914
Daily reminder that a camera needs a lens to function properly.

File: WCIHATC.jpg (423KB, 664x1000px) Image search: [Google]
WCIHATC.jpg
423KB, 664x1000px
Incoming weirdness.
It's all about dem Crowns.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATION
Camera ModelNIKON D90
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS5 Windows
Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.7
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern770
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)75 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Created2011:12:04 12:51:22
Exposure Time1/200 sec
F-Numberf/5.6
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating200
Lens Aperturef/5.6
Exposure Bias0 EV
Subject Distance3.55 m
Metering ModeSpot
Light SourceFlash
FlashNo Flash
Focal Length50.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width664
Image Height1000
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceManual
Scene Capture TypeStandard
Gain ControlNone
ContrastNormal
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal
Subject Distance RangeUnknown
130 posts and 40 images submitted.
>>
File: 5 bottles.jpg (427KB, 1000x664px) Image search: [Google]
5 bottles.jpg
427KB, 1000x664px
I once did a thing with stuff.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATION
Camera ModelNIKON D90
Camera SoftwareVer.1.00
Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.7
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern670
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)75 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Created2011:07:26 19:26:55
Exposure Time1/8 sec
F-Numberf/2.8
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating200
Lens Aperturef/2.8
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModeSpot
Light SourceCool White Fluorescent
FlashNo Flash
Focal Length50.00 mm
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceManual
Scene Capture TypeStandard
Gain ControlNone
ContrastNormal
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal
Subject Distance RangeUnknown
>>
File: crown royal bottle.jpg (539KB, 1000x664px) Image search: [Google]
crown royal bottle.jpg
539KB, 1000x664px
mmmmm.... nummy crowns.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATION
Camera ModelNIKON D90
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS5 Windows
Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.7
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern770
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)75 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Created2010:11:17 22:28:45
Exposure Time1/160 sec
F-Numberf/22.0
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating200
Lens Aperturef/22.0
Exposure Bias0 EV
Subject Distance0.84 m
Metering ModeSpot
Light SourceFlash
FlashNo Flash
Focal Length50.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width1000
Image Height664
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceManual
Scene Capture TypeStandard
Gain ControlNone
ContrastNormal
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal
Subject Distance RangeUnknown
>>
File: drinking-pirate.jpg (127KB, 1152x864px) Image search: [Google]
drinking-pirate.jpg
127KB, 1152x864px
moar crowns.

File: IMG_3279 [1024x768].jpg (177KB, 766x768px) Image search: [Google]
IMG_3279 [1024x768].jpg
177KB, 766x768px
what i managed to capture before i broke my shitty lens.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeCanon
Camera ModelCanon EOS 50D
Camera SoftwareRawTherapee
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width3160
Image Height3169
Compression SchemeUncompressed
Pixel CompositionRGB
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Data ArrangementChunky Format
Image Created2016:06:29 20:40:50
Exposure Time1/60 sec
F-Numberf/10.0
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating400
Lens Aperturef/9.9
Metering ModePartial
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length18.00 mm
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
33 posts and 25 images submitted.
>>
File: IMG_3273 [1024x768].jpg (132KB, 1024x681px) Image search: [Google]
IMG_3273 [1024x768].jpg
132KB, 1024x681px
if you don't rate me, shame on you

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeCanon
Camera ModelCanon EOS 50D
Camera SoftwareRawTherapee
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width4762
Image Height3169
Compression SchemeUncompressed
Pixel CompositionRGB
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Data ArrangementChunky Format
Image Created2016:06:29 18:27:16
Exposure Time1/125 sec
F-Numberf/10.0
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating400
Lens Aperturef/9.9
Metering ModePartial
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length18.00 mm
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
>>
File: IMG_3269 [1024x768].jpg (134KB, 990x768px) Image search: [Google]
IMG_3269 [1024x768].jpg
134KB, 990x768px
which version is better?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeCanon
Camera ModelCanon EOS 50D
Camera SoftwareRawTherapee
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width3887
Image Height3015
Compression SchemeUncompressed
Pixel CompositionRGB
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Data ArrangementChunky Format
Image Created2016:06:29 18:25:37
Exposure Time1/125 sec
F-Numberf/10.0
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating400
Lens Aperturef/9.9
Metering ModePartial
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length18.00 mm
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
>>
File: IMG_3266 [1024x768].jpg (232KB, 984x768px) Image search: [Google]
IMG_3266 [1024x768].jpg
232KB, 984x768px
I think this composition is a little cluttered

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeCanon
Camera ModelCanon EOS 50D
Camera SoftwareRawTherapee
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width4062
Image Height3169
Compression SchemeUncompressed
Pixel CompositionRGB
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Data ArrangementChunky Format
Image Created2016:06:29 18:16:32
Exposure Time1/125 sec
F-Numberf/11.0
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating400
Lens Aperturef/11.3
Metering ModePartial
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length55.00 mm
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard

File: 800x655643mal.jpg (130KB, 676x800px) Image search: [Google]
800x655643mal.jpg
130KB, 676x800px
tell me everything you know about taking shots of portraits

some chick asked me for a photo shoot of her in a few days and I am just a dumb ass with a cheap camera, but she will pay me some cash (not much, but, anything helps), so I might as well try my best

tell everything, common mistakes, what to do and what not to do. My camera is a Nikon D3300 with the basic 18 - 55mm kit lens.

general portrait thread

thank you /p/

>pic semi related, something like this
31 posts and 7 images submitted.
>>
>>2874486
forgot to mention, it is going to be outdoors in the old city of my capital, if it matters anyhow
>>
>>2874486
focus on eyes, don't use a shallow DoF, anything going for f4 and f5.6 would be fine. mind your composition.

Edition
remember to give her a natural skin tone, also you can soft her skin in photoshop using gaussian blur, or in lightroom removing contrast from her skin. add some little exposure to her eyes and darken her iris.

I think the basic could be it, so far I remember. I'm learning portraits
>>
>>2874499

is this a bait post?

>don't use shallow dof for basic portraits

Going to have to see some work for you to back this up. Why are you suggesting this to a total beginner?

It requires way more skill to pull off, and to 99% of people will see the end result as the same or less impressive than shallow-DOF shots.

not even going to touch your questionable pp process.

File: 27794053643_f504a3538c_b.jpg (408KB, 1024x681px) Image search: [Google]
27794053643_f504a3538c_b.jpg
408KB, 1024x681px
Okay /p/
I'm having a dilemma. I cant settle on a good crop for this photo that makes the most of the (fairly shit) leading lines from the edges of the gardens. So I put it to you guys - how would you crop this image?
9 posts and 5 images submitted.
>>
>>2886050
To add on to my op, I found a good crop in a 16:9 ratio but would prefer to keep the original 4:3 ratio pls
>>
>>
File: D700-76833.jpg (2MB, 2947x1961px) Image search: [Google]
D700-76833.jpg
2MB, 2947x1961px
>>2886057
Thanks anon I hadnt thought of cropping that far in. I settled on this, and I am much happier with it. I appreciate your inout, helped a lot

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATION
Camera ModelNIKON D700
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.6 (Macintosh)
PhotographerJesse Wormald Photography
Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.7
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern818
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)50 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution240 dpi
Vertical Resolution240 dpi
Image Created2016:07:19 22:35:58
Exposure Time1/1000 sec
F-Numberf/5.6
Exposure ProgramAperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating200
Lens Aperturef/5.6
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash
Focal Length50.00 mm
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
Gain ControlNone
ContrastNormal
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal
Subject Distance RangeUnknown

Pages: [First page] [Previous page] [352] [353] [354] [355] [356] [357] [358] [359] [360] [361] [362] [363] [364] [365] [366] [367] [368] [369] [370] [371] [372] [Next page] [Last page]

[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Search | Top | Home]

I'm aware that Imgur.com will stop allowing adult images since 15th of May. I'm taking actions to backup as much data as possible.
Read more on this topic here - https://archived.moe/talk/thread/1694/


If you need a post removed click on it's [Report] button and follow the instruction.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com.
If you like this website please support us by donating with Bitcoins at 16mKtbZiwW52BLkibtCr8jUg2KVUMTxVQ5
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties.
Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from that site.
This means that RandomArchive shows their content, archived.
If you need information for a Poster - contact them.