Redpill me /p/ on this advertisement.
The poster was published by JWT and Campari. (Whom i asked and never actually gave any info about). So I need the experts of /p/ to give me all the information possible such as photographers in the 80's with similar shots and styles. Kinds of cameras to give the same result. Lighting and color control used for this.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1350 Image Height 1600 Scene Capture Type Standard
>>2885643
I happen to know a bit.
This ad almost brought J Walter Thompson down.
Luca Garavoglia from Campari met a key account person from JWT in 1982 in Rome, seemingly by chance. He was in Piazza Navona getting a gelato with his wife's son. JWT copy writer Bill Lane was there working on the Eastman Kodak account and recognized Luca, struck up a conversation. One thing led to another, and JWT won the account.
Campari was mainly convinced by the work JWT USA had done with the manischewitz wine brand ("There's a Seder in Every Bottle"
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software PhotoFiltre 7 Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2015:02:26 12:12:39 Image Width 758 Image Height 530
>>2885671
Now, we all know that William Eggleston shot Manischewitz, but refused to travel to Italy for Campari
He used 6x7 Pentax cameras and Kodak Gold 400 film exclusively in this era pushed +2 stops for his commercial work (which is not often discussed, as it's eclipsed by his dye prints etc).
The interesting thing about the Eggleston Commercial style is that it subbornly requires only direct sun, cloudless days, and basically 1pm-2pm light (equivalent to 1-2pm light in the summer months, Northern Hemisphere below the Tropic of Rockwell (69°34′N)
>>2885674
Silver reflectors and large mercury mirrors were used to create a hard light look.
This was incredibly expensive and quite dangerous, especially the mirrors.
The photographer for the Campari shoot basically had to find this location where the light would be perfect at 1-2pm, import a Pentax 6x7 camera and get a bunch of rolls of Kodak Gold 400 color film from Eggleson (it wasn't available in Europe due to the Communism issue in Germany).
Anyway, they bring in this giant bar looking thing, paint a wall in this industrial park and start shooting.
What happens is a production assistant braks one of the mirrors and mercury goes fucking everywhere. A total disaster.
A bunch gets on Luca Garavoglia's wife's son and they call her at her boyfirend's house and she's pissed. She leaves her boyfriend's place and drives like MAD to the studio to ream the photographer out and then she sees him.
It's a young Ken Fucking Rockwell. Before the growing family - he was a commercial photographer. She knew him from a few international competitions.
Long story, short - the bomb is diffused, but the wife ends up sleeping with Rockwell. So now JWT and Campari are all at odds.
This is what we made its all gone be safe for work so here we go
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand
Welp there it is but were not through yet
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand
>>2885597
just kys my man!
More is here m9 and there's still more
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Aviary for Android 3.2.0 Image-Specific Properties: Image Created 2016:07:18 15:23:20 Light Source Unknown Image Orientation Unknown Scene Capture Type Standard Exposure Mode Auto Saturation Normal
What do you tend to listen to while you edit. Does the particular shot dictate the genre or is it something you dont even think about?
I tend to put on pretty mellow music
>Tycho
>Boards of Canada
>Tim Hecker
>Loscil
>Emancipator
Sometimes I do a complete 180 though
>In Flames
>August Burns Red
>Electric Wizard
So no, the particular shot doesn't dictate the genre. More what my general mood is.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software ACD Systems Digital Imaging Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2008:07:13 11:57:38 Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 400 Image Height 405
>>2885342
I tend to listen to relaxing music that i put together on youtube playlist, sometimes ambient, classical, jazz and trip-hop
>Steve Reich
>Brian Eno
>Philip Glass
>Ryuichi Sakamoto
>Joe Hisaishi
>Shlohmo
>Ludovico Einaudi
>Erik Satie
>Michel Petrucciani
>Jdilla
>Flylo
>Nujabes
>>2885401
>Steve Reich
The ultimate editing music.
Anyone know what mount this is?
>>2885109
Canon EF.
Couldn't have been easier.
>>2885110
Literally the most plebs mount out there (albeit there are some great glass out there)
I wanna start shooting medium format (120) black and white, mostly because of quality of grain and sharpness
however I'm really married to the style of photography that comes with a 35mm SLR camera. realistically, are there any decent 120 cameras that would be more like a 35mm SLR?
I'm talking in terms of size, weight, portability, being able to handhold it and use an internal meter. in other words, being able to take a spontaneous shot "somewhat" quickly. i almost always shoot in manual
Size? Portability? Lol no- there are some Fuji and Mamiya rangefinders that may fit the bill there. However in terms of internal metering and quick use, I'd recommend a 645n, and in terms of the slr experience I'd recommend a Pentax 67.
>>2884941
Mamiya 7 your only choice
Or hassy x-pan, if you literally want shoot wide medium format on 35 film
Size and weight in an SLR style if where you'll be let down. Tho a lot of cameras have AE prisms and grips available, they're still moderately heavy and bulky. You may be better off with a folder.
>>2884971
>7
>only choice
fuck you tbqh.
There are other rangefinders out there.
>Xpan
>135
Just shooting an Xpan doesn't give you less grain. You're still using 135 film at the end of the day and you're still limited by the negative area being 24mm tall.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make SEIKO EPSON CORP. Camera Model EPSON scanner Camera Software EPSON Scan Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 2400 dpi Vertical Resolution 2400 dpi Image Created 2016-07-06T18:29:05+01:00
Hey /p/,
I was curious if someone could offer advice on adapting threaded filters (77mm DSLR filters) on older cinema lenses? The lens I'd be using it on would be this Zeiss 10-100 T3 for starters but I will be using older lenses which threaded isn't possible. I'd like to avoid anything that would include a matte box because I simply don't have the budget for one. So specifically anything that can take these filters and attach directly onto the lens or 15mm rods.
>>2884540
I once stuck on an incorrectly sized ND using blu-tack once lel
>>2884678
Hah I've considered just using gaffer's tape but I'd like something a little more stable
>>2884540
Why you even bought it
I'm pretty shure m43 analogs are cheaper and shure have better quality for using on your bmpcc
Since there was a few threads asking for C&C I thought I'd just make a general.
>post a photo
>tell /p/ what you like about it
>tell /p/ what you dont like about it/unsure of
>ask /p/ why youre such a faggot who cant take good photos
>????
>profit
To kick things off, what do you guys reckon of these photos I shot yesterday? Personally I like the framing of this first one, but I'm not convinced on the edit.
>>2884518
And I'd love some brutally honest critique on this one too. I like the framing and the contrast of the colours, but i'm still not conviced its actually that interesting of a photo.
>>2884519
looks like a giant lego man about to eat some old dude
Recent Photo Thread
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.6 (Windows) Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 94 dpcm Vertical Resolution 94 dpcm Image Created 2016:07:16 22:27:18 Color Space Information sRGB
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.6 (Windows) Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 94 dpcm Vertical Resolution 94 dpcm Image Created 2016:07:16 22:29:54 Color Space Information sRGB
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.6 (Windows) Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 94 dpcm Vertical Resolution 94 dpcm Image Created 2016:07:16 22:31:33 Color Space Information sRGB
I'll keep self-bumping for now, took this from a dam
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.6 (Windows) Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 94 dpcm Vertical Resolution 94 dpcm Image Created 2016:07:16 22:41:26 Color Space Information sRGB
http://petapixel.com/2016/01/06/kodak-is-bringing-back-the-super-8-as-a-film-camera-with-digital-features/
The camera is estimated to be $400-$750.
50ft of film, with developing and digital scanning included, is estimated to be $50-$75.
So, shooting at 18fps, you get 3m20s of footage, and you have to wait however many days for Kodak to process and scan the film to get your results, and it costs you $50-$75, for EVERY 3m20s??!?
Let's think about that for a moment. We'll assume the bottom of the estimate, $50 for 3m20s of footage.
For an hour of footage, that comes to $900.
Who does Kodak think is going to buy this camera?
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 633 Image Height 507
>>2883980
>january 6th
>>2883980
rich ppl
>>2883980
Hipsters
and boy will they buy this
8mm has always been super un-economical. This isn't a new thing, if you wanted to use the format these were always the costs involved.
What does /pee/ think about recent instant cameras? I'm considered purchasing pic related.
I'm in love with the look of film and I just want to shoot and not think.
>and I just want to shoot and not think.
Bait?
Personally I think they're hugely overrated and more to the point overpriced. However the former is because I'm in a film ivory tower and the latter because I've no second-hand nostalgia or want for a physical photograph, which some of the younger folks using these things probably do.
IQ wise I remember them being basically alright. If you're comfortable paying whatever it is for 8 shots, then go for it.
>>2882309
You may as well get a 35mm film SLR that has auto modes on it
I recently got a Pentax p30 for £30 and it has a full auto mode, or aperture/shutter priority on it, plus you have the manual option incase you wanna use it too
>>2882311
>Bait?
No, just an uninformed retard/pleb. It just seems like an easy gateway to film point and shooting to me.
Daily reminder that this is the best camera in the world.
But I've never seen this thread before. How could it be daily?
Daily reminder you're a delusional shill
Maybe Sony will release a paid firmware update to give you some common sense
>>2881914
Daily reminder that a camera needs a lens to function properly.
Incoming weirdness.
It's all about dem Crowns.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make NIKON CORPORATION Camera Model NIKON D90 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS5 Windows Maximum Lens Aperture f/1.7 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Color Filter Array Pattern 770 Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 75 mm Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2011:12:04 12:51:22 Exposure Time 1/200 sec F-Number f/5.6 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 200 Lens Aperture f/5.6 Exposure Bias 0 EV Subject Distance 3.55 m Metering Mode Spot Light Source Flash Flash No Flash Focal Length 50.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 664 Image Height 1000 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Manual Scene Capture Type Standard Gain Control None Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal Subject Distance Range Unknown
I once did a thing with stuff.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make NIKON CORPORATION Camera Model NIKON D90 Camera Software Ver.1.00 Maximum Lens Aperture f/1.7 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Color Filter Array Pattern 670 Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 75 mm Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2011:07:26 19:26:55 Exposure Time 1/8 sec F-Number f/2.8 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 200 Lens Aperture f/2.8 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Spot Light Source Cool White Fluorescent Flash No Flash Focal Length 50.00 mm Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Manual Scene Capture Type Standard Gain Control None Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal Subject Distance Range Unknown
mmmmm.... nummy crowns.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make NIKON CORPORATION Camera Model NIKON D90 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS5 Windows Maximum Lens Aperture f/1.7 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Color Filter Array Pattern 770 Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 75 mm Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2010:11:17 22:28:45 Exposure Time 1/160 sec F-Number f/22.0 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 200 Lens Aperture f/22.0 Exposure Bias 0 EV Subject Distance 0.84 m Metering Mode Spot Light Source Flash Flash No Flash Focal Length 50.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1000 Image Height 664 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Manual Scene Capture Type Standard Gain Control None Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal Subject Distance Range Unknown
moar crowns.
what i managed to capture before i broke my shitty lens.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS 50D Camera Software RawTherapee Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 3160 Image Height 3169 Compression Scheme Uncompressed Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Data Arrangement Chunky Format Image Created 2016:06:29 20:40:50 Exposure Time 1/60 sec F-Number f/10.0 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 400 Lens Aperture f/9.9 Metering Mode Partial Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 18.00 mm Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard
if you don't rate me, shame on you
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS 50D Camera Software RawTherapee Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 4762 Image Height 3169 Compression Scheme Uncompressed Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Data Arrangement Chunky Format Image Created 2016:06:29 18:27:16 Exposure Time 1/125 sec F-Number f/10.0 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 400 Lens Aperture f/9.9 Metering Mode Partial Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 18.00 mm Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard
which version is better?
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS 50D Camera Software RawTherapee Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 3887 Image Height 3015 Compression Scheme Uncompressed Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Data Arrangement Chunky Format Image Created 2016:06:29 18:25:37 Exposure Time 1/125 sec F-Number f/10.0 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 400 Lens Aperture f/9.9 Metering Mode Partial Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 18.00 mm Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard
I think this composition is a little cluttered
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS 50D Camera Software RawTherapee Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 4062 Image Height 3169 Compression Scheme Uncompressed Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Data Arrangement Chunky Format Image Created 2016:06:29 18:16:32 Exposure Time 1/125 sec F-Number f/11.0 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 400 Lens Aperture f/11.3 Metering Mode Partial Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 55.00 mm Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard
tell me everything you know about taking shots of portraits
some chick asked me for a photo shoot of her in a few days and I am just a dumb ass with a cheap camera, but she will pay me some cash (not much, but, anything helps), so I might as well try my best
tell everything, common mistakes, what to do and what not to do. My camera is a Nikon D3300 with the basic 18 - 55mm kit lens.
general portrait thread
thank you /p/
>pic semi related, something like this
>>2874486
forgot to mention, it is going to be outdoors in the old city of my capital, if it matters anyhow
>>2874486
focus on eyes, don't use a shallow DoF, anything going for f4 and f5.6 would be fine. mind your composition.
Edition
remember to give her a natural skin tone, also you can soft her skin in photoshop using gaussian blur, or in lightroom removing contrast from her skin. add some little exposure to her eyes and darken her iris.
I think the basic could be it, so far I remember. I'm learning portraits
>>2874499
is this a bait post?
>don't use shallow dof for basic portraits
Going to have to see some work for you to back this up. Why are you suggesting this to a total beginner?
It requires way more skill to pull off, and to 99% of people will see the end result as the same or less impressive than shallow-DOF shots.
not even going to touch your questionable pp process.
Okay /p/
I'm having a dilemma. I cant settle on a good crop for this photo that makes the most of the (fairly shit) leading lines from the edges of the gardens. So I put it to you guys - how would you crop this image?
>>2886050
To add on to my op, I found a good crop in a 16:9 ratio but would prefer to keep the original 4:3 ratio pls
>>2886057
Thanks anon I hadnt thought of cropping that far in. I settled on this, and I am much happier with it. I appreciate your inout, helped a lot
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make NIKON CORPORATION Camera Model NIKON D700 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.6 (Macintosh) Photographer Jesse Wormald Photography Maximum Lens Aperture f/1.7 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Color Filter Array Pattern 818 Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 50 mm Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2016:07:19 22:35:58 Exposure Time 1/1000 sec F-Number f/5.6 Exposure Program Aperture Priority ISO Speed Rating 200 Lens Aperture f/5.6 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash Focal Length 50.00 mm Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Gain Control None Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal Subject Distance Range Unknown