[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Search | Free Show | Home]

Archived threads in /p/ - Photography - 312. page

This is a blue board which means that it's for everybody (Safe For Work content only). If you see any adult content, please report it.

File: IMG_0194.jpg (4MB, 5184x3456px) Image search: [Google]
IMG_0194.jpg
4MB, 5184x3456px
....

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeCanon
Camera ModelCanon EOS 1200D
Lens Size18.00 - 55.00 mm
Firmware VersionFirmware Version 1.0.1
Lens NameEF-S18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 III
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2016:08:14 13:15:41
Exposure Time1/320 sec
F-Numberf/11.0
Exposure ProgramNormal Program
Lens Aperturef/11.3
Exposure Bias0 EV
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length55.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width5184
Image Height3456
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
Focus TypeAuto
Metering ModeEvaluative
ISO Speed RatingAuto
SharpnessUnknown
SaturationNormal
ContrastNormal
Shooting ModeUnknown
Image SizeLarge
Focus ModeAI Focus
Drive ModeSingle
Flash ModeOff
Compression SettingFine
Macro ModeNormal
White BalanceAuto
Exposure Compensation3
Sensor ISO Speed160
Color Matrix135
13 posts and 6 images submitted.
>>
File: 1252976673406.jpg (96KB, 474x474px) Image search: [Google]
1252976673406.jpg
96KB, 474x474px
>>2928586

This would've been a great photo if it didn't have the black shit on the bottom and you cropped it for better composition.

Also resize

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS4 Windows
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution1203 dpi
Vertical Resolution1203 dpi
Image Created2009:02:23 23:59:35
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width474
Image Height474
>>
>>2928587
I was at an airshow with hundreds of people around me evrywhere..thats someones hair..unfortunately couldnt avoid
>>
>>2928589
Clone out the hair and then resize

File: image.jpg (503KB, 1536x2048px) Image search: [Google]
image.jpg
503KB, 1536x2048px
Hey /p/ just took this photo on accident and turned out like this. It's the strangest thing I've ever seen, I've never seen anything like it. Any of you guys know why or how this happened? Was taken on an iPhone 6

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width1536
Image Height2048
Scene Capture TypeStandard
6 posts and 2 images submitted.
>>
>>2928204
yes ghosts lmao.

now go and be a retarded teen somewhere else.
>>
>cross-board banners
>>
>>2928204
>image.jpg
Forget to update to iOS 10?

That effect is what happens when you have HDR active and there is subject motion. The camera tried to prevent his skin from blowing out due to overexposure, but because he was moving, the second exposure was displaced relative to the first one, and the gray area is where the blend should have occurred. This is compounded by the fact that the "brighter" exposure happens at a lower shutter speed, so it tends to blur more easily.

File: IMG_1545.jpg (149KB, 1075x723px) Image search: [Google]
IMG_1545.jpg
149KB, 1075x723px
Some anon posted it on /b/. But that's definitely belongs to /p/.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width1075
Image Height723
Scene Capture TypeStandard
9 posts and 1 images submitted.
>>
>>2928017
Right in the feels but anon was right it does belong to /b/.
We don't do food delivery.
>>
>>2928028

Sugar probably has.
>>
>>2928017
I wad not prepared for this feel. Old people with a lot of life experience dying and the memories fading are my weak spots

>tfw my grandpa travelled the world for his work and at one time had a brown bear as a pet and a thoroughbred which he traded for a 1916 Triumph, but half of the stories were never told and nobody who was there is still alive

File: IMG_2500.jpg (395KB, 1936x1285px) Image search: [Google]
IMG_2500.jpg
395KB, 1936x1285px
A couple snapshits from my hike yesterday. Constructive criticism appreciated.
6 posts and 1 images submitted.
>>
love it
>>
amazing
>>
>>2927845
Trying to post the second but I can't find a good compression program

File: P1180970.jpg (896KB, 2112x2816px) Image search: [Google]
P1180970.jpg
896KB, 2112x2816px
wHAT aRE tHESE wHITE sPOTS?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakePanasonic
Camera ModelDMC-G1
Camera SoftwareMicrosoft Windows Photo Viewer 6.2.9200.16384
Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.7
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)40 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution180 dpi
Vertical Resolution180 dpi
Image Created2016:09:18 10:00:38
Exposure Time1/30 sec
F-Numberf/13.0
Exposure ProgramAperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating500
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceFlash
FlashFlash, Compulsory
Focal Length20.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width2112
Image Height2816
RenderingCustom
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
Gain ControlHigh Gain Up
ContrastNormal
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal
12 posts and 1 images submitted.
>>
>>2927608
iT'S dUST yOU dUMB fAGGOT
>>
>>2927614
hOW/wHERE tO rEMOVE iT?
>>
>>2927616
GOOGLE.COM

Should I back it up /p/?
So the main difference of this camera with the Lomo'Instant camera is that it is automatic?

Other than that Instant Camera General Thread
9 posts and 2 images submitted.
>>
>>2927600
looks better than Fuji's blobs, but that's it really.
>>
>>2927600
Seems pretty cool for a 2016 item. Not to mention backing saves you 35% off the top which is nice.
>>
should you back up a format that already exists since years with cameras that you could buy today for less money producing the same exact image buying the same film you'll use for this 2016 hipster shitty version with apple marketing techniques on creating hype and selling something just because of the external looks of the machine, but not offering anything new inside of it in terms of evolution. Back it up if you are a Black Lives Matter supporter, but if you are one of us, one of 'the others', don't do it. Buy instead the new camera by Impossible, it's also a horrible looking overpriced camera marketed to hipsters and people in /film/

File: Windows.jpg (4MB, 5680x3503px) Image search: [Google]
Windows.jpg
4MB, 5680x3503px
I'll take notes of any advices, im trying to get better at this. 1/5

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution240 dpi
Vertical Resolution240 dpi
Color Space InformationsRGB
11 posts and 5 images submitted.
>>
File: Gallery.jpg (4MB, 6000x4000px) Image search: [Google]
Gallery.jpg
4MB, 6000x4000px
2/5

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution240 dpi
Vertical Resolution240 dpi
Color Space InformationsRGB
>>
File: Drunk.jpg (4MB, 3919x5170px) Image search: [Google]
Drunk.jpg
4MB, 3919x5170px
3/5

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution240 dpi
Vertical Resolution240 dpi
Color Space InformationsRGB
>>
File: Stranger.jpg (5MB, 2813x3751px) Image search: [Google]
Stranger.jpg
5MB, 2813x3751px
4/5

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution240 dpi
Vertical Resolution240 dpi
Color Space InformationsRGB

File: image.jpg (660KB, 2448x2448px) Image search: [Google]
image.jpg
660KB, 2448x2448px
Chaught a pic taken by some anon, dont remember the thread-name. Must have been atleast a week ago. Just want him to know that the girls and guys in my collective house agreed to order a b1 size poster of his photo.
Pic related.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeApple
Camera ModeliPhone 6
Camera Software9.3.5
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)59 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationRight-Hand, Top
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2016:09:18 01:31:20
Exposure Time1/33 sec
F-Numberf/2.2
Exposure ProgramNormal Program
ISO Speed Rating320
Lens Aperturef/2.2
Brightness1.5 EV
Exposure Bias0.1 EV
Metering ModeSpot
FlashNo Flash, Auto
Focal Length4.15 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width2448
Image Height2448
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceAuto
Digital Zoom Ratio1.5
Scene Capture TypeStandard
6 posts and 1 images submitted.
>>
Are you drunk? Honest question.
>>
>>2927406
Yes, honest answer
>>
>>2927408
Good, so am I. You worried me for a moment. We can have a good laugh about it tomorrow.

File: DSC_0009.jpg (1MB, 3840x2160px) Image search: [Google]
DSC_0009.jpg
1MB, 3840x2160px
I recently bought a Canon Fd 50mm 1.4, I was cleaning it today and noticed some spots.

Is it fungus? And if so, can it go away by exposing it to the sun?
6 posts and 1 images submitted.
>>
>>2927299
1. One can't see shit on your picture.
2. Just Google how fungus looks you retard
3. No, exposing fungus to sunlight won't kill it. Best method is to use saliva to clean it.


Aaaaaaaaand sage/hide
>>
>>2927299
It is fungus and is scratched to fuck. Even if you get rid of the fungus it already etched into the glass and the scratches fuck up the IQ even more. Your best bet is to throw it out before it spreads the spores on the rest of your gear
>>
>>2927372
Fuck, thanks for the advice

what does /p/ think of the G5X?
12 posts and 1 images submitted.
>>
Just get the new EOS M5
>>
Screen cant flip out... or protect itself. and its too big.
>>
looks like a mixed mongrel.

File: 40.gif (29KB, 840x372px) Image search: [Google]
40.gif
29KB, 840x372px
Hi /p/, video noob here.

There's a LOT of aspect ratio and some are very similar.

So, why should I use a certain aspect ratio, what impact does it have on the movie?
12 posts and 3 images submitted.
>>
Wider ratios convey a sense of scale. More square ratios.. don't.

Take kill bill - when the bride is in the coffin, QT switches to a 4:3 to convey a feeling of claustrophobia. But when he made hateful 8, he went for 2.76:1 70mm.
>>
>>2927061
ok so when shooting landscapes, i should use a wider aspect ratio?
>>
>>2927085
You know not only is Google a fucking thing, there's also a stupid questions thread and a video thread.

File: image.jpg (68KB, 2048x1053px) Image search: [Google]
image.jpg
68KB, 2048x1053px
Hey everyone, new to this thread but I've been a photographer for a while, mostly freelance, shoot a lot of landscape images and action sports.

My current setup consists of:
- Canon 6D
- 24-105mm f/4L
- Rokinon 14mm f/2.8
- Canon 50mm f/1.8
- Canon 100mm f/2.8
- Canon 70-300mm f/4

I shoot with these lenses which are mostly good quality glass, especially the L series lens I do have.

A problem I'm running into is when I'm shooting anything I go to do some work after in Lightroom, and there's always a weird look to my photos. They don't seem sharp. Also I shoot raw. When I open the photo in LR and click on it, it looks a certain way and then it changes a second later and it's less vivid and seems worse and I don't know if anyone knows what I'm talking about but I'm not getting the look I want for my images most of the time. Keep in mind I've been shooting for a long time my camera settings and focus are always the first thing I make sure are perfect. I just feel like it's something to do with my export settings or something but I've done quite a lot of experimenting.

Pic is some of my work.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width2048
Image Height1053
Scene Capture TypeStandard
8 posts and 1 images submitted.
>>
K.
>>
>>2927011
That could be just how raw files look like, you do have to do some post work on them. Try shooting in jpeg with different profiles and see if the problem is still there. Maybe you should invest on learning post processing. Nice pic btw
>>
>>2927011
It's probably showing the jpg for a second (jpg information from the camera is stored in the raw file even if you shoot just raw). Shoot raw+jpg and compare them.

The raw file untouched has no sharpening, contrast, saturation etc. added so will appear soft and drab looking. I usually add a preset to the raws to get something near what I want, then play about with them.

I'm no expert though and could be completely wrong.

File: modeling.png (676KB, 1007x731px) Image search: [Google]
modeling.png
676KB, 1007x731px
what do you think /p/, legit?
9 posts and 2 images submitted.
>>
>>2926885
looks a bit creepy
>>
File: 1473993574243.gif (913KB, 366x432px) Image search: [Google]
1473993574243.gif
913KB, 366x432px
>>2926885
ends in rape
>>
>>2926885
Make someone accompany you.

File: IMG_20160917_125712.jpg (57KB, 472x426px) Image search: [Google]
IMG_20160917_125712.jpg
57KB, 472x426px
there's this annoying fucking thing on my viewfinder.

Cant seem to find where it physically is. I can see it on the mirrors, but cant pin point where to brush/blow/scrape.

It doesnt show up on pictures though.

Help? It's triggering my OCD.
13 posts and 6 images submitted.
>>
>>2926855
Is it still there when you take off the lens?
>>
File: IMG_20160917_130154.jpg (109KB, 626x475px) Image search: [Google]
IMG_20160917_130154.jpg
109KB, 626x475px
>>2926855
pic from inside
>>
>>2926856
most likely culprit is the focusing screen

File: image.jpg (339KB, 1280x1920px) Image search: [Google]
image.jpg
339KB, 1280x1920px
Hey, so I'm trying to pick up photography as a hobby (never owned a good camera before, only ever used my phone) but I'm not sure what I should get. I just bought a Canon Powershot SX410 IS for 200$, and it would have been great, but I've found that you can't manually adjust the shutter speed- something I need to do for action shots.
I want to mainly do photos of wildlife and landscape, so I need to be able to zoom fair distances, and take fast-shutter photos (which needs to be manually adjustable). I'm currently looking at another Powershot or maybe a Nikon Coolpix
My budget is about $200, any suggestions? (Pic related, I'd like to be able to get photos close to, if not exactly that)

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Softwarehttp://wallup.net
Photographerhttp://wallup.net
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width1280
Image Height1920
Scene Capture TypeStandard
17 posts and 4 images submitted.
>>
File: 4,21,16-Rocky_Mountain_Fire_2016.jpg (225KB, 1000x555px) Image search: [Google]
4,21,16-Rocky_Mountain_Fire_2016.jpg
225KB, 1000x555px
>>2926826
its just a little above your price range but the d3300 from nikon is freaking amazing for the price. the body alone is maybe $220? but its a normal DX frame camera. if you buy the kit for $400 you get 2 lenses that are pretty fantastic to start out with. Ultralight, perfect for hikes, stunning quality for what it is.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CC 2015 Windows
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Created2016-09-16T22:51:30+20:00
Image Width1000
Image Height555
>>
>>2926845
I really can't go over 200. My original price range was 150-170 and so I'm pushing it as it stands,
>>
>>2926879
coolpix p530s are around that price.

Pages: [First page] [Previous page] [302] [303] [304] [305] [306] [307] [308] [309] [310] [311] [312] [313] [314] [315] [316] [317] [318] [319] [320] [321] [322] [Next page] [Last page]

[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Search | Top | Home]

I'm aware that Imgur.com will stop allowing adult images since 15th of May. I'm taking actions to backup as much data as possible.
Read more on this topic here - https://archived.moe/talk/thread/1694/


If you need a post removed click on it's [Report] button and follow the instruction.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com.
If you like this website please support us by donating with Bitcoins at 16mKtbZiwW52BLkibtCr8jUg2KVUMTxVQ5
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties.
Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from that site.
This means that RandomArchive shows their content, archived.
If you need information for a Poster - contact them.