File: Fujifilm_15175769_Neopan_Acros_100_135_36_Professional_224783.jpg (33KB, 500x500px) Image search:
[Google]
33KB, 500x500px
So Iheard from some semi-reliable source (a Fuji distributor) that Fuji is about to discontinue Acros 100 in 35mm format. He said that they officially "know nothing", but they're expecting it any moment now.
Better stock up while you still can.
30 Posts / 2 Images
View this topic
>>
>>2932638
Fuji sounds so close to just moving to instax only
>>
Fuji sounds so close to finally getting its jaw past their own sphincter.
>>
>>2932943
Still not getting why anyone uses Instax. The quality is horrid, and the price is high.
File: IMG_4165.jpg (3MB, 5184x3456px) Image search:
[Google]
3MB, 5184x3456px
r8
helios 44 58mm
eos m
f-5
1/1000
iso 640
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS M Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows) Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2016:09:23 18:57:19 Exposure Time 1/1000 sec Exposure Program Shutter Priority ISO Speed Rating 640 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Flash No Flash, Compulsory Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 5184 Image Height 3456 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Manual Scene Capture Type Standard
14 Posts / 6 Images
View this topic
>>
I just wish there was a containment thread for all these dank meme troll threads so each genious prankster wouldnt bump off an actual thread off the board every time we get one of these.
>>
File: 20160622-DSC07020.jpg (220KB, 2048x1365px) Image search:
[Google]
220KB, 2048x1365px
>>2932362
>3.25MB
>starting your own thread for this shit
>writing the EXIF in comments like a fag
>overkill ISO & shutter speed
>unsharp at f/5
>cat picture
Kill yourself slowly senpai.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make SONY Camera Model ILCE-7M2 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.6.1 (Windows) Photographer david mornet Maximum Lens Aperture f/1.0 Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2016:09:14 21:24:11 Exposure Time 1/25 sec Exposure Program Shutter Priority ISO Speed Rating 200 Brightness -2.9 EV Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Daylight Flash No Flash, Compulsory Color Space Information sRGB Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Manual Scene Capture Type Standard Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal
>>
>>2932365
the iso was automatic
how is the shutter speed overkill?
File: images (1).jpg (9KB, 210x240px) Image search:
[Google]
9KB, 210x240px
Ok. Here is the story. I have budget of about 200£. Thinking of buying starter telescope for photography.
Is any of telescopes below worth considering. Or would you recommend different one and why.
Once again keep it below 200£
Celestron AstroMaster 130EQ3
Skywatcher Explorer 130M (EQ2)
Celestron AstroMaster 130EQ-MD Motor Drive
Also would motor drive help or cause problems with photography (added vibrations for example)
Thanks
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Unknown Metering Mode Unknown
14 Posts / 3 Images
View this topic
>>
Deep sky or planetary?
Motor drive is virtually essential.
>>
>>2932330
Deep sky if possible with any but novice to a strong photography so gathering info before I buy anything.
>>
"astro photography" not "strong..." Stupid phone.
File: weridlens1-800x600.jpg (49KB, 800x600px) Image search:
[Google]
49KB, 800x600px
So /p/, are you planning on getting one?
http://petapixel.com/2016/09/23/laowa-24mm-f14-2x-macro-lens-super-weird-also-awesome/
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1200 Image Height 900
27 Posts / 5 Images
View this topic
>>
>>2932231
I love Laowa. Those crazy chinks are doing some really innovative stuff in macro photography.
>>
>>2932233
True. The 15mm macro is wonderful.
>>
This camera fucking sucks. $2000 and it doesn't even take sharp photos. Who cares if it does 11 fps.
Don't even get me started on the pop-up flash.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Apple Camera Model iPhone 4S Camera Software 9.3.5 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 35 mm Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Bottom, Right-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2016:09:23 15:43:06 Exposure Time 1/15 sec F-Number f/2.4 Exposure Program Normal Program ISO Speed Rating 800 Lens Aperture f/2.4 Brightness -2.2 EV Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 4.28 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 3264 Image Height 2448 Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard
40 Posts / 6 Images
View this topic
>>
File: 4pgpNcN.jpg (63KB, 480x608px) Image search:
[Google]
63KB, 480x608px
Remember not to reply to troll threads
>>
>>2932103
Just dug up a snapshit from my d300, before I moved to Sony alpha
I never had much issue with sharpness, maybe it's your lens
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 4288 Image Height 2848 Scene Capture Type Standard
>>
>>2932103
> using any crop sensor camera
> zoom lens not G series
Those two reasons alone tell me you're poor and/or retarded. Could've bought a D700 and a decent lens anon.
File: IMG_5407 [1280x768].jpg (194KB, 1154x768px) Image search:
[Google]
![IMG_5407 [1280x768].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/EncAl81.jpg "IMG 5407 [1280x768]")
194KB, 1154x768px
here we,
here we,
HERE WE FUCKING GO
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS 50D Camera Software RawTherapee Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 4762 Image Height 3169 Compression Scheme Uncompressed Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Data Arrangement Chunky Format Image Created 2016:09:20 17:34:26 Exposure Time 1/4 sec F-Number f/3.5 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 250 Lens Aperture f/3.5 Metering Mode Spot Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 18.00 mm Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard
45 Posts / 23 Images
View this topic
>>
File: IMG_5403 [1280x768].jpg (263KB, 1137x768px) Image search:
[Google]
![IMG_5403 [1280x768].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/84wqiSF.jpg "IMG 5403 [1280x768]")
263KB, 1137x768px
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS 50D Camera Software RawTherapee Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 4692 Image Height 3169 Compression Scheme Uncompressed Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Data Arrangement Chunky Format Image Created 2016:09:20 17:32:53 Exposure Time 1/8 sec F-Number f/3.5 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 250 Lens Aperture f/3.5 Metering Mode Spot Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 18.00 mm Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard
>>
File: IMG_5340 [1280x768].jpg (214KB, 1152x768px) Image search:
[Google]
![IMG_5340 [1280x768].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/3ydoLki.jpg "IMG 5340 [1280x768]")
214KB, 1152x768px
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS 50D Camera Software RawTherapee Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 4124 Image Height 2749 Compression Scheme Uncompressed Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Data Arrangement Chunky Format Image Created 2016:09:20 16:16:58 Exposure Time 1/15 sec F-Number f/3.5 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 250 Lens Aperture f/3.5 Metering Mode Spot Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 18.00 mm Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard
>>
nice snapshits
File: NOT A REBADGED CAMERA.jpg (89KB, 796x448px) Image search:
[Google]
89KB, 796x448px
>This is no rebadged camera - Hasselblad
What did they mean by this?
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make OLYMPUS IMAGING CORP. Camera Model E-M5MarkII Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.6 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/1.4 Color Filter Array Pattern 770 Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 50 mm Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2016:06:23 17:27:24 Exposure Time 1/80 sec F-Number f/2.2 Exposure Program Aperture Priority ISO Speed Rating 250 Lens Aperture f/2.2 Exposure Bias -0.3 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 25.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Gain Control High Gain Up Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal
36 Posts / 9 Images
View this topic
>>
There have been several Sony (and even Fuji) cameras released with Hasselblad logos and inflated prices. This is not one of those - you can't get the same device cheaper with a different company's brand name on it.
>>
>>2931854
Waiiiit a minute, the Hasselfuji exists ? me wants
>>
>>2931855
From back in the day...
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS Macintosh Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 75 dpi Vertical Resolution 75 dpi Image Created 2005:01:20 16:00:59 Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 444 Image Height 283
Is there any way for me to coat my own lenses? Say if I were cleaning vintage lenses and wanted to coat the elements to eliminate ghosting
Is it possible?
Is camera lens coating any different from RX lens coating?
Could I just buy this stuff online and apply it myself?
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 842 Image Height 394 Scene Capture Type Standard
20 Posts / 1 Images
View this topic
>>
>>2931704
Commercial coating applications are quite complex and are performed using specialized machinery.
If a low cost, low quality coating exists, it would be in dunk or spray form. You'd have issues with getting an even coating.
>>
>>2931704
Even if you found the equipment and chemicals to do it, you can't just coat the front and rear elements. It's like how manufacturers implement low dispersion lens elements only at certain areas to optimize cost to performance ratios.
>>
>>2931704
WARNING: Do not try this at home.
Anonymous
OC examples of good/bad framing? 2016-09-22 22:03:39 Post No.2931558
[Report] Image search: [Google]
OC examples of good/bad framing? 2016-09-22 22:03:39 Post No.2931558
[Report] Image search: [Google]
File: FramingBad.png (685KB, 1296x432px) Image search:
[Google]
685KB, 1296x432px
OC examples of good/bad framing?
Anonymous
2016-09-22 22:03:39
Post No. 2931558
[Report]
[View this topic]
hi /p/haggots i was hoping you could show me some examples of bad framing vs good framing using your own photos?
like could you possibly grab your camera and take a photo of the first thing you see, inside or outside, doesn't matter? and show me how you would frame that object/thing/person/pet PROPERLY and then also show me how NOT to frame?
im actually trying to take photography more seriously and i think framing is the most important thing to try to learn for now
29 Posts / 7 Images
View this topic
>>
Today's photographer need not necessarily make his picture resemble a wash drawing in order to have it admitted as art, but he must abide by the "rules of composition." That is the contemporary nostrum. Now to consult rules of composition before making a picture is a little like consulting the law of gravitation before going for a walk. Such rules and laws are deduced from the accomplished fact; they are the products of reflection and after-examination, and are in no way a part of the creative impetus. When subject matter is forced to fit into preconceived patterns, there can be no freshness of vision. Following rules of composition can only lead to tedious repetition of pictorial cliches.
Good composition is only the strongest way of seeing the subject. It cannot be taught, because, like all creative effort, it is a matter of personal growth. In common with other artists the photographer wants his finished print to convey to others his own response to his subject. In the fulfillment of this aim, his greatest asset is the directness of the process he employs. But this advantage can only be retained if he simplifies his equipment and technique to the minimum necessary, and keeps his approach free from all formula, art-dogma, rules, and taboos. Only then can he be free to put his photographic sight to use in discovering and revealing the nature of the world he lives in.
>>
>>2931558
The rule of thirds is shit and images that obey it are boring
>>
>>2931578
source?
File: police-do-not-cross-steam-2013-copy4.jpg (971KB, 1500x1018px) Image search:
[Google]
971KB, 1500x1018px
So yesterday I was out shooting and I came across a great location and starting waiting for a subject to walk by. It is right by my city's police station. As I get my camera ready for someone walking by, this person looks at me and he has a huge burn mark on his face. He warns me not to take the shot, and that I can't take his photo. I pussied out and hesitated, and the shot was gone.
I'm pretty certain this man was a cop because of how he was dressed and because he walked into the police station's employee entrance. My question is, what is the legality of taking photos of off duty cops? They are public servants aren't they? If someone tells you blatantly to not take their photo, and you still did, what would be the legal repercussions of using said photo.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS4 Macintosh Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2013:10:31 07:22:31 Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 1500 Image Height 1018
20 Posts / 1 Images
View this topic
>>
>>2931345
Cop or not, he's got no reasonable expectation of privacy so if you're in a civilised country you're fine taking the shot. That said, it's a dick move taking photos of people who have specifically asked you not to.
>>
>>2931345
when u know ur rights and can take this shot you will be stronger
>>
>>2931350
I don't usually take photos of people who have specifically expressed that they don't want it taken. I should've been quicker and just walked away after taking the shot.
>>2931352
I'll have to read more on the subject. I'm sure it will give me a boost of confidence once I know what I can and can't do legally.
File: example.jpg (196KB, 1059x704px) Image search:
[Google]
196KB, 1059x704px
How do I get this kind of film look with digital? Obviously you need the right colors and lighting but then how do you edit it to look similar to this? The first thing I guess are the crushed shadows and the slight grain but there is more to it that I just can't put my finger on since I don't have much editing knowledge.
46 Posts / 11 Images
View this topic
>>
File: PAR50424.jpg (225KB, 1056x704px) Image search:
[Google]
225KB, 1056x704px
>>2931334
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS3 Macintosh Photographer © HARRY GRUYAERT/MAGNUM PHOTOS Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 7576 Image Height 5051 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Compression Scheme Uncompressed Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Data Arrangement Chunky Format Image Created 2014:05:29 15:19:32 Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 7576 Image Height 5051
>>
File: PAR115107.jpg (207KB, 1056x704px) Image search:
[Google]
207KB, 1056x704px
>>2931335
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS3 Macintosh Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 7475 Image Height 4983 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Compression Scheme Unknown Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 527 dpi Vertical Resolution 527 dpi Image Data Arrangement Chunky Format Image Created 2011:02:01 10:32:00 Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 4600 Image Height 3067
>>
File: example2.jpg (196KB, 1056x704px) Image search:
[Google]
196KB, 1056x704px
>>2931336
There is this painterly quality that I just don't know how to achieve.
File: mathers0055lglg.jpg (107KB, 921x600px) Image search:
[Google]
107KB, 921x600px
Tricky sticky:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Gh-fomKSuIEZ-GJo2tere4YMjsDvmmsuyiJKzQ-1ZRk
Talk about cinematography and stuff
23 Posts / 1 Images
View this topic
>>
>>2931198
/vid/ Video General
some mod can add this please? i forgot it!
>>
>>2931198
>/vid/ Video General
/vid/ Video General
/vid/ Video General
/vid/ Video General
/vid/ Video General
>>
I currently have a G7 with the 14-140mm kit lens and the 25mm 1.7.
Now the times has come to the the kitlens go and get the 24-70mm equivalent zoom that many recommend to me and I found 2 options:
>A: Panasonic 12-35mm 2.8
>B: Sigma 17-50mm 2.8 + a cheap AF speedbooster i found from Kipon
They are both stabilized and parfocal with constant aperture and both will cost me between 750-850€ but I can get the Panasonic for cheaper if I'm lucky (I actually missed an amazon sale for 400€ which I still hate me for because I hesitated). The Sigma+speedbooster has the advantage that It opens the EF mount up for me with a faster aperture but the cheap Kipon speedbooster is a certain risk. Also, the in-lens stabilizer of the Canon won't be able to work with the IBIS of future panasonic cameras, if I ever decide to upgrade.
Any pointers?
File: AU000171-Edit-2.jpg (248KB, 800x530px) Image search:
[Google]
248KB, 800x530px
1/15
Critique and offer suggestions. trying to post in order of edit
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Color Space Information sRGB
41 Posts / 19 Images
View this topic
>>
File: AU000145-Edit-2.jpg (486KB, 800x530px) Image search:
[Google]
486KB, 800x530px
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Color Space Information sRGB
>>
File: AU000144-Edit.jpg (398KB, 800x533px) Image search:
[Google]
398KB, 800x533px
3/15
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Color Space Information sRGB
>>
File: AA001446-Edit-2.jpg (539KB, 640x800px) Image search:
[Google]
539KB, 640x800px
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Color Space Information sRGB
File: cl_40f14_800.jpg (156KB, 810x544px) Image search:
[Google]
156KB, 810x544px
Thoughts?
I have a chance to get one relatively cheap.
Should I invest?
I'm in search for an everyday camera with just one lens, not to heavy and big to carry around and I love film.
22 Posts / 5 Images
View this topic
>>
>>2930354
why not a compact film camera with fixed and retractable lens?
>>
>>2930357
I'm a fan of fixed focal length.
>>
>>2930363
they come in fixed focal lengths too
Anonymous
What if canon or nikon released a camera like this one. 2016-09-20 16:13:46 Post No.2929696
[Report] Image search: [Google]
What if canon or nikon released a camera like this one. 2016-09-20 16:13:46 Post No.2929696
[Report] Image search: [Google]
File: 5ea23a3cb1ea7e6b84dc6e356e3c9ee6.jpg (83KB, 736x712px) Image search:
[Google]
83KB, 736x712px
What if canon or nikon released a camera like this one.
Anonymous
2016-09-20 16:13:46
Post No. 2929696
[Report]
[View this topic]
Digital
Square sensor
Same lens mount as the DSLR line
Has only live view
Huge square LCD display on the top, can swivel to the back.
What do you guys think?
35 Posts / 6 Images
View this topic
>>
>>2929696
> square sensor
What format are you thinking?
Also, if it's going to be mirrorless then give it a new mount with a shorter flange focal plane distance, and an adaptor for SLR lenses.
>>
>>2929698
>> square sensor
>What format are you thinking?
Just make a sensor that is square and big enough for FF lenses.
>>
>>2929700
30.6mm