which photo of the two is better?
1/2
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Panasonic Camera Model DMC-G1 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/1.7 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 40 mm Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2016:09:19 16:10:01 Exposure Time 1/160 sec F-Number f/8.0 Exposure Program Aperture Priority ISO Speed Rating 800 Lens Aperture f/8.0 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 20.00 mm Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 900 Image Height 1200 Rendering Custom Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Gain Control High Gain Up Contrast Hard Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal
2/2
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Panasonic Camera Model DMC-G1 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/1.7 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 40 mm Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2016:09:19 16:14:38 Exposure Time 1/250 sec F-Number f/8.0 Exposure Program Aperture Priority ISO Speed Rating 800 Lens Aperture f/8.0 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 20.00 mm Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 900 Image Height 1200 Rendering Custom Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Gain Control High Gain Up Contrast Hard Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal
>>2929601
no, you
Hello /p/.
I dream of starting a camera company. I'm not so sure, if I ever have the chance to do so but that not the subject of this thread.
My vision would be to make cameras that last a long time and are suitable for slow people. Modern cameras have tons of features and the models are refreshed every few years.
In the old times cameras were simple and lasted a long time, because the technology developed slowly. Every camera had basically just the shutter speed dial, shutter release and aperture ring on the lens. A lot of accessories were also available, such as different types of viewfinders.
I only use manual settings and automatic focus, because my D7100 doesn't have a proper focusing screen. I would like to bring back simplicity and modularity to cameras but I need something to balance the lack of modern features.
My idea is that the body would remain unchanged for long periods of time, there wouldn't be a lot of electronics and most electronic components could be updated without buying a new body. Manual focus, mechanical shutter, interchangeable image sensor, image processor and connectors, back screen would be an accessory, only manual settings... Basically imagine taking an old film camera and making it digital. I would also like that users could program apps and new features for the camera.
So my question is this: what would this kind of camera have to offer to make up for the lack of modern features? Also, should it be mirrorless or SLR?
You would get a simple camera for landscape shooting and other slow photography and you wouldn't have to buy a new camera every few years but what else would you want? Should the electronics be in an interchangeable back, so that you could shoot film too? What image format should the camera be? What if the camera was waterproof without an underwater case? What kind of styling? Should it be useful for video too? Focal-plane or central shutter? Should the camera have light metering? All ideas are welcome.
Just ask your dad for financial assistance instead of scamming kickstarter.
>>2928879
>Hello /p/.
>I dream of starting a camera company. I'm not so sure, if I ever have the chance to do so but that not the subject of this thread.
>My vision would be to make cameras that last a long time and are suitable for slow people. Modern cameras have tons of features and the models are refreshed every few years.
>In the old times cameras were simple and lasted a long time, because the technology developed slowly. Every camera had basically just the shutter speed dial, shutter release and aperture ring on the lens. A lot of accessories were also available, such as different types of viewfinders.
>I only use manual settings and automatic focus, because my D7100 doesn't have a proper focusing screen. I would like to bring back simplicity and modularity to cameras but I need something to balance the lack of modern features.
>My idea is that the body would remain unchanged for long periods of time, there wouldn't be a lot of electronics and most electronic components could be updated withoutbuying anew body. Manual focus, mechanical shutter, interchangeable image sensor, image processor and connectors, back screen would be an accessory, only manual settings... Basically imagine taking an old film camera and making it digital. I would also like thatusers could program apps and new features for the camera.
>So my question is this: what would this kind ofcamerahave to offer to make up for the lack of modern features? Also, should it be mirrorless or SLR?
>You would get a simple camera for landscape shooting and other slow photography and you wouldn't have to buy a new camera every few years but what else would you want? Should the electronics be in an interchangeable back, so that you could shoot film too? What image format should the camera be? What if the camera was waterproof without an underwater case? What kind of styling? Should it be useful for video too? Focal-plane or central shutter? Should the camera have light metering? All ideas are welcome.
wew
>>2928881
I wouldn't use crowdfunding but starting the company is purely a dream at this point. Now I just want to play around with the idea of designing a camera from a completely different point of view than most cameras these days.
ITT: Historical Photos from your country
Those were the days.
I would like to get this book but the design looks so shitty. Original one was far better.
>Taschen in charge of art
Photobook thread i guess.
Leica to
>literally judging a book by its cover
Kill yourself. And fuck this shitty thread to death before it even starts.
>>2927326
I guess you're just a fag op
I'm new to /p/ but I was wondering what you guys think of what is in my opinion a perfect picture, especially since apparently there was no editing done to the image, and since it was a Windows XP wallpaper it gives me a bit of nostalgia as well.
>>2925122
>apparently there was no editing done to the image
Citation needed? I always thought that image is color corrected beyond recognition
>>2925122
literally uncanny valley: the "nature" image.
wouldnt surprise me if it was some sort of psy-op.
>apparently there was no editing done to the image
a non issue, who cares. also, its shooped to hell and back.
>>2925129
>>2925132
>Former National Geographic photographer Charles O'Rear, a resident of the nearby Napa Valley, took the photo on film with a medium-format camera while on his way to visit his girlfriend in 1996. While it was widely believed later that the image was digitally manipulated or even created with software such as Adobe Photoshop, O'Rear says it never was. He sold it to Corbis for use as a stock photo. Several years later, Microsoft engineers chose a digitized version of the image and licensed it from O'Rear.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bliss_(image)
Is there a better mobile photo editor?
Not since they added white balance and raw support.
When they add resize and sharpening it'll be god
>>2923503
mind giving a name? Dont really edit on mobile but when i occasionally do i've just been using lightroom
>>2923652
Snapseed
This is the Film General Thread, aka FGT.
>just posting in the FGT doesn't make you gay, unless you shoot Kodak TMAX.
This is the place to post your film photos, without flushing them down the Recent Photo Toilet.
It's OK to ask about film gear in this thread.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi
Hey, what do you guys think of my shitty duck photo?
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make SAMSUNG Camera Model SM-G360V Camera Software G360VVRU2AOF2 Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.6 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 2560 Image Height 1536 Image Orientation Right-Hand, Top Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2016:09:20 23:07:06 Exposure Time 1/20 sec F-Number f/2.6 Exposure Program Normal Program ISO Speed Rating 250 Lens Aperture f/2.6 Brightness 1.2 EV Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Center Weighted Average Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash Focal Length 3.31 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 2560 Image Height 1536 Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Unique Image ID A05QFHI01NA
>>2930186
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi
TMax for op
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi
>This is National Geographic now
What the FUCK.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make FUJIFILM Camera Model X-Pro2 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.4 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/1.4 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 24 mm Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2016:09:23 18:02:21 Exposure Time 1/30 sec F-Number f/4.0 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 1000 Lens Aperture f/4.0 Brightness 1.0 EV Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 16.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Sharpness Normal Subject Distance Range Unknown
>>2932218
>being surprised that magazines are struggling in a digital world
>>2932218
...what exactly is the point of the chick flashing nature picture?
>>2932218
>new museum showcases african american lives
>changing face of europe
ewww.
Photokina 2016 General
Alright /p/, the biggest event in /p/ gearfagging is kicking off, so lets have a dedicated thread for it.
Discuss all the new hot stuff thats being unveiled here.
DPreview coverage:
https://www.dpreview.com/photokina-2016
PCmag coverage:
http://www.pcmag.com/photokina
And remember - be polite.
For starters - panasonic GH5
marketed as 6K camera that does 6K only in burst mode. LOL
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make NIKON CORPORATION Camera Model NIKON D810 Maximum Lens Aperture f/4.0 Image-Specific Properties: Exposure Time 1/250 sec F-Number f/5.0 ISO Speed Rating 2000 Lens Aperture f/5.0 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Fine Weather Flash No Flash Focal Length 65.00 mm Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Manual
Sony just announced the A99 II
>42.5 mpix
>IBIS
>12 fps burst with tracking
>399 af points
>4k at 100mbps
>priced at 3200 usd
not too bad though a bit pricey.
>>2928467
So far this thread offers:
>gearfagging
>a dpreview video
>a panasonic camera
and
>a sony camera
Man. This is off to a great start.
based danny rick edition
Previous Thread >>2850680
Post your car photos, /p/ros
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS 5D Mark II Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC 2014 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/4.0 Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2016:03:21 22:14:55 Exposure Time 1/30 sec F-Number f/6.7 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 100 Lens Aperture f/6.7 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Center Weighted Average Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 105.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 2048 Image Height 1366 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS 70D Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.8 Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2016:08:07 22:53:18 Exposure Time 1/100 sec F-Number f/22.0 Exposure Program Shutter Priority ISO Speed Rating 100 Lens Aperture f/22.0 Exposure Bias -2 EV Metering Mode Center Weighted Average Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 105.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1000 Image Height 667 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard
>>2898671
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS 70D Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.8 Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2016:08:07 22:54:32 Exposure Time 1/80 sec F-Number f/8.0 Exposure Program Shutter Priority ISO Speed Rating 100 Lens Aperture f/8.0 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Center Weighted Average Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 150.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1000 Image Height 667 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard
>>2898672
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS 70D Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.8 Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2016:08:07 22:51:33 Exposure Time 1/100 sec F-Number f/7.1 Exposure Program Shutter Priority ISO Speed Rating 100 Lens Aperture f/7.1 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Center Weighted Average Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 105.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1000 Image Height 667 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard
>Comfy *places*
>Comfy *rooms*
>Comfy *spots*
>Comfy *nature*
>Comfy *movie* *scenes*
Post *comfy*.
Fuck, this board's gone to shit.
Is it a good idea to buy a good lens for an entry-level body?
I have a Canon Rebel T3i. The crop factor is 1.6, and I've been considering buying a Canon 70-200mm, but I don't know if the crop factor and my less powerful body will render it useless or not.
I want a Mark III but unfortunately that's out of my price range, and I don't know if there's a cheaper Canon full frame available.
What are your thoughts?
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Comment Screenshot Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 750 Image Height 888
One one hand it will be longer than on a full frame (112-320mm equivalent) which means it may be a little tight for portraits but will have a little more reach for sports and wildlife. It also won't be as fast as on a full frame, F4.48 equivalent. On the other hand all lens will be in the same boat so even if it is slower than it would be on a full frame it still compares well to other lenses on the same body.
>>2923221
>It also won't be as fast as on a full frame, F4.48 equivalent.
Why is this?
>>2923224
Don't pay attention to that. It is factually incorrect. The aperture of the lens has nothing to do with the body.
Overall, lenses matter more to a final image than bodies do. Just be sure the focal length and field of view the 70-200mm gives you on that camera are what you want. 70mm on a crop body is pretty tight.
show me your face /p/
OC
Claiming number 4.
That group looks very unbalanced: the women are all edible (even the fatty), the guys are all deformed.
>>2919516
>Claiming number 4.
I'll fucking fight you m8
>>2919516
that flash up
Just got an X-Pro1 on a breddy gud deal; how do I rangefinder, especially with varied lenses?
>>2933515
Bumping for knowledge
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1920 Image Height 1080 Scene Capture Type Standard
The xpro1 isn't a rangefinder per se, (inb4 isi) and doesn't require dramatically different technique than any other camera.
I use an x100s, which I imagine works the same way, but here's my advice either way: shoot with the optical viewfinder for maximum versatility. I turn image review off so that I don't get any blackout. Learn to be patient, anticipate the moment, and then take lots of photos.
There's really not much else besides that.
>>2933515
Older film cameras had distance marking on the lens so you know where the zone of focus is. Start with that in the OVF mode and use a tight aperture to get more in focus. This will really really teach you about focus and depth of field control. My first camera was a fed 2 and it had the DOF markings on the lens for the different apertures and that taught me quite a bit.
Otherwise use the EVF, which sends you the picture from the sensor. Xpro should have focus peaking, no? That should help you out.
I was bad.
Took this Saturday, though, while my ass was B&.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties:
Might as well put the shit from the last thread back.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties:
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties:
>>2913526
What happen? Did Isis rustle your jimmies again?