[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Search | Free Show | Home]

Archived threads in /p/ - Photography - 14. page

This is a blue board which means that it's for everybody (Safe For Work content only). If you see any adult content, please report it.

File: daniel sommer ACRos 50113-Edit.jpg (392KB, 1200x750px) Image search: [Google]
daniel sommer ACRos 50113-Edit.jpg
392KB, 1200x750px
photo thread, a

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution70 dpi
Vertical Resolution70 dpi
Color Space InformationsRGB
108 posts and 83 images submitted.
>>
File: daniel sommer apx 200 218-Edit.jpg (523KB, 848x1200px) Image search: [Google]
daniel sommer apx 200 218-Edit.jpg
523KB, 848x1200px
>>3128666

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution70 dpi
Vertical Resolution70 dpi
Color Space InformationsRGB
>>
File: apx400 200 juni019-Edit.jpg (615KB, 800x1200px) Image search: [Google]
apx400 200 juni019-Edit.jpg
615KB, 800x1200px
>>3128667

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution70 dpi
Vertical Resolution70 dpi
Color Space InformationsRGB
>>
File: apx400 200 juni001-Edit.jpg (611KB, 800x1200px) Image search: [Google]
apx400 200 juni001-Edit.jpg
611KB, 800x1200px
>>3128668

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution70 dpi
Vertical Resolution70 dpi
Color Space InformationsRGB

Post some landscapes here
216 posts and 139 images submitted.
>>
File: BlackTusk2.jpg (1MB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]
BlackTusk2.jpg
1MB, 1000x1000px
1/3

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS5 Windows
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width4984
Image Height5000
Number of Bits Per Component8, 8, 8
Compression SchemeUncompressed
Pixel CompositionRGB
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Data ArrangementChunky Format
Image Created2012:11:17 23:11:55
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width1000
Image Height1000
>>
File: GoatMountainBehind.jpg (643KB, 800x800px) Image search: [Google]
GoatMountainBehind.jpg
643KB, 800x800px
2/3

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS5 Windows
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width2659
Image Height2643
Number of Bits Per Component8, 8, 8
Compression SchemeUncompressed
Pixel CompositionRGB
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Data ArrangementChunky Format
Image Created2011:08:20 22:53:29
Color Space InformationUncalibrated
Image Width800
Image Height800
>>
File: NorthVanGrouse.jpg (623KB, 800x800px) Image search: [Google]
NorthVanGrouse.jpg
623KB, 800x800px
3/3

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS5 Windows
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width2655
Image Height2644
Number of Bits Per Component8, 8, 8
Compression SchemeUncompressed
Pixel CompositionRGB
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Data ArrangementChunky Format
Image Created2011:08:22 17:06:08
Color Space InformationUncalibrated
Image Width800
Image Height800

File: peakdesign_strap_bk-700x700 (1).jpg (194KB, 700x700px) Image search: [Google]
peakdesign_strap_bk-700x700 (1).jpg
194KB, 700x700px
Can we have a non-camera, non-lens gearthread?
I recently got a peakdesign slide, because whenever I put my stuff on my Shoulder rig or Monopod for video, the neckstrap would just hand around and annoy me. I gotta say, the system is darn practical, especially because I can attach the neckstrap to anything else that needs strapping, like itself, to form sort of a sling with one free anchorpoint.
More stuff on this, including Tripods, Monopods, Filters, caps, bags, etc.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS2 Windows
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2016:06:09 15:48:47
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width700
Image Height700
311 posts and 51 images submitted.
>>
>>3123698
I didn't have a camera strap for my 1d mark II so I put on a strap from an old minolta SLR I found in a thrift store.

I have a bad neck so I can't hang the camera round my neck (I don't know why anyone would anyway, it's like 13 lbs of camera+lens) but I guess if I dropped the camera the strap would be the last line of defense I could grab onto before it hit the ground.

I should probably get a hand strap.
>>
>>3123704
...or make one now that I'm thinking of it...
>>
>>3123698
The gear thread isn't specific to cameras.

>>3123704
> I should probably get a hand strap.
Also tiring in most instances. Can't you just sling it around your shoulders rather than your neck? There are even dedicated straps for this.

File: summer_snaps.jpg (646KB, 667x1000px) Image search: [Google]
summer_snaps.jpg
646KB, 667x1000px
Summer finally reached Western Norway, and the mountains are starting to clear up.
Sharing some snaps from a recent outing.

Hit that mf upvote button famiglia

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
112 posts and 71 images submitted.
>>
File: summer_snaps-2.jpg (580KB, 1000x667px) Image search: [Google]
summer_snaps-2.jpg
580KB, 1000x667px


[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
>>
File: summer_snaps-3.jpg (455KB, 1000x667px) Image search: [Google]
summer_snaps-3.jpg
455KB, 1000x667px


[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
>>
File: summer_snaps-4.jpg (397KB, 1000x667px) Image search: [Google]
summer_snaps-4.jpg
397KB, 1000x667px


[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi

File: IMG_20170727_235222_425.jpg (349KB, 1055x1319px) Image search: [Google]
IMG_20170727_235222_425.jpg
349KB, 1055x1319px
Recent portrait thread
343 posts and 142 images submitted.
>>
File: IMG_20170727_235052_470.jpg (535KB, 1620x911px) Image search: [Google]
IMG_20170727_235052_470.jpg
535KB, 1620x911px
>>
File: DSC_3232-02.jpg (278KB, 1080x1620px) Image search: [Google]
DSC_3232-02.jpg
278KB, 1080x1620px


[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATION
Camera ModelNIKON D750
Camera SoftwareSnapseed 2.0
PhotographerPeter Swire - [email protected]
Maximum Lens Aperturef/4.1
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern970
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)45 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Created2017:07:18 21:54:07
Exposure Time1/125 sec
F-Numberf/5.6
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating100
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModeCenter Weighted Average
Light SourceFlash
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length45.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width1080
Image Height1620
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceManual
Scene Capture TypeStandard
Gain ControlNone
ContrastNormal
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal
Subject Distance RangeUnknown
>>
>>3122027
>>3122031
they look like mr potatoheads

File: Glasgow310817007.jpg (2MB, 2048x1360px) Image search: [Google]
Glasgow310817007.jpg
2MB, 2048x1360px
Hey /p/ anyone else had a mixed experience with the Hexar AF? I want to like the camera but after some use I can't seem to get the universal praise for this thing
11 posts and 2 images submitted.
>>
>hurr why excellent camera makes bad pics?
maybe you need to git gud?
>>
>>3142987

Maybe it's me lol

Camera works fine and holy fuck is it quiet so it's got that going for it. Perhaps it's my inner leicafag/bokeh whore but I don't really like the clinical quality of the 35 f2
>>
>>3142994
>but I don't really like the clinical quality of the 35 f2

You really should not rely on the lens to make your images interesting.

File: canon_eos_5d_mark_iv_1274706.jpg (377KB, 2000x2000px) Image search: [Google]
canon_eos_5d_mark_iv_1274706.jpg
377KB, 2000x2000px
Hey /p/, I am a graphic design major who's really interested in all forms of digital media. I like marketing and product packaging, film, music videos, album art, etc.

That said, I want to get a nice cheap beginners DSLR / mirrorless to start on. I know nearly nothing about DSLRs specifically, but i've handled plenty of film cameras and know how lenses work, etc. I didn't see any beginners guides or anything in the sticky, so apologies if you get these threads too often. I mainly plan on using it for recording beginner music videos and maybe short films, as well as product packaging and photos for use in my designs. Obviously needs to be at least 1080p, preferably 60fps but I don't know if that's common or not.

I currently work at Best Buy so if it's available there that's a plus because I can use my discount, but I am looking for the best deal, so if I can get it cheaper with a slightly used one on eBay i'd rather go for that.

Thank you!
10 posts and 2 images submitted.
>>
Get a Sony a7ii. They're a great deal and cheaper than reddit tier crop sensor bullshit. Best system on the market.
>>
File: Screenshot_20170901-004542.png (690KB, 1440x2560px) Image search: [Google]
Screenshot_20170901-004542.png
690KB, 1440x2560px
>>3142857
Appreciate the advice, and I do like Sony's a series, that looks a little over what I'd currently consider cheap though. I was hoping to keep it under $1000 after getting all the neccessary supplies (SD cards, case, lenses)
>>
>>3142857
Dude, that is not an entry level camera at all.

File: maxresdefault.jpg (81KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]
maxresdefault.jpg
81KB, 1280x720px
What is Lauren Southern's camera?
22 posts and 2 images submitted.
>>
looks like a c300 to me.
>>
>>3142567
overkill for stupid altright youtube vlog shit
>>
Leitz typ 14 with Zeiss 88mm lens and an aftermarket barrel shroud.

sage

>>>/tv/

File: DSC_0459 copy.jpg (80KB, 727x485px) Image search: [Google]
DSC_0459 copy.jpg
80KB, 727x485px
Why is it so hard to get into infrared flash photography? I can't find a single place that will just sell me an infrared flash.

Photo by Nir Arieli

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATION
Camera ModelNIKON D800
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS5.1 Macintosh
Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern922
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)36 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width7552
Image Height5040
Number of Bits Per Component8, 8, 8
Pixel CompositionRGB
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution240 dpi
Vertical Resolution240 dpi
Image Created2012:08:14 21:38:39
Exposure Time1/200 sec
F-Numberf/3.5
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating200
Lens Aperturef/3.5
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length36.00 mm
Color Space InformationUncalibrated
Image Width727
Image Height485
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
Gain ControlNone
ContrastNormal
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal
Subject Distance RangeUnknown
18 posts and 7 images submitted.
>>
>>3141249
If a scrape off the IR filter from a d70 can I take pictures like this?
>>
File: phpThumb_generated_thumbnail.jpg (23KB, 830x546px) Image search: [Google]
phpThumb_generated_thumbnail.jpg
23KB, 830x546px
>https://www.buzzfeed.com/saeedjones/youve-got-to-see-nir-arielis-infrared-photographs-of-male-da?utm_term=.vfwLJO4ll#.piqBV6Y22

But those are all fucking ultraviolet photos. Infrared does the opposite, making skin smooth and doll-like, the skin being semi-transluscent to IR. Jesus christ, every article about this photographer/set says infrared and it's clearly not.

>>3141249
1. Buy old milsurp ir flashlight/iluminator.
2. Get large GN flashgun.
3. Glue flashlight ir filter to flash.
4. ?????
5. Cliché!
>>
So what do negroes look photographed w/ an IR flash on an IR sensitive medium? And does this shit see through clothes?

File: scan overexposed it.jpg (1023KB, 1196x800px) Image search: [Google]
scan overexposed it.jpg
1023KB, 1196x800px
Hello again friends! I've got a bunch of film from over the summer, tell me what you lot think

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2017:08:28 18:51:08
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width1196
Image Height800
68 posts and 44 images submitted.
>>
File: alt bunker.jpg (974KB, 1196x800px) Image search: [Google]
alt bunker.jpg
974KB, 1196x800px
This first batch is Fuji Superia 400 shot on my oly AF twin

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2017:08:28 18:43:20
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width1196
Image Height800
>>
File: arcade fire.jpg (602KB, 1196x800px) Image search: [Google]
arcade fire.jpg
602KB, 1196x800px


[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2017:08:28 18:41:52
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width1196
Image Height800
>>
File: barred.jpg (844KB, 1196x800px) Image search: [Google]
barred.jpg
844KB, 1196x800px


[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2017:08:28 20:35:58
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width1196
Image Height800

File: 1485505056973.jpg (209KB, 1267x835px) Image search: [Google]
1485505056973.jpg
209KB, 1267x835px
Questions that don't deserve their own threads:

Taking an idea from other boards since there are a lot of threads with very few responses. Post your questions in here that don't quite fit in with /gear/ or the other generals.


I'll start. Are there any good lightmeter phone apps?
315 posts and 47 images submitted.
>>
>>3122333
so, that /p/ book for 2016.....?
>>
>>3122333
I live in Australia and currently use a flatbed scanner to dry mount my film negetives from 135mm up to 4x5. I want to try my hand at wet mounting. The first problem im facing is trying to find a mounting fluid product here in Australia. Obviously the liquid is pretty volatile and people wont ship it internationally. Are there any fluids i can buy from hardware stores that will do. I see some people suggest everything from baby oil to lighter fluid.
>>
>>3122333
I bought David Quiles' LightMeter app yesterday because I was getting sick of the free version. The full version gives you the ability to callibrate the measurements manually which I did side-by-side with a DSLR's meter because I was unsure about my phone camera's base readings (which I am glad I did because it was off). That plus the fact that it retains ISO and other settings makes it a lot more useful. Can't comment on the incident meter's accuracy though as I always use it on reflected mode.

File: nav-dx[1].jpg (21KB, 200x200px) Image search: [Google]
nav-dx[1].jpg
21KB, 200x200px
Why do americunts babble out "DEER ALE ESS ARRHH"

instead of just Dillsir like a civilized gent?
19 posts and 1 images submitted.
>>
Diesel argh!
>>
>not calling it a rooty tooty point and shooty like a civilized gent

get out
>>
You mean a Spiegelreflex?

File: Unbenannt.png (435KB, 844x553px) Image search: [Google]
Unbenannt.png
435KB, 844x553px
https://www.theverge.com/circuitbreaker/2017/8/31/16228202/olympus-e-m10-mark-iii-4k-camera

Yes, I know - m43 meme, but anyways. Opinions?
17 posts and 3 images submitted.
>>
>>3142426
an entry level mirrorless camera that has 4k video and is better than expensive compact cameras like X100F. this is the future of amateur hobbyists.
>>
>>3142426
Em10.2 owner. The mark III looks ood for anyone who wants an entry level m43 and doesn't have one already. Not enough of an upgrade for anyone who already has any other Olympus or Panasonic camera though.

Supposedly the IBIS is much stronger on this new em10, on par with the em1 or em5. That and 4K video is the biggest improvement IMO, but I'd rather get a secondhand em5.ii for the weather sealing, or wait to see if the next em5 has the 20mp sensor.
>>
>>3142432
If it only didn't cost three times as much as every other entry level alternative.

File: espacio-srgb-vs-adobe-rgb.jpg (34KB, 371x359px) Image search: [Google]
espacio-srgb-vs-adobe-rgb.jpg
34KB, 371x359px
ive been doing a lot of research on sRGB and AdobeRGB and i'm still really confused on what i should be using and how i should be using it.

this all started when i noticed that my pictures seemed to be losing a lot of saturation when transferring them to my phone and uploading to instagram, which i assume is happening because i'm shooting in adobeRGB

I would simply use sRGB but i also like to print my own photos at home.
i saw some videos online saying that i should only be shooting in adobeRGB if i had a printer that was capable of it. I then did more research and found people saying that there is not such thing as an adobeRGB printer and that they use CMYK which left me even more confused.

tl;dr I don't want to use sRGB if it means i'm gonna lose color detail in my prints, but i'm not sure if its even making a difference. Help me out here??
24 posts and 5 images submitted.
>>
you're overcomplicating this.
Convert to srgb for web, proof using color managed software and your monitor profile
Convert to cmyk for prints, softproof using fogra shit or a profile supplied by your print service
Use argb or profoto as intermediate
>>
>>3142346

yeah ive been looking into the color proofs in photoshop

so I should just shoot argb and just export it to whatever colorspace i need?
>>
>>3142347
Yes
Unless you have a fantastic 100%argb monitor there should be close to no visible difference in between properly converted color spaces if you got your color management right

File: 140k.jpg (2MB, 3840x3600px) Image search: [Google]
140k.jpg
2MB, 3840x3600px
No one can be this useless, at this point they must be doing it on purpose, right?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2017:08:30 19:44:30
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width3840
Image Height3600
9 posts and 3 images submitted.
>>
File: file.png (2MB, 2560x1440px) Image search: [Google]
file.png
2MB, 2560x1440px
>>3142004
>makes fun of tv colors while having videos looking like a simpsons character
>blacks are purple
>purples are blue

How can one man be so blind?
>>
>>3142005
BUT MUH LUTS!
>>
>>3142004
>they must be doing it on purpose, right?

Yes, it's called clickbaiting.
It's how they make money.

Pages: [First page] [Previous page] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20] [21] [22] [23] [24] [Next page] [Last page]

[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Search | Top | Home]

I'm aware that Imgur.com will stop allowing adult images since 15th of May. I'm taking actions to backup as much data as possible.
Read more on this topic here - https://archived.moe/talk/thread/1694/


If you need a post removed click on it's [Report] button and follow the instruction.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com.
If you like this website please support us by donating with Bitcoins at 16mKtbZiwW52BLkibtCr8jUg2KVUMTxVQ5
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties.
Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from that site.
This means that RandomArchive shows their content, archived.
If you need information for a Poster - contact them.