File: IMG_2460.jpg (2MB, 2448x2448px) Image search:
[Google]
2MB, 2448x2448px
I have this nearly unused Polaroid SLR 680 with all the sheets and even an old pack of 600 film expired in the 80s. I really dont know what do with it, should I buy some of the overpriced instant film and shoot with it? or just sell it off to someone and buy a regular polaroid? impossible project is selling this model for $500+
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Apple Camera Model iPhone 6 Camera Software 8.3 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 39 mm Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Right-Hand, Top Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2015:07:12 19:07:57 Exposure Time 1/24 sec F-Number f/2.2 Exposure Program Normal Program ISO Speed Rating 40 Lens Aperture f/2.2 Brightness 2.3 EV Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Flash Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 4.15 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 2448 Image Height 2448 Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard
5 Posts / 2 Images
View this topic
>>
File: IMG_2460.jpg (1MB, 2447x2347px) Image search:
[Google]
1MB, 2447x2347px
>>3139436
sorry for rotated pic
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Apple Camera Model iPhone 6 Camera Software 8.3 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 39 mm Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2015:07:12 19:07:57 Exposure Time 1/24 sec F-Number f/2.2 Exposure Program Normal Program ISO Speed Rating 40 Lens Aperture f/2.2 Brightness 2.3 EV Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Flash Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 4.15 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 2448 Image Height 2448 Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard
>>
>>3139436
Bump
>>
>>3139436
Do you want to take photos on a polaroid? If so then keep it and use it. If not sell that thing make a quick buck off of a trendie.
File: IMG_0834.jpg (3MB, 3024x4032px) Image search:
[Google]
3MB, 3024x4032px
How come my iPhone takes better pictures than m43 cameras?
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Apple Camera Model iPhone 7 Camera Software 10.3.3 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 28 mm Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2017:08:13 09:27:27 Exposure Time 1/714 sec F-Number f/1.8 Exposure Program Normal Program ISO Speed Rating 20 Lens Aperture f/1.8 Brightness 8.8 EV Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 3.99 mm Image Width 3024 Image Height 4032 Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard
7 Posts / 1 Images
View this topic
>>
How come my OP is more of a faggot than other /p/ posters?
>>
daily m43 bait thread
sage
>>
Yay another gay thread
>1/724th second
Sage
Anonymous
Best book that cover digital camras? 2017-08-26 02:24:26 Post No.3139371
[Report] Image search: [Google]
Best book that cover digital camras? 2017-08-26 02:24:26 Post No.3139371
[Report] Image search: [Google]
Best book that cover digital camras?
Anonymous
2017-08-26 02:24:26
Post No. 3139371
[Report]
[View this topic]
From very basic stuff like aperture,exposure to thinks like camera sensors CCD etc
7 Posts / 2 Images
View this topic
>>
Beautiful picture.
>>
>>3139371
>From very basic stuff like aperture,exposure
Literally any book from the library that covers the technical basics.
>to thinks like camera sensors CCD etc
not even a relevant topic
Don't forget to look at books with lots of pictures in them.
>>
File: Photos-In-Color6 (1).jpg (75KB, 795x500px) Image search:
[Google]
75KB, 795x500px
>>3139371
Have you tried "Stunning Digital Photography" by Toni and Chelsee Northdrop? Check it out at sdp.io/ImAMassiveCuck
File: 1466953077500.png (544KB, 549x567px) Image search:
[Google]
544KB, 549x567px
i jus want a digital rangefinder without having to pay for bullshit technologies like electronic viewfinder and electronic focusing.
16 Posts / 3 Images
View this topic
>>
>>3139370
Why though?
>framelines are never fully accurate
>no depth of field preview
>no exposure preview
>if rangefinder and lens are not perfectly calibrated you get blurry images
>parallax
>no auto focus
Electronic viewfinders are great.
>>
File: 1437481153367.jpg (347KB, 1000x668px)
347KB, 1000x668px
>>3139376
Oh and I forgot: certain lenses block the viewfinder
>>
Muhmegapickels (ID: !!0Z+XAssRGPW)
2017-08-26 02:38:40
Post No.3139382
[Report] Image search: [Google]
[Report] Image search: [Google]
File: L1018388 (Custom).jpg (326KB, 1000x673px) Image search:
[Google]
326KB, 1000x673px
>>3139376
>framelines are never fully accurate
just imagine them overlaid on what you're looking at
>no depth of field preview
what is a distance scale
>no exposure preview
you should be setting eggsposure yourself when you're not in AE ideal light anyway
>parallax
only a few cm, besides you should only have the camera on your face in the moment of exposure
>no auto focus
Ur the focus. an AF will struggle in weird light, but with MF you can always focus (preemptively too) as long as you're aware of where the subject is.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Leica Camera AG Camera Model M8 Digital Camera Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.7.1 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/1.0 Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 100 dpcm Vertical Resolution 100 dpcm Image Created 2017:08:07 23:15:37 Exposure Time 1/1000 sec F-Number f/4.8 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 640 Lens Aperture f/4.8 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Center Weighted Average Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Unique Image ID 00000000000000000000000000005641
File: LRM_EXPORT_20170826_182339-min.jpg (1MB, 4640x3480px) Image search:
[Google]
1MB, 4640x3480px
How do I deal with noises? The original photo was so noisy that it generated a JPEG file of ~16MB. This one had a Level 2 Noise Reduction applied using Lightroom Mobile.
Ignore the mobile part, I'm not a photographer but I like to improve myself on whatever skills that I feel like I can improve upon.
12 Posts / 1 Images
View this topic
>>
>Implying that noise is a bad thing
>>
>>3139359
Forgot to add, Level 2 NR and it went to 7MB. This is compressed using an online JPEG compressor.
My actual question is how to deal with noises without compromising the details of the photo? I see a lot of crisps photos without all the bad noises.
>>3139361
I didn't. I simply want to avoid the bad kinds of noises.
>>
>>3139359
Larger sensor, better lens. Get a higher-end FF camera with a recent sensor and a nice lens that is sharp at wide apertures.
Or shoot in / create better light.
File: olympus-pen-f-camera-review.jpg (171KB, 1000x667px) Image search:
[Google]
171KB, 1000x667px
Do you think people in the 60s got shit for using Micro Four Thirds?
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make FUJIFILM Camera Model X-T1 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.5 (Macintosh) Maximum Lens Aperture f/1.2 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 84 mm Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2015:03:05 13:19:17 Exposure Time 1/60 sec F-Number f/11.0 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 200 Lens Aperture f/11.0 Brightness -0.5 EV Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 56.00 mm Image Width 1800 Image Height 1200 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Sharpness Normal Subject Distance Range Unknown
17 Posts / 4 Images
View this topic
>>
>>3139310
no, because the internet wasn't around then
>>
>>3139311
I bet gearfags were though.
>>
>>3139310
Half frame and 110 were mainly aimed at children, occasionally an overpriced adult version would pop up that was ridiculed by photographers and snapped up by old, wealthy asian men.
File: dubai_pano.jpg (191KB, 1280x529px) Image search:
[Google]
191KB, 1280x529px
nice pictures taken with cheap/shitty/unorthodox equipment or technique thread
pic related was taken using a 70€ chink 28/2.8 lens on a fuji x-m1 and an ultrapod, fastened around a lamp post. had to move and re-attach that thing for every vertical shot because of how bad the head on that piece of shit is
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make FUJIFILM Camera Model X-M1 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.10 (Windows) Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 42 mm Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2017:08:26 14:14:05 Exposure Time 1/9 sec F-Number f/1.0 Exposure Program Aperture Priority ISO Speed Rating 200 Lens Aperture f/1.0 Brightness -2.1 EV Exposure Bias 0.7 EV Metering Mode Average Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 28.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Sharpness Normal Subject Distance Range Unknown
4 Posts / 2 Images
View this topic
>>
>cheap/shitty/unorthodox equipment
>tfw all my shots are that because I have a bentax
>>
File: Cool Mushroom 2 1000px.jpg (301KB, 1000x667px) Image search:
[Google]
301KB, 1000x667px
Taken with a cosina 28mm f/2.8 pentax fit lens which i found on my dads old pentax k1000 in the loft. I taped it on backwards to my 1200D and used a bag of peas as a tripod.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS 1200D Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows) Photographer William Shaw [email protected] Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 5184 Image Height 3456 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2017:08:26 19:45:46 Exposure Time 2 sec Exposure Program Aperture Priority ISO Speed Rating 100 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 50.00 mm Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 1000 Image Height 667 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard
>>
>>3139513
noice
File: maxresdefault.jpg (397KB, 2880x1800px) Image search:
[Google]
397KB, 2880x1800px
Preset Cola r/dfvvk7h4
2 Posts / 2 Images
View this topic
>>
File: 1493495463898.jpg (28KB, 263x395px) Image search:
[Google]
28KB, 263x395px
>>3139171
mfw your fucking pictures. Also please explain.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 263 Image Height 395 Scene Capture Type Standard
File: DSC_0389s.jpg (474KB, 1000x664px) Image search:
[Google]
474KB, 1000x664px
first time shooting with a dslr, first time using lightroom. critique me.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make NIKON CORPORATION Camera Model NIKON D90 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.7 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/5.3 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Color Filter Array Pattern 748 Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 93 mm Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2017:08:26 00:45:27 Exposure Time 1/160 sec F-Number f/6.3 Exposure Program Not Defined ISO Speed Rating 200 Lens Aperture f/6.3 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Auto Focal Length 62.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Gain Control None Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal Subject Distance Range Unknown
14 Posts / 8 Images
View this topic
>>
File: DSC_0171s.jpg (343KB, 1000x715px) Image search:
[Google]
343KB, 1000x715px
most aggressive postprocessing by far. i have no idea what i'm doing.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make NIKON CORPORATION Camera Model NIKON D90 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.7 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/5.7 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Color Filter Array Pattern 748 Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 157 mm Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2017:08:26 00:46:51 Exposure Time 1/125 sec F-Number f/25.0 Exposure Program Aperture Priority ISO Speed Rating 200 Lens Aperture f/25.0 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Center Weighted Average Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash Focal Length 105.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Gain Control None Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal Subject Distance Range Unknown
>>
File: DSC_0244s.jpg (271KB, 1000x642px) Image search:
[Google]
271KB, 1000x642px
don't get spooked
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make NIKON CORPORATION Camera Model NIKON D90 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.7 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/5.7 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Color Filter Array Pattern 748 Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 157 mm Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2017:08:26 00:43:35 Exposure Time 1/400 sec F-Number f/5.6 Exposure Program Aperture Priority ISO Speed Rating 200 Lens Aperture f/5.6 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Center Weighted Average Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash Focal Length 105.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Gain Control None Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal Subject Distance Range Unknown
>>
File: DSC_0334s.jpg (533KB, 1000x664px) Image search:
[Google]
533KB, 1000x664px
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make NIKON CORPORATION Camera Model NIKON D90 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.7 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/5.7 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Color Filter Array Pattern 748 Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 157 mm Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2017:08:26 00:45:45 Exposure Time 1/250 sec F-Number f/8.0 Exposure Program Not Defined ISO Speed Rating 200 Lens Aperture f/8.0 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Auto Focal Length 105.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Gain Control None Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal Subject Distance Range Unknown
File: product_34_body.jpg (186KB, 1200x900px) Image search:
[Google]
186KB, 1200x900px
Should I join the TRUE Medium Format Masterrace?
(Hasselblad X1D and Fuji GFX doesn't count)
Im thinking of buying an PhaseOne 645 DF with P45+ back and 110m 2.8 (35mm eq. to 73mm, f2) for around 6000 euro.
Want to add more lenses later.
But am not quite sure if its worth it
pro's:
-Medium format look will distinguish my pictures from all the other meme APS-C and Fullframe crowd.
-delicious depth of field rendering
-16bit color rendition, Toptier Fullframe have only 14bit
(for the normies here, remember that bits are counted binary, so 16bits means 4x or 400% more color information then 14bit)
-I shoot partly studio and I think some models and clients will have a better impression if they see Phase One.
-Leaf shutter flash sync up to 1/2000 (HSS is not really an alternative since it diminishes flash power)
-Medium format look could land me 1-2 5k/day jobs per year
Con's:
-Iso only to 800, so basically only a studio cam or good weather cam
-Super heavy, so no events possible with that thing
-Super expensive
-Old CCD sensor technology
-Shitty focusing
-Expensive lenses
-Will be memed down the road to buy one of their 40000 Euro Systems one day.
-no one gives a shit about 16bit colors, since even the biggest clients display their images on shitty 5inch screens in highly compressed jpgs.
So /p/ enlighten me with your wisdom.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties:
16 Posts / 1 Images
View this topic
>>
I think you should just kill yourself instead.
>>
>>3138995
>But am not quite sure if its worth it
I know this is a troll thread, but in the interests of potentially saving the financial life of an utter moron on the other side of the world, it is definitely not worth it.
No potential client that you would ever have access to would even be aware of the existence of MF digital, let alone require it.
>let alone be able to tell the fucking difference from files alone; that is literally never happening in 2017
You get MF digital when you are literally being flown around the planet on the regular to shoot fortune 500 corpo shit, or for vogue (not vogue pakistan, either).
Anything you want to do with that camera, you should be able to do comfortably with a 5d2 and 85/1.8.
>>
Of course they don't know the existence of MF but the look is there.
There is a different rendering with that huge sensor size.
SO clients will only think "of those are so pretty" thats all I need.
File: Screen Shot 2017-08-25 at 3.07.36 PM.png (2MB, 1269x837px)
2MB, 1269x837px
album cover - judge brutally
Anonymous
2017-08-25 09:12:32
Post No. 3138977
[Report]
[View this topic]
i know this picture sucks anus and its underexposed, not to mention the dude is ugly
but what should i dot next time and what would you recommend i do with it for retouch in photoshop? skin retouch, colors? what else
3 Posts / 1 Images
View this topic
>>
>>3138977
The lighting, colour and composition are bad, yes, but that’s not what makes it a bad photo. It’s the fact that your subject is an ugly guy standing awkwardly against a wall in a suit he looks extremely uncomfortable in. If this is meant to be an album cover you could hardly choose a photo more likely to discourage people from buying it.
>>
>>3138977
comp wise, shoot at subject's eye level
and not center with already a hard background, it makes for a constricted photo, yours looks like one of a dude in jail
File: bus stop.png (62KB, 1200x900px) Image search:
[Google]
62KB, 1200x900px
Can someone recommend me a good lens hood for a canon video camera?
5 Posts / 2 Images
View this topic
>>
>>3138912
The one that fits
>>
>>3138912
the one you have with you
>>
File: 381102119_e8957e3f79.jpg (88KB, 500x328px)
88KB, 500x328px
>>3138912
File: IMG_2988.jpg (2MB, 2894x2893px)
2MB, 2894x2893px
Hey guys what do y'all think of this pic I took
2 Posts / 1 Images
View this topic
>>
Why so frontal and symmetric?
File: iHmhQc6.png (525KB, 433x680px)
525KB, 433x680px
>work as a videographer for a school
>supervisor is always suggesting changes to edits based on their personal taste
3 Posts / 2 Images
View this topic
>>
File: 1503309682381.jpg (62KB, 1024x1024px)
62KB, 1024x1024px
>>3138898
what is this garbage?
are you surprised that people give unsolicited opinions on things?
are you surprised your supervisor looks at your work?
I hope you aren't actually some autist who is upset about this.
What the fuck did you expect?
>>
>work as head of av department at a school
>some stupid videographer underneath me is always skeptical of the edits i suggest
Dovile
Help me chose the best pictures (lingerie/nude photoshoot), please? 2017-08-25 04:36:44 Post No.3138818
[Report] Image search: [Google]
Help me chose the best pictures (lingerie/nude photoshoot), please? 2017-08-25 04:36:44 Post No.3138818
[Report] Image search: [Google]
File: 20170821-_DSC6406.jpg (68KB, 665x1000px) Image search:
[Google]
68KB, 665x1000px
Help me chose the best pictures (lingerie/nude photoshoot), please?
Dovile
2017-08-25 04:36:44
Post No. 3138818
[Report]
[View this topic]
Hey! I've recently done this shoot to get some plain, simple, natural looking images.
There was no MUA, no stylist, just me and the photographer. Very little to no editing.
We ended the shoot with more sensual/erotic pictures, but anyway...
I'd like to select a few pictures for my portfolio, but I'd like to get some opinions from outside.
Here's a link to the gallery, there're around 60 pictures. Lingerie, implied nudity, nudes:
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/fadmc7ykva3kbrp/AADyYPjqnV3gtNA6pt5bgORHa?dl=0
I'd appreciate it if you could copy and paste names of the photos you liked the most.
That would help me immensly.
P.S. You'll see I have some self harm scars, I'm OK with them being visible. I know it doesn't look super nice and everything, but... life happens sometimes.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make NIKON CORPORATION Camera Model NIKON D700 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.7 (Windows) Photographer Olivier Bernard Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.0 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Color Filter Array Pattern 806 Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 35 mm Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2017:08:25 15:33:23 Exposure Time 1/100 sec F-Number f/4.0 Exposure Program Aperture Priority ISO Speed Rating 800 Lens Aperture f/4.0 Exposure Bias 1/3 EV Metering Mode Spot Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash Focal Length 35.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Gain Control Low Gain Up Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal Subject Distance Range Unknown
13 Posts / 2 Images
View this topic
>>
>>3138818
>life happens sometimes
WTH that is not a "life happens sometimes" it was a choice. DO NOT glam that shit up, she has problems get her help. The self harm scars kill all the images. Number of photos I like 0.
>>
20170821-_DSC6433.jpg
20170821-_DSC6435.jpg
20170821-_DSC6510.jpg
20170821-_DSC6517.jpg
>>
This is not a thread to talk about self harm. I do take it seriously and I'm working on getting better. I haven't harmed myself in nearly two months. But while the scars are there, I don't see much point in Photoshoping them... I'm not aiming to look like girls from magazine covers.