[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Search | Free Show | Home]

Archived threads in /p/ - Photography - 12. page

This is a blue board which means that it's for everybody (Safe For Work content only). If you see any adult content, please report it.

File: 104628860287113p.jpg (15KB, 400x400px) Image search: [Google]
104628860287113p.jpg
15KB, 400x400px
Stupid questions that don't deserve their own thread

Because knowing is half the battle

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
99 posts and 14 images submitted.
>>
So there are these cameras (no particular order):

- Canon 80D
- Fuji X-T20
- Pentax K3 II
- Nikon D610 or used D750 (below 50k actuations)
- Sony a6300


And I'd like to buy one from the list, with 35mm FoV lens. I'd like to earn with it small ammounts of cash (low-level events, stock, prints), do some travels. Size and video capabilities are much less important than image quality. Which would you take?
>>
I have a Canon 7D with a 28-80. Is this fine for street photography?

Also is it called street photography if you don't really want people in your shots?
>>
>>3129032
>35mm equivalent
well that rules out the 80D and the K3 if you want a prime.

>>3129052
More architecture at that point. Ditch the 28-80 for something more suitable for the APS-C sensor, maybe the 10-18 if wide angle is your thing.

File: Untitled-144.jpg (1MB, 1926x1926px) Image search: [Google]
Untitled-144.jpg
1MB, 1926x1926px
I shot this inside a mall not using a low enough Fstop and now it is noisy as hell. Can anyone try to fix it? i tried using the blur tool on the yonug girls face but the noise is uniform throughout the photo

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution240 dpi
Vertical Resolution240 dpi
Image Created2017:08:12 02:04:08
Color Space InformationUncalibrated
Image Width1926
Image Height1926
13 posts and 2 images submitted.
>>
>>3144756
the full file is here

www.chosis.com/image.jpg (JPG)

www.chosis.com/RAW.ARW

both are around 20 MB

free free to crop and change it to try to make it look less noisy
>>
we do not support pedos here sorry
>>
>>3144791
i p-p-p-promise i'm not a p-p-p-edo just bc i take pictures of children

File: back-front.jpg (70KB, 976x342px) Image search: [Google]
back-front.jpg
70KB, 976x342px
Anyone got experience with the bmpcc?
22 posts and 1 images submitted.
>>
Shit battery life
Overheats
Bad at low light
>>
just sold mine after 3 years. it's a fun little camera but there's a lot better things now at the same price point
>>
>>3144076
>bad at low light
considering is has bigger pixels than the A7 (42mm2 per megapixel compared to 36mm2 per megapixel), I don't think you know what you're talking about

File: [email protected] (253KB, 2048x2048px) Image search: [Google]
Sunny_16-6_9bc52aa8-75bd-4b7b-b92d-0ee8e5da3709_2048x@2x.jpg
253KB, 2048x2048px
>repackaged fuji stock
>could go and buy some cheap fuji instead of supporting Melbourne nu-males
>hipsters love it

Disgusting
13 posts and 2 images submitted.
>>
>>3143901
>sunny 16
>iso 400
>implying any cameras can shoot at 1/400
>implying hipsters even know how to expose without a meter
>>
>>3143901
How's the price compare to Fuji? I know AUS prices are typically insane.
>>
>>3143911
what kind of shit camera cant shoot 1/400?

File: 1478954594746.jpg (509KB, 712x950px) Image search: [Google]
1478954594746.jpg
509KB, 712x950px
ignore the differences in the trails, which colours would you prefer?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width7370
Image Height4916
Number of Bits Per Component8, 8, 8
Pixel CompositionRGB
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Created2017:09:03 07:07:18
Color Space InformationUncalibrated
Image Width712
Image Height950
16 posts and 4 images submitted.
>>
>>3143875
Upper, looks more natural.
>>
>>3143875
upper
>>
>>3143875
Blue

File: IMG_3224.jpg (138KB, 1800x1125px) Image search: [Google]
IMG_3224.jpg
138KB, 1800x1125px
Let's save everyone's time from googling and dwelling in forums, post some influential legends (that really inspire you) and their works that really fascinate you. And of course, /discuss/.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CC (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width1800
Image Height1125
Scene Capture TypeStandard
28 posts and 21 images submitted.
>>
The power couple of modern photography.
>>
File: IMG_3225.jpg (63KB, 821x1000px) Image search: [Google]
IMG_3225.jpg
63KB, 821x1000px
>>3143795
I really like Yousuf Karsh. Maybe because i like traditional composition, i'm not really into experimental/modern composition that tries to be a e s t h e t i c.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width821
Image Height1000
Scene Capture TypeStandard
>>
File: IMG_3226.jpg (49KB, 780x1000px) Image search: [Google]
IMG_3226.jpg
49KB, 780x1000px
>>3143798

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width780
Image Height1000
Scene Capture TypeStandard

File: IMG_20170902_161317_1-768x1024.jpg (219KB, 768x1024px) Image search: [Google]
IMG_20170902_161317_1-768x1024.jpg
219KB, 768x1024px
Any other phaggots at the Ayr airshow just now?
16 posts and 11 images submitted.
>>
File: 20160417-IMG_4356.jpg (129KB, 1000x333px) Image search: [Google]
20160417-IMG_4356.jpg
129KB, 1000x333px
No, been about a year for me.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeCanon
Camera ModelCanon EOS 60D
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.12 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperturef/5.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution120 dpi
Vertical Resolution120 dpi
Image Created2017:09:02 11:23:51
Exposure Time1/320 sec
F-Numberf/7.1
Exposure ProgramShutter Priority
ISO Speed Rating100
Lens Aperturef/7.1
Exposure Bias0.7 EV
Metering ModePattern
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length180.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
>>
>>3143529
you had a nice day for it anon
>>
>>3143638
only had the 200mm with me, will post any if they are decent.

File: dsc_0013.ACR.jpg (66KB, 589x442px) Image search: [Google]
dsc_0013.ACR.jpg
66KB, 589x442px
>No 20mp sensor
>small m4/3 sensor
>screen not fully articulated for lol selfies and video but added 4k? lol wut
>same shit as before but this time $800++

I've had it with Olympus. They are like the Nikon Df of the camera world. Only bringing shit for looks with no use in the real world.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATION
Camera ModelNIKON D7500
Maximum Lens Aperturef/4.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Exposure Time1/200 sec
F-Numberf/6.3
ISO Speed Rating100
Lens Aperturef/6.3
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash
Focal Length80.00 mm
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceAuto
26 posts and 1 images submitted.
>>
sage for autism
>>
wow cool info but not really I actually don't care haha lol.
>>
>>3143413
Go back to your full frame DSLR then, autist. Go shoot something that will end up in your instagram, with a $6000 full frame DSLR camera.

>"real camera for real photography!"

What a bullshit thing. You're here, very occupied with hating M4/3 but you're not saying anything about point and shoot photography?

File: images (9).jpg (8KB, 275x184px) Image search: [Google]
images (9).jpg
8KB, 275x184px
would be great for talking and sharing easily
11 posts and 1 images submitted.
>>
Wow that's a great picture how do u do that?
>>
>>3143305
What app/filter did you use to make the lights look like that?
>>
>>3143313
He used the rangefinder app. It makes sure non of your photos are in focus. Even at f32.

File: film digi.jpg (96KB, 1000x765px) Image search: [Google]
film digi.jpg
96KB, 1000x765px
So, now that the film vs digital is pretty much settled, as film has been proven superior to digital everytime, can we envision a third medium for creating photography?

We had a chemical medium, then a digital conversion from light via quantizing, which delivers awful results, and it seems the "scientists" behind all this wont ever experiment with a third medium. I say we should get a chemical to digital medium that changes shape everytime and resets electronically, bassically a reusable chemical sensor that can output digital data.
37 posts and 9 images submitted.
>>
also
>film = beautiful white girl
>digital = t h o t
>>
>>3143126
The person taking these photos was clearly trying to make digital look bad. Just look at the background
>>
Literally
one minute
of editing

File: IMG_0988.png (214KB, 400x399px) Image search: [Google]
IMG_0988.png
214KB, 400x399px
Why doesn't Olympus just go full frame?
11 posts and 1 images submitted.
>>
>>3143115
no ff lenses
would need to design new mount
basically need to design a whole new system from scratch
>>
Because you don't convince people to buy your stuff by bringing more of the same of what your competitors do.
If you want to sell, you have to offer something different.
Olympus' motto is fast & compact.
>>
>>3143118
seems to me like they can either do that now or get totally left behind within 2 or 3 years.
We're getting toward medium format sized sensors in DSLRs now - they need to catch the fuck up and fast.

>The only polaroid that can actually focus
>Starts at $350

Why is the funnest form of photography so expensive.
39 posts and 7 images submitted.
>>
>>3142896
ill sell you mine for 200
>>
Mine can focus and it's not this polaroid.
>>
Buying one isn't the problem. The film itself is expensive as fuck. $35 for 8 shots.

>be on instagram
>liking random photos on different hashtags trying to get followers
>one of my mom's co-workers says that I have been liking her photos, acting like I am a weirdo
>she shows me a picture of her co-worker
>never seen her in my life
>check all of the photos I have liked for the last 3 months
>don't see a single photo of her
>everyone acting like I am weirdo for liking random photos try to get followers

What the fuck? Isn't it normal to randomly like photos on instagram trying to get followers back?

Not only did I never like one of this lady's photos, my mom is acting like I am insane for liking random photos
47 posts and 6 images submitted.
>>
>>3142694
I run a bot of my instagram at home, I like over 1000 photos a day and follow hundreds. I Don't give a shit, and you shouldn't either
>>
>>3142699
Can you get your instagram account deleted because of running a bot?
>>
aww does littel babby anon want milkies from mommy's special friend?

Is that why you keep liking the pictures of her boobies anon?

This is why medium format is crippled until we begin printing on circles instead of squares.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS5 Windows
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution180 dpi
Vertical Resolution180 dpi
Image Created2012:09:29 18:09:21
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width975
Image Height401
20 posts and 4 images submitted.
>>
your post makes absolutely no sense.
>>
>>3142664
Maybe to a tiny dick micro four third Vick like you. It makes sense to people who aren't fucking pleb cunts.
>>
>>3142662
Like, you understand that medium format lenses cover a larger image circle, right?

File: how.jpg (254KB, 1680x863px) Image search: [Google]
how.jpg
254KB, 1680x863px
How is this possible? iso 6400, shutterspeed 1/3000 and this image is still so bright?

I know that when im shooting at iso 6400 I have to use slow shutterspeed (1/30 - 1/80). I'm aware that it does not say what f/-stop he is using but even if he used f/1.4 or below.. it still doesnt make any sense to me how this image can be so well-exposured.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
17 posts and 2 images submitted.
>>
>>3142623
because 6400 is a pretty high iso. i just tried those same settings with my d5100 and 18-55 kit lens wide open in a room with 2 energy saving bulbs and some natural light and the picture wasn't even really that underexposed. it's probably a lens that goes to 1.8 or 1.4 and any kind of decently bright light.

i think the real question though, is why use 1/3000 when you're shooting a static object
>>
>>3142623
ISO 6400 is high ISO. Maybe you're confused because your camera's auto ISO only picks that high when it's really dark out? I'm guessing he's shooting in daylight.

>>3142636
Up in the corner of the Op image, it says "Full Review: Leica M10". So probably shooting at that shutter speed specifically to show how the pictures look at ISO 6400.
>>
File: kevin-carter-vulture.jpg (301KB, 700x1773px) Image search: [Google]
kevin-carter-vulture.jpg
301KB, 700x1773px
>>3142623
>I know that when im shooting at iso 6400 I have to use slow shutterspeed (1/30 - 1/80)
What are you talking about?

-ISO determines the sensor's sensitivity. A higher number means more sensitivity.
-Shutter speed controls the duration of exposure, which affects exposure. (Longer exposure means more light, shorter exposure means less light.)
-Aperture controls the size of the opening in the lens that lets light through. (Smaller number means bigger hole, more light comes through. Bigger number means smaller hole meaning less light comes through.)

Go to your library and read a book about photography basics. Sounds like you've been misinformed by an idiot friend or an idiot blogger.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand

Pages: [First page] [Previous page] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20] [21] [22] [Next page] [Last page]

[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Search | Top | Home]

I'm aware that Imgur.com will stop allowing adult images since 15th of May. I'm taking actions to backup as much data as possible.
Read more on this topic here - https://archived.moe/talk/thread/1694/


If you need a post removed click on it's [Report] button and follow the instruction.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com.
If you like this website please support us by donating with Bitcoins at 16mKtbZiwW52BLkibtCr8jUg2KVUMTxVQ5
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties.
Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from that site.
This means that RandomArchive shows their content, archived.
If you need information for a Poster - contact them.