wtf i hate books now!
>>8760708
OMG IM SO OUTRAGED
WE NEED MORE PEOPLE IN HERE
GET IN HERE AND ENGAGE IN A CIRCLEJERK
MOBILIZE THE MASSES: SOMEONE GO TO REDDIT, ANOTHER TO FACEBOOK, AND ANOTHER TO TWITTER, AND FIND THINGS WE CAN GET OUTRAGED ABOUT AND POST IT HERE SO WE CAN VALIDATE EACH OTHER AND CONSTITUTE OUR IDEALIZED SELF-IMAGE
>>8760723
>its OK when fucking retards like people in OPs pic engage in furious circle jerking to the service of false nonsense
>if we call it out, were no better than them!!! We're actually the wrong people, guys!!!!
Stop
>>8760808
>yfw he did
>There’s no use in my trying to tell you what they were like, because the awful, the blasphemous horror, and the unbelievable loathsomeness and moral foetor came from simple touches quite beyond the power of words to classify.
Bravo Lovecraft
>>8760668
What a hack
Try writing a paragraph of erotica like Lovecraft writes horror.
>Shakespeare wrote 37 plays and five poetry collections, writing a total of 17,677 unique words. Around 10 percent of the words he used were entirely of his own invention.
Who gave this fucker a license to word invention? How did he get away with it?
>>8760611
First post, best post :^)
>>8760611
>tfw to smart to only use words that other people thereput
>>8760611
Shakes made it work.
He invented words where they needed to be that served linguistic purpose, that's why theyre still used today. Like "assassin".
Joyce on the other hand just wanked for prose points
Oh, God, this is going to sound like a typical /lit/ response, but I find AdB quite insufferable: pretty much every bit of his output I've ever encountered has left me with the impression of irritating triteness masquerading as depth.
I'd really be interested to hear from anybody who finds him interesting, insightful, worthwhile, etc. Because personally, I've just never been able to see it.
>>8760596
De Botton, was for me, a very light intro into philosophy when I was younger, and actually inspired me to read the philosphers he talks about in the book.
>>8762359
However, the more I grew-up the more I became aware of what you said. He masquerades the lack of worthwhile content with overly decriptive and weird examples.
Basically it's extremely bias and diluted philosophy for dummies. But could be helpful when starting out.
Don't (ever) waste your time, with philosophy: go straight to the source text
So what made him "go continental"?
>>8760584
His massive intellect.
my diary desu
readin stuff like nietzsche and goethe and schopenhauer
What book will make me want to call my parents? "They don't want to bother you, call them first. You'll regret it when they die." No words no matter how true can help me bear just ten minutes of the half-sincere, half-guilt-ridden small talk.
>>8760546
Know that feel. Fortress of Solitude - Jonathan Lethem. While the protagonist parents only play a big role in the first half of the novel I couldn't help but call them after reading this.
>>8760546
I love those rural town/futurism juxtaposition artworks
anyhow Crime and Punishment may give you mom feels.
Has /lit/ read this? If so what did you think of it?
There are better self-loathing books out there and with better prose and a non-meme covers
>>8761361
For example?
>>8761383
Mein Tagebuch by Ursprüngliches Plakat fagot
>tfw when you unironically start a battle rap thread on /lit/
So this is something I've been following on and off for a few years, and I wondered if anons here would get a kick out of it. Battling may not be destined for the Western Canon, but there is definitely something going on and there is nothing quite like seeing a room full of people lose their shit over a metaphor.
So here are some battles /lit/ might find interesting, b/c metaphor and wordplay are alive and well. And even if it's not to your tastes, it's pretty crazy to see the energy in some of these battles.
Calico vs Loaded Lux
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H9LNvVhEHgI
Eurgh vs 24/7
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cuFVk7che4M
Hollohan vs Pat Stay
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wlkTCXS0l0U
>>8760501
>fucking hell tfw can't tfw. everytime argbarglfarglfaflgr
>>8760501
the only rapper worth a damn now a days is Saul Williams.
>>8760501
>there is nothing quite like seeing a room full of people lose their shit over a metaphor
I unironically lose my shit over dank allegory
>I'm off the chain like broke nunchucks
got damn
What do you think about it my dear /lit/?
It is good. The final section is the weakest. I like part one best.
I've gotten past the airborne toxic event, and now I feel like things have kind have fizzled out. I'll keep reading though.
i like it a lot. its funny
This guy really blew up this week. Are there any good books on the alt-right?
inb4 Mein Kampf
Since they are fact-averse and stupidly authoritarian – No, not really.
is that chuck tingle? i saw he got a write up the other day in everyone's favorite fake news source: the new york times
>>8760417
There's no such thing as the "alt-right" its a journalist buzzword. What you want is a book on the nature of Fascism
I recommend this as a starter
If holiness means chastity and all believers should aspire to holiness, does this mean that Christianity is antinatalist?
Catholic monks did not aspire for all men to be chaste nor did they condemn sex in general
>>8760392
There have actually been various sects who believed this and acted on it, the cathars are a good example, but there have been more recent ones.
What was his problem?
>>8760389
autism and gay
depression
did u see a gay roman statue from his personal collection was up for auction a couple months ago at christies? usually when u look at the "provenance" section of the brochure it's just like "previous owner: some rich jewish guy no one heard of", but when i saw ludwig wittgenstein i was oh shit i know that nigga!
How to become a writer?
Write, you dumb fuck.
Write a short story
Then rewrtite again anda again and gain, each time using a different technique and words
>Write
>Read it, realize it's shit
>Repeat until satisfied.
>tfw just finished reading The Western Canon
but seriously, what the fuck is his problem?
>>8760244
He has to live with that droopy face
>>8760244
>One of my principal memories is that I and my friends, just to survive, had constantly to fight street battles with neighborhood Irish toughs, some of whom were very much under the influence of a sort of Irish-American Nazi organization called the Silver Shirts. This was back in the 1930s. We were on the verge of an Irish neighborhood over there in the East Bronx. We lived in a Jewish neighborhood. On our border, somewhere around Southern Boulevard, an Irish neighborhood began, and they would raid us, and we would fight back. They were terrible street fights, involving broken bottles and baseball bats. They were very nasty times. I say this even though I’ve now grown up and find that many of my best friends are Irish.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EVWiwd0P0c0
I don't know why /lit worships this idiot, Charlie Rose completely obliterated this crusty fool without even trying
>muh old things, not at all like the new things
Hey lit!
Aestheticism in art is "what aesthetic delights, is good, what aesthetic disgusts, is bad"
How do you go about this with out just repeating "hur cause i like it its good", how do you actually support aestheticism in art from an non-subjective level where you can actually write a convincing argument about it?
how do you explain this high subjective "aesthetic delight"
>no memes pls
>>8760196
>good and bad
spooky
>>8760200
no memezzz plz
either I am retarded for not getting it or this "aestheticism" is a joke and I was retarded enough to believe it.
:/