As 2016 draws to a close, share your recommended reads.
>Strong recommend
- “Kubrick” - Michael Herr
- “Hemingway in Love” - A.E Hochtner
- “The Autobiography of Malcolm X” - Alex Haley
- “When Breath Becomes Air” - Paul Kalanithi
- “By Any Means Necessary” - Spike Lee
>Recommend
- “Born Standing Up” - Steve Martin
- “Art Life and the Other Thing” - Ashleigh Wilson
- “Stanley Kubrick” - Vincent LoBrutto
>Don’t Recommend
- “Popism” - Andy Warhol
- “Essays in Love” - Alain De Botton
I'm on a non-fiction binge at the moment.
>Strongly recommended
The Iliad, by Homer
Blood Meridian, by Cormac McCarthy
Journey to the End of the Night, by Louis-Ferdinand Céline
Our Lady of the Flowers, by Jean Genet
>Recommend
The Setting Sun, by Osamu Dazai
The Elementary Particles, by Michel Houellebecq
Augustus, by John Williams
The Melancholy of Resistance, by László Krasznahorkai
>Don't recommend
Imperial Bedrooms, by Bret Easton Ellis
Marthe, by J-K. Huysmans
Nice year. Not very productive, but filled with good literary experiences.
>>8757849
>The Iliad, by Homer
Wow you're a brave one
>>8757745
>Strong Recommend
Virginia Woolf - Orlando
Yukio Mishima - Temple of the Golden Pavilion
William Gass - The Tunnel
>Recommend
Phil Larkin - Jill
Han Kang - The Vegetarian
>Don't Recommend
Michel Houellebecq - The Elementary Particles
Herman Hesse - Siddhartha
Made a thread yesterday looking for journo books, got a couple of replies. Figured I'll broaden my topic a bit more.
How the fuck does one get started in journalism nowadays? My journalism/English professor's idea of journalistic success is writing think pieces at the New Yorker. I just feel like I've learned next to nothing about the craft of journalism, I realize that I just haven't had strong professors but I'd like to seek this info out on my own. I don't want to "work towards" something. I have my own site that I publish on, I have a smartphone with a camera, I have a car, there's no reason to not do the journalism I want to NOW. I'm not asking you guys to hold my hand, I just need some fucking pointers, you know? Books, journalists, interviews, tips, lectures, give me any and all advice you have for someone like me. How feasible is it to try to do this alone? Do you really need much of a support network? My main interest is US nat'l politics.
I assume a decent amount of you are somewhat intertwined with journalism, being writers and publishers, hence why I'm asking here.
>>8757727
Report facts not opinions and analysis like every other journalist out there nowadays. People are savvy on spin and don't like it.
>>8757731
I do, when reporting. I do think investigative stuff (which I've began to dip my toe into) requires a more polemical tone, or else you fall into the pit of underselling the reality of the situation in the name of 'objectivity.'
>>8757727
Go ask journalists how to get started today, it isn't easy for most journalists right now. Send them messages on social media or at their work email (Americans will be on holiday).
Just got into reading and would like to expand my knowledge without the fantasy type genre. I'd like to expand my knowledge based on human circumstances and possibilities without diving too deep into freudian and hawkings style brain fuckery. Anyone have any suggestions for books other then
>1984
>Brave new world
>We
Any help would be appreciate
crime and punishment
>>8757675
Dostoyevsky
Woolf
Faulkner
>>8757675
lost generation is good. Hemmingway, Fitzgerald, Dos Passos.
Why in the fuck is it impossible to find this book for under $30 anywhere? This is actually angering me
Because the copies that they printed are all the copies there are, because not a lot of people in the world is interested in the book and the ones that are interested are interested enough to pay that and more.
I'm angered myself too, but what can we do against the market?
The amount of time you'll spend reading it will more than justify that price. Unless, of course,you just want it for your shelf.
>>8757635
Thanks for the Econ 101 explanation, I was hoping I could get an answer more substantive than "Supply and Demand" though, because if you ask me the pricing is way too high on the supply curve to be justified considering its demand.
So, is this a good adaptaion of the book?
>>8757549
Not faithful in the least but still very enjoyable. I like the fact that Albert is the focus, Franz has a far greater role, and the mystery surrounding the count. Better to watch this before knowing anything about the book.
It's basically not the book. Enjoyable and visually interesting, but not really The Count of Monte Cristo (especially because they kinda fucked up the Count's character and arc).
>>8757736
>I like the fact that Albert is the focus, Franz has a far greater role, and the mystery surrounding the count
Huh, I was just thinking that it would be interesting if the novel started on the Rome part. I'm not OP but I'll probably watch the show just for this
This is excluding the Rabbit books. I don't know much about his other books. How are his short story collection?
People here haven't read Updike?
his two books about witches are pretty good
CI NE MA
Wow, it's been two thousand years and not a single philosophical thought has been able to match it yet.
When did you realise that Socrates literally ended the game?
Every day: they more I study and learn, the more I realise that I don't know a lot and actually know almost nothing. He was quite right though. It is the tragic consequence of learning: the more you do it, the more you realise how less you know.
>>8757195
I know you're a faggot, OP. And that's enough.
Ended the game.
Whose works are you better off knowing by heart: Aristotle's or Shakespeare's?
>>8757157
yes
>>8757157
Word for word: Shakespeare
Ideas: Aristotle
>>8757157
Shakespeare.
Aristotle is pure ideology.
Is Camus the worst popular philosopher ever?
His argument for absurdity is "you are impermanent you will be forgotten so it doesn't even matter the universe is big and the stars don't care about you". He's basically a nihilist, but he's too stupid to realize living a life conscious of the absurd is in no way better than living a life where you believe in God or morality, because nothing is better than anything else within his framework. He values courage and defiance for no reason, and he despises leaps of faith for no reason.
It's basically nihilism with a "fuck you" attitude towards fate that he predicates on trying to sound cool. In fact, his only goal is trying to sound cool, and he writes by stringing together a bunch of aphorisms that are individually quotable but don't amount to much. And yet he's popular here and he's taught in Philosophy classes.
Why? How did this fraud go viral?
>>8756812
he has that typical smug gaze associated with idiotic people who tend to think they're actually smart
seneca is worse
>>8756812
And what have you contributed to philosophy?
hey /lit/eralfaggots what do you think about kreutzer sonata? I liked it a lot, can I consider it a trusty example of russian literature? i'd like to get better into the genre but i've heard some pretty bad things about it
it's great
>I've heard some pretty bad things about it
What? Literally a lot of the best novels ever.
>>8756793
>i've heard some pretty bad things about it
I've never heard anything bad about Russian lit
Do you know what? The Russians, they'd only be an eight o'clock breakfast for the Japanese.
what should i read so i can write lyrics like stephin's?
Oscar Wilde I guess
Wasn't he influenced by broadway and cabaret stuff?
>>8756661
he reads a lot too. i was wondering which writers are similar to him
MAZOLA NEW AND IMPROVED
why did he put so many memes in this book and why won't he stop memeing them.
Cause Gaddis is not subtle. He wanted you to read the book quickly, at the pace of normal conversation, without stopping to reread passages in an attempt to attribute dialogue to specific characters. He also wanted you to read the book in large chunks, 50-100 pages at a time.
He describe the book as a "Blizzard of noise," and he wants to make sure you see the billboards he cares about through all the snow, so he erects a lot of them.
Hoppin' With Flavor!
>>8756820
>at the pace of normal conversation
pleb
With Brexit/Trump and god knows what else, will there ever be a more incorrect theorist than ol' Frankie Fukuyama?
>>8756465
In his last book he literally apologizes, analyzes his errors, points out that he was being influenced by neo-conservative ideology, and attempts to create an updated world view.
Also Trump and Brexit less so than the failure of Iceland's financial institutions illustrate the failures of that book.Tribalism and failures of elite institutions will always trump good intentions
>>8756486
The spoilered part is his thesis btw, not my opinion. badly put.
>>8756486
>Tribalism and failures of elite institutions will always trump good intentions
Thank fuck.
Is there any website that writes articles on literature? The only thing I know of is aldaily.com, but I need something more specific.
If not literature-based, are there even essential /lit/-ish websites that deal with politics,news,culture,history etc. and/or write articles/essays about such?
>>8756457
mcsweeney's
you prolly won't like it tho
>>8756457
All I know is /lit/ desu
>>8757192
Tried reading a few articles.
That was fucking painful.
Thoughts on this? Is it a masterpiece?
cool cover, cool translator. that's my review. you can tell i've read this.
>>8756482
>cool translator
JEW is good?
One of the GOATs