Archived threads in /k/ - Weapons - 2571. page

>>32258401
My parents weren't even born

>>32258410
Then how are you posting on this day, 12/8/2016, the day John Glenn died?

Fuckin' 2016

>>32257823
Read the fucking sticky

File: Hi Point Custom 25_zpsxj9fzgj3.jpg (189KB, 800x600px) Image search: [Google]

189KB, 800x600px

>>32257823

File: Mosin_M44L_long_carbine_1.jpg (140KB, 1272x1262px) Image search: [Google]

140KB, 1272x1262px

Soak the bolt parts in mineral spirits or kerosene for a few days to dissolve that shit.

Next time don't fuck up.

Congratulations op. You have baked in cosmoline ans/or rusty and pitted chamber.

Boiling isnt hot enough to melt the bake. You need to let it sit fully submerged in a solvent for a few days.

>>32257955
Chamber and bore are both good. Thanks, I'll try that

Fucking mosins man

File: Punji-Spikes.jpg (99KB, 640x433px) Image search: [Google]

99KB, 640x433px

>>32257695

>having to go into combat with a fireteam exclusively made up of /k/ommandos

>minefields

File: foster-miller-inc-robot.png (468KB, 600x450px) Image search: [Google]

468KB, 600x450px

>>32257635
Welcome to 2003.

>still can't climb mountainous terrain

>>32257673

>those quad 40s

That's so cute

An issue that I'm considering is the explosives issue.

I personally was unaware that it was illegal to disseminate the explosives info within the U.S. , and am uncomfortable breaking the law.
>inb4 pussy/cuck/etc.

I want fellow kommandos to be well equipped in any event.
But I am not willing to risk 20 years in prison to do so. Being a rebel against unconstitutional law is best done in the public eye, not just passing out shit on anonymous platform.

That doesn't mean it shouldn't be included in the final work, but simply that I will not be the one to include it.
The person running murdercube can simply move the explosives file from the original dokument into the file that we are creating.

>I repeat, It can, should, and in all likelihood WILL BE included. I just won't be doing it.

This is not something that's really up for debate. I am very sorry if you were looking forward to a cleaned up anarchists cookbook, but DESU it's not that hard.

So, information about the project and some decisions that need crowd input are the following:

As of right now, I have not deleted anything from the Original file, with a good bit of the contributions added,it is roughly 65 GB.
Most contributions have been determined as to whether or not they are going to be added. Some things from the original dok are still zipped. There is still a lot of trimming and consolidating, but that's small potatoes at the moment.

55 GB is WITH all the videos from the original do/k/ument. Without ANY of the video files, it shrinks to a MEASLEY ~28 GB, and that's with trimming to do.
So you might be thinking, anon WTF, get that shit out. The two main offenders are Magpul Dynamics(23 GB) and the AGI(14 GB) with some random leftovers.

I am getting rid of AGI(Gunsmithing. Like not just at home gunsmithing) for certain.
Magpul Dynamics is a different story. They have ~7 hours of handgun training and concealed carry courses, ~5 hours on shotgun training, and ~8 on carbines. That's 20+ hours of competent teaching, with drills and other helpful tools for each section. My question to all of you is do you think it should be included in the final package.

I'd rather not. Things to remember:
>Anons all over may not have good internet. We'd be cutting the size in half
>The information contained within is pretty extensively covered on youtube.
>File sharing would be way less strained, meaning more likely long term seeding


In the last thread I mentioned having 3 different editions: --Text. --Infographs/PDf & Text. --Videos included.
I'm still up for doing that, but only if you guys are that concerned with the videos.


Here's a strawpoll to give your opinion.
>http://www.strawpoll.me/11830166

File: Top Level.png (54KB, 1600x900px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 1600x900px

So, we either do or don't have an edition with videos. That's a big decision. Here are some more minor issues, and stawpolls for each.


>1. What is the maximum file size you are willing to download? (Hint: This will determine how "harshly" I cut material from the original.)

>www.strawpoll.me/11830206


Pic related is the current top-level setup, with "skills" underneath survival.
>2. Should there be a /k/ommando section, that contains a fitness, lockpicking, and more trivial shit (art of manliness/how not to be a fuckup type stuff)

It would be less than 1 GB
>www.strawpoll.me/11830226


>3. Should I extend my work to include text files of all the "Sniper101" youtube video captions.

This would likely take 1 extra week unless I could find a quicker way to cut out the caption timing in the text files. But anons, that shit is good.
>www.strawpoll.me/11830245/


Decisions I have made or am very likely to make that you can talk about below:
1. I will not be able to download the ar/k/ after all, I checked our data usage per month and it's too high to manage. If someone wants to put up a MEGA with individual folders available for download, that'd be amazing.
2. There will be a relatively small /k/ section in all non-text only editions. Not gay shit. Stuff like stalker challenge, state konstitutions, gadsdens, etc. Maybe a few songs or relevant images. It will be small, x<500 MB.
3. I'm getting rid of a majority of the "patents" and other documents that date from before even the 90s.
4. I'm cutting the History section, no one seems to care, and no one has sent me anything.

>>32257247
i dont do drills much

>>32257247
Her stomach is perfect

I enjoy shooting dirt, not pretending to know what I'm doing

It depends.

>>32256964
unlike cars you don't have to wait 100 years for them to be worth anything, gun values steadily rise but it still takes years

>>32256964
>is it hard to resell guns for what you paid? do they depreciate immediately like a new car would?
for exactly what you paid its hard unless you find an idiot. expect to lose 20-25%% for most guns. there are exceptions. if a gun is discontinued it increases in value unless its complete pile of shit. the guns that depreciate the most are pumpshotguns you buy a 500 or 870 for 300-400 new its suddenly worth 200 used since pumps are common as fuck. other guns that dont hold value are budget handguns in the 300 range like the sd9ve,canik, or ria which instantly drop to around 2/3s used. parts kit builds like franken ar m4gerys dont hold value either.
that said a factory gun thats bone stock is generally easy to sell at around 80% of new price.

if you want to waste money you upgrade your gun by tacticooling it with ati or something. then the gun is worth less than it would be if it was stock and you are out all the money on the furniture.

No. No. No.

File: 1480816960679.jpg (20KB, 500x313px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 500x313px

>>32256946

File: female oper8or.jpg (349KB, 1192x2912px) Image search: [Google]

349KB, 1192x2912px

blueberry best girl

>>32256829
>ruger

What's wrong with it?

File: puke.jpg (49KB, 543x960px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 543x960px

>ruger

>>32256616
If your intention was to invoke envy, you did well.

If you intend to keep it and sell it in 50 years time then you did good, otherwise, it was a waste of money, They're really not as rare as they're made out to be, my friends grandfather has like 8 of them

Steyr Hahn? Nice

>>32256298
Because if someone did that it would be considered an act of war and repercussions would be commensurate to the damage done.

Information and communication are both key to national defense and taking out satellites disrupts both of those, ergo, an attack on a nation's satellite network is an attack on that nation's capacity to defend itself.

>>32256326

But there's no way to confirm who did it.

And why would ISIS care about declarations of war?

>>32256298
Because satellites have input overload safety systems. They are literally billion-dollar assets, not easily replaced either. And do you have any idea how MUCH radio frequency energy you'd have to generate to scorch a Comsat, particularly a geosynchronous one

>>32256220
What

>>32256313
It is a pretty /k/ riddle.

>>32256220
Bumping my autism

File: ATF Defense Force Doggo.jpg (323KB, 961x961px) Image search: [Google]

323KB, 961x961px

>>32256120
Stabber that gun grabber.

>gun sniffing dogs
X Doubt

File: 1454591541650.jpg (67KB, 334x750px) Image search: [Google]

67KB, 334x750px

>>32256212
Stabber that gun grabber.

>long time question, what is sauce on this image

>>32255810
Longer barrel (more velocity), accurization, optics, optimal projectiles.

>>32255810
There isn't really any good way of doing that, short of maybe a lighter bullet with a higher powder charge, but that's it's own can of worms.
Really, 7.62x39mm was never a great long range cartridge.

If you want more range, either move to a .223 rifle, or move up to a .308 battle rifle, like a PTR91 (H&K G3 clone), fairly affordable and a good entrylevel BR.

Or if a self-loading action isn't required, a bolt-action rifle in .270 has quite a lot of reach.

>>32255846
Finding a longer barrel for an SKS isn't going to be a cakewalk.