Who was the greatest warrior of all time?
>>1515739
Achilles. It's not like we have any way of knowing about how skilled individuals were before recent history, so we may as well just go all the way with someone who almost definitely didn't exist.
>>1515739
Too simple
Im trying to wrap my head around this
How do nomadic steppe horsemen manage to BTFO so many empires/ nations everytime they show up?
They used unconventional tactics that caught these major empires off guard and they were mobile, they didn't have a single city that you could attack as they moved their entire villages and cities with them in a massive horde.
Speed, tactical flexibility, arrows+horses are hard to catch and force into pitched battles. Not to mention that steppe nomands tend to be tough people anyway.
I'm sure some anon knows more about horse nomads than me.
>>1515685
Horsemen + Archers = What the fuck you've turned my asshole inside out
What the fuck was his problem?
Seriously, did he just invade everybody just for the hell of it? How is he anything but the bad guy? Why does anyone celebrate this person?
>What the fuck was his problem?
He had different values to your bitch ass
>Seriously, did he just invade everybody just for the hell of it?
Pretext: Invaded persia as revenge for the Greeks
True Reason: Glory
>How is he anything but the bad guy?
Because he's ~GREAT~
>Why does anyone celebrate this person?
Because he's ~GREAT~
>>1515636
too much sex drive. common affliction amongst hommasectuals. makes us over-achieve, if not a little rash.
>>1515636
"I wanna be the very best like no one ever was"
- Alex "catch all the semen" of Macedon
Why is it that among societies that have traditions - formal or informal - of homosexuality, that the predominant form it manifests in is adult men having sexual relations with young, relatively effete, and frankly, 'twink'-like men/boys? Why has it never manifested as an attraction to - for example, sat - bara or bear types like pic-related?
t.Barafag
because the traditional form of sexual relationship is between the dominant male and submissive woman, and the first kind of homosexuality you mentioned simply replaces the gender of the woman with the male while keeping the same form of power dynamics
and when sexual relations is between the dominant and submissive, being fucked (penetrated, etc) means that you are viewed as submissive and unmasculine
since life back then was much tougher than modern life the value of masculinity was extremely high, by submitting in the sex act you lower your value in the eyes of society
when some barely pubescent boy submits to his teacher in the sex act it's okay because he's not a man yet anyway, when a grown-ass man bends over he's surrendering his masculinity
/lgbt/ must be a really boring place.
>>1515513
>when some barely pubescent boy submits to his teacher in the sex act it's okay because he's not a man yet anyway, when a grown-ass man bends over he's surrendering his masculinity
You just keep repeating yourself, though. You keep saying "because masculinity was valued", but you don't really explain the 'why' as to how being the penetrative partner would have been submissive, or at least, why the ancients - and even some today - still see it as a sign of transgressing on the idea of manliness.
In other words, you keep telling me "being penetrated was unmanly", but I don't see a reason for 'why'.
Simple question; Did the romans come in any contact with slavic or finno-ugric tribes? Or did they just fuck around with gauls and celts?
They most likely knew of their existence but they generally just lumped all barbarians together as Gauls, Celts or Germans
>Romanians are not slavs
Yeah, we get it, your Romans...
>>1515400
W-wat? :c
>For the scientist who has lived by his faith in the power of reason, the story ends like a bad dream. He has scaled the mountains of ignorance, he is about to conquer the highest peak; as he pulls himself over the final rock, he is greeted by a band of theologians who have been sitting there for centuries.” - Robert Jastrow
>theological propositions
>falsifiable
Pick one
What even is the point of theology, obviously religion isn't real so no matter how much you build it up none of it matters.
>oh but God thinks that *latin term* qualifies as THIS such and such category of rituals determined by the conclave of...
lol
>>1515285
>language
>falsifiable
Pick one.
What if the Tokugawas opted for a
Japan of trade instead of isolation?
The Shogunate would've been brought down sooner.
The entire reason they shut down foreign trade was because their former enemies, who were completely removed from positions of power in the government, instead sought power by trade.
>>1515226
They could potentially end up like China.
On the other hand should they be able to
do it correctly it's not hard to imagine them
becoming extremely wealthy as they were
abundant in some resources valuable to
European merchants and the like.
>>1515226
Tokugawa Ieyasu was pretty much a promoter of exploration and openness and even commissioned a few European style ships.
However, his grandson or thereabouts had a conversation with a Spanish priest who showed him a map of all their colonies so he chimped out and banned Christianity and open trade except for the Dutch.
Is this the true extent of Chinese civilization?
>Mongolia, Sakhalin, Kyrgyzstan, all of Manchuria, and larger parts of Siberia, Central Asia and South Asia belonged to China during the time of the Qing Dynasty
>Japan, Burma and Korea were vassal states to Qing China.
>Vietnam was part of the Chinese civilization since its annexation during the time of the Han Dynasty, and Vietnamese people even have Chinese surnames.
>Thai, Tai or Dai people are of Chinese origin: the Dai or Shan, though not Han, are part of the Zhonhua minzu (Chinese people) and inhabit Yunnan. Since the Shan States of Myanmar and the kingdoms of Laos and Thailand were ruled by the Dai people, this makes these states Chinese.
>Thai people also conquered Assam and established a kingdom there, the Ahom kingdom. This makes Northeast India part of China, too.
>Most Taiwanese people are of Chinese origin and language, and Taiwan was part of China from 1683 to 1949. This makes Taiwan part of China, too.
>Most Singaporeans are of Chinese descent and language, so this makes Singapore part of China, too.
>There were polities of Chinese culture in Luzon in ancient times, such as Pangasinan or Feng-chia-hsi-lan. This makes Luzon part of China, too.
>>1515171
Culturally maybe, but the idea that china at any time held direct or even indirect control over all this area is ridiculous
With the exception of Vietnam, SEA was never within the realm of Chinese civilization
They were indianized states
>Thailand and Burma are Chinese
Bullshit. Just because they are descended or related to an ethnic group that was eventually conquered by China's borders doesn't mean they are "Chinese" in any meaningful sense.
The rest is alright, though.
http://www.selectsmart.com/FREE/select.php?client=christiandenom
Take this quiz, post results
Liberal Quakerism and Unitarian Universalism (They both have 100%)
>>1515100
Fuck im an Anglo now
I'm not a Christian so I answered honestly and got Unity Church lmao
>live in Constantinople in 13th century
>live in one of the largest and fabulous cities of the entire world
>earn a good living by working as a bureaucrat in one of the Empire's many administrative departments: have enough money to send my son to our renowned university so that he can also study to become a bureaucrat and to marry off my daughter to some minor nobility
>live in luxury and comfort completely unknown to the people of Western Europe despite being a middle-class man: eat a diet supplemented by exotic spices and quality foodstuffs gained from trade, dress in silks produced domestically, regularly attend the public baths, and go watch the races at the Hippodrome
>suddenly, barbarian cringey Crusaders shouting "le Dayus Volt xDD!" ransack the city
>economy destroyed thanks to their implementation of primitive feudialism on a population that has never known it
>universities and libraries burned to the ground, my son is now a NEET
>the nobility scattered or dead, I have to marry my daughter off to some ugly filthy Venetian to conceal her rape
>the bureaucratic departments dismantled, have to join my son in NEETdom; starvation and famine ensue because the faggot barbarians can't into administration or economics
Thanks, Western Euros.
They didn't manage to pay the money some powerless pretender promised so they all had it coming.
>>1514970
>ever thinking a pretender had the power to speak for an entire Empire
My point still stands: idiot barbarians.
Also:
>not knowing about the Venetian Crusade
>not knowing about the Sack of Thessalonica
>not knowing about Dandolo's well-documented pettiness and inferiority complex
Learn history, faggot, instead of spouting memes.
>>1514957
>ask for an elite force of knights to aid armies
>fucking savage westerners were too busy slaughtering each other to count
>an entire fucking army moves up outside my gate
>fucking damnit
My great grand parents were born in Hungary. I really don't know much about this country. Can somebody give me a quick rundown about the history of Hungary?
Yes. Here you go: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Hungary
All you need to know.
>>1514962
Wow thank you, this is a wonderful website.
>HRE is a shithole
>Into the trash it goes
> Im a witty guy, for you
What was his fucking problem?
What did he mean by this?
Who was in the wrong here?
What was his endgame?
Thoughts, /v/?
>>1514886
Hmmm really makes you think
>>1514880
why were all societies that practices pedastry great? Greeks invented all that maths shit, Romans made like concrete or something, Arabs also did cool maths shit. someone explain this correlation
>>1514844
getting your ass fucked as a boy opens your mind
>>1514844
>it's an "Ancient people were gay" thread
Seriously, where did people get this idea? Even if it happened sometimes, it doesn't necessarily mean it was the norm or that everybody accepted it during the entire period those civilizations existed or that there weren't people who hated it.
What is the evidence for this?
And no, HBO Spartacus doesn't count.
>>1514863
listen I'm just saying it's a bit suspicious that all these societies perceived as scientifically advanced are also thought to have practices pedastry. even Leonardo da Vinci apparently diddled some kids.
And if he was why are so many places named after him in America? Shouldnt there be movements and petitions to rename these places?
What factual knowledge do you contain to make this statement? Please elaborate and formally state your sources. Some Indian boy named Ishaan Tharoor is not a legitimate source.
>>1514769
Of course he wasn't, only white people can be racist.
>>1515154
>Implying organisations like Nation of Islam and Black Lives Matter, were not racists
Are the people of modern day Maceedonia descendants of Alexander the Great?
>>1514715
Alex only fugged boipucci
>>1514715
""""Macedonia""""
>>1514715
>Filthy Bulgarians
>Alexander
Pick one