Woke rationalists

>theological propositions
>falsifiable

Pick one

What even is the point of theology, obviously religion isn't real so no matter how much you build it up none of it matters.

>oh but God thinks that *latin term* qualifies as THIS such and such category of rituals determined by the conclave of...
lol

>>1515285

>language
>falsifiable

Pick one.

>>1515297

That doesn't even make any sense

>>1515318

What is the material/mathematical reduction of language and how can you prove you're understanding these words?

How can you prove understanding, for that matter?

>>1515332
>What is the material/mathematical reduction of language

Something that most scientists will happily admit will never be complete or perfect, unlike theologians

>how can you prove you're understanding these words?
>How can you prove understanding, for that matter?

Consciousness is an unknown as of now, that doesn't allow you to make shit up and declare it true

>>1515350

>Something that most scientists will happily admit will never be

Just stop there.

>as of now

I hope the irony is not lost on you that this a faith-based statement.

>that doesn't allow you to

And that this is a dogmatic one.

>>1515364
>I hope the irony is not lost on you that this a faith-based statement.

Well, you're somewhat right, this is something called an assumption. I indeed assume that knowledge is fallible and always will be. On the one hand, I can't guarantee that this forever remain true. On the other hand, the Titanic being deemed unsinkable, the Chernobyl plant and the Fukushima plant both being declared completely safe, and World War 1 being declared over in a few months in 1914 tell me that this is a very safe assumption