File: DSC_0117.jpg (89KB, 1024x681px) Image search:
[Google]
89KB, 1024x681px
hey /p/ I've got a troubleshooting question for Lightroom. When converting to jpeg I've noticed a massive drop in quality from the nef files after exporting, is this just going to happen? or is there a way to combat this? I'll post a couple of the images it's most notable in.
1/3
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make NIKON CORPORATION Camera Model NIKON D3200 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.8 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/5.7 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Color Filter Array Pattern 814 Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 82 mm Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2016:12:18 00:23:53 Exposure Time 1/40 sec F-Number f/8.0 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 3200 Lens Aperture f/8.0 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash Focal Length 55.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Gain Control High Gain Up Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal Subject Distance Range Unknown
10 Posts / 4 Images
View this topic
>>
File: DSC_0208.jpg (92KB, 681x1024px) Image search:
[Google]
92KB, 681x1024px
>>2985440
2/3
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make NIKON CORPORATION Camera Model NIKON D3200 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.8 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/4.9 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Color Filter Array Pattern 814 Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 60 mm Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2016:12:18 00:24:33 Exposure Time 1/50 sec F-Number f/5.0 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 3200 Lens Aperture f/5.0 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash Focal Length 40.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Gain Control High Gain Up Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal Subject Distance Range Unknown
>>
File: DSC_0143.jpg (84KB, 681x1024px) Image search:
[Google]
84KB, 681x1024px
>>2985441
3/3
the thing i've noticed the most is the edges are
no longer sharp mostly. Any noise or grain I
can't do anything about. Thanks /p/
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make NIKON CORPORATION Camera Model NIKON D3200 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.8 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/3.5 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Color Filter Array Pattern 814 Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 27 mm Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2016:12:18 00:24:03 Exposure Time 1/40 sec F-Number f/8.0 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 3200 Lens Aperture f/8.0 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash Focal Length 18.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Gain Control High Gain Up Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal Subject Distance Range Unknown
>>
>>2985440
>nikon D3200
>Iso 3200
>badly exposed
There's your problem.
File: nikon-coolpix-p900-15.jpg (43KB, 770x433px) Image search:
[Google]
43KB, 770x433px
what does /p/ think of the NIKON P900?? want sumthin with same type of zoom...any other alternatives?
15 Posts / 3 Images
View this topic
>>
>>2985354
It's a bridge camera. All the drawbacks of a DSLR, none of the advantages. Same shitty sensor and noise performance of a compact point and shoot.
Get a beginner DSLR instead like a D3300 with kit lens and get a consumer telezoom like the 55-300 or Tamron 70-300 VC
>>
>>2985409
Forgot to mention the superzoom lens design means it is full of distortion and color aberrations meaning the image is soft and has weird color outlines and very dark meaning the sensor produces a lot of noise even in daylight.
The resulting image is dogshit.
If you want a decent and easy to use camera get a small compact point and shoot instead.
>>
What I think of it:
It's an oversized point and shoot designed for people to buy it and upload a video of zooming in on something far away on youtube to give it free advertising so more dumbasses buy it and the cycle repeats.
Alternatives:
1. Get a Canon PowerShot SX50 HS for $200 off eBay, it has more than enough zoom and doesn't cost $600
2. Get an interchangeable lens camera and a telephoto, plus a 2x converter if you need more zoom.
File: magnam.jpg (143KB, 489x495px) Image search:
[Google]
143KB, 489x495px
For the Magnum agency the human condition has been reduced to migrants problems, migrants concerns, identity politics and so on.
What went wrong?
15 Posts / 5 Images
View this topic
>>
Interesting light, some careful placement in consideration with leading lines. And there's a message, it's shot with a purpose.
Nice pic.
For the rest, you might be looking for >>>/pol/.
>>
>>2985294
The Jews
>>
File: 1470864714384.gif (63KB, 632x200px) Image search:
[Google]
63KB, 632x200px
>>2985294
File: 5b8dee8b87f17edd5801f00c4c0ca0d5.jpg (368KB, 1401x510px) Image search:
[Google]
368KB, 1401x510px
Are you indecisive /p/? How do you stop from being indecisive about what was the best shot you took during a shoot? I feel it is a problem i need to get over, i dont have the confidence to decide for sure which looks the best for me to present
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties:
12 Posts / 2 Images
View this topic
>>
>>2985086
>How do you stop from being indecisive
i dont. im just honest with what i see. a shit shot is shit, meh is meh, a good shot just pops at you.
sometimes the shit shot is clean, and the good shot has some stupid unfixable elements that kill the composition and you are left with nothing and you have to live with it and move on.
>>
>>2985090
This.
It is what it is. Just keep making decisions.
To be overly cautious early on is perhaps natural, but keep making those "hard" decisions and you'll find a natural rhythm and get faster at it.
Listen to what makes people go oohhhh without compromising on what you want too.
>>
File: 1480921159420.png (259KB, 500x336px) Image search:
[Google]
259KB, 500x336px
If you're just posting for giggles then don't? If you actually care about building a base then you need to be honest with yourself. Be willing to call entire outings a wash because they will be and often if you're shooting landscapes.
Anonymous
Critique if interesting 2016-12-17 07:14:45 Post No.2984751
[Report] Image search: [Google]
Critique if interesting 2016-12-17 07:14:45 Post No.2984751
[Report] Image search: [Google]
File: maraprava.png (2MB, 546x819px) Image search:
[Google]
2MB, 546x819px
Haven't done this since I got my first batch of photos, but I've nothing to do for the next hour
SO, here's some of my photos.
Discuss.
P.S All of this is film with contrast, brightness and white balance adjustments at most.
44 Posts / 30 Images
View this topic
>>
File: coldgrin.png (2MB, 546x819px) Image search:
[Google]
2MB, 546x819px
>>2984751
>>
File: justthehead.png (3MB, 546x819px) Image search:
[Google]
3MB, 546x819px
>>2984752
>>
File: thelookup.png (2MB, 546x819px) Image search:
[Google]
2MB, 546x819px
>>2984754
Hey /p/,
not sure if this is the right board but I figured someone here would be able to help me. I want to make posters out of these two images I found online. Assuming there's no copyright issues because I don't intend to distribute them, how would I print these large enough to look good on my wall but not drastically drop in quality? I'll post both of the pics just for reference and file size
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 150 dpi Vertical Resolution 150 dpi Image Width 1457 Image Height 1870
8 Posts / 3 Images
View this topic
>>
File: 02684_ukvogue_may2001_122_512lo.jpg (767KB, 2527x3317px) Image search:
[Google]
767KB, 2527x3317px
>>
>>2984654
Decent quality prints are 300dpi.
So the first pic you're limited to about 6", the second about 10".
If you want bigger, you will need better quality files.
>>
>>2984656
are you saying width or length
File: NO_FILE_GIVEN (0B, 0x0pxpx)
0B, 0x0pxpx
I don't know anything about photography, but I'm looking to get into it and don't want to spend my money on shit that I'll regret buying. can anyone recommend a good pleb tier camera to start with that I won't end up having to replace once I start getting more serious?
12 Posts / 2 Images
View this topic
>>
>>2984482
bump for waiting
>>
bump yo, cause I'm still waiting for a response fo my question dot.com fo sho mo go no lo bo fro yo
>>
File: 1477004341755.jpg (108KB, 300x449px) Image search:
[Google]
108KB, 300x449px
nobody has responded yet so feel free to ignore this bump as it serves no purpose.
I love my fuji x-e1 and all but its goddamn huge?!
Was at the store and tried out the a6000, it feels so much lighter and less bulky and more responsive in a way. even saw the olympus em 10 mk2, which i thought looked enormous on pictures, and it was small as a toy!
why are the fuji mirrorless so large?
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 1600 Image Height 1201
69 Posts / 2 Images
View this topic
>>
Weak bait is weak
>>
Only mirror less designed for adult hands
>>
File: Dell_XPS_14_35332513_04.jpg (41KB, 770x433px) Image search:
[Google]
41KB, 770x433px
Need a laptop for editing and other graphic works at university
Dell xps14
>Intel® Core™ i7-3517U
>1 GB nVidia GeForce GT 630M
>500gb hdd + 32gb ssd
>8gigs ram
600€
Is this a good deal ?
8 Posts / 1 Images
View this topic
>>
>>2983942
Need a solid and sexy looking notebook for
>Muh xtrans raws
>&
>Contax g2 tiffs
C'mon /p/
>>
>>2983944
Old MacBook pro (not the fucking retarded touchfagbar one). People only buy apple because they think it looks good.
Use iridient (still Mac only) for your
>muh x-tranny trans
>>
>>2983966
I will install ios on my pc maybe since its a gigabyte mb, so i can use iridient but i like windows on my notebook somehow
File: DSC01964-resize.jpg (706KB, 1813x1219px) Image search:
[Google]
706KB, 1813x1219px
Hey /b/
I've been wanting to offer local photography services, primarily animal portraits. Will you guys tell me what you think/how I can improve and what I'm doing wrong. These are mostly of my own dog.
Also, I'm wondering, do I charge people by the hour or by the photo? And what's an outrages amount to expect for such a service?
Thanks in advance.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make SONY Camera Model ILCE-7 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.7 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/1.8 Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 75 mm Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 1080 dpi Vertical Resolution 1080 dpi Image Created 2016:12:13 14:30:35 Exposure Time 1/640 sec F-Number f/2.8 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 125 Lens Aperture f/2.8 Brightness 7.4 EV Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 50.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal
18 Posts / 7 Images
View this topic
>>
File: DSC02098-Resize.jpg (825KB, 2304x1190px) Image search:
[Google]
825KB, 2304x1190px
>>2983839
Welp, meant to say /p/
But whatever. Here's another.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make SONY Camera Model ILCE-7 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.7 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/1.8 Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 75 mm Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 1080 dpi Vertical Resolution 1080 dpi Image Created 2016:12:13 15:08:16 Exposure Time 1/640 sec F-Number f/2.8 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 125 Lens Aperture f/2.8 Brightness 8.2 EV Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 50.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal
>>
File: DSC01088-resize.jpg (807KB, 1219x1755px) Image search:
[Google]
807KB, 1219x1755px
>>2983840
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make SONY Camera Model ILCE-7 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.6 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/1.8 Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 75 mm Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 1080 dpi Vertical Resolution 1080 dpi Image Created 2016:11:02 15:30:05 Exposure Time 1/250 sec F-Number f/4.5 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 200 Lens Aperture f/4.5 Brightness 7.3 EV Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 50.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal
>>
File: DSC01983-Resize.jpg (822KB, 2165x1411px) Image search:
[Google]
822KB, 2165x1411px
>>2983843
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make SONY Camera Model ILCE-7 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.7 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/1.8 Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 75 mm Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 1080 dpi Vertical Resolution 1080 dpi Image Created 2016:12:13 14:57:01 Exposure Time 1/640 sec F-Number f/2.8 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 125 Lens Aperture f/2.8 Brightness 6.9 EV Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 50.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal
Our wedding photographer was amazing.
In his contract he was to be there from 08:30am to 08:30pm. He was there from 08:00am to 11:30pm. In the contract he was supposed to give us 350 edited photos, he gave us over 750.
Above all else, the photos were fantastic.
I don't know how to do a favour for a photographer. Is there a site I can use to review him?
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS 5D Mark III Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.7 (Macintosh) Photographer Kim Hua Yeo Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.8 Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 300 dpcm Vertical Resolution 300 dpcm Image Created 2016:12:08 23:50:48 Exposure Time 1/1600 sec F-Number f/4.0 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 200 Lens Aperture f/4.0 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 34.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Manual Scene Capture Type Standard
8 Posts / 1 Images
View this topic
>>
potential for spicy thread.
>>
>>2983800
Just recommend him on Facebook. Be sure to credit his photography page (with a link!) if you post his photos. Word of mouth is all a local photog needs.
>>
>>2983800
>I don't know how to do a favour for a photographer.
Give him a negative review and badmouth him whenever you can. Say he was pushy and tried too hard while delivering subpar results shot from only a 5dmIII. Make sure to mention his lazy ass being too cheap to own a real lens and using a zoom (lol is he a soccer mom).
Maybe then Kim can get a real photography job.
Sup /p/, need guidance to recover photos from a dead hard drive. Its partitioned into two disks, C for windows, D for shit. C got fucked and i had sensible stuff stored there. It gives me messages of "cyclic redundancy, wanna format bro?".
What software or procedure should i use to recover whats inside the C partition?
pic unrelated.
7 Posts / 2 Images
View this topic
>>
gib help, faggots.
>>
>>2983783
Put it in another machine, recover/backup your personal data, get new hard drive.
Not fucking rocket science mate
>>
FileScavenger, I paid for mine but you can find cracked versions on Piratebay
Testdisk is another one that's breddy gud. If you're not getting those errors on the D partition the physical drive is okay which is a big plus and FS should be able to recover everything. Do it ASAP and do both from a different computer. Once you have recovered all the data you want then run Testdisk and scan for bad sectors. Disk Recoup is another one that works with drives that have physical damage to them if the first two do nothing try that.
File: X-T1GSE_catalog_cover.jpg (485KB, 1936x1145px) Image search:
[Google]
485KB, 1936x1145px
Am I the only one who finds the X-T1 to be a lot worse for manually focusing than the first gen Fuji X cameras? I found no one else complaining about this so maybe there's some kind of setting hidden in the menus I missed? I'm using the latest firmware (5.00).
The main problem for me is the implementation of focus magnification on the X-T1 (focus peaking is too inaccurate/misleading in my experience).
When I use the highest magnification on the X-T1, the image becomes incredibly pixelated, causing all kinds of hideous moiré-like artifacts and making it very hard to see fine detail and nail the focus. It looks pretty much like they just render a small section of the regular view and stretch it to fill the screen. The pixelation is even obvious in "dual mode" and lower magnification modes.
On the other hand, on my X-E1 the magnified view is always perfectly clear and rendered at full resolution, though it's obviously laggier even in good light.
This is the main reason I still find using the X-E1 with manual lenses much more enjoyable, even though the lag is annoying and the write speed infuriatingly slow.
Another thing: is there a way to store different Auto ISO settings on the X-T1? On the X-E1 I had multiple custom C settings each with a different minimum shutter speed in the auto ISO for different focal lengths, which was very convenient.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make FUJIFILM Camera Model X-T1 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC (Macintosh) Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.4 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 90 mm Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 4720 Image Height 3323 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Compression Scheme Uncompressed Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 350 dpi Vertical Resolution 350 dpi Image Data Arrangement Chunky Format Image Created 2014:09:09 22:43:52 Exposure Time 1.7 sec F-Number f/16.0 Exposure Program Aperture Priority ISO Speed Rating 200 Lens Aperture f/16.0 Brightness 1/2 EV Exposure Bias -1 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 60.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1936 Image Height 1145 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Sharpness Normal Subject Distance Range Unknown
7 Posts / 1 Images
View this topic
>>
>>2983616
fuck
right
off
with
your
fucking
blog
>>
>>2983616
where can I unsubscribe from your blog?
>>
>>2983902
click H E R E to subscribe to catfacts
File: llpegspiral_hubble_1625.jpg (546KB, 1625x1625px) Image search:
[Google]
546KB, 1625x1625px
Hello /p/.
As I love space and photography, I declare this space photos thread open.
19 Posts / 12 Images
View this topic
>>
File: NorthSaturn_Cassini_1024.jpg (99KB, 1024x1024px) Image search:
[Google]
99KB, 1024x1024px
Northpole of saturn by Cassini spacecraft
>>
File: ngc4696_Hubble_1500.jpg (227KB, 1500x1200px) Image search:
[Google]
227KB, 1500x1200px
Op Here. As I download a vast majority of images from APOD i'll post expanation with the pictures.
>NGC 4696: Filaments around a Black Hole
>What's happening at the center of elliptical galaxy NGC 4696? There, long tendrils of gas and dust have been imaged in great detail as shown by this recently released image >from the Hubble Space Telescope. These filaments appear to connect to the central region of the galaxy, a region thought occupied by a supermassive black hole. Speculation >holds that this black hole pumps out energy that heats surrounding gas, pushes out cooler filaments of gas and dust, and shuts down star formation. Balanced by magnetic >fields, these filaments then appear to spiral back in toward and eventually circle the central black hole. NGC 4696 is the largest galaxy in the Centaurus Cluster of Galaxies, >located about 150 million light years from Earth. The featured image shows a region about 45,000 light years across.
>>
File: Arp240_HubbleKotsiopulos_1618.jpg (251KB, 1618x1288px) Image search:
[Google]
251KB, 1618x1288px
One of my favoite
>Arp 240: A Bridge between Spiral Galaxies from Hubble
>Why is there a bridge between these two spiral galaxies? Made of gas and stars, the bridge provides strong evidence that these two immense star systems have passed close to each other and experienced violent >tides induced by mutual gravity. Known together as Arp 240 but individually as NGC 5257 and NGC 5258, computer modelling and the ages of star clusters indicate that the two galaxies completed a first passage >near each other only about 250 million years ago. Gravitational tides not only pulled away matter, they compress gas and so caused star formation in both galaxies and the unusual bridge. Galactic mergers are >thought to be common, with Arp 240 representing a snapshot of a brief stage in this inevitable process. The Arp 240 pair are about 300 million light-years distant and can be seen with a small telescope toward the >constellation of Virgo. Repeated close passages should ultimately result in a merger and with the emergence of a single combined galaxy. Free Download: APOD 2017 Calendar: NASA Images
File: Screenshot_2016-12-13-23-39-08.png (372KB, 720x1280px) Image search:
[Google]
372KB, 720x1280px
The gear threads are over filled and only give a general overview. So I want a thread if just camera comparisons. Not just the specs because anyone can Google those. It's even better to give input if you've used whatever camera people ask to compare.
I'll start
D7200 vs D5500
D7200 vs K-70
71 Posts / 12 Images
View this topic
>>
File: Cleese.gif (2MB, 500x391px) Image search:
[Google]
2MB, 500x391px
>>
File: 1478656017981.jpg (11KB, 394x295px) Image search:
[Google]
11KB, 394x295px
>>2983352
Epic meme bro 10/10 reply you really made the site better
>>
MODS